...oppositions. Binary oppositions can be defined as “ a pair of related terms or concepts that are opposite in meaning.” “Waiting for Godot”, a classic of modern theatre, is a tragicomedy in two acts which tells the story of two men, Vladimir and Estragon, who are waiting to meet a man named Godot. By using deconstructive literary criticism, the play can be analyzed threw the following binary oppositions: passive/active hopelessness/hope, forgetfulness/remembrance and staying/going. Vladimir and Estragon are in a constant state of waiting for Godot: “Nothing to be done. / I'm beginning to come round to that opinion."(Waiting for Godot). Although they are being passive they try to occupy themselves while waiting for Godot. Derrida states that in binary oppositions there is a unspoken hierarchy in which the first term functions as superior to the second term which is considered inferior: “ Derrida’s procedure is to invert the hierarchy in which the first term functions as privileged and superior and the second term as derivative and inferior. By showing that the primary term can be made out to be derivative from or a special case of the secondary term” By reversing the first term with the second a greater meaning can obtained. Although Vladimir and Estragon as in a passive state of waiting they attempt to keep active in order to pass the time. This shows that being active is valued over being passive: “ What about trying them. / I’ve tried everything/ No I mean the boots/ Would that be a...
Words: 1146 - Pages: 5
...Logan McGeady 14 October 2014 ENG 121-020 Essay #2 Nothing To Be Done The play Waiting For Godot by Samuel Beckett engages the idea of what it means to be human and how meaningless life can really be. Beckett uses literary techniques to show that human life is based on chance, time is meaningless, and that people will impose meaning on life to distract themselves from the fact that their situation is unalterable. The realization of this drives the characters to rely on outside forces, which may or may not be real, for order and direction. The basic proposition Beckett imposes in the play is that chance is the main factor behind existence and human life. Therefore life is determined by chance and there Is nothing Vladimir or Estragon can do that can influence their life. This is established when Vladimir alludes to the story of the two thieves from the Bible. "One is supposed to have been saved… and the other…damned” (Beckett 4). The idea of percentage is important because this represents how the fate of humanity is determined randomly and without any reason. There is a percentage chance that a person will be saved and sent to heaven or damned and sent to hell, taking away meaning of human life and simply categorizing people into those who are saved, and those who are damned. Vladimir continues by citing the fault in the Gospels on the story of the two thieves. "And yet…[pause]…how is it that of the four Evangelists only one speaks of a thief being saved. The four of them...
Words: 954 - Pages: 4
...lack of purpose: the uncertainty of life. The characters are both anxiety driven men who wait around for the mysterious Godot. They believe waiting for him in necessary for them to take action. They are waiting for something external to give them meaning. Their is also an religious interpretation in the sense people wait for religion to give them direction to the next course of action they should take. They rely on God to give their life purpose who could be an interpretation of Godot. 3. I believe in the original black and white movie the characters are portrayed more accurate rather then the newer colored movie. Information about their appearance is slim but “he walks in "short stiff strides, legs wide apart," and is heavier than Estragon. their is little information since there is no description of Estragon's weight. It tends to be the convention in most productions, however,...
Words: 777 - Pages: 4
...Godot begins with two men on a barren road by a leafless tree. These men, Vladimir and Estragon, are often characterized as "tramps". The world of this play is operating on its own set of rules, its own system. There nothing happens, nothing is certain, and there’s never anything to do. Vladimir and Estragon are waiting for Godot, a man or perhaps a deity. The tramps can’t be sure if they’ve met Godot, if they’re waiting in the right place, if this is the right day, or even whether Godot is going to show up at all. While they wait, Vladimir and Estragon fill their time with a series of mundane activities (like taking a boot on and off) and trivial conversations (turnips, carrots) scattered with more serious reflection (dead voices, suicide, the Bible). "We always find something," Estragon casually remarks in Act II, "to give us the impression we exist." The tramps are soon interrupted by the arrival of Lucky, a man/servant/pet with a rope tied around his neck, and Pozzo, his master, holding the other end of the long rope. The four men proceed to do together what Vladimir and Estragon did earlier by themselves: namely, nothing. Lucky and Pozzo then leave so that Vladimir and Estragon can go back to doing nothing by themselves. Vladimir suggests that this is not the first time he’s met with Lucky and Pozzo, which is surprising, since they acted like strangers upon arrival. Then again, Estragon can’t even remember a conversation ten lines after it happens, so we’re not going to...
Words: 985 - Pages: 4
...First Meetings 1) ‘Estragon: [pretending to search] Bozzo… Bozzo…’ - Estragon hasn’t listened to Pozzo’s introduction of himself. Usually when meeting someone you pay attention to information about the other person such as names and where they are from. 2) ‘Pozzo: … Does that name mean nothing to you?’ - Pozzo expects Vladimir and Estragon to already know who he is, which puts him at a higher class. Usually when meeting someone, you make the conversation as equal as possible, noting the other person’s class without mentioning it. 3) ‘Estragon: [Timidly to Pozzo] you’re not Mr Godot, sir? - Estragon and Vladimir are intimidated by Pozzo. This is shown by the way Estragon adresses Pozzo, calling him ‘Sir’ and asking him timidly. When first meeting someone it is usual to try and make the other person feel comfortable talking to them, not intimidated. 4) ‘Pozzo: [Halting.] You are human begins none the less. [He puts on his glasses.] As far as one can see. [He takes off his glasses]. Of the same species as myself. [He bursts into an enormous laugh.] Of the same species as Pozzo! Made in God’s image!’ - This large chunk of text shows that Pozzo is prolix. This means that the conversation is unbalanced and therefore uncomfortable. It is unusual in a first meeting for one person to hold most of the conversation without offering the other person to talk. 5) ‘Vladimir: Well you see- Pozzo: [Peremptory] Who is Godot?’ -This interruption shows an intimidating...
Words: 592 - Pages: 3
...Godot begins with two men on a barren road by a leafless tree. These men, Vladimir and Estragon, are often characterized as "tramps". The world of this play is operating on its own set of rules, its own system. There nothing happens, nothing is certain, and there’s never anything to do. Vladimir and Estragon are waiting for Godot, a man or perhaps a deity. The tramps can’t be sure if they’ve met Godot, if they’re waiting in the right place, if this is the right day, or even whether Godot is going to show up at all. While they wait, Vladimir and Estragon fill their time with a series of mundane activities (like taking a boot on and off) and trivial conversations (turnips, carrots) scattered with more serious reflection (dead voices, suicide, the Bible). "We always find something," Estragon casually remarks in Act II, "to give us the impression we exist." The tramps are soon interrupted by the arrival of Lucky, a man/servant/pet with a rope tied around his neck, and Pozzo, his master, holding the other end of the long rope. The four men proceed to do together what Vladimir and Estragon did earlier by themselves: namely, nothing. Lucky and Pozzo then leave so that Vladimir and Estragon can go back to doing nothing by themselves. Vladimir suggests that this is not the first time he’s met with Lucky and Pozzo, which is surprising, since they acted like strangers upon arrival. Then again, Estragon can’t even remember a conversation ten lines after it happens, so we’re not going to...
Words: 985 - Pages: 4
...escape, or a release from a variety of difficulties. The book has plenty of instances where the characters act in a bizarre manner, where they do things that go against common sense. They are acting this way because they are such lost, bored, confused, broken characters that are just waiting for Gadot to come so they can escape their situation. A particular instance that makes me think that Gadot symbolizes an escape is when they all fall down and cannot get up. This shows absolute hopelessness and lack of understanding. They cannot get up on their own because they are trapped in their situation, and they need Gadot to come to let them escape. Vladimir and Estragon need Gadot to help them escape from time. They are trapped in time, as is evident in the way they have trouble remembering what day it is. Also, the passage where Estragon cannot remember what had happened the day before shows how time has become so irrelevant and difficult to grasp. This explains some of the characters weird...
Words: 604 - Pages: 3
...the hope you had is false hope it blocks your ambition and makes it harder to be able to strive for success. Oedipus and Othello are both given hope by their sense of nobility and by their desire to overcome an obstacle. To them it looks like things are going to get better and that they will keep their position above the people. Its human nature to want and to strive to overcome obstacles. The audience can relate with Othello and Oedipus’s struggles because most people have been in a situation where they thought things were looking up but the events turned and caused the opposite outcome. The loss of hope in both the plays and in reality make it harder to keep pushing forward to overcome obstacles. Unlike Othello and Oedipus, Vladimir, Estragon,...
Words: 1810 - Pages: 8
...characteristics of the Theatre of the Absurd, not only through its content and dialogue, but also through its language and structure. The structure of dialogue chosen by Beckett, mixes short and concise sentences with meaningful ideas and opinions about the human condition. Although the dialogue appears to be an illogical banter, it would be a mistake to make the assumption that it has no meaning. For instance, throughout the play, Estragon and Vladimir repeat the lines “nothing to be done” and “nothing happens.” Such references along with the cyclical nature of the dialogue, suggest Beckett’s vision that human existence is bleak and that nothing significant ever really happens in our lifetimes, but instead the same situations are repeated throughout life. Beckett’s style revolutionizes the traditional play as he deviates from the orthodox playwright by creating a play with no central plot or storyline. There is no progression of the characters in the play. They simply wait for a man named Godot. Although nothing changes in the lives of the two main characters, Estragon and Vladimir, signs of progression of time are revealed throughout the play. For example, the tree on the set of the play grows leaves between act one and act two, suggesting that some period of time has passed. Furthermore, Beckett’s style...
Words: 1145 - Pages: 5
...his strange little piece. I think many people put this theory forth as the true meaning of Waiting, and there are many aspects of it by which they can make their point. The most obvious is the title character, Godot, because the root word of the name is God. The many references to Christianity also create a close connection between the storyline and many important stories from the Bible. From the very beginning Vladimir and Estragon think about their salvation, consider death, and draw a parallel between themselves and the two thieves that were crucified along with Jesus, according to the Gospels. The general attitude expressed throughout the play is the hopelessness, or maybe the meaningless-ness of life. A good example of the hopelessness I am talking about is on page 3 when Vladimir is searching through his hat and says “Sometimes I feel it coming all the same. Then I go all queer. How Shall I say? Relieved and at the same time… appalled. AP-PALLED. Funny. Nothing to be done. Well?” and following Vladimir saying this Estragon responds with “Nothing.” Society’s purpose is simply to wait out its existence until the Second Coming. Everything we do, say, feel, and experience, is just passing the time until our lives come to an end. Let us assume that Godot does symbolize God. He is someone who will come to make a great change in the Vladimir and Estragon’s...
Words: 696 - Pages: 3
...ANÁLISIS GENERAL ANÁLISIS DE CARÁCTER Vladimir ( Didi ) Vladimir se distingue más fácilmente de Estragon por su algo más elevada percepción y entendimiento. Mientras Estragon lamenta sus limitaciones físicas , Vladimir se encuentra reflexionando sobre la lucha en el que está atrapado. Él disfruta de discurso sobre dilemas mentales y emocionales , en referencia ocasionalmente a sus limitados recuerdos de la Biblia en un intento de dar sentido a su vida. Es pragmática y filosófica en cuanto a los problemas que aquejan a él y Estragon . Ejerce un control casi absoluto sobre Estragon y afirma su supremacía muy sutilmente . Cuando Estragon es golpeado por segunda vez y culpa a Vladimir por no haberlo salvado , Vladimir responde que si Estragon fue golpeado , era porque había hecho algo para merecerlo. Reconoce , además, que si hubiera estado presente , habría mantenido Estragon de hacer que lo malo , por lo que lo salvó de la paliza . En cierto sentido, asume la responsabilidad de ser la conciencia de Estragon . Él está convencido de que sin él, la existencia de Estragon es incompleta . Incluso en su posición de superioridad limitada , Vladimir afirma su dependencia de Estragon , diciendo: "Tú eres mi única esperanza ", y por temor a que un intento de suicidio dejaría una sola de ellas . La mayoría de los aforismos y refranes sagaz emanan de Vladimir . Una de estas preguntas se encuentra al final del segundo acto , cuando Pozzo y Lucky se van - " ¿A dónde vamos desde...
Words: 1250 - Pages: 5
...interpretive choices made in the actual process of producing Beckett’s play on stage. My goal as the director of this Kennedy eatre production is to create a thoroughly contemporary experience that evades the usual clichés many have come to associate with Beckett’s style, such as monotony and leadenness. From this vantage point, I will now identify two major challenges to any stage production of Waiting for Godot in 2010—challenges relating to the historical and metaphysical background of the play. e setting (country road, tree), costume items (bowler hats, halfhunter watch), and habits of the characters (the pipe-smoking Pozzo), as well as the poverty and frugality of the two protagonists (a diet of turnips, radishes and carrots for Vladimir and Estragon), clearly suggest earlier historical periods such as the Irish Potato Famine from around 1850, the wasteland of northern France in the wake of the trench warfare of WWI, or America’s Great Depression in the 1930s. e names of the characters (Russian, French, Italian and English) suggest a possible (illegal?) immigrant status for at least one or two of them. Overall, it is not a far stretch to link the play to the current economic recession, with tent cities of the homeless and the working poor stretching along the Wai‘anae Coast, and long-term unemployment being considered the “new normal.” ese associations can also be...
Words: 3965 - Pages: 16
...Deconstruction essay The play Waiting for Godot, by Samuel Beckett, is about two men, Vladimir and Estragon, who endlessly wait for another man named Godot to appear. In this play, there are several binary oppositions that contribute to the overall meaning of the play. Through the use of three binaries: forgetfulness/memory, active /passive, and despair/hope, it appears the meaning of this play would be that by waiting or being inactive one will eventually gain success. However, by reversing the binaries, it becomes apparent that the true emphasis of this play is that people need to be active in order to accomplish something. Throughout the play, Vladimir and Estragon repeat the same activities over and over. They forget events that have happened in the past while waiting for Mr. Godot to arrive. "And Pozzo and Lucky? / Pozzo and Lucky? / He's forgotten everything!" (Beckett 67). Not only are Vladimir and Estragon affected by this "amnesia," but several of the other characters also do not remember having previously interacted with the two primary characters. "Do you not recognize me? / No sir. / It wasn't you came yesterday. / No Sir" (Beckett 105). Although the audience knows that the same boy came and delivered a message to Vladimir, the boy refuses to acknowledge that fact. By reversing the binary of forgetfulness/memory, these moments create meaning. When another character forgets something, the others become angry, so the idea that forgetfulness is more valued does not make...
Words: 816 - Pages: 4
...Section: Society In Waiting for Godot Beckett proposes the view that happiness can never be enduring; it comes and goes and is subject to chance and change. Whether in postwar 1953 or credit crisis 2009, is encouraging people to think happy thoughts more like a desperate recourse to denial than a therapy struggling to engage with reality? Vladimir: Say you are, even if it's not true. Estragon: What am I to say? Vladimir: Say, I am happy. Estragon: I am happy. Vladimir: So am I. Estragon: So am I. Vladimir: We are happy. Estragon: We are happy. (Silence.) What do we do now, now that we are happy? Vladimir: Wait for Godot.( n1) An outbreak of happiness interrupts the otherwise bleak landscape of Waiting for Godot. Samuel Beckett's play, first produced in Paris during 1953, has justifiably become a classic of modern theatre. Neither comedy nor tragedy, but a mixture of both -- with ample quantities of clowning thrown in for good measure -- the whole becomes a vehicle for dramatic meaning and irony. It would be easy to discount this play as a period piece of postwar angst, belonging to the vanished world of existentialism that marked so much European culture after the Second World War. Following two world wars, mass genocide, and economies geared to armed conflict, happiness may have struck contemporaries in the early 1950s as a luxurious and vacuous entity. There was, for example, an urgent debate about whether any literature, art, or drama was possible after Auschwitz...
Words: 3036 - Pages: 13
...Existentialism affects people by raising an important question about creation of people and their position in life .Human searches for adequate decisions and creates his own views to find a path through his personal life. Human's personal responsibility and discipline is crucial. Existentialism impacts humans free will proving that it influences on their way of thinking, making descision and understanding who are they. Firstly, one of the most important themes being raised - a theme of existence. Especially, in the play Waiting for Godot readers spectate scenes that repeats with the same point. Estragon and Vladimir are waiting for someone who's name is 'Godot', but he never shows up. "ESTRAGON:(He turns to Vladimir.) Let's go. VLADIMIR: Wecan't. ESTRAGON: Why not? VLADIMIR: We're waiting for Godot. ESTRAGON(despairingly). Ah! (Pause.) You're sure it was here? VLADIMIR: What?ESTRAGON: That we were to wait. VLADIMIR: He said by the tree."(Waiting for Godot, p 19). This conversation show that they do not know why are they here, but they believe that Godot was here once and should come back again. Characters thinks that Godot is...
Words: 987 - Pages: 4
