...Federal Bureaucracy – to what Extent does the President have Control of it? When the framers of the Constitution developed our government, they gave Congress the authority to create the departments necessary to carry out the day-to-day responsibilities of governing - the federal bureaucracy. The vast majority of the departments, agencies, and commissions that make up the federal bureaucracy today were created by Congress through legislative acts. Congress is unable to act in a bubble though, due to the nature of the system’s built-in checks and balances, Congress must first get the president’s “buy off” which is represented by his signature. Although Congress has the authority to create these agencies (with the president’s agreement of course), the Constitution designated the president as the person responsible for implementing and administering the decisions and actions of the bureaucracy. “As chief executive, the president is constitutionally charged with ensuring that the laws be faithfully executed” (Harrison, Harris, and Deardorff 391). The resulting tension between Congress, as the creators of the bureaucracy, and the president, as the executive in charge of the bureaucracy, is just one of the tugs-of-war that the bureaucracy is subjected to that affect their behavior and ultimately the amount of control the president is able to wield over them. Originally, the federal bureaucracy had a modest role. In 1789, George Washington headed a federal bureaucracy of...
Words: 849 - Pages: 4
...world’s most tightly controlled society in modern times to include forced labor, prison camps, trafficking of women and re-education camps. In order to combat such atrocities and disregard of human rights, the founding fathers of the United States created a systematic approach to divide power amongst each governing body that has influence of the people that they serve, in order to create structure and control. The method of control and division of power is known as checks and balances which, plays a vital role within Legislative, Judicial and Executive branches of government. The legislative branch is made up of U.S congress, composed of 100 U.S senators and 435 members of the House of Representatives. This branch makes laws, approves judges and justices, aids in passing the national budget, and lastly declares war. A significant role in the legislative branch is the introduction of new legislation. Legislations are proposed bills that can ultimately influence the people of the United States. Once a bill is approved, it is given to the president who is a part of the executive branch. The president can either approve or veto the bill. If the bill is signed it then becomes a law. However, the legislative branch can override president’s veto with two-thirds vote of the vote. The president is elected by the entire country and serves a four year term and is the head of the...
Words: 610 - Pages: 3
...to the separation of powers in America the legislature, executive and judiciary are all completely separate which means to get items pasts of decisions made, people from each of these 3 main sections needs to do work. As the president is only head of the executive, he must rely on the support of other people to get hi desired bills and legislation passed. From this comes the argument that his only real main power is to persuade, as it is the 3 departments combined which actually do the work and all he has done is persuade people in these departments to side with him. The president actually has many specific powers he has responsibility for, ranging from the proposition of legislations, submitting the annual bill and veto of legislation, to acting as chief executive, negotiating treaties and acting as the overall commander-in-chief. These powers burden the president with great responsibility; he is looked to for advice and guidance from all areas of government. The president is the chief executive of the United States, putting him at the head of the executive branch of the government, whose responsibility is to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” To carry out this duty, the president is given control of the four million employees of the federal executive branch. The power of a president to fire executive officials has long been a contentious political issue. Generally, a president may remove purely executive officials at his discretion, giving him great powers of...
Words: 347 - Pages: 2
...the country. Having a republic government, France has been able to progressively move forward, working with the voice and opinions of the people to better the country, economically and civilly. Cuba has struggled due to the government control over everything. In France, the president serves as the Head of State, the Head of Executive, and the Supreme Commander of Military. After being elected through popular vote from the people (18 years or older), the president then elects a prime minister, who then suggests the Council of Ministers for the president to appoint. The president makes the decisions for his country and enforces the laws with the aid of the prime minister and his Council of Ministers. Together they form the executive branch. The cabinet meets weekly with the president presiding to determine and apply policy through decrees, and to put new legislation before Parliamentary in the form of bills. In Cuba, however, the executive branch is made up of the president (who also serves as the Chief of State and the Head of Government), the Council of State, and the Council of Ministers (the Cabinet). The President of the Council of State proposes a Council of Ministers (seven vice presidents of the Council of State, Secretary of Executive Committee, and Heads of National Ministries) for the National Assembly to appoint. The President, Vice President, and Council of State are also elected by the National Assembly. France allows the people of its country the privilege of...
Words: 1074 - Pages: 5
...powerful than another. The three branches of our government are: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. To ensure the government is effective in its role and the United States citizens’ rights are protected, each branch has its own powers, each branch is also responsible for working with the other branches cohesively. The first of three branches that make up our government is the legislative branch. This is made up of the House of Representatives and Senate, known collectively as Congress. The legislative branch makes all laws, declares war, regulates interstate and foreign commerce and controls taxing and spending policies (house.gov, 2014). This branch has various organizations such as Architect of the Capitol and Library of Congress (house.gov, 2014). The legislative branch is responsible for the following checks over the executive branch: overriding presidential vetoes with a two-thirds majority vote, funding executive actions, removing the president through impeachment, Senate approves treaties and presidential appointments (Kelly, 2014). The legislative branch is also responsible for certain checks over the judicial branch such as creating lower courts, has the power to impeach judges, and Senate’s approval of appointment of judges (Kelly, 2014). The second branch is the executive branch. The executive branch consists of the president, his or her advisors, and various departments and agencies. The executive branch is responsible for enforcing the laws made up by the...
Words: 1161 - Pages: 5
...without defense or justification, and made punishable by the state in a judicial proceeding” (Schmalleger, Hall, Dolatowski, 2010, p. 4). Laws are principles and regulations that are established to keep the people in some form of order. If the people stray from these regulations and principles, they may actually be committing a crime. Government Structure The criminal justice system is made up of agencies from the local, state, and federal levels. There are also three branches of government. These three branches of government include the Legislature, Judicial, and Executive branches. The legislative branch is responsible for making the laws. The judicial branch is responsible for determining if laws are constitutional and can also overturn prior rulings by other judges. The executive branch is responsible for signing and vetoing laws. A president is elected, by the people, to be the head of the executive branch every four years. Choice Theories Choice theories are explanations as to why crime is committed. These theories come in the form of eight general categories. These categories include classical, biological, psychological, psychobiological, sociological, social process, conflict, and emergent. Classical theory involves the individual’s exercise of his or her free will. Biological theory refers to genes that cause defiant, criminal behavior. Psychobiological theory refers to “human DNA, environmental contaminants, nutrition, hormones, physical trauma, and body...
Words: 904 - Pages: 4
...power describes the distribution of the executive, judicial, and legislative responsibilities of a government among separate and distinct branches. b) Be able to explain the status and the nature of the relationship of the three branches. The three branches of the government operates independently of the others. This is known as “the separation power” c) What is the principle of blending of power? Blending of power is actually sharing of power of the different department of the government whereby one department helps and coordinates with the other in the exercise of a particular power, function, or responsibility. 2. Be able to: a) Explain the principle of check and balance. "Checks and balances" is a concept set up in the whereby the various powers of any government are divided into 3 separate branches with no one branch having all of such powers. b) What are the purposes of the principle of the check and balance? The purpose of the principle of the check and balance is it guarantees that no part of the government becomes too powerful. For example, the legislative branch is in charge of making laws. The executive branch can veto the law, thus making it harder for the legislative branch to pass the law. The judicial branch may also say that the law is unconstitutional and thus make sure it is not a law. The legislative branch can also remove a president or judge that is not doing his/her job properly. The executive branch appoints judges and the legislative...
Words: 451 - Pages: 2
...person or group then that power is misused. To counter this problem our Constitution set up our system of Checks and Balances which basically does not give one branch of government complete control over this country but spread power evenly among among the branches. Also the Constitution has The Amendment Process and it is a way to add in amendments that the Constitution might of missed, or to fix a horrible problem. Our system of Checks and Balances and the Amendment Process keep us out of the horrible hands...
Words: 744 - Pages: 3
...Assignment 1: Social Media Nicole Brock Prof. Davenport; LEG 100 May 19, 2014 This paper is going to be discussed the Twitter social media outlets and also detailed about four components of legally astute social media marketing. It explains the methods of alternative dispute resolution and determines the effective genuine disputes. This paper analyzes that how the federal government controlled the consumer transactions. It also examines the three branches of government for the discussion of impact of consumer transactions. This paper is going to be explained the agency relationship for utilizing the site for advertising. It also concludes this topic by providing the entire details of Twitter social media outlets. This was to be the component of astute Twitter social media marketing which was to manage the risks and to develop the realizable value for the initiation of rules which were offended by the law. The component provided the firms’ overall strategy which varied according to the legal tools of managers in business. This component analyzed that how the law affected the risk ratio for making business of Twitter social media marketing and also it provided the proper application of legal tools for attaining the legal astute of social media marketing. The ability to exercise informed judgment was to be the second component of social media marketing which provides the legal rules and outcomes for executing the facts and minor changes dramatically. It was also to...
Words: 1323 - Pages: 6
...18. The Sixteenth Amendment (1913) gave Congress the power to collect an income tax; it was proposed and ratified to replace a law that had ben declared unconstitutional in an 1895 Supreme Court case. The income tax had been seen as means of putting into effect the concept of the progressive taxation, in which the tax rate increases with income. The Sixteenth Amendment put the progressive taxation on a constitutional basis. Progressive taxes helped promote social equality through the redistribution of income; that higher-income people are taxed at higher rates to help fund social programs that benefit lower-income people. This being said progressive taxes are very important to our democracy, it helped promote social equality. The Commerce clause is the third clause of the Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution, which gives Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states. This was very important to the Constitution because the commerce clause was a major factor that increased the national governments power. After the Revolution ended and independence was a reality, it became clear that the national government had neither the economic nor the military power to function effectively. In 1786 a sever problem happened in Massachusetts where high interest rates and high state taxes were forcing farmers into bankruptcy. The Shays Rebellion revolted against established order continuing until 1787 when Massachusetts appealed to the constitution for help. The rebellion demonstrated...
Words: 836 - Pages: 4
...From Governor To Dictator Power is a figurative quality associated with wealth, worth and control. Since 1974, a well paid salary and a four-year term has been given to the Texas Governor, who is seen as a very powerful person but in reality is a weak one. A big argument in Texas is if the Governor should have more power over Texas, but this would only cause the state unnecessary problems. Powers of The Governor The Governor of Texas has both informal and formal powers that cover a variety of things. A Texas governor is said to be someone who must use the power of persuasion, media and personality in order to effectively govern the state. People believe that the Texas Governor is a very strong official, but compared to other governors around the nation and the importance of the people working with him, it’s truly a weak one. The 1876 Constitution created a plural executive structure in which the governor is but one of several elected officials who share power in the executive branch, limiting the power of the governor. All executive officers are elected independently except for the Secretary of State, making them directly answerable to the public not the Governor. If the Governor can’t hire or fire his subordinates, then he has less or no control over them. Power is highly decentralized and spread out to several different officials, which prevents the governor from having too much power. For instance the lieutenant governor, who heads the Senate and appoints its committees...
Words: 691 - Pages: 3
...SOURCES OF LAW 1.1 Classification of Law Law is a set of rules that control the human behaviours that is developed over a long period of time that regulates interaction that people have within one another. It is also a set of rules that humans have to follow and it set standards and conduct between *individual and individual* and *individual and the government* which is enforced by law through sanctioned. Public law Public law is a law which governs the relationship between individual and the state. Public law can be further divided into constitutional law and criminal law. - Constitutional law Body of law which defines the relationship of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. - Criminal Law It is a body of rules and statute that defines the conduct prohibited by the government. In Malaysia, the penal code is a main source of criminal law. It covers most criminal offenses and provides relevant penalties where relevant acts are breached .It actually codifies various acts committed by individual against the state such as murder, cheating, forgery , rape, and other criminal offenses. Common law A law that derive from case law (precedent) and statute. It is accusatorial with an emphasize remedies. It form a basic right of English law and it can be found in the U.S , other commonwealth nation including Australia, Canada, Singapore, New Zealand, parts of Africa , India and Pakistan. Malaysia derives their legal...
Words: 1838 - Pages: 8
... Although, the power is for judgement, they are truly slow. When a case is chosen, it pass months and more months after the decision can be reached, and for me, if they are there for judgement, why the wait?; I understand, the cases are several, but taking months for a decision is just "ridiculous" for me. The opinions about the power they have are really disperse. Some think the Judicial Branch has not power at all, as Alexander Hamilton once said, just for judgement, because the Congress has control over almost all. But many others think that the Judicial Branch it is the most dominant branch of the government, because its power influence each individual of this Nation. I agree, in part, the Judicial Branch has become very powerful, but surely is not the most powerful. Other branches of the government have clearly more power and control of many issues of the society. For example the Executive Branch or the Congress. They can pass "unfair" laws, but the Executive Branch will enforce them. The power of the Judicial Branch too far, with the 1803 case of Marbury Vs. Madison. In this case, was the first time that the Supreme Court declared a Federal Law as "unconstitutional". Please Reply 2 Jina Here: (DQ2) What are the implications for judicial review on American democracy? Should any branch of...
Words: 507 - Pages: 3
...QUESTION: DIFFERENCE, BOUNDARY, DISTINCTION BETWEEN MERITS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW Merits Review and Judicial Review are both mechanisms for one to appeal to for a review of a decision made against them. There are many differences and distinctions between the two, however, sometimes the boundaries between them are blurred. As Merits Review is undertaken at a Tribunal, which is part of the Executive arm of government, and Judicial Review is undertaken within the Courts system, part of the Judicial arm of government, their processes and jurisdiction are distinguished. However, often the role of a Tribunal is likened to one of a Court, and the lines between the separation of powers, particularly Executive and Judicial, are blurred. In terms of jurisdiction and main function of Merits Review and Judicial Review, they are easily distinguished. The jurisdiction to undertake Merits Review by applying to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal is under the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) (AAT Act). Judicial Review, on the other hand, can be completed at common law or statute, under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) (ADJR Act). The main distinction between the two is that Merits Review considered whether decisions are substantially correct, whereas Judicial Review considers the legality of the decision. A new administrative decision-maker asks ‘Is this the best decision on the merits’, and then by undergoing do novo review, they look at the facts...
Words: 848 - Pages: 4
...promote efficiency, but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power.” I agree with him. The separation of powers impresses me most. According to the constitution, the government is separated into three branches-Legislative, Executive and Judicial. Congress has the sole power to legislate. Executive power is vested in the President by Congress with the advice and consent of the Senate so that he may preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and the laws of the United States. The power to decide cases and controversies is vested in the Supreme Court and inferior courts established by Congress. The judges must be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. In this way, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others and guarantee that no one branch becomes too powerful and make sure that the power is balanced between them. In my opinion, separation of power is a must. In the first place, it can restrict power and preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. As Montesquieu-the father of the separation theory said,” All those who have power are easy to abuse of power, this is an unchangeable experience.” Democracy may easily be destroyed by dictatorship without power restriction. Thus, it is a real need to control powers of both socialist country and capitalist countries. In the next place, public opinions can be expressed better. In a truly democratic society, people can fight for their rights easily than absolutist countries. ...
Words: 382 - Pages: 2