www.ccsenet.org/jas

Journal of Agricultural Science

Vol. 3, No. 3; September 2011

Effect of Organic Fertilizer on Growth and Yield Components in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Morteza Siavoshi (Corresponding author) Ph.D. Student, Department of Botany, Fergusson College, Pune, India Tel: 91-989-098-7811 E-mail: morteza_siavoshi@yahoo.com Alireza Nasiri Department of Agronomy, Science and Research branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran E-mail: a.nasiri1362@gmail.com Shankar. L. Laware Associate Professor, Department of Botany, Fergusson College, Pune, India Tel: 91-982-274-2384 Received: December 14, 2010 Abstract In order to study the effect of organic fertilizer on growth and yield components in rice, an experiment was carried out in 2008 and 2009, in randomized block design based on 4 replications. The chicken manure, cow manure and paddy rice were mixed together in 1:1:0.5 ratio to from organic fertilizer. The treatments of organic fertilizer were given in 5 levels (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 ton/ha). At one level organic fertilizer 1.5 ton/ha was mixed with inorganic fertilizers (N-50, P-25, K-25 kg / ha) and recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer-NPK (N=100, P=50, K=50 kg/ha) was used as check. The plants without treatments were served as control. Grain yield and its components were significantly increased in all the treatments over control. The maximum grain yield in 2008 (4335.88 kg/ha) was noted in plants treated with 2 ton/ha organic fertilizer and it was (4662.71 kg/ha) for 2009 for plant treated with combination of chemical fertilizer + 1.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer. An increase in the grain yield at the abovementioned treatments was may be due to the increase of 1000-seed weight, panicle number, number of fertile tiller, flag leaf length, number of spikelet, panicle length and decrease number of hollow spikelet per panicle. Keywords: Organic fertilizer, Rice, Grain yield 1. Introduction In the past few decades, chemical fertilizers have widely spread throughout the world focusing that the soil is inert medium for plant roots, rather than as a living biosphere in which the crop is only one of hundreds or thousands of interacting species. However, it is now realized that in fields under intensive monoculture which receive heavy applications of chemical fertilizers alone, there is a slow decline in productivity. This decline occurs even in irrigated paddy fields (FFTC, 1998). Applications of nitrogen fertilizers are responsible for emissions of green house gases like nitrous oxide (N2O) and ammonia (NH3). Besides supplying nitrogen, ammonia can also increase soil acidity. Excessive nitrogen fertilizer applications lead to pest problems by increasing the birth rate, longevity and overall fitness of certain pests (Jhan 2004, Jhan et al. 2005). Experience in tropical Asian countries generally shows that organic farming alone does not supply enough nutrients, and organic fertilizers need to be supplemented by a basal dressing of chemical fertilizer. However, over a longer period of time, applications of organic materials such as livestock manure and crop residues have been found to bring about a gradual improvement in soil productivity and crop performance. A study carried out on five crops in Japan showed that applications of organic matter enhance root growth and nutrient uptake, resulting in higher yields (FFTC, 1998).
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education 217

E-mail: laware_sl@yahoo.com doi:10.5539/jas.v3n3p217

Accepted: December 22, 2010

www.ccsenet.org/jas

Journal of Agricultural Science

Vol. 3, No. 3; September 2011

Another benefit from the increased use of organic materials is that it can help to solve pollution problems caused by agro-industrial wastes. However, the soil must not be seen as a dumping ground for organic wastes. If too much nitrogen fertilizer is applied, whether in the form of organic matter or chemical fertilizer, some of the excess nitrogen is converted to nitrates, which are harmful to human health (Preap et al. 2002). Improper use of organic fertilizers can cause nitrates to accumulate in groundwater, and also in crops if they are taken up by the plant roots. In the light of these problems, it was planned to study the effect of organic fertilizer based on cow manure, poultry manure and paddy rice on growth and yield components in rice. 2. Materials and methods This experiment was carried out at Baykola Research Center, Neka, Mazandaran, Iran in 2008 and 2009. The research plot was located in 36°, 60 N and 53°, 13 E and 4 meters above of sea level. There were total eight treatments including control. The treatments were arranged in randomized complete block design based on four replications. Organic fertilizer was used at five levels: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 ton/ha, chemical fertilizers (N=100, P=50, K=50 kg/ha) at one level and mixture of organic and chemical fertilizers (N-50, P-25, K-25 + organic fertilizer 1.5 ton/ha) at one level. The plants without treatments were served as control. Nitrogen in the form of urea was given in tree doses at the time transplanting, at tillering and flowering stage. Hand weeding was done after 3 weeks of transplantation and regular disease control measures recommend for rice were followed to avoid any disease incidence. Plants were irrigated with regular intervals. At the time of harvesting eight hills were selected from each plot for counting total number of tillers and total number of fertile tillers per hill. Total eight samples were cut from ground level from each plot for measuring the plant height, flag leaf length and panicle length and panicle number. Plants were cut from one square meter area from the centre of each plot for measuring panicle number, grain yield, weight of 1000-seeds and biological yield. Ten panicles were randomly selected from each plot for counting total number of spikelet per panicle and total number of hollow spikelet per panicle. 3. Results The results depicted in Table (1) showed that plant height, total number of tiller per hill, flag leaf length and dry matter were significantly increased in all the treatments over control. Maximum plant height in 2008 was noted in plants treated with 2 ton/ha organic fertilizer (132.22cm), it was followed by organic fertilizer+ NPK (131.38 cm) and NPK alone (130.47 cm) and minimum of that was for 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (126.56 cm), whereas control plants showed 122.44 cm as an average plant height but in 2009 the maximum plant height was observed in application of organic fertilizer+ NPK (139.44 cm), it was followed by 2 ton/ha organic fertilizer (139.31 cm), then NPK (138.06 cm) and minimum of that was for 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (134.31 cm), whereas control plants showed (128.94 cm) as an average plant height. Highest total number of tillers were observed in plots treated with 2 ton/ha organic fertilizer (11.19), it was followed by organic fertilizer+ NPK (11.03) and NPK alone (10.66) and minimum of that was for 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (9.75) against untreated control (9.63). On the other hand in 2009 it was seen that majority of total number of tillers per hill was observed in organic fertilizer + NPK (13.01), after that it was in plants treated with organic fertilizer 2 ton/ha (12.87) and chemical fertilizer (12.47) also the minimum of total number of tillers per hill was in plot treated through 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (11.19), simultaneously in control total number of tillers was (10.94). The flag leaf length in control plant was (28.17 cm), while maximum flag leaf length was noted in plants treated with 2.0 ton/ha organic fertilizer (29.48 cm). The plants treated with chemical fertilizer in combination with organic fertilizer exhibited 29.28 cm flag leaf length and was followed by chemical fertilizer treated plants (29.27 cm). Even so in 2009 the best flag leaf length was exhibited by chemical fertilizer in combination with organic fertilizer (29.97 cm), followed by organic fertilizer 2 ton/ha (29.83 cm) and chemical fertilizer (29.66 cm), also the minimum flag leaf length was as result of 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (28.71 cm), while in control flag leaf length was 28.46 cm. Data cornering to dry matter accumulation clearly indicate that more dry matter accumulation significantly increased in all the treatments and more dry matter accumulation (51.35 g) was observed in plants grown in plots treated 2.0 ton/ha organic fertilizer, however, in 2009 it was noted for organic fertilizer + NPK (54.20 g) and followed by organic fertilizer 2 ton/ha (53.94 g) and organic fertilizer 2.5 ton/ha (53.41 g). The least quantity dry matter accumulation was seen in plots treated in 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (49.78 g), while in control it was 46.56 g.

218

ISSN 1916-9752

E-ISSN 1916-9760

www.ccsenet.org/jas

Journal of Agricultural Science

Vol. 3, No. 3; September 2011

The results given in Table (2) showed that number of fertile tillers per hill, panicle number per square meter and panicle length significantly increased in all the treatments over control. Maximum number of fertile tillers were observed in plots treated with 2 ton/ha organic fertilizer (10.53), it was followed by 2.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (10.51) and organic fertilizer in combination with NPK (10.48), chemical fertilizers alone (10.28) and minimum of that was for 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (9.50) against untreated control (9.47). On the other hand in 2009 it was seen that maximum total number of tillers per hill was noted in organic fertilizer + NPK (10.63), after that it was in plants treated by organic fertilizer 2 ton/ha (10.59) and chemical fertilizer (10.44), also the minimum of total number of tillers per hill was in plot treated through 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (9.72), simultaneously in control total number of tillers was 9.49. Maximum number of panicles per square meter area was noted in plants treated with 2 ton/ha organic fertilizer (329.58), it was followed by organic fertilizer in combination with NPK (326.27) and 2.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (324.81) and minimum of that was for 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (310.57), whereas control plants showed 306.17 as an average panicle number in said unit area, but in 2009 the utmost panicles per square meter area was noticed for organic fertilizer 1.5 ton/ha + NPK (343.28), afterward plot treated by organic fertilizer 2 ton/ha (341.04) then plot treated with organic fertilizer 2.5 ton/ha (335.69), and the minimum amount of panicles per square meter area was for 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (327.63), although control plants showed 308.50 panicles. Panicle length in control plant was (22.22 cm), while maximum panicle length was noted in plants treated with 2.0 ton/ha organic fertilizer (22.89 cm). The plants treated with chemical fertilizer in combination with organic fertilizer exhibited 22.82 cm panicle length and was followed by chemical fertilizer treated plants (22.73 cm), Even so in 2009 the more panicle length was observed in plot treated with chemical fertilizer in combination with organic fertilizer 1.5 ton (25.50 cm), followed by organic fertilizer 2.0 ton/ha (25.45 cm) and plot treated with chemical fertilizer (25.34 cm). Minimum panicle length was shown by organic fertilizer 0.5 ton/ha (24.95 cm), whereas in control the panicle length was 24.56 cm. The data depicted in Table (3) reveal that number of spikelet per panicle increased in all the treatments and number of hollow spikelet per panicle significantly decreased over control. Maximum number of spikelets per panicle was observed in plants treated with 2 ton/ha organic fertilizer (90.98), it was followed by organic fertilizer+ NPK (89.82) and 1.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (89.55) and minimum of that was for 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (85.50), whereas control plants showed 80.18 as an average spikelet number per panicle. The chemical fertilizer (NPK) significantly increased number of spikelets per panicles, however the increase was only 8.29 percent over untreated control, whereas in 2.0 ton/ha organic fertilizer treatment it was 13.47 percent and chemical fertilizer in combination with organic fertilizer showed 12.02 percent increase over untreated plants. In 2009 maximum number of spikelet per panicle (99.40) was exhibited by chemical fertilizer in combination with organic fertilizer, and the next was for organic fertilizer 2.0 ton/ha (98.64) and plot treated with 2.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (97.35), the minimum number was seen in plot treated with 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (92.72), whereas in control the number of spikelet per panicle was 86.34. The data concerning to hollow spikelets clearly indicate that number of hollow spikelets per panicle significantly decreased in all the treatments except chemical fertilizer treated plants as against untreated plants. Maximum number of hollow spiklets per panicle (8.15) was observed in plants treated with chemical fertilizer (NPK). Rest all the treatments decreased number of hollow spikelets and maximum decrease (11.46 %) was noted in plants treated with organic fertilizer in combination with chemical fertilizers (NPK) and it was followed by in 2 ton/ha organic fertilizer (5.48 %) and 1.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (3.82 %) and minimum of that was for 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (0.38%). However, in 2009 the maximum number of hollow spikelets per panicle was found in plants treated with chemical fertilizer (9.54), after that plots treated by organic fertilizer 0.5 ton/ha (8.94), then plots treated with organic fertilizer 1.0 ton/ha (8.80). Lowest number of hollow spikeletes (7.90) was exhibited by organic fertilizer 1.5 ton/ha + NPK, while in control the number of hollow spikeletes per panicle was 8.98. The data presented in Table (4) reveal that 1000-seed weight, grain yield, and biological yield significantly increased in all the treatments over control. Maximum 1000-seed weight was noted in plants treated with 2 ton/ha organic fertilizer (25.42 g), it was followed by organic fertilizer in combination with NPK (25.40 g) and 2.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (25.06 g) and minimum of that was for 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (23.38 g), whereas control plants showed 22.92 g as an average 1000-seed weight. The chemical fertilizer (NPK) significantly increased 1000-seed weight (25.02 g); however the increase was 9.18 percent over untreated control, whereas in 2.0 ton/ha organic fertilizer treatment it was 10.90 percent and chemical fertilizer in combination with organic fertilizer showed 10.84 percent increase
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education 219

www.ccsenet.org/jas

Journal of Agricultural Science

Vol. 3, No. 3; September 2011

over untreated plants. On the other hand in 2009 maximum 1000-seed weight (27.16 g) was exhibited by chemical fertilizer in combination with organic fertilizer, afterward plot treated by organic fertilizer 2.0 ton/ha (27.12 g) and in plot treated through chemical fertilizer (27.06 g). Moreover the least 1000-seed weight was shown by organic fertilizer 0.5 ton/ha (25.02 g), whereas in control 1000-seed weight was 23.06 g. Maximum grain yield was observed in plots treated with 2 ton/ha organic fertilizer (4335.88 kg/ha), it was followed by organic fertilizer in combination with NPK (4334.32 kg/ha), 2.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (4332.56 kg/ha) and in chemical fertilizers it was 4256.37 kg/ha. Whereas, minimum grain yield (4001.92 kg/ha) was noted in the plot treated with 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer as against untreated control (3925.00 kg/ha). Even so in 2009 the more grain yield was noted for organic fertilizer+ NPK (4662.71 kg/ha), after that plot treated with organic fertilizer 2.0 ton/ha (4650.73 kg/ha), then plot treated with NPK (100:50:50) (4425.65 kg/ha), as well as the minimum amount of grain yield was identified in plot treated with 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (4127.91 kg/ha), whereas control it was 3962.79 kg/ha. Biological yield in control plant was 6434.61 kg/ha, while maximum biological yield was noted in plants treated with 2.0 ton/ha organic fertilizer (7863.00 kg/ha). The plants treated with chemical fertilizer showed 7805.51 kg/ha biological yield and was followed by chemical fertilizer in combination with organic fertilizer treated plants (7722.92 kg/ha). In 2009 the highest amount of biological yield was viewed through organic fertilizer+ NPK (8207.59 kg/ha), afterward plot treated by organic fertilizer 2 ton/ha (8175.00 kg/ha) and plot treated with chemical fertilizer (8027.61 kg/ha). Moreover the least amount of biological yield was seen with 0.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer (7162.50 kg/ha), while in control it was shown to be 6512.50 kg/ha. The data related soil physical and chemical properties are given in table 5. The results clearly indicate that soil properties are improved due to application of organic fertilizer. 4. Discussions Chemical fertilizer offers nutrients which are readily soluble in soil solution and thereby instantly available to plants. Nutrient availability from organic sources is due to microbial action and improved physical condition of soil (Sarker et al. 2004). The increase in plant height, number of tillers per hill, spikelet number per panicle, grain yield and 1000-grain weight in response to application of organic and chemical fertilizers is probably due to enhanced availability of nutrients. The variation in plant height due to nutrient sources was considered to be due to variation in the availability of major nutrients. Muhammad et al. (2008) observed similar results with application of organic manure and compost in rice. The available nutrients might have helped in enhancing leaf area, which thereby resulted in higher photo-assimilates and more dry matter accumulation. These results are supported by the findings of Swarup and Yaduvanshi, (2000) and Yadana et al. (2009). The increase in fresh weight has also been reported by Sarwar et al. (2008). Tillering is an important trait for grain production and is thereby an important aspect in rice yield. Mirza et al. (2010) reported increase in number of tillers in rice plants due to influence of different fertilizer combinations. According to them more number of tillers per square meter might be due to the more availability of nitrogen, which plays a vital role in cell division. Organic sources offer more balanced nutrition to the plants, especially micro nutrients which positively affect number of tiller in plants (Miller, 2007). In case of any plant, leaves are important organs which have an active role in photosynthesis. To achieve high yield maximization of leaf area is an important factor. In present investigation we found that organic fertilizer alone and in combination with chemical fertilizers significantly increased the flag leaf length over untreated control. Similar findings are reported by Mirza et al. (2010). The increase in leaf number as well as size due to enough nutrition can be explained in terms of possible increase in nutrient absorption capacity of plant as a result of better root development and increased translocation of carbohydrates from source to growing points (Singh and Agarwal, 2001). The yield components of rice crop viz., number of panicle per square meter, number of filled grains/panicle, unfilled grain percentage and 1000-grain weight showed significant differences due to treatments. Salem (2006) reported that application of FYM along with nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased number of panicles per square meter, panicle length, panicle weight, number of filled grains/panicle, 1000-grain weight and grain yield in rice. The productivity of rice plant is greatly dependent on the number of productive tiller (tillers which bears panicle) rather than the total number of tillers. In present investigation maximum number of fertile tillers and spikelet per panicle were observed in the all the treated plants. From this study it was observed that excess application of inorganic fertilizers is not necessary to produce effective tillers if we can supplement it from organic manures, which also help in providing essential micronutrients to the plants (Miller, 2007; Rakshit et al., 2008). Mirza et al. (2010) also reported similar results in rice.
220
ISSN 1916-9752 E-ISSN 1916-9760

www.ccsenet.org/jas

Journal of Agricultural Science

Vol. 3, No. 3; September 2011

In present study we observed reduction in hollow spikelets in all the treated plants except chemical fertilizer treated plants. Similar observations were made by Luong and Heong (2005). They observed reduction in unfilled grain percentage, increase in grain weight of rice with application of organic manure. Bala et al. (2008) suggested application of Mo with organic matter to produce highest number of panicle / hill, spikelets / panicle and grains. The increase in biological and grain yield could be due to the increase in yield attributes (plant height, number of productive tillers/hill, panicle weight and 1000-grain weight) consequently (Ebaid et al., 2007). A significant difference in 1000-grain weight of rice as affected by variation in fertilizer packages was also observed by Mirza et al. (2010). These results were supported by Channabasavanna and Biradar (2001). The increase in grain yield components can be due to the fact that available more water enhanced nutrient availability which improved nitrogen and other macro- and micro-elements absorption as well as enhancing the production and translocation of the dry matter content from source to sink. Ebaid et al. (2007). Similar results were reported by El- Weheishy and Abd El-Hafez (1997), Awad (2001) and El-Refaee et al. (2006). From the above discussion it is clear that organic fertilizer have a significant influence on growth and productivity in rice. Organic ferthilizer can be a better supplement of inorganic fertilizer to produce better growth and yield. All the treatments showed significant influence on growth and productivity of rice. Form the present study it was observed that 1.5 ton/ha organic fertilizer along with 50 % recommended chemical fertilizer could give similar yield. However, among organic fertilizer treatments the 2.0 ton/ha itself produced the better grain yield compared to others organic fertilizer treatments. From the economic point of view farmers can use the combination of organic fertilizer and reduced rate of inorganic fertilizers to boost the yield of rice as well as to maintain and improve soil health. References Awad, H. A. (2001). Rice production at the North of Delta Region in Egypt as affected by irrigation intervals and nitrogen fertilizer levels. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 26: 1151-1159. Bala, P., and S. M. A. hossain. (2008, June6). Yield and Quality of Rice as Affected by Molybdenum Applied With Chemical Fertilizers and Organic Matter, J Agric Rural Dev, 6(1&2), 19-23. Channabasavanna, A. S., and P. D. Biradar. (2001). Yield and yield attributes of transplanted summer rice as influenced by organic manures and zinc levels. J. Maharashtra Agril. Univ., 26:170-172. Ebaid, R. A., and I. S. EL-REFAEE. (2007). Utilization of rice husk as an organic fertilizer to improve productivity and water use efficiency in rice fields, African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, 8: 1923-1928. El-Refaee, I. S., R. A. Ebaid., and I. M. El-Rewiny. (2006). Performance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant under different water regimes and methods of planting. Alex .J. Agric. Res., 51(2): 47-55. El-Weheishy, M. M., and A.G. Abd El-Hafez. (1997). Response of flooded rice to water deficit. J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ., 23:273-288. FFTC publication database. (1998). Food and Fertilizer technology centre Taiwan Microbial and Organic Fertilizers in Asia. Jhan, G.C. (2004). Effect of soil nutrients on the growth, survival and fecundity of insect pests of rice: an overview and a theory of pest outbreaks with consideration of research approaches. Multitrophic interactions in Soil and Integrated Control. International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) wprs Bulletin, 27 (1): 115-122. Jhan, G.C., Almazan, L.P., and Pacia, J. (2005). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the intrinsic rate of increase of the rusty plum aphid, Hysteroneura setariae (Thomas) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environmental Entomology, 34 (4): 938-943. doi:10.1603/0046-225X-34.4.938, http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-34.4.938 Luong, M. C., and K.L. Heong. (2005). Effects of organic fertilizers on insect pest and diseases of rice, Omonrice, 13: 26-33. Miller, H. B. (2007). Poultry litter induces tillering in rice. J. Sustain. Agric., 31:1-12. Mirza Hasanuzzaman, K. U., Ahamed, N. M., Rahmatullah, N., Akhter, K. N., and M. L. Rahman. (2010). Plant growth characters and productivity of wetland rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by application of different manures, Emir. J. Food Agric., 22 (1): 46-58.

Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

221

www.ccsenet.org/jas

Journal of Agricultural Science

Vol. 3, No. 3; September 2011

Muhammad Ibrahim. (2008). Response of wheat growth and yield to various levels of compost and organic manure. Pak. J. Bot., 40(5): 2135-2141. Preap, V., Zalucki, M.P., and Jhan,G.C. (2002). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and host plant variety on fecundity and early instar survival of Nilaparvata lugens (Stål): immediate response. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Inter-Country Forecasting System and Management for Planthopper in East Asia. 13-15 November 2002. Guilin China. Published by Rural Development Administration (RDA) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 163-180, 226. Rakshit, A., Sarkar, N.C., and Debashish, S. (2008). Influence of organic manures on productivity of two varieties of rice, J. Cent. Eur. Agric., 9(4): 629-634. Salem, A. K. M. (2006). Effect of nitrogen levels, plant spacing and time of farmyard manure application on the productivity of rice. Journal of applied sciences research, 2(11):980-987. Sarker, M. A. R., M. Y. A. Pramanik., G. M. Faruk., and M. Y. Ali. (2004). Effect of green manures and levels of nitrogen on some growth attributes of transplant aman rice. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci., 7:739-742. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2004.739.742, http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2004.739.742 Sarwar, G., H. Schmeisky., N. Hussain., S. Muhammad., M. Ibrahim., and E. Safdar. (2008). Improvement of soil physical and chemical properties with compost application in rice-wheat cropping system Pak. J. Bot., 40(1): 275-282. Singh, R., and Agarwal, S. K. (2001). Analysis of growth and productivity of wheat in relation to levels of FYM and nitrogen. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 6: 279-83. Swarup, A., and N.P.S. Yaduvanshi. (2000). Effect of Integrated nutrient management on soil properties and yield of rice in Alkali soils. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 48: 279-282. Yadana, K. L., Aung, K. M., Takeo, Y., and Kazuo, O. (2009). The Effects of Green Manure (Sesbania rostrata) on the Growth and Yield of Rice, J. Fac. Agr., Kyushu Univ., 54 (2): 313–319. Table 1. Effect of organic fertilizer on plant height, total number of tillers per hill, flag leaf length and dry matter per hill in rice.
Treatments (Per hectare) Control NPK (100:50:50 kg) Organic fertilizer 0.5 tones Organic fertilizer 1.0 tones Organic fertilizer 1.5 tones Organic fertilizer 2.0 tones Organic fertilizer 2.5 tones Organic fertilizer 1.5 NPK CD 5% CD 1% 1.36 1.96 _ _ 1.50 2.17 _ _ 0.28 0.40 _ _ 0.37 0.54 _ _ 0.28 0.41 _ _ 0.45 0.65 _ _ 0.90 1.30 _ _ 1.05 1.52 _ _ tones + 131.38 7.30 139.44 8.14 11.03 14.61 13.01 18.91 29.28 3.94 29.97 5.31 50.69 10.07 54.20 16.41 129.91 6.10 137.44 6.59 10.34 7.47 12.34 12.85 28.88 2.50 29.42 3.37 49.84 8.24 53.41 14.71 132.22 7.99 139.31 8.04 11.19 16.22 12.87 17.65 29.48 4.66 29.83 4.82 51.35 11.52 53.94 15.85 129.91 6.10 137.25 6.44 10.29 6.88 12.26 12.05 29.23 3.77 29.56 3.86 50.46 9.59 53.31 14.50 128.75 5.15 136.75 6.06 10.13 5.19 11.91 8.91 28.59 1.50 28.91 1.57 50.13 8.87 52.63 13.04 126.56 3.37 134.31 4.17 9.75 1.30 11.19 2.28 28.28 0.39 28.71 0.87 48.24 4.76 49.78 6.92 Plant height (cm) 2008 122.44 130.47 PIOC 0.00 6.56 2009 128.94 138.06 PIOC 0.00 7.07 Total number of tillers per hill 2008 9.63 10.66 PIOC 0.00 10.73 2009 10.94 12.47 PIOC 0.00 13.99 Flag leaf length (cm) 2008 28.17 29.27 PIOC 0.00 3.89 2009 28.46 29.66 PIOC 0.00 4.21 Dry matter per hill (g) 2008 46.05 49.17 PIOC 0.00 6.78 2009 46.56 52.19 PIOC 0.00 12.09

222

ISSN 1916-9752

E-ISSN 1916-9760

www.ccsenet.org/jas

Journal of Agricultural Science

Vol. 3, No. 3; September 2011

Table 2. Effect of organic fertilizer on number of fertile tiller per hill, panicle number and panicle length in rice.
Treatments (Per hectare) Control NPK (100:50:50 kg) Organic fertilizer 0.5 tones Organic fertilizer 1.0 tones Organic fertilizer 1.5 tones Organic fertilizer 2.0 tones Organic fertilizer 2.5 tones Organic fertilizer 1.5 tones + NPK CD 5% CD 1% Number of fertile tiller per hill 2008 9.47 10.28 9.50 9.59 9.85 10.53 10.51 10.48 0.25 0.36 PIOC 0.00 8.58 0.33 1.32 4.02 11.22 11.02 10.62 2009 9.49 10.44 9.72 9.96 10.28 10.59 10.55 10.63 0.21 0.31 PIOC 0.00 10.04 2.46 4.97 8.39 11.61 11.18 12.02 Panicle number (M2) 2008 306.17 320.00 310.57 311.77 312.10 329.58 324.81 326.27 3.21 4.64 PIOC 0.00 4.52 1.44 1.83 1.94 7.65 6.09 6.57 2009 308.50 334.88 327.63 329.13 330.56 341.04 335.69 343.28 3.79 5.48 PIOC 0.00 8.55 6.20 6.69 7.15 10.55 8.81 11.27 Panicle length (cm) 2008 22.22 22.73 22.41 22.59 22.69 22.89 22.55 22.82 0.10 0.15 PIOC 0.00 2.32 0.84 1.69 2.11 3.02 1.48 2.72 2009 24.56 25.34 24.95 25.23 25.31 25.45 25.31 25.50 0.16 0.23 PIOC 0.00 3.19 1.60 2.73 3.06 3.62 3.06 3.83 -

Table 3. Effect of organic fertilizer on number of spikelets per panicle and hollow spikelets per panicle in rice. Treatments (Per hectare) Control NPK(100:50:50 kg) Organic fertilizer 0.5 tones Organic fertilizer 1.0 tones Organic fertilizer 1.5 tones Organic fertilizer 2.0 tones Organic fertilizer 2.5 tones Organic fertilizer 1.5 tones + NPK CD 5% CD 1%
1000-seed weight (g) 2008 PIOC 2009 22.92 0.00 23.06 25.02 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 1.5 23.38 24.05 24.57 25.42 25.06 25.40 0.35 0.51 9.18 2.02 4.93 7.21 10.90 9.35 10.84 _ _ 27.06 25.02 25.74 25.91 27.12 26.07 27.16 0.52 0.75

Number of spikelets per panicle 2008 PIOC 2009 PIOC 80.18 0.00 86.34 0.00 86.83 8.29 94.82 9.82 85.50 6.64 92.72 7.38 88.93 10.91 96.03 11.22 89.55 11.69 96.91 12.24 90.98 13.47 98.64 14.24 89.18 11.23 97.35 12.75 89.82 12.02 99.40 15.12 1.93 2.11 2.78 3.05 Grain Yield (Kg/ha) 2008 PIOC 2009 3925.00 0.00 3962.79 4256.37 4001.92 4089.82 4185.48 4335.88 4332.56 4334.32 68.87 99.50 8.44 1.96 4.20 6.64 10.47 10.38 10.43 _ _ 4425.65 4127.91 4280.59 4375.46 4650.73 4325.56 4662.71 93.87 135.61

Hollow spikelets per panicle 2008 PIOC 2009 PIOC 7.85 0.00 8.98 0.00 8.15 3.82 9.54 6.32 7.82 -0.38 8.94 -0.39 7.73 -1.59 8.80 -1.95 7.55 -3.82 8.58 -4.43 7.42 -5.48 8.45 -5.82 7.65 -2.55 8.63 -3.90 6.95 -11.46 7.90 -11.98 0.41 0.32 0.59 0.46 Biological yield (Kg/ha) 2008 PIOC 2009 6434.61 0.00 6512.50 7805.51 6519.04 6625.41 7165.57 7863.00 7465.48 7722.92 231.87 335.35 21.31 1.31 2.97 11.36 22.20 16.02 20.02 _ _ 8027.61 7162.50 7295.36 7387.50 8175.00 7762.50 8207.59 202.17 292.08

Table 4. Effect of organic fertilizer on 1000-seed, grain yield and biological yield in rice.
Treatments (Per hectare) Control NPK (100:50:50 kg) Organic fertilizer tones Organic fertilizer tones Organic fertilizer tones Organic fertilizer tones Organic fertilizer tones Organic fertilizer tones + NPK CD 5% CD 1% PIOC 0.00 17.38 8.51 11.62 12.39 17.64 13.06 17.82 _ _ PIOC 0.00 11.68 4.17 8.02 10.41 17.36 9.15 17.66 _ _ PIOC 0.00 23.26 9.98 12.02 13.44 25.53 19.19 26.03 _ _

Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

223

www.ccsenet.org/jas

Journal of Agricultural Science

Vol. 3, No. 3; September 2011

Table 5. Effect of organic fertilizer on soil parameters.
After crop harvest Soil Characters 2008 pH E.C Organic Carbon Organic Matter Nitrogen % Phosphoro us P.P.M Potassium P.P.M Sand Silt Clay Soil texture 7.66 1.19 1.23 2009 6.92 1.10 1.25 Pre-planting Control (00) 2008 7.53 1.03 1.32 2009 7.23 1.05 1.33 Chemical (Kg/ha) 2008 7.49 1.14 1.36 2009 7.25 1.13 1.37 Organic (0.5 t/h) 2008 7.34 1.41 1.38 2009 7.26 1.47 1.39 Organic (1.0 t/h) 2008 7.54 2.02 1.41 2009 7.37 1.95 1.42 Organic (1.5t/h) 2008 7.48 1.98 1.43 2009 7.31 1.89 1.45 Organic (2.0 t/h) 2008 7.44 1.54 1.46 2009 7.29 1.55 1.48 Organic (2.5 t/h) 2008 7.45 1.30 1.48 2009 7.27 1.29 1.49 Chemical + organic 2008 7.40 1.11 1.44 2009 7.35 1.14 1.48

2.12

2.28

2.26

2.34

2.38

2.40

2.40

2.41

2.42

2.43

2.46

2.47

2.52

2.55

2.58

2.59

2.51

2.55

0.12

0.13

0.13

0.14

0.21

0.23

0.18

0.19

0.20

0.22

0.22

0.24

0.23

0.25

0.24

0.26

0.25

0.27

6.00 120.0 0 15.00 54.00 27.00 Si.C. L

6.00 170.0 0 16.00 57.00 27.00 Si.C. L

4.00 142.4 2 16.00 57.00 26.85 Si.C. L

5.00 200.0 0 17.00 58.00 27.00 Si.C. L

4.52 190.1 2 15.00 59.00 28.00 Si.C. L

5.00 230.0 0 16.00 61.00 27.00 Si.C. L

3.00 190.6 8 14.56 60.00 28.00 Si.C. L

4.00 225.0 0 15.00 61.00 27.00 Si.C. L

4.00 200.2 2 14.67 60.00 28.00 Si.C. L

5.00 230.0 0 15.00 61.50 27.00 Si.C. L

4.00 230.9 2 14.41 61.00 26.90 Si.C. L

5.00 240.0 0 16.00 62.00 27.00 Si.C. L

3.00 234.4 8 14.34 58.00 27.59 Si.C. L

5.00 245.0 0 16.00 60.00 27.00 Si.C. L

3.00 236.5 6 14.28 60.00 27.84 Si.C. L

5.00 245.0 0 16.00 61.00 27.00 Si.C. L

4.00 230.7 8 14.16 60.00 27.00 Si.C. L

5.00 250.0 0 16.00 61.00 27.00 Si.C. L

224

ISSN 1916-9752

E-ISSN 1916-9760