Democratic Debate Before watching the Democratic Debate, I thought that the setting in which it took place would be more private and formal. I didn’t know that the candidates would be answering some questions from other people, but that idea really appealed to me. I also thought that the contestants would nicely raise their hand in order to respond to a question or an opinion instead of blurting out arguments. The placement also might have affected the whole event since the two candidates on the outside did not get to speak frequently so I barely have any information from them so I will not include them in these topics. But overall, it was a pleasure to spectate the discussion. While I listened to some of the contenders’ opinion on how we whould fix gun control, I have to say that Martin O’Malley, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders all had great concepts of adjusting it. Sanders, Clinton, and O’Malley all said that we should expand background checks so that we can hopefully confirm that we are selling a weapon to someone who’s not going to violently violate the law. Even though Sanders came from a rural city and their views on gun control is completely different from urban cities, I …show more content…
Sanders wanted colleges to be tuition-free but paid by taxing the Wall Street. Clinton says that tuition should be calculated by how much a family can afford to pay. O’Malley said that he wants to let people with student debts refinance their loans and that he would automatically enroll all borrowers in income-based repayment plans. He’d also like to limit tuition at four-year public colleges to 10% of a state’s median income. In my opinion, I would comply with Sander’s idea because Wall Street keeps all the money because they are very greedy. I’d also agree with O’Malley’s idea since it seems efficient and simple in my