Premium Essay

Compare And Contrast Shay's Rebellion

Submitted By
Words 1427
Pages 6
Shays’ Rebellion was an armed uprising of farmers in Massachusetts from 1786 to 1787.
Farmers in Massachusetts rebelled against the United States government. This occurred because several farmers incurred high debts from creditors, that they could not afford to pay off. Farmers also suffered from high taxes, that the government imposed in attempt to pay off debt from the Revolutionary War. Massachusetts did not respond to farmers asking for help, so the rebellion transpired. The main conflict of Shay’s rebellion was farmers in debt versus the state of Massachusetts’ government. Shays’ rebellion was quite similar to the American revolution, it was citizens resisting the government when nothing was done to fix the nation’s issues.The Articles of …show more content…
It opened the country’s eyes, demonstrating that the Articles of Confederation was not viable; a change needed to come to the United States.
This conflict needs to be looked at from both sides. In the rebel’s point of view, they were being over-taxed, and when they reached out for help they did not receive it. Therefore they protested, the protest turned hostile, but in the end result, changes were made. What the farmers did in Shays’ rebellion reflected the ideals of America. Shays’ rebellion is quite similar to the American Revolution in a couple of senses. People were being over-taxed, and the government was ignoring their concerns. The people then revolted against the government because they believed this was the only change that would occur. The government found themselves in a very difficult position. On one hand, there was a rebellion that needed to end because it endangered the American people. However, farmers who were not paying taxes were imprisoned and could therefore not pay taxes, and the government needed money. This flaw became evident in a system to be run under the Articles of

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Constitutional Convention's Debates On Slavery

...did not know whether it was a delegate from Maryland, South Carolina, Georgia, etc. I would have expected to have found this to help make things more clear on what state they were representing and what their stance on slavery was. Another absence that I found ominous was the non presence of the state of Rhode Island, I wonder why they did not appoint a representative to come, and what did they not want to discuss and why. This source compares with other secondary accounts very similarly that I have learned about whether that be through reading or school lessons. This source however included a lot more information from different people’s perspectives which gave more detail for the entire document and the points on the issue of slavery. The Arguments against Ratification at the Virginia Convention was written in 1788 during the time that the U.S. Constitution was trying to be ratified. During this time the Articles of Confederation were failing because of the weak government and needed to be fixed because rebellions, such as Shay’s Rebellion began to happen. Northern and Southern states had different views on whether slavery and other issues and large states wanting more representation than smaller states. These reasons and the fact that many people feared that some states would leave the union because of the change in law was why this document was created, to discuss all of the issues presented and to find a happy medium for all of the states. An implied meaning that I...

Words: 1962 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Pols Final Exam Review

...Federal Government Exam 1 Review: The first exam will consist of questions generated from the following review sheet. Make sure you understand each of these topics before proceeding to the test. The exam will be timed so you will not have the ability to peruse your notes or retake the exam. The exam itself will consist of 30 multiple choice questions and you will have 35 minutes to complete the exam. Federalism: The Basic elements of a Federal system of government (i.e. how is it structured/how power is shared) • Layers of gov • Equal power • Distinct powers Powers of the federal government: delegated powers, implied powers (necessary and proper clause), and concurrent powers. • Delegated Powers: (expressed/enumerated powers) powers given to the federal government directly by the constitution. Some most important delegated powers are: the authority to tax, regulated interstate commerce, authority to declare war, and grants the president role of commander and chief of the military • Implied Powers: Powers not expressed in the constitution, but that can be inferred. “Necessary and proper clause” • Concurrent powers: powers shared by both levels of government. Ex: Taxes, roads, elections, commerce, establishing courts and a judicial system • Reserved powers: powers not assigned by the constitution to the national government but left to the states or the people. Guaranteed by the 10th amendment. Include “police power”-health and public...

Words: 37488 - Pages: 150

Free Essay

Foundation Outline (Prof. William Ewald)

...[Enter Document Title]  Foundations            of the U.S.               Legal System  Prof. William Ewald  Contributors  Wim De Vlieger Suvitcha Nativivat Alasdair Henderson Ana Carolina Kliemann Alexey Kruglyakov Rafael A. Rosillo Pasquale Siciliani Paul Lanois Gloria M. Gasso Kamel Ait El Hadj Yuanyuan Zheng Ana L. Marquez Pumthan Chaichantipyuth Wenzhen Dai Penn Law Summer 2006 I.  Introduction and Historical Background    A. What the course will cover?      This  is  not  an  introductory  course.    You  are  all  lawyers;  I  shall  assume  a  good  deal  of  professional  expertise,  and  that  many  of  you  already  have  a  body  of  knowledge  about  American  law.    The task: prepare you for the coming year, give you the basic grounding that you will need  for the courses you are going to start taking in September.  For this, you need two things:    ♥ A  great  deal  of  basic  factual  information  about  how  the  courts  and  the  legal  system  function, and about basic legal concepts (and legal vocabulary);     ♥ But  more  importantly:  background  information  about  some  of  the  critical  ways in which  the American legal system is unique, and differs from legal systems elsewhere in the  world.  This is hard: often you will find that your professors or fellow‐students will make  assumptions  or  presuppose  certain  ways  of  doing  things  that  aren’t  explained  in  class.    A  large goal of this course is to explain those assumptions...

Words: 43059 - Pages: 173