Free Essay

Fi 312 Chap 1 Hw

In:

Submitted By carmelahawk3
Words 2072
Pages 9
Chapter 1 A Brief History of Risk and Return

Concept Questions

1. For both risk and return, increasing order is b, c, a, d. On average, the higher the risk of an investment, the higher is its expected return.

2. Since the price didn’t change, the capital gains yield was zero. If the total return was four percent, then the dividend yield must be four percent.

3. It is impossible to lose more than –100 percent of your investment. Therefore, return distributions are cut off on the lower tail at –100 percent; if returns were truly normally distributed, you could lose much more.

4. To calculate an arithmetic return, you simply sum the returns and divide by the number of returns. As such, arithmetic returns do not account for the effects of compounding. Geometric returns do account for the effects of compounding and for changes in the base used for each year’s calculation of returns. As an investor, the more important return of an asset is the geometric return.

5. Blume’s formula uses the arithmetic and geometric returns along with the number of observations to approximate a holding period return. When predicting a holding period return, the arithmetic return will tend to be too high and the geometric return will tend to be too low. Blume’s formula adjusts these returns for different holding period expected returns.

6. T-bill rates were highest in the early eighties since inflation at the time was relatively high. As we discuss in our chapter on interest rates, rates on T-bills will almost always be slightly higher than the expected rate of inflation.

7. Risk premiums are about the same whether or not we account for inflation. The reason is that risk premiums are the difference between two returns, so inflation essentially nets out.

8. Returns, risk premiums, and volatility would all be lower than we estimated because aftertax returns are smaller than pretax returns.

9. We have seen that T-bills barely kept up with inflation before taxes. After taxes, investors in T-bills actually lost ground (assuming anything other than a very low tax rate). Thus, an all T-bill strategy will probably lose money in real dollars for a taxable investor.

10. It is important not to lose sight of the fact that the results we have discussed cover over 80 years, well beyond the investing lifetime for most of us. There have been extended periods during which small stocks have done terribly. Thus, one reason most investors will choose not to pursue a 100 percent stock (particularly small-cap stocks) strategy is that many investors have relatively short horizons, and high volatility investments may be very inappropriate in such cases. There are other reasons, but we will defer discussion of these to later chapters.

Solutions to Questions and Problems

NOTE: All end of chapter problems were solved using a spreadsheet. Many problems require multiple steps. Due to space and readability constraints, when these intermediate steps are included in this solutions manual, rounding may appear to have occurred. However, the final answer for each problem is found without rounding during any step in the problem.

Core Questions

1. Total dollar return = 100($41 – 37 + 0.28) = $428.00 Whether you choose to sell the stock or not does not affect the gain or loss for the year; your stock is worth what it would bring if you sold it. Whether you choose to do so or not is irrelevant (ignoring commissions and taxes). * 2. Capital gains yield = ($41 – 37) / $37 = 10.81% Dividend yield = $0.28 / $37 = 0.76% Total rate of return = 10.81% + 0.76% = 11.57%

3. Dollar return = 500($34 – 37 + 0.28) = –$1,360 Capital gains yield = ($34 – 37) / $37 = –8.11% Dividend yield = $0.28 / $37 = 0.76% Total rate of return = –8.11% + 0.76% = –7.35% 4. a. average return = 6.2%, average risk premium = 2.5% b. average return = 3.7%, average risk premium = 0% c. average return = 11.7%, average risk premium = 8.0% d. average return = 17.5%, average risk premium = 13.8% 5. Cherry average return = (17% + 11% – 2% + 3% + 14%) / 5 = 8.60% Straw average return = (16% + 18% – 6% + 1% + 22%) / 5 = 10.20% 6. Cherry: RA = 8.60% Var = 1/4[(.17 – .086)2 + (.11 – .086)2 + (–.02 – .086)2 + (.03 – .086)2 + (.14 – .086)2] = .00623 Standard deviation = (0.00623)1/2 = .0789, or 7.89% Straw: RB = 10.20% Var = 1/4[(.16 – .102)2 + (.18 – .102)2 + (–.06 – .102)2 + (.01 – .102)2 + (.22 – .102)2] = .01452 Standard deviation = (0.01452)1/2 = .1205, or 12.05% 7. The capital gains yield is ($59 – 65)/$65 = –.0923, or –9.23% (notice the negative sign). With a dividend yield of 1.2 percent, the total return is –8.03%. 8. Geometric return = [(1 + .17)(1 + .11)(1 - .02)(1 + .03)(1 + .14)](1/5) – 1 = .0837, or 8.37% 9. Arithmetic return = (.21 + .12 + .07 –.13 – .04 + .26) / 6 = .0817, or 8.17% Geometric return = [(1 + .21)(1 + .12)(1 + .07)(1 – .13)(1 – .04)(1 + .26)](1/6) – 1 = .0730, or 7.30%

Intermediate Questions 10. That’s plus or minus one standard deviation, so about two-thirds of the time, or two years out of three. In one year out of three, you will be outside this range, implying that you will be below it one year out of six and above it one year out of six. 11. You lose money if you have a negative return. With a 12 percent expected return and a 6 percent standard deviation, a zero return is two standard deviations below the average. The odds of being outside (above or below) two standard deviations are 5 percent; the odds of being below are half that, or 2.5 percent. (It’s actually 2.28 percent.) You should expect to lose money only 2.5 years out of every 100. It’s a pretty safe investment. 12. The average return is 6.2 percent, with a standard deviation of 12.2 percent, so Prob( Return < –6.0 or Return > 18.4 ) ≈ 1/3, but we are only interested in one tail; Prob( Return < –6.0) ≈ 1/6, which is half of 1/3 . 95%: 6.2 ± 2σ = 6.2 ± 2(12.2) = –18.2% to 30.6% 99%: 6.2 ± 3σ = 6.2 ± 3(12.2) = –30.4% to 42.8% 13. Expected return = 17.5% ; σ = 36.6%. Doubling your money is a 100% return, so if the return distribution is normal, Z = (100 – 17.5)/36.6 = 2.25 standard deviations; this is in-between two and three standard deviations, so the probability is small, somewhere between .5% and 2.5% (why?). Referring to the nearest Z table, the actual probability is = 1.209%, or about once every 100 years. Tripling your money would be Z = (200 – 17.5)/ 36.6 = 4.986 standard deviations; this corresponds to a probability of (much) less than 0.5%, or once every 200 years. (The actual answer is less than once every 1 million years, so don’t hold your breath.) 14. | Year | Common stocks | T-bill return | Risk premium | | 1973 | –14.69% | 7.29% | –21.98% | | 1974 | –26.47% | 7.99% | –34.46% | | 1975 | 37.23% | 5.87% | 31.36% | | 1796 | 23.93% | 5.07% | 18.86% | | 1977 | –7.16% | 5.45% | –12.61% | | sum | 12.84% | 31.67% | –18.83% | a. Annual risk premium = Common stock return – T-bill return (see table above). b. Average returns: Common stocks = 12.84 / 5 = 2.57% ; T-bills = 31.67 / 5 = 6.33%; Risk premium = –18.83 / 5 = –3.77% c. Common stocks: Var = 1/4[ (–.1469 – .0257)2 + (–.2647 – .0257)2 + (.3723 – .0257)2 + (.2393 – .0257)2 + (–.0716 – .0257)2] = .072337 Standard deviation = (0.072337)1/2 = .2690 = 26.90% T-bills: Var = 1/4[(.0729 – .0633)2 + (.0799 – .0633)2 + (.0587 – .0633)2 + (.0507–.0633)2 + (.0545 – .0633)2] = .0001565 Standard deviation = (.000156)1/2 = .0125 = 1.25% Risk premium: Var = 1/4[(–.2198 – (–.0377))2 + (–.3446 – (–.0377))2 + (.3136 – (–.0377))2 + (.1886 – (–.0377))2 + (–.1261 – (–.0377))2] = .077446 Standard deviation = (.077446)1/2 = .2783 = 27.83%

d. Before the fact, the risk premium will be positive; investors demand compensation over and above the risk-free return to invest their money in the risky asset. After the fact, the observed risk premium can be negative if the asset’s nominal return is unexpectedly low, the risk-free return is unexpectedly high, or any combination of these two events. 15. ($324,000 / $1,000)1/50 – 1 = .1226, or 12.26% * 16. 5 year estimate = [(5 – 1)/(40 – 1)] × 10.24% + [(40 – 5)/(40 – 1)] × 12.60% = 12.36% * 10 year estimate = [(10 – 1)/(40 – 1)] × 10.24% + [(40 – 10)/(40 – 1)] × 12.60% = 12.06% 20 year estimate = [(20 – 1)/(40 – 1)] × 10.24% + [(40 – 20)/(40 – 1)] × 12.60% = 11.45% 17. Small company stocks = ($21,997.36/ $1)1/87 – 1 = .1218, or 12.18% Large company stocks = ($3,247.50 / $1)1/87 – 1 = .0974, or 9.74% Long-term government bonds = ($112.14 / $1)1/87 – 1 = .0557, or 5.57% Treasury bills = ($22.39 / $1)1/87 – 1 = .0364, or 3.64% Inflation = ($12.83 / $1)1/87 – 1 = .0298, or 2.98% 18. RA = (–.09 + .17 + .09 + .14 - .04) / 5 = .0540, or 5.40% RG = [(1 – .09)(1 + .17)(1 + .09)(1 + .14)(1 - .04)]1/5 – 1 = .0490, or 4.90% 19. R1 = ($15.61 – 13.25 + 0.15) / $13.25 = 18.94% R2 = ($16.72 – 15.61 + 0.18) / $15.61 = 8.26% R3 = ($15.18 – 16.72 + 0.20) / $16.72 = –8.01% R4 = ($17.12 – 15.18 + 0.24) / $15.18 = 14.36% R5 = ($20.43 – 17.12 + 0.28) / $17.12 = 20.97% RA = (.1894 + .0826 – .0801 + .1436 + .2097) / 5 = .1090, or 10.90% RG = [(1 + .1894)(1 + .0826)(1 – .0801)(1 + .1436)(1 + .2097)]1/5 – 1 = .1038, or 10.38% 20. Stock A: RA = (.08 + .08 + .08 + .08 + .08) / 5 = .0800, or 8.00% Var = 1/4[(.08 – .08)2 + (.08 – .08)2 + (.08 – .08)2 + (.08 – .08)2 + (.08 – .08)2] = .000000 Standard deviation = (.000)1/2 = .000, or 0.00% RG = [(1 + .08)(1 + .08)(1 + .08)(1 +.08)(1 + .08)]1/5 – 1 = .0800, or 8.00% Stock B: RA = (.03 + .13 + .07 + .05 + .12) / 5 = .0800, or 8.00% Var = 1/4[(.03 – .08)2 + (.13 – .08)2 + (.07 – .08)2 + (.05 – .08)2 + (.12 – .08)2] = .001900 Standard deviation = (.001900)1/2 = .0436, or 4.36% RG = [(1 + .03)(1 + .13)(1 + .07)(1 + .05)(1 + .12)]1/5 – 1 = .0793, or 7.93% Stock C: RA = (–.24 + .37 + .14 + .09 + .04) / 5 = .0800. or 8.00% Var = 1/4[(–.24 – .08)2 + (.37 – .08)2 + (.14 – .08)2 + (.09 – .08)2 + (.04 – .08)2] = .047950 Standard deviation = (.047950)1/2 = .2190, or 21.90% RG = [(1 – .24)(1 + .37)(1 + .14)(1 + .09)(1 + .04)]1/5 – 1 = .0612, or 6.12% The larger the standard deviation, the greater will be the difference between the arithmetic return and geometric return. In fact, for lognormally distributed returns, another formula to find the geometric return is: arithmetic return – ½ variance. Therefore, for Stock C, we get .0800 – ½(.047950) = .0560. The difference in this case is because the return sample is not a true lognormal distribution.

Spreadsheet Problems

CFA Exam Review by Schweser

1. a Geometric average return = [(.9)(1.25)(.95)(1.30)(1.05)]1/5-1 = 7.85%

2. b Scenario 2 Scenario 3 CF0 -100 -100 CF1 0 0 CF2 -20 +10 CF3 0 0 CF4 0 0 CF5 171.82 132.92 IRR 7.96% 7.78% Scenario 2 Ending MV End of Year 2 = 100(.9)(1.25) + 20 = 132.5 End of Year 5 = 132.5(.95)(1.30)(1.05) = 171.8194 Scenario 3 Ending MV End of Year 2 = 100(.9)(1.25) - 10 = 102.5 End of Year 5 = 102.5(.95)(1.30)(1.05) = 132.9169 3. c Annualized return = (1.0163)12 – 1 = 21.412% 4. b Geometric returns provide the best estimate of a portfolio manager’s return because it neutralizes the impact of the client’s cash flow decisions. For the clients themselves, the dollar weighted return would be appropriate.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Supply Chain

...THIRD EDITI ----- --·-- --·-- - - -- - O N -- SU PP LY CH AI N MA NA GE ME NT Stra tegy , Plan ning , and Ope ratio n Sunil Chopra Kellogg Schoo l of Manag ement Northwestern University Peter Meindl Stanfo rd University --------Prentice I-I all Uppe r Saddl e River , New Jersey ·--· PEAR SON -- · - · - - - "ibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data :::hopra, Sunil Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation I Sunil Chopra, >eter Meind!.-3rd ed. p. em. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN: 0-13-208608-5 1. Marketing channels-Managemen t. 2. Delivery of goods-Management. i. Physical distribution of goods-Management. 4. Customer servicesvfanagement. 5. Industrial procurement. 6. Materials management. I. vfeindl, Peter II. Title. HF5415.13.C533 2007 658.7-dc22 2006004948 \VP/Executive Editor: Mark Pfaltzgraff ii:ditorial Director: Jeff Shelstad ;enior Project Manager: Alana Bradley E:ditorial Assistant: Barbara Witmer Vledia Product Development Manager: Nancy Welcher \VP/Executive Marketing Manager: Debbie Clare Vlarketing Assistant: Joanna Sabella ;enior Managing Editor (Production): Cynthia Regan flroduction Editor: Melissa Feimer flermissions Supervisor: Charles Morris Vlanufacturing Buyer: Michelle Klein Vlanager, Print Production: Christy Mahon Composition/Full-Service Project Management: Karen Ettinger, TechBooks, Inc. flrinter/Binder: Hamilton Printing Company Inc. fypeface: 10/12 Times Ten Roman :::redits...

Words: 138607 - Pages: 555

Premium Essay

Lulzking

...THIRD EDITI ----- --·-- --·-- - - -- - O N -- SU PP LY CH AI N MA NA GE ME NT Stra tegy , Plan ning , and Ope ratio n Sunil Chopra Kellogg Schoo l of Manag ement Northwestern University Peter Meindl Stanfo rd University PEAR SON --------Prentice I-I all Uppe r Saddl e River , New Jersey ·--· -- · - · - - - "ibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data :::hopra, Sunil Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation I Sunil Chopra, >eter Meind!.-3rd ed. p. em. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN: 0-13-208608-5 1. Marketing channels-Managemen t. 2. Delivery of goods-Management. i. Physical distribution of goods-Management. 4. Customer servicesvfanagement. 5. Industrial procurement. 6. Materials management. I. vfeindl, Peter II. Title. HF5415.13.C533 2007 658.7-dc22 2006004948 \VP/Executive Editor: Mark Pfaltzgraff ii:ditorial Director: Jeff Shelstad ;enior Project Manager: Alana Bradley E:ditorial Assistant: Barbara Witmer Vledia Product Development Manager: Nancy Welcher \VP/Executive Marketing Manager: Debbie Clare Vlarketing Assistant: Joanna Sabella ;enior Managing Editor (Production): Cynthia Regan flroduction Editor: Melissa Feimer flermissions Supervisor: Charles Morris Vlanufacturing Buyer: Michelle Klein Vlanager, Print Production: Christy Mahon Composition/Full-Service Project Management: Karen Ettinger, TechBooks, Inc. flrinter/Binder: Hamilton Printing Company Inc. fypeface:...

Words: 141930 - Pages: 568

Premium Essay

Work, Culture and Identity in Mozambique and Southafrica 1860-1910

...Acknowledgments ix Acknowledgments This book owes a great deal to the mental energy of several generations of scholars. As an undergraduate at the University of Cape Town, Francis Wilson made me aware of the importance of migrant labour and Robin Hallett inspired me, and a generation of students, to study the African past. At the School of Oriental and African Studies in London I was fortunate enough to have David Birmingham as a thesis supervisor. I hope that some of his knowledge and understanding of Lusophone Africa has found its way into this book. I owe an equal debt to Shula Marks who, over the years, has provided me with criticism and inspiration. In the United States I learnt a great deal from ]eanne Penvenne, Marcia Wright and, especially, Leroy Vail. In Switzerland I benefitted from the friendship and assistance of Laurent Monier of the IUED in Geneva, Francois Iecquier of the University of Lausanne and Mariette Ouwerhand of the dépurtement évangélrlyue (the former Swiss Mission). In South Africa, Patricia Davison of the South African Museum introduced me to material culture and made me aware of the richness of difference; the late Monica Wilson taught me the fundamentals of anthropology and Andrew Spiegel and Robert Thornton struggled to keep me abreast of changes in the discipline; Sue Newton-King and Nigel Penn brought shafts of light from the eighteenthcentury to bear on early industrialism. Charles van Onselen laid a major part of the intellectual foundations on...

Words: 178350 - Pages: 714

Free Essay

Drahgdrha

...Web  Video  Texts  Audio  Projects  About  Account  TVNews  OpenLibrary | | | | Home | American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections | Search:    Advanced Search | Anonymous User (login or join us) | Upload | Full text of "Natya Shastra of Bharata Muni Volume 1"THE NATYASASTRA A Treatise on Hindu Dramaturgy and Histrionics Ascribed to B ii A R A T A - M r X I Vol. I. ( Chapters I-XXVII ) Completely translated jor the jirst tune from the original Sanskrit tuttri «u Introduction and Various Notes M .U'OMOH A N liHOS H M.A., Pn. I). <OaU 2 Viu i95y CALCUTTA THE RoyiL ISIAJtC SOCIETY OF BENGAL Dedicated to the memory of thom great scholars of India. and the West mho by their indefatigable study and. ingenious interpretation of her Religion, Philosophy, Literature and Arts, have demon- strated the high ealiie of India- s culture to the World at large and ham helped her towa.nls a reawakening and political alteration., and who by their discovery of the Universal aspect of this culture have made patent India's spiritual kinship with the other ancient nations of the World and ham paved the way for an ultimate triumph of Internationalism. PREFACE The preparation 'of an annotated English translation of the Natya&stra entrusted...

Words: 220089 - Pages: 881

Free Essay

The Origins and Development of the English Language (Textbook)

...THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE This page intentionally left blank THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE SIXTH EDITION ± ± John Algeo ± ± ± ± ± Based on the original work of ± ± ± ± ± Thomas Pyles Australia • Brazil • Japan • Korea • Mexico • Singapore • Spain • United Kingdom • United States The Origins and Development of the English Language: Sixth Edition John Algeo Publisher: Michael Rosenberg Development Editor: Joan Flaherty Assistant Editor: Megan Garvey Editorial Assistant: Rebekah Matthews Senior Media Editor: Cara Douglass-Graff Marketing Manager: Christina Shea Marketing Communications Manager: Beth Rodio Content Project Manager: Corinna Dibble Senior Art Director: Cate Rickard Barr Production Technology Analyst: Jamie MacLachlan Senior Print Buyer: Betsy Donaghey Rights Acquisitions Manager Text: Tim Sisler Production Service: Pre-Press PMG Rights Acquisitions Manager Image: Mandy Groszko Cover Designer: Susan Shapiro Cover Image: Kobal Collection Art Archive collection Dagli Orti Prayer with illuminated border, from c. 1480 Flemish manuscript Book of Hours of Philippe de Conrault, The Art Archive/ Bodleian Library Oxford © 2010, 2005 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced, transmitted, stored, or used in any form or by any means graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including...

Words: 164520 - Pages: 659