...Describe in detail the five stages of team/group development. Give specific examples for each stage. Explain how and why teams and groups may or may not proceed through these stages. The five-stage model, which can be applied to groups and teams, assumes that members will progress through five phases: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Teams and groups do not move through each phase in a sequential pattern, but the model as a whole proves beneficial to individuals who have struggles about working with others. Within this model, individuals shift from independent input to equal effort when working with others (Langton, Robbins and Judge 161). Group development begins with the forming stage. Beginning in the first meeting, this stage is the period where members experience anxiety and uncertainty about the team’s purpose, structure, and guidance (Langton, Robbins and Judge 161). Individual issues include members questioning where they fit in, and group issues include members questioning why the group was formed (Langton, Robbins and Judge 162). Active forming occurs when members doubt their acceptance or belonging within the group, have low trust in others, and make an attempt to understand what is expected of them (Stuermer). The forming stage is complete when members view themselves involved with the team or group (Langton, Robbins and Judge 161); this means members acknowledge the team’s needs over individual ones. The second stage is storming which is...
Words: 1279 - Pages: 6
...Building a Coalition Case Study In building a cohesive coalition, there is a five stage model that is a useful guide in understanding group development. The five stage development model consists of forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. The forming stage in the five stage development model consists of a lot of uncertainty about the groups, purpose, structure, and leadership. The storming stage of the five stage development model deals with conflict and identifying who will lead the group. The norming stage of the five stage development model gives the group structure, with guidelines set for the behavior of each member. The performing stage is the fourth stage in the development model. In this stage, the group is completely structured and each member is performing their task at hand. The adjourning stage is the final stage in the development model, in which short term committees and other staff complete unfinished activities of the group as they prepare to dismiss. The Woodson Foundation is now in the storming stage. The school district is concerned about Woodson Foundation having too much control. The school system is concerned about jeopardizing their procedures and protocols of the faculty and staff for the procedures of Woodson Foundation. In order for Woodson Foundation to create a coalition with the school system I think following the five stage model would be very beneficial. The Woodson Foundation have to reassure the school system they are not trying...
Words: 676 - Pages: 3
...A Review of Tuckman’s Small Group Development Model Introduction Over the past two decades, it seems that teamwork has become increasingly important and more companies have formed different teams and groups for various purposes (Samson & Daft, 2012). Teamwork often means more innovative ideas and greater diversity of experience, perspectives, and knowledge on the coming problems at work (Gummer, 1996). Another significant benefit of teamwork is that teams are often capable to manage significant cross-disciplinary concerns (Gummer, 1996). Although it is proved that good teams can be highly productive, not every team is successful (Samson & Daft, 2012). Forming a team can be time consuming and there are many problems related to teamwork, for...
Words: 1842 - Pages: 8
...GM591-WBREY September 19, 2010 Part I: Group Development Bruce Tuckman developed a four stage model of group development in 1975 he added a fifth stage. The first stage is forming and that is the “getting to know each other” phase. This stage is basic orientation (Schermerhorn, Hunt and Osborn 2010) and the group members identify with other group members. This stage also defines the task and how to approach it. The second stage is storming, “dealing with tensions and defining group tasks “(Schermerhorn, Hunt and Osborn 2010)”. Within this stage group members attempt to organize the task and chaos way occurs. Questions may arise about who is going to be responsible for what, what the rules are, and what the reward system is. The third stage is norming and that is “building relationships and working together “(Schermerhorn, Hunt and Osborn 2010)”. This is the stage where the group members agree on how the group operates and share a sense of group belonging. The fourth stage is performing and that is when the group is “maturing in relationships and task performance” (Schermerhorn, Hunt and Osborn 2010). This is when the group becomes affective in meetings the groups’ objectives. The group is able to handle disagreements and complex problems in a mature manner. The fifth stage is adjourning, “disbanding and celebrating accomplishments “(Schermerhorn, Hunt and Osborn 2010)”. This final stage is the process of termination of the group, which includes...
Words: 1009 - Pages: 5
...The Five Stages of Project Team Development May 8, 2010 | Author: PM Hut | Filed under: Team Building The Five Stages of Project Team Development By Gina Abudi Every team goes through the five stages of team development. First, some background on team development. The first four stages of team growth were first developed by Bruce Wayne Tuckman and published in 1965. His theory, called “Tuckman’s Stages” was based on research he conducted on team dynamics. He believed (as is a common belief today) that these stages are inevitable in order for a team to grow to the point where they are functioning effectively together and delivering high quality results. In 1977, Tuckman, jointly with Mary Ann Jensen, added a fifth stage to the 4 stages: “Adjourning.” The adjourning stage is when the team is completing the current project. They will be joining other teams and moving on to other work in the near future. For a high performing team, the end of a project brings on feelings of sadness as the team members have effectively become as one and now are going their separate ways. The five stages: • Stage 1: Forming • Stage 2: Storming • Stage 3: Norming • Stage 4: Performing • Stage 5: Adjourning This article provides background on each stage and an example of a team going through all five stages. Stage 1: Forming The “forming” stage takes place when the team first meets each other. In this first meeting, team members are introduced to each. They share information about their backgrounds...
Words: 3491 - Pages: 14
...toward accomplishing the task of a company. Tuckman’s developed five stages pertaining group development include forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. Managers ought to understand various group behaviors and remove potential barriers within the groups so as to attain organizational goals. The must also put an effort of implementing an appropriate team size structure so as to enable all members to participate and contribute equally. The theory of Tuckman tends to explain how various teams are formed by utilizing five group development stages. The first stage is forming. Under this stage, team members get to interact and know each other. Forming is all about the significance of bringing a team together as well as to be sure that that particular team acts as one. It is quite significant to be sure that the team members understand what is forming. Members tend to know the focus pertaining their mission, schedule, responsibilities and rules at the forming stage. As a manager, one would ensure that forming is a norm and assure that effective standards are set and appropriately applied daily (Champoux, 2011). Moreover, a manager should communicate the task ahead as well as ensure the team meets. Another significant stage is storming. In the stage of storming, group conflict storming can be quite productive. This can be done by exposing ideas of members and refining proper goals. Under this stage, team members require vivid clarifications and commitment. A manager...
Words: 599 - Pages: 3
...One cannot expect a new team to perform well when it first comes together. As with many things, the progress of a group isn’t always neat and tidy. Sometimes groups will revert to an earlier stage if there’s a major change such as a group member leaves or another is added, or for various other reasons. Groups tend to develop in stages. As you work with a support group, or with almost any group of people who are working together toward a common cause, you'll be able to see the progression. Many theories have been developed to explain the process of group development. One of them is the five-stage model of group development which is the basis for subsequent models. The five-stage model of group development The five stage group development model characterizes groups as proceeding through the distinct stage of forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. The forming, storming, norming, performing model of group development was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965, later he added a fifth stage, "adjourning”. These phases are all necessary and inevitable in order for the team to grow, to face up to challenges, to tackle problems, to find solutions, to plan work and to deliver results. * Forming: It is the first stage in group development, where there is much uncertainty. Individual behavior is driven by the desire to be accepted by the others, and avoid controversy or conflict. Serious issues and feelings are avoided, and people focus on being busy with routines...
Words: 746 - Pages: 3
...9/16/11 Part I: Group Development Five stages of team development are as follows: (1) Forming, getting to know each other. (2)Storming, dealing with tensions and defining group tasks. (3) Norming, building relationships and working together. (4) Performing, maturing relationships and task performance. (5) Adjourning, disbanding and celebrating accomplishments. With Mike, the team never could get past the storming stage. Without Mike the group is at the performing stage. By understanding the stages of team development, Christine could have seen and solved the primary problem during the storming stage. The cafeteria incident where Mike walked away upset, was part of the storming stage and that was in week three. The group is now in week five. As the team leader, Christine should have addressed the problem so that the entire team could approach and move to the Norming Stage smoothly and harmoniously together as a team. Instead, they left Mike behind and moved on without his presence. The team at week five is now ready to present their case and is now in the Performing Stage. Mike only has some rough handwritten notes. Knowledge of the Team Development Stages should have helped Christine fix problems during the Storming Stage before moving on to the next stage clean and fresh. Part II: Problem Identification The primary problem is Mike, the secondary problem is Christine. During the first group meeting, Mike showed resistance to get together...
Words: 1037 - Pages: 5
...effective team it is very important to understand the stages of development of a team. The five stages of team development are forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. The forming stage is the initial entry or the meet and greet of the team members. Some may also call this the “polite stage” because members seem to be very pleasant and want to make a good first impression. Members are interested in getting to know each other and discover what is considered acceptable behavior, and what role they will play on the team. In this stage you can really see the excitement and anticipation based on the fact that everything is new. The next stage is the storming stage which I feel is the most important of all the five stages. The honeymoon is over. In this stage emotions and tensions are high among the group members. People have revealed their true colors; who they really are and their worth to the team. Disagreements occur along with the formation of cliques or partners within the team that want to impose their preferences on the entire group. Coupled with demands of premature performance expectations and the before mentioned emotions a hostile environment can be created. It is very critical that management needs to do a lot of coaching to get people to work past their differences. The team has moved into the norming stage when the members really start to come together as a coordinated unit. The experiences that they have had during the storming stage have now...
Words: 1001 - Pages: 5
...psychologist best know for his theory called “Tuckman’s stages of group development". Tuckman’s theory is one of the most famous group development theories. His theory has been use for a lot further developments group theories including Belbin’s group theory, Fishers theory and Tubbs small group theory. Tuckman’s model is significant because it recognizes the fact that groups do not start such as a fully-formed and functioning group and finish like one whole. He suggests, that teams improve their performance through clearly defined stages, from their creation as groups of different people, to good organized, focused, task solving group. First developed in 1965, Tuckman’s model is worldly known as a basis for effective group building. The value of Tuckman’s model is, that it helps us to understand that the teams are development and improve themselves in different part of their work. According to Tuckman groups go through five stages, they are forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. The first stage is the forming: this is where the group see each other for the first time and the task is given to them. The next phase is storming. This is the stage where the group is more open mind, give new ideas and searching for right decision to solve the task. The next stage is norming, it is occurring when the group begin what Tuckman calls ‘a”patching-up”phase’ (Tuckman 1965: 392). Next one is performing. This is the stage when the group is working together, they accepted each...
Words: 837 - Pages: 4
...form a diverse team to head it up. Incorporating diversity within the team will encourage creativity and innovation into the formation of the processes and solutions that result in the outcome of the project. Each team member will be able to change and grow by drawing from the different experiences, backgrounds and skills from each individual. The team needs to have a process in place to communicate and collaborate openly and listen to all member’s views, ideas and goals. Diverse work teams will almost always have a level of conflict within them. Respecting each other’s different views and experiences and recognizing that they have been brought together because of a common goal can result in a more effective resolution process.” Regardless of the composition of the group, differences can be leveraged to achieve superior performance.” (Robbins & Judge, 2012 p.58). Part 1: Group Development The Woodson Foundation and Washington D.C. public schools are teaming together to form a new after school program to improve their student outcomes within the community. The NCPIE (National Coalition for Parental involvement in Education) is also going to have a role in this program to represent the parents on behalf of the PTA. (Robbins & Judge, 2012 p.629). When forming a group there is usually five different stages that take place. This group development process is referred to as the five-stage group-development model. (Robbins & Judge, 2012 p. 275). “The five stage group development...
Words: 2092 - Pages: 9
...organization it should form a diverse team to head it. Incorporating diversity within the team will encourage creativity and innovation into the formation of the processes and solutions that result in the outcome of the project. Each team member will be able to change and grow by drawing from the different experiences, backgrounds and skills from each individual. The team needs to have a process in place to communicate and collaborate openly and listen to all member’s views, ideas and goals. Diverse work teams will almost always have a level of conflict within them. Respecting each other’s different views and experiences and recognizing that they have been brought together because of a common goal can result in a more effective resolution process.” Regardless of the composition of the group, differences can be leveraged to achieve superior performance.” (Robbins & Judge, 2012 p.58). 3 BUIDLING A COALITION Part 1: Group Development The Woodson Foundation and Washington D.C. public schools are teaming together to form a new after school program to improve their student outcomes within the community. The NCPIE (National Coalition for Parental involvement in Education) is also going to have a role in this program to represent the parents on behalf of the PTA. (Robbins & Judge, 2012 p.629). When forming a group there is usually five different stages that take place. This group development process is referred to as the five-stage...
Words: 2131 - Pages: 9
...Coalition January 26, 2014 Part I: Group Development While teaming up with the public school system in Washington, D.C, the Woodson Foundation, a non-profit social service agency, needs to create an executive development team; to improve student outcomes within the schools. In order for you to develop this team, you must first understand the stage of group development. There is typically a five-stage model that must groups following in forming teams, however not all groups go through each stage at the same time. The five-stage model consists of the following stages: 1. Forming 2. Storming 3. Norming 4. Performing 5. Adjourning Each stage is essential in its own way. The forming stage is crucial to choosing the right individuals to form your team. You will need to maintain a cross-organizational nature, so therefore representatives from the Woodson Foundation, the school district and the NCPIE (National Coalition for Parental Involvement in Education) all must be a part of this team. You will need an HR representative from the Woodson foundation, the schools and the NCPIE. The in the second stage of storming, there will be conflict at this stage because each member is unclear about who will take on the leadership role. Once leadership is established, it is important to get each member of the team to come together and storm or share ideas and thoughts about the purpose and issues at hand. The third stage of norming is when each must begin to develop...
Words: 1240 - Pages: 5
...classroom. The turnover rate for the best teachers is high, they tend to leave and go to schools that aren’t as troubled (629). Part 1: Group Development The organization has five stages of group development. In the forming stage they have identified that there is a problem, now the plan is how to drive results. The first stage is bringing the plan forward and forming an executive development team. The team will consist of an HR representative from Woodson, the schools, and the NCPIE. This team’s responsibility is developing an operating plan for improving school performance. It is expected that representatives from both teams participate. Once this stage is finalized they can move on to the storming stage. The storming stage will consist of conflicts. This is an aggressive way to get to know each other a little better. Once the team has gotten over differences they start the norming stage. In this stage they realized although they have differences they still share things in common. The cohesiveness is established and they began to work towards a goal .They all are interested in meeting the needs of students and like to increase student learning (630). They decide who are the best candidates based of their beliefs and experience. Once the candidates are chosen they can work closely on achieving results. This is the performing stage they all use their different experiences to find a solution....
Words: 1186 - Pages: 5
...3 100% 4 5 6 100% 7 8 9 100% 10 11 12 100% 13 14 15 structure Mechanistic and Organic Structures Types of Contemporary Organizational Designs Types of Internal and External Collaboration Stages of Group Development Five Conflict Management 100% Techniques 16 100% Structure 18 19 Six Aspects of Group 17 20 21 Concept: Six key elements in determining organizational structure Mastery 100% Questions 1 2 3 1. The process of dividing work activities into separate job tasks is known as ________. A. work specialization B. differentiation C. chain of command D. span of control Correct: The Correct Answer is: A. Work specialization is the division of work activities into separate tasks. Individual employees are assigned to specific job tasks within a work activity rather than completing an entire work activity on their own. 2. The process of grouping jobs together is known as ________. A. departmentalization B. centralization C. formalization D. decentralization Correct: The Correct Answer is: A. Departmentalization is the process of grouping jobs together in one of five common forms such as functional, geographical, product, process, and customer. This process ensures common work activities are grouped together so work is completed in a coordinated way. 3. The line of authority that extends from upper organizational...
Words: 1579 - Pages: 7
