Premium Essay

Consob vs Pcaob

In:

Submitted By victorrance
Words 868
Pages 4
differences in the structure of shareholding, with more family-owned businesses in Italy lowering the perceived importance of independence; (iii) traditionally less concern for independence as a governance characteristic in Italy.

No countries within the EU, with the exception of Italy, currently have a system of mandatory audit firm rotation.

In recent years, auditing of financial reports, i.e. the activity aimed at certifying “substantial reliability” of the financial statements, has been regulated both as a consequence of Europeans Union (EU) Directives, and as a consequence of domestic initiatives aimed at rebuilding public confidence in financial reports after the wellknown financial scandals.

Furthermore, the reform of the Italian Company Act
(Legislative Decree no.5 of 17 January 2003) requires that financial reports of all listed companies as well as limited liability companies (above a given size threshold) be audited by an independent auditor. It is required that the auditing be carried out by either an audit firm, by a Board of statutory auditors or by an individual auditor.

According to art. 2409-bis of the Civil Code, the by-laws of unlisted companies which are not required to prepare consolidated financial reports can delegate the accounting audit to a Board of statutory auditors. As a consequence, under this regulation, it was required that the audit of private Italian companies’ financial reports be made by the
Board of statutory auditors or by another body that may be selected among3: 1. Chartered auditors who are members of the Registro dei Revisori;
2. Audit firms that are members of the Registro dei Revisori or of the register kept by
CONSOB (the Italian equivalent of US SEC)
** Current Italian regulation allows private companies respecting certain criteria to have their accounts audited by either an audit firm, by

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Professional Accounting in the Public Interest

...Chapter Four Professional Accounting in the Public Interest, Post-Enron Purpose of the Chapter When the Enron, Arthur Andersen, and WorldCom debacles triggered the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), a new era of stakeholder expectations was crystallized for the business world and particularly for the professional accountants that serve in it. The drift away from the professional accountant’s role as a fiduciary to that of a businessperson was called into question and reversed. The principles that the new expectations spawned and renewed resulted in changes in how the professional accountants are to behave, what services are to be offered, and what performance standards are to be met. These standards have been embedded in a new governance structure and in guidance mechanisms, which have domestic and international components. The influence of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) will be as important as that of SOX in the long run. This chapter examines each of these developments and provides insights into important areas of current and future practice. Building upon the understanding of the new stakeholder accountability framework facing clients and employers developed in earlier chapters, this chapter explores public expectations for the role of the professional accountant and the principles that should be observed in discharging that role. This leads to consideration of the implications for services to be...

Words: 62999 - Pages: 252