Premium Essay

Earl Miller Multitask

Submitted By
Words 1543
Pages 7
Distraction, an issue that prevents someone from giving full attention to something else, happens to everyone, every day whether it is realized or not. Multitasking, the handling of more than one task at the same time by a single person, also an everyday issue that most people do not even think about being an issue to their everyday life, but little do they know without this type distraction they could get forty percent more of their work done. Distraction is everywhere, and with distraction comes multitasking, this combination is something that should be avoided if possible.
Focusing on one task has been the biggest issue with the creation of the internet and smartphones. Dewatripont mentions in his paper, “focusing on the two-task case for …show more content…
Although, now researchers now have the data to back it up, proving that multitasking is in fact, a myth. Earl Miller, a Picower professor of neuroscience at MIT, stated that “switching from task to task, you think you're actually paying attention to everything around you at the same time. But you're actually not.” Therefore, what is done is shifting the focus from one thing to the next. Miller compares this to talking on the phone and writing and email, which is nearly impossible. “You cannot focus on one while doing the other. That's because of what's called interference between the two tasks,” Miller stated. “They both involve communicating via speech or the written word, and so there's a lot of conflict between the two of them.” In a lab at the University of Michigan, researchers used an MRI scanner to take photographs of the test subjects' brains as they attempt to multitask (Hamilton, 2009). During the test, Daniel Weissman, the neuroscientist in charge of the experiment, explained that a man lying inside the scanner would be performing different tasks, depending on the color of two numbers he sees on a screen. “On the other hand, if the digits are a different color — say green — then the subject decides which digit is actually printed in a larger font size,” Weissman stated. The tests could get very complex and tricky, especially when told to move …show more content…
Miller stated that the brain is “not wired to multitask well... when people think they're multitasking, they're actually just switching from one task to another very rapidly. And every time they do, there's a cognitive cost,” (Hamilton, 2009). Constant task-switching encourages bad brain habits. Dopamine, a reward hormone is released when completing a tiny task, like sending a text message or sending an email. Brains love dopamine, therefore it is encouraged to keep switching between small mini-tasks that gives an instant gratification. This gratification can cause any social media, emailing, or sending a simple text message as a neural addiction. (Kim, 2015) Multitasking makes it more difficult to organize thoughts and it reduces the efficiency and quality of work, it also been found to increase production of cortisol, which is known as the stress hormone.
According to Strayer's research, the people who think they are the best multitaskers are usually among the worst. (Loria, 2014). Brains just aren’t equipped for multitasking tasks that do require brainpower, for example, that’s why chewing gum and sending a text message is very simple. Although trying to accomplish two diverse tasks, each one requiring some level of consideration and attention, multitasking falls apart (Woolston, 2015). The brain just can’t take in and process two simultaneous,

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Multitasking Tool

...Have you ever attempted accomplishing multiple tasks all at once and lose focus on what you were doing? Are you listening to music, shouting at your siblings or children, online shopping, checking emails, and texting friends and wondering why you’re still stuck writing your first paragraph in your essay for an hour now? Multitasking may seem like a simple tool to use to accomplish numerous tasks at once; however, that essay may have already been completed if you were to simply focus on one task at a time. Is all the multitasking even worth it at this point? Multitasking can be a wonderful tool in certain people’s eyes, but it can be deleterious to the task at hand. “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus” is an article written by Alina...

Words: 637 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Multitasking

...Multitasking is not something new to today’s modern society. We as people believe by doing multiple things at a time is faster and more of an effective way of doing things. In Alina Tugend’s New York Times article “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Umm…Focus,” she explains that multitasking serves otherwise. She informs that it does more harm to our brain and body by causing us to lose focus and dividing our brains attention span in a way it was not meant to. Being an eighteen year old part time employee and full time student I found I could relate very well to this article. Therefore this reading needs to be featured in IVYT 101 course to ensure students like me, a safe and effective way through college. Edward M. Hallowell, a psychiatrist and author of “CrazyBusy: Overstretched, Overbooked, and About to Snap!” indicates “Multitasking is shifting focus from one task to another in rapid succession. It gives the illusion that we’re simultaneously tasking, but we’re really not. It’s like playing tennis with three balls.” (Tugend 714). When I’m stressed I tend to get anxious and lose focus wherein I try to take some of the work load of my shoulders, I’m sure others do this too, to do so I switch from one thing to another hoping to get something done ahead of time, which in reality never happens. As Edward Hallowell comments “you have to keep in mind that you sacrifice focus when you do this,” (Tugend 714). Most people know that focus is key to any accomplishment, if one do not focus...

Words: 1061 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Negotiation

...The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture Michele J. Gelfand Jeanne M. Brett Editors STANFORD BUSINESS BOOKS The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture Edited by miche le j. ge lfand and jeanne m. brett Stanford Business Books An imprint of Stanford University Press Stanford, California 2004 C Stanford University Press Stanford, California C 2004 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, Jr., University. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system without the prior written permission of Stanford University Press. Printed in the United States of America on acid-free, archival-quality paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The handbook of negotiation and culture / edited by Michele J. Gelfand and Jeanne M. Brett. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-8047-4586-2 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Negotiation. 2. Conflict management. 3. Negotiation—Cross-cultural studies. 4. Conflict management—Cross-cultural studies. I. Gelfand, Michele J. II. Brett, Jeanne M. bf637.n4 h365 2004 302.3—dc22 2003025169 Typeset by TechBooks in 10.5/12 Bembo Original printing 2004 Last figure below indicates year of this printing: 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 Contents List of Tables and Figures Foreword Preface xi xv ix ...

Words: 186303 - Pages: 746