California is currently experiencing major environmental obstacles. With changing climate and weather patterns, forest fires continue to devastate the state. Couple this with the depleting water supply the outlook for California appears grim. The article takes on the many aspects of each environmental challenge and follows them with solutions. As water becomes scarcer, technology advances are being made from utilizing wastewater to agriculture reduced irrigation. One unique solution presented by the article is desalinating water, which comes with its own challenges. The article predicts that the naturally occurring El Niño will alleviate the water scarcity. However, this prediction is just that, a prediction. California has a long road ahead itself, and it starts with the average citizen …show more content…
The qualifications of the author are not stated in the article. Rather, they are easily accessible as she is linked within the article. The author Erika Hayden has a undergraduate degree in biology from Stanford University. Before writing for Nature, Erika Hayden has extensive journalist experience in the science and health while working for Newsweek Magazine. The writer’s attitude toward the issue is not easily identifiable. The article was written mainly of facts with a serious attitude, rather than an emotional opinionated stance toward the issue. The article is presented with bias, as only one side of the issue was presented. However, it can prove difficult to find opposition to droughts and forest fires. One viewpoint left out is those who do not believe climate change exists. Presenting this viewpoint would allow the reader to see both sides of the issue and form their own opinion.
The article cites several people that are used to add support and creditability to the argument. The author quotes Peter Gleick, which is immediately followed with his credentials. Peter Gleick is the President of Pacific Institute. His quote is used to highlight the drastic situation