...for BUS203 Week 2 – Australian Legal System Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1936) Daniels v White (1938) Wallis v Downard-Pickford (North Queensland) Pty Ltd (1994) Week 3 – Torts Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1936) Perre v Apand (1999) Rogers v Whitaker (1992) Bolton v Stone (1951) p.92 Paris v Stepney Borough Council (1951) The Flying Fox Case (2005) p.94 Agar v Hyde (2000) p.94 Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation (1987) March v Stramare (1991) The Wagon Mound No. 1 Case (1961) – remoteness test Jon Blake Case – contributory negligence Insurance Commissioner v Joyce (1948) – voluntary assumption of risk McCracken v Melbourne Storm (2005) – voluntary assumption of risk Avram v Gusaroski (2006) – voluntary assumption of risk Drunken Possum Hating Cleaner Case (2003) – vicarious liability Week 4 – Business Entities Birtchnell v Equity Trustees (1929) Salomon’s Case [1897] Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd [1961] Gilford Motor Co v Horne [1933] Artedomus v Del Casale [2006] Contracts (week 5) Clarke v Dunraven (1897) Balfour v Balfour (1919) Balfour v.Balfour:⑤丈夫(被告)为英国政府在锡兰(今斯里兰卡)的一个灌溉项目负责人,夫妻婚后在斯里兰卡生活了15年。1915年夫妻回国休假,因妻子患风湿性关节炎,不适合热带气候,遵医嘱留在英国。丈夫出国前给了妻子一张24英镑的支票,作为当月的生活费,并许诺夫妻团聚前,每月给妻子30英镑。1918年3月,双方离婚,妻子得到法定抚养费后起诉丈夫违约,要求支付剩余款项。初审法院支持了其诉讼请求。上诉法院判决,本案的夫妻协议虽有对价,因妻子身患疾病且只身在国内,其支出完全可能超过30英镑,但当事人没有成立合同的意图,故驳回了原告的请求 Wakeling v Ripley (1951) couple, move to aus , taking care of senior...
Words: 442 - Pages: 2
...Assignment Topic “The Company at Law is Distinct from its Members. Directors are neither Agents nor Trustees of the Company” Prepared For Barrister Shaheen Ahmed Lecturer School of Business North South University Prepared By Shahriar Hasnaine Sakib ID- 111 0261 030 LAW 200 Section: 07 Date of Submission July 15, 2014 Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Objective 3 Introduction 3 Company’s Classification and Characteristics 3 Separate legal personality 4 Consequences of treating the company as a separate legal entity: 5 Company has a Distinct Entity from its Members 6 Agent & Trustee 6 Directors 6 Analysis to the Leading Cases 7 Salomon v. Salomon & Co. 7 Lee and Lee’s Air Farm’s Ltd 8 Macaura v. Northern Assurance Co Ltd 8 DHN v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council 9 Lubbe v Cape Plc [2000] 9 Some Other Famous Cases: 10 Paul v. Virginia (1869) 10 Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co 10 Adams v Cape Industries plc [1990] 10 Walkovszky v. Carlton 10 Findings 11 Conclusion 11 Bibliography 12 Objective ‘’A company is distinct from its members. Directors are neither agents nor trustees of a company’’ The purpose of this Assignment is to analyze the legendary statement made by Lord Mac Naughton during the Salomon vs Salomon case on corporate personality, in the lights of some leading cases. The statement of Lord Mac Naughton was “The Company is at law a different person altogether from its members, the company is not in law agent of the subscribers...
Words: 3514 - Pages: 15
...CONTENTS Introdcution ...................................................................................................................................................................2 Definition of a Company ............................................................................................................................................2 Features of a Corporation ..........................................................................................................................................3 Difference Between a Company and Its personnel .......................................................................................................4 Shareholders ..............................................................................................................................................................4 Directors ....................................................................................................................................................................4 Directors as agent: .................................................................................................................................................5 Directors as Trustees: ............................................................................................................................................5 The Veil of Incorporation ............................................................................................................................
Words: 2034 - Pages: 9
...Law of Business Organisations SUMMARY 2010 LAWSKOOL PTE LTD BUSINESS ORGANISATIONS LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 :Types Of Business Organization.................................................... 9 1.1 Sole Proprietorships .......................................................................................... 9 1.2 Partnerships ..................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Limited Liability Partnerships ......................................................................... 11 1.4 Limited Partnerships........................................................................................ 11 1.4 Companies........................................................................................................ 12 1.4 Joint-Ventures .................................................................................................. 12 1.5 Business Registration Act [Cap 32, Rev Edn 1985] ...................................... 13 1.5.0 Purpose of registration:................................................................................ 13 1.5.1 Consequences of Non- Registration ........................................................... 13 1.5.2 Power to grant Relief .................................................................................... 14 2 Nature and Definition of A Partnership ..........................................16 2.1 Carrying on of a Business............................
Words: 2872 - Pages: 12
...and heartiest gratitude to our course instructor of BUS 361Md. K.I.M.MANZUR-E-MAWLA, Adjunct Faculty, Department Of Bachelor of Business Administration, East West University. Without him, preparing this report would be simply impossible for us. We also like to thank our seniors and classmates to giving advices and reliable information. We are paying our hearties appreciation to all of these people for their great co-operation, which will be always remembered by us. Letter of transmittal 22 April, 2010 K.I.M.MANZUR-E-MAWLA Adjunct Faculty Department of Business Administration East West University Dear Sir For the purpose of understanding the company law and corporate personality in the real life scenario and what are the cases that influence the company law. Therefore we have prepared a report on Company: A Corporate Personality. It is our honor to transmit to you the report and grateful to you for giving us the chance to prepare this report being a part of course works Legal Environment of Business (BUS 361). In spite of various limitations, we did our best to put rational analysis in this report through our collective effort. We hope that you will find some...
Words: 3402 - Pages: 14
...to Salomon v Salomon& Co Ltd , the fundamental attribute of separate legal entity is that the company is regarded as a legal person distinct from any and all of the individuals involved in the company by incorporation of a projected or existing enterprise. Under s15(1) of the Companies Act 2006, companies which are registered become incorporated and separate legal persons on registration. As a consequence of the existence of a distinct legal entity, a company has the capacity to be a party to a contract, sue or being sued, commit a crime, be the victim of a crime, hold property, and rationally, thus, make profits and losses that are its own rather than those of the shareholders of the company. The Principle of Separate Legal Personality The importance of the corporate personality which was created by statute in the first half of the nineteenth century was not fully appreciated until the well-known case of Salomon. This case firmly established the operation of the concept of the separate legal personality of a company under the Companies Act of 1862 and this principle is still existed in the Companies Act of 2006 today under the UK Company Law. The Salomon case makes it clear that it is possible for a sole trader owner to transfer a small business into a registered company and hence separate himself from the liabilities of the business. In this case, Salomon carried on a boot and shoe manufacturing business as a sole proprietor. In 1892, he registered a company and sold his...
Words: 3282 - Pages: 14
...Representation 3) Implied Terms a) In Fact b) In Law c) In Statute d) By Custom 4) Classification of Terms 5) Exemption Clauses: Incorporation a) By Signature b) By Notice c) By Previous Course of Dealing 6) Construction a) Contra Proferentem Rule b) Rule in Cases of Negligence Liability c) Doctrine of Fundamental Breach 7) Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) a) Liability in Negligence b) Liability in Contract c) Sale and Supply of Goods d) Test of Reasonableness Parol Evidence Rule a) No extrinsic evidence (such as any oral agreement or statement) is admissible to add to, vary or contradict a written instrument or contract. b) Exceptions c) Contract was the result of mistake, a lack of consideration, or of misrepresentation d) Mistake in the written contract i) Joscelyne v Nissen (1970) e) Contract has not yet come into existence or that it is no longer in operation i) Maybe due to the occurrence or non-occurrence of a certain event by a certain date, which has been accepted verbally ii) Pym v Campbell (1856) iii) Obligation to buy shares in an invention was conditional upon a 3rd party approving the invention, of which the approval had not been received. f) Where extrinsic evidence demonstrates that a particular custom of trade must be implied to, and therefore become a part of, the written agreement. i) Smith v Wilson (1832) ii) Evidence of local custom show...
Words: 6952 - Pages: 28
...Mittal COMPANY LAW - LECTURE NOTES I. INTRODUCTION TO INCORPORATION 1. Definition of a "Company" A company is a "corporation" - an artificial person created by law. A human being is a "natural" person. A company is a "legal" person. A company thus has legal rights and obligations in the same way that a natural person does. 2. Companies and Partnerships Compared (a) A company can be created only by certain prescribed methods - most commonly by registration under the Companies Act 1985. A partnership is created by the express or implied agreement of the parties, and requires no formalities, though it is common to have a written agreement. (b) A company incurs greater expenses at formation, throughout its life and on dissolution, though these need not be excessive. (c) A company is an artificial legal person distinct from its members. Although in Scotland a partnership has a separate legal personality by virtue of s.4(2) of the Partnership Act 1890, this is much more limited than the personality conferred on companies. (d) A company can have as little as one member and there is no upper limit on membership. A partnership must have at least two members and has an upper limit of 20 (with some exceptions). (e) Shares in a company are normally transferable (must be so in a public company). A partner cannot transfer his share of the partnership without the consent of all the other partners. (f) Members of a company are not entitled to take part in the management of the company unless...
Words: 11886 - Pages: 48
...Contract Law Notes Contracts ‘A’ Offer - Bilateral contracts - Unilateral contracts - Offers to the public at large What is an offer? - Mere puff - Supply of information - Invitation to treat Categorizing transactions - Advertisements a) Advertisements in a catalogue or a curricular b) Advertisements in newspapers or magazines c) Advertisements appearing on the internet d) Display of goods - Auctions a) Advertisement of auction b) Auctions with reserves c) Auctions without a reserve - Tendering - Standing offers ➢ Options Communication of an offer Termination of an offer - An offer may be terminated by a) Revocation by the offeror b) Rejected by the offeree c) Lapse of time d) Failure of a condition subject to which the offer was made e) Death Acceptance Requirements of acceptance Acceptance must correspond to offer - Offeree must have knowledge of and act in reliance to an offer Page 9 Page 9 Page 10 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page14 Page14 - A counter offer is not acceptance - Acceptance must be unqualified - Mere enquiry does not constitute acceptance Notification to the offerer of the fact of acceptance - Method of acceptance a) Method of acceptance stipulated by offer b) Acceptance by silence c) Acceptance by conduct - Instantaneous communication: Acceptance must be communicated a) General rule b) Meaning of instantaneous...
Words: 20962 - Pages: 84
...Contract Law Notes Contracts ‘A’ Offer - Bilateral contracts - Unilateral contracts - Offers to the public at large What is an offer? - Mere puff - Supply of information - Invitation to treat Categorizing transactions - Advertisements a) Advertisements in a catalogue or a curricular b) Advertisements in newspapers or magazines c) Advertisements appearing on the internet d) Display of goods - Auctions a) Advertisement of auction b) Auctions with reserves c) Auctions without a reserve - Tendering - Standing offers ➢ Options Communication of an offer Termination of an offer - An offer may be terminated by a) Revocation by the offeror b) Rejected by the offeree c) Lapse of time d) Failure of a condition subject to which the offer was made e) Death Acceptance Requirements of acceptance Acceptance must correspond to offer - Offeree must have knowledge of and act in reliance to an offer Page 9 Page 9 Page 10 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page14 Page14 - A counter offer is not acceptance - Acceptance must be unqualified - Mere enquiry does not constitute acceptance Notification to the offerer of the fact of acceptance - Method of acceptance a) Method of acceptance stipulated by offer ...
Words: 20964 - Pages: 84
...INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF CONTRACT DEFINITION A contract may be defined as a legally binding agreement or, in the words of Sir Frederick Pollock: “A promise or set of promises which the law will enforce”. The agreement will create rights and obligations that may be enforced in the courts. The normal method of enforcement is an action for damages for breach of contract, though in some cases the court may order performance by the party in default. CLASSIFICATION Contracts may be divided into two broad classes: 1. Contracts by deed A deed is a formal legal document signed, witnessed and delivered to effect a conveyance or transfer of property or to create a legal obligation or contract. 2. Simple contracts Contracts which are not deeds are known as simple contracts. They are informal contracts and may be made in any way – in writing, orally or they may be implied from conduct. Another way of classifying contracts is according to whether they are “bilateral” or “unilateral”. 1. Bilateral contracts A bilateral contract is one where a promise by one party is exchanged for a promise by the other. The exchange of promises is enough to render them both enforceable. Thus in a contract for the sale of goods, the buyer promises to pay the price and the seller promises to deliver the goods. 2. Unilateral contracts A unilateral contract is one where one party promises to do something in return for an act of the other party, as opposed to a promise, eg, where X promises...
Words: 54083 - Pages: 217
...INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF CONTRACT DEFINITION A contract may be defined as a legally binding agreement or, in the words of Sir Frederick Pollock: “A promise or set of promises which the law will enforce”. The agreement will create rights and obligations that may be enforced in the courts. The normal method of enforcement is an action for damages for breach of contract, though in some cases the court may order performance by the party in default. CLASSIFICATION Contracts may be divided into two broad classes: 1. Contracts by deed A deed is a formal legal document signed, witnessed and delivered to effect a conveyance or transfer of property or to create a legal obligation or contract. 2. Simple contracts Contracts which are not deeds are known as simple contracts. They are informal contracts and may be made in any way – in writing, orally or they may be implied from conduct. Another way of classifying contracts is according to whether they are “bilateral” or “unilateral”. 1. Bilateral contracts A bilateral contract is one where a promise by one party is exchanged for a promise by the other. The exchange of promises is enough to render them both enforceable. Thus in a contract for the sale of goods, the buyer promises to pay the price and the seller promises to deliver the goods. 2. Unilateral contracts A unilateral contract is one where one party promises to do something in return for an act of the other party, as opposed to a promise, eg, where...
Words: 54394 - Pages: 218
...COMPILATION OF CASE LAWS LAW OF TORT 1. DONOGHUE V. STEVENSON (1932) AC 562 On the evening of Sunday 26 August 1928, Mrs May Donoghue, boarded a tram in Glasgow for the thirty minute journey to Paisley. At around ten minutes to nine, she and a friend took their seats in the Wellmeadow Café in the town's Wellmeadow Place. They were approached by the café owner, Francis Minghella, and May's friend ordered and paid for a pear and ice and an iced drink. The owner brought the order and poured part of a bottle of ginger beer into a tumbler containing ice cream. May drank some of the contents and her friend lifted the bottle to pour the remainder of the ginger beer into the tumbler. On doing so, it was claimed that the remains of a snail in a state of decomposition plopped out of the bottle into the tumbler. May later complained of stomach pain, and her doctor diagnosed her as having gastroenteritis. She also claimed to have suffered emotional distress as a result of the incident. On 9th April 1929, Donoghue brought an action against David Stevenson, aerated water manufacturer Paisley, in which she claimed £500 as damages for injuries sustained by her through drinking ginger beer which had been manufactured by the defender. May had not ordered or paid for the drink herself, so there was no contractual relationship between May and the café owner. Tort law at this time did not allow for May to sue the café owner. There was a contractual relationship between him...
Words: 19909 - Pages: 80
...H8032-Prelims.QXD 7/1/06 11:08 AM Page i CIMA’S Official Learning System CIMA Certificate in Business Accounting, 2006 Syllabus Certificate Level Fundamentals of Ethics, Corporate Governance and Business law David Sagar Larry Mead Philippa Foster Back H8032-Prelims.QXD 7/1/06 11:08 AM Page ii CIMA Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA First edition 2006 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (ϩ44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (ϩ44) (0) 1865 853333; e-mail: permissions@elsevier.com. Alternatively you can submit your request online by visiting the Elsevier web site at http://elsevier.com/locate/permissions, and selecting Obtaining Permission to use Elsevier material Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. British Library Cataloguing in Publication...
Words: 249182 - Pages: 997
...available from us. On the whole, the cover design possesses a sophisticated aura that is inspired by our innovative corporate spirit. table of contents Notice of Annual General Meeting 02 Corporate Structure 08 Corporate Information 10 Directorsʼ Profile 11 Chairmanʼs Statement 18 Management Discussion and Analysis 22 Corporate Social Responsibilty 24 Corporate Governance Statement 27 Internal Control Statement 36 Audit Committee Report 40 Financial Statements 45 Statistics on Shareholdings 132 Statistics on Shareholdings-Warrant 135 List of Properties 138 Additional Compliance Information 144 Form of Proxy Notice of Annual General Meeting FARM’S BEST BERHAD (301653-V) 2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Twentieth Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at Function Room 2, Level 2, Holiday Inn Melaka, Jalan Syed Abdul Aziz, 75000, Melaka on Friday, 27 June 2014 at 11.00 a.m. for the following purposes :AGENDA ORDINARY BUSINESS:1. To receive the Audited Financial Statements for the financial year ended 31 December 2013 together with the Reports of the Directors and Auditors thereon. Please refer to Explanatory Notes A 2. To approve the payment of Directorsʼ fees of RM108,000-00 for the financial year ended 31 December 2013. Ordinary Resolution 1 3. To re-elect the following Directors who retire by rotation in accordance with Article 105 of the Companyʼs...
Words: 49752 - Pages: 200