Free Essay

Ddef

In:

Submitted By monicaa
Words 1275
Pages 6
Manufacturing footprint, outsourcing and cost out by Jean-Marc Lechêne, COO

Agenda

1. Personal background
2. New Manufacturing and Global Sourcing setup in place
3. Key priorities and achievements

2

Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

Introducing your speaker
Jean-Marc Lechêne



Executive Vice President of Manufacturing and
Global Sourcing (COO).



Member of Vestas’ Executive Management team. •

Joined Vestas in July 2012.



MBA from INSEAD and Master’s degree from
École des Mines de Paris.



15 years of experience managing multi billion business units with Lafarge and Michelin in
China, North America and Europe.



Live in Denmark with my wife.

3

Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

What I bring to the table
Past experience

Today´s challenges



Major cost reduction and restructuring programs in global companies. •

Implementing a lean, flexible and asset light production setup without compromising safety and quality.



General management in process and manufacturing industries.



Eliminating unnecessary costs and complexity out of products and the whole value chain.



Strategist and doer: Delivering change to the bottom line.



Reinforcing the alignment between
Sales, R&D, Manufacturing,
Sourcing and Service.

4

Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

Key priorities
Shipment from factories
GW

1. 5 GW shipment run rate in 2013

6.3

2. Product cost out

-21%

5.0

3. Identification of outsourcing opportunities
4. Global sourcing

2012E

5

Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

2013E

New Manufacturing and Global Sourcing setup in place
A streamlined organisation

Manufacturing and
Global Sourcing

Global Sourcing

Quality

Supply Chain

Finance

PEX

People & Culture

Blades

6

Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

Assembly

Controls &
Generators

Components

A leaner Manufacturing organisation
Reductions in number of employees

Hourly paid employees in Manufacturing
Number of employees

Salaried employees in Manufacturing
Number of employees

-8%
-34%

2011 FY

7

Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

2012 end Sep.

2011 FY

2012 end Sep.

A leaner Manufacturing organisation
Implemented adjustments



13 June 2012



Closure factory in Hohhot (CH)

25 June 2012



Reduction of manufacturing work force at tower factory in Pueblo, Colorado (US)

13 August 2012



Reduction of manufacturing work force at nacelle assembly in Brighton, Colorado (US)

20 August 2012



Cease of production at the controls factory in Ólvega (ES)

1 October 2012



8

Sale of tower factory in Varde (DK)

Reduction of production capacity at the blade factory in Damiel (ES)

1 October 2012

Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

North America highlights

The challenge
• US market uncertainties*
• Sustained activities in Canada and
Mexico
• Lay-off costs
• Rehire, training and ramp-up costs
• Mouth-balled plant costs
• Logistics costs

Ongoing evaluation of and decision on our manufacturing footprint

* On 2 August 2012, the Senate Finance Committee approved “The Family and Business Tax Cut Certainty Act of 2012” bill. The bill includes a one-year extension of the PTC. In addition, the bill includes a five-per cent “under construction” threshold for projects that begin in 2013. The final bipartisan vote in support of reporting the bill was 19-5.
9

Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

Product cost out



Multi-functional teams (R&D, Manufacturing, Sourcing)



Best selling 2 MW and 3 MW platforms



Scope: Bill of Material (BOM)



Many projects completed



EUR 30m EBIT impact in late 2012



Significantly larger impact in 2013

10 Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

Identification of outsourcing opportunities



Many parameters in the economic equation:
Sales proceeds
Supply agreements (volume, price, quality, warranties, etc.)
Direct savings
Indirect savings
Supplier quality management



Various forms of divestment considerations



In parallel, commercial discussions with external customers to increase utilisation


E.g. the US duties imposed on towers imported from China and Vietnam increases the competitiveness of Vestas’ tower factory in Colorado, USA.

11 Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

A new way of working with our suppliers
Fewer suppliers, but deeper relationships

Objective
• To eliminate any unnecessary costs from products and the whole activity chain

How
• Increased supplier involvement in development
• More systems, less parts
• More outsourcing: o Production o Value adding services
Consequence
• A more strategic win-win relationship
• Fewer suppliers
• Higher expectations in terms of accountability

12 Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

Summary
Manufacturing and Global Sourcing

1
2
3

We are adjusting our production capacity to the lower level of activity expected next year and we evaluate our manufacturing footprint accordingly.

We have a leaner structure that increases flexibility, transparency and agility, and which is more cost efficient.

We are on track in taking costs out of our products. 13 Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

Thank you for your attention

Copyright Notice
The documents are created by Vestas Wind Systems A/S and contain copyrighted material, trademarks, and other proprietary information. All rights reserved. No part of the documents may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means - such as graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems without the prior written permission of Vestas Wind Systems A/S. The use of these documents by you, or anyone else authorized by you, is prohibited unless specifically permitted by Vestas Wind Systems A/S. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from the documents. The documents are provided “as is” and
Vestas Wind Systems A/S shall not have any responsibility or liability whatsoever for the results of use of the documents by you.

Disclaimer and cautionary statement
This presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning Vestas' financial condition, results of operations and business. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements.
Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning Vestas' potential exposure to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. There are a number of factors that could affect Vestas' future operations and could cause
Vestas' results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this presentation, including (without limitation): (a) changes in demand for Vestas' products; (b) currency and interest rate fluctuations; (c) loss of market share and industry competition; (d) environmental and physical risks; (e) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments, including changes in tax or accounting policies; (f) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (g) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, and delays or advancements in the approval of projects; (h) ability to enforce patents; (i) product development risks; (j) cost of commodities; (k) customer credit risks; (l) supply of components from suppliers and vendors; and (m) customer readiness and ability to accept delivery and installation of products and transfer of risk.
All forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are expressly qualified by the cautionary statements contained or referenced to in this statement. Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements. Additional factors that may affect future results are contained in Vestas' annual report for the year ended 31 December 2011 (available at vestas.com/investor) and these factors also should be considered. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this presentation. Vestas does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information or future events others than required by Danish law. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation.
1515 Vestas’ capital markets day 2012

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Fama French Work

...Journal of Financial Economics 33 (1993) 3-56. North-Holland Common risk factors in the returns stocks and bonds* Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 1992 Unirrrsit.v 01 Chicayo. Chiccup. I .L 60637, C;S;L Received July 1992. final version received September on This paper identities five common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. There are three stock-market factors: an overall market factor and factors related to firm size and book-to-market equity. There are two bond-market factors. related to maturity and default risks. Stock returns have shared variation due to the stock-market factors, and they are linked to bond returns through shared variation in the bond-market factors. Except for low-grade corporates. the bond-market factors capture the common variation in bond returns. Most important. the five factors seem to explain average returns on stocks and bonds. 1. Introduction The cross-section of average returns on U.S. common stocks shows little relation to either the market /Is of the Sharpe (1964tLintner (1965) assetpricing model or the consumption ps of the intertemporal asset-pricing model of Breeden (1979) and others. [See, for example, Reinganum (198 1) and Breeden, Gibbons, and Litzenberger (1989).] On the other hand, variables that have no special standing in asset-pricing theory show reliable power to explain the cross-section of average returns. The list of empirically determined averagereturn variables includes size (ME, stock...

Words: 16818 - Pages: 68

Premium Essay

Fama and French 1993

...Journal of Financial Economics 33 (1993) 3-56. North-Holland Common risk factors in the returns stocks and bonds* Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 1992 Unirrrsit.v 01 Chicayo. Chiccup. I .L 60637, C;S;L Received July 1992. final version received September on This paper identities five common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. There are three stock-market factors: an overall market factor and factors related to firm size and book-to-market equity. There are two bond-market factors. related to maturity and default risks. Stock returns have shared variation due to the stock-market factors, and they are linked to bond returns through shared variation in the bond-market factors. Except for low-grade corporates. the bond-market factors capture the common variation in bond returns. Most important. the five factors seem to explain average returns on stocks and bonds. 1. Introduction The cross-section of average returns on U.S. common stocks shows little relation to either the market /Is of the Sharpe (1964tLintner (1965) assetpricing model or the consumption ps of the intertemporal asset-pricing model of Breeden (1979) and others. [See, for example, Reinganum (198 1) and Breeden, Gibbons, and Litzenberger (1989).] On the other hand, variables that have no special standing in asset-pricing theory show reliable power to explain the cross-section of average returns. The list of empirically determined averagereturn variables includes size (ME, stock...

Words: 16818 - Pages: 68

Premium Essay

Swqeq

...Journal of Financial Economics 33 (1993) 3-56. North-Holland Common risk factors in the returns stocks and bonds* Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 1992 Unirrrsit.v 01 Chicayo. Chiccup. I .L 60637, C;S;L Received July 1992. final version received September on This paper identities five common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. There are three stock-market factors: an overall market factor and factors related to firm size and book-to-market equity. There are two bond-market factors. related to maturity and default risks. Stock returns have shared variation due to the stock-market factors, and they are linked to bond returns through shared variation in the bond-market factors. Except for low-grade corporates. the bond-market factors capture the common variation in bond returns. Most important. the five factors seem to explain average returns on stocks and bonds. 1. Introduction The cross-section of average returns on U.S. common stocks shows little relation to either the market /Is of the Sharpe (1964tLintner (1965) assetpricing model or the consumption ps of the intertemporal asset-pricing model of Breeden (1979) and others. [See, for example, Reinganum (198 1) and Breeden, Gibbons, and Litzenberger (1989).] On the other hand, variables that have no special standing in asset-pricing theory show reliable power to explain the cross-section of average returns. The list of empirically determined averagereturn variables includes size (ME, stock...

Words: 16818 - Pages: 68

Free Essay

Essay

...756 Maths In Focus Mathematics Extension 1 Preliminary Course Answers 8. o oo oo o (a) 0.83 (b) 0.07 (c) 0.13 (d) 0.16 o oo o or 0. 142857 (h) 1.18 (g) 0.142857 9. (a) 8 9 (h) Chapter 1: Basic arithmetic 13 60 Problem 5 Exercises 1.1 1. 2. (a) Rational (b) Rational (e) Rational (f) Irrational (i) Rational (j) Irrational (e) - 4.3 (a) 18 (b) 11 (c) 6 (d) 11 (h) 1 3. (c) Rational (g) Irrational 19 20 (i) 2 (j) 3 (d) Irrational (h) Rational (f) −1 (g) 2 7 15 1 3 (f) 0.17 (g) 0.36 (h) 1.20 (i) - 4.27 1300 8. 5. 950 600 16. 1.7 6. 3000 (j) 8.16 1. 7. 11 000 8. 17. 79 cents 18. 2.73 19. 1.1 20. 3.6 m 21. $281.93 22. 1.8 g (b) 2 3 20 (d) 12. 0.73 13. 33 14. 3.248 15. 4.21 Exercises 1.2 6. - 1.2 10. - 2 15. 5 3. - 56 4. 10 (a) 7. - 7.51 8. - 35.52 11. - 7 12. −23 13. 10 (b) 17. 1 14. 1 18. 60 19. −20 20. 9 51 1000 (c) 5 1 20 (d) 11 7 20 3 (e) 5 (a) 4. 7 18 (d) 2 6 11 (g) 7 45 oo (e) 1.72 4 45 (e) 14. 17.5% 3 28 17 20 3. (a) 15. 41.7% (b) 7 10 (c) 1 7. $65 179 cm 9. (a) 11.9 (b) 5.3 (c) 19 (d) 3.2 (e) 3.5 (f) 0.24 (g) 0.000 18 (h) 5720 (i) 0.0874 (j) 0.376 15. 402.5 g 19. 573 12. 1152.125 g 16. 41.175 m 13. $10.71 17. $30.92 20. $2898 5 minutes after 1 o’clock. 11 Exercises 1.5 1 ...

Words: 45070 - Pages: 181