...René Descartes was a French philosopher, mathematician, scientist, and writer of the 17th century. He was dissatisfied with the philosophy of his time which was dominated by scholastic philosophy, which sought to answer highly abstract philosophical questions mainly on the basis of Aristotle’s teachings. Descartes was dissatisfied with this kind of philosophy because he considered their highly abstract arguments senseless. Because of this dissatisfaction, Descartes tried to create a whole new system of thought that would unify all knowledge. As a result, René Descartes has been dubbed the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. René Descartes is the man credited to the famous dictum, Cogito Ergo Sum which translates to “I think, therefore I am”. Can one really prove that something, anything exists by this? I would like to believe that the cogito phrase holds an absolute truth. Come to think of this, if you’re even having these profound thoughts of questioning whether anything exists or not, if you even really care about purpose, the meaning, existence, why you are here or if you are real, can’t you then establish that you exist? Just by the mere fact that you are doing the process of examining yourself, you inside know that you are a complex creature, you truly do exists. If you’re looking at questions of self purpose and meaning and the existence of God, none of it would make sense but for the fact that you exists. Only you and you alone can prove that you exist, and that proof is...
Words: 403 - Pages: 2
...Descartes’ Mind Body Dualism Rene Descartes’ main purpose is to attempt to prove that the mind that is the soul or the thinking thing is distinct and is separate from the body. This thinking thing was the core of himself, which doubts, believes, reasons, feels and thinks. Descartes considers the body to be an extended unthinking thing; therefore it is possible that one may exist without the other. This view is known as mind-body dualism. He believes that what he is thinking in his mind is what God created and instilled in him. Descartes outlines many arguments to support and prove his claims of his discoveries. He states that because he can think, his mind exists. This is known as the Cogito, which is the first existential principal of all of Descartes’ work where modern philosophy begins. Descartes also explains that it is possible that all knowledge of external objects, including his body could be false because of the deceiving actions of an evil genius. The evil genius could make him contemplate his existence of his nature as a thinking thing. Descartes further explains in his arguments, even physical objects, such as the body, are better and more distinctly known through the mind than through the body. Descartes shows this through his example of The Wax Argument, where solid wax transitions into liquid state. With all of this in mind, Descartes theories suggest the mind and body can exist separately but it can be argued, the mind needs the body in order to think and reason...
Words: 1480 - Pages: 6
...Fate, Mistakes or Something Else? Is there such a thing as a mistake? We all talk about how everything happens for a reason. I believe in the idea of timing. I realize that our experiences shape us. They make us who we are, and we would not be who we are without them. In life, we learn to accept the decisions we make, and we call them decisions rather than mistakes because they are all part of the master plan that develop us into who we will eventually be when we die? I do not know. When do we become who we are? Are we always becoming and never being? Or is that the secret? Do we spend all our time trying to become and never pay attention to the fact that we actually are all along the way? If everything is an important and significant experience in our constant formation, then nothing could be a mistake; it is always just an experience. I am a skeptic of this belief. I think there is such a thing as wasted time. And if time were wasting, then every second of that time would be a mistake in the making. Though I have been positive and happy with every experience I have had, I know there are people in the world whose lives are nearing an end, and they live with regret. It is something I hope never to know. I pray that I will do everything I can to be aware of myself, my life, my feelings – to be as honest as I can be so that I never have to look back on this life and think, “I wasted so much time. I wish I had done this. I wish I had done that." I have always wished I had...
Words: 675 - Pages: 3
...“I think; Therefore, I am” “Cogito Ergo Sum” Rene Descartes Why is Education Important to me? When I think of education, I reminisce on all of my failed attempts to obtain the goals until now Unreachable. Not long ago I thought could never get an Associate’s Degree or even smart enough for school and gave up. However, I took a long look at my life and decided to motivate myself to achieve what was unobtainable. Now that Iam in my forties, it is beginning to make a whole lot of sense realizing; determined to diligently strive to work harder; education is something very relevant in my life at this time. Education gave me a head-start on life as it paved the way for my success in getting a new start. Well, my’ first home in fact... After being told that I wouldn't have a bright future, inspired me to complete anything I could accelerate it. The advantages of education to me are vast and it’s amazing something I took for granted as a child. However, it’s a shame that today is free and we still don’t take the opportunities to use it or learn. I recently took a free class about nutrition an online course; just to test my knowledge and get an understanding of the class as a whole. Some of the courses are extremely hard to understand, but I took a chance to challenge my ability. The good side of all this was it was free if I failed the course, I would not have to repeat unless necessary! Moreover, worry about that grade...
Words: 982 - Pages: 4
...24 April 2010 Philosophy 1010 Assignment 3 Descartes theory of doubt rest on the Latin phrase Cogito Ergo Sum. Translated into English the phrase means “I think, therefore I am”. This theory hinges on what is real and what is false; and mimics the branch of philosophy called Metaphysics. Metaphysics questions the reality of environment as does the method of doubt. Descartes skepticism (method of doubt) is termed methodological, because it presents a process which is used to deduce information to arrive at appropriate conclusions which determines or distinguishes reality from fantasy or a state of confusion. Descartes believed that some outcomes were very clear. He provided an analogy utilizing numbers. With numbers there is a pure outcome once the formula is applied or understood correctly. However, with environment or physical movement it becomes difficult to predict the end result. Therefore, to gain a better understanding of reality, Descartes formulates the theory of doubt and creates a check list of three requirements which must be indubitable fulfilled when applied to the method of doubt. The three requirements are 1) impossibility to doubt – meaning something is absolute 2) independent certainty – a theory which cannot be supported by another and 3) an item which exists so that data can be deduced to confirm existence. “Thinking includes doubting, understanding, denying, willing, refusing, and feeling” all key components in analytic phases of questioning surroundings...
Words: 540 - Pages: 3
...The Second Meditation is subtitled "The nature of the human mind, and how it is better known than the body" and takes place the day after the First Meditation. The Meditator is firm in his resolve to continue his search for certainty and to discard as false anything that is open to the slightest doubt. He recalls Archimedes' famous saying that he could shift the entire earth given one immovable point: similarly, he hopes to achieve great things if he can be certain of just one thing. Recalling the previous meditation, he supposes that what he sees does not exist, that his memory is faulty, that he has no senses and no body, that extension, movement and place are mistaken notions. Perhaps, he remarks, the only certain thing remaining is that there is no certainty. Then, he wonders, is not he, the source of these meditations, not something? He has conceded that he has no senses and no body, but does that mean he cannot exist either? He has also noted that the physical world does not exist, which might also seem to imply his nonexistence. And yet to have these doubts, he must exist. For an evil demon to mislead him in all these insidious ways, he must exist in order to be misled. There must be an "I" that can doubt, be deceived, and so on. He formulates the famous cogito argument, saying: "So after considering everything very thoroughly, I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind...
Words: 401 - Pages: 2
...Meditation Descartes Allgemeines über Meditationen * sechs Einzelmeditationen * übersetz Meditationen über die Erste Philosophie, in welcher die Existenz Gottes und die Unsterblichkeit der Seele bewiesen wird sind ein epochales Werk des französischen Philosophen René Descartes * über Metaphysik und Erkenntnistheorie aus dem Jahre 1641 * Im Jahre 1647 wurden die zunächst lateinisch gedruckten Meditationen unter dem * Auf Deutsch erschien ein Teil des Buches 1863 übersetzt von Kuno Fischer in denHauptschriften zur Grundlegung seiner Philosophie * Große Zielgruppe nicht nur die des fachs sondern an das gewöhnliche Volk, die selbst durch methodisches Zweifeln das Fundament der eigenen Urteile überprüfen solle * jeder Mensch besitzt eine moralische Verantwortung 1. Meditation ( Gedankenexperiment) * Allgemein: Gründe, warum man an allen Dingen, besonders an den materiellen zweifeln kann * Die erste Meditation beschäftigt sich mit einem der einflussreichsten Elemente der Cartesischen Methodologie, dem radikalen Zweifel. * Nichts voraussetzen, was nicht absolut gewiss und unbezweifelbar ist * Descartes beginnt seine Ausführungen mit der Feststellung, dass er schon immer viel Falsches gelten lassen habe. * Sein Ziel ist es für etwas Unerschütterliches und Bleibendes in den Wissenschaften festen Halt schaffen zu wollen. * Das sei möglich, wenn er alles von den Grundlagen an umstoßen und auf seine Gültigkeit prüfe. * Dabei wolle er aber...
Words: 1071 - Pages: 5