Forum Language Development and the Nature/Nurture Debate

I believe that both Forms of language Development and Nature/ Nurture Debate are important for the language Development in children or Babies. Sure Language learning is natural. Babies are born with the ability to learn it and that learning begins at birth. All children, no matter what language their parents speak, learn language much the same way. Also Researchers have found that language development begins before a child is even born, as a fetus is able to identify the speech and sound patterns of the mother's voice and that language learning takes place in stages. I agree, but the other way I do tend more to support the Behaviorist B. F. Skinner. He believed that we can explain how babies acquire language entirely with principles of learning, such as the association of objects with the sounds of words, the imitation of language modeled by others, and the reinforcement of correct use of words and syntax by parents and teachers is that children still need the interaction with an adult to be able to learned to speak. I believed if a child would born 100% healthy and capable to learn anything, however there is no one talking or interacting with the child, the child wouldn’t be able to develop any verbal skills, because it’s never had any input. This would show that all the children’s natural learning stages wouldn’t worked without any input. The child needs input from the parent s or surrounding so they can learn how to speak.

Source: American Academy of Pediatrics http://search.proquest.com/docview/421441089 Special Issue / Baby's First Year; Talk to Me; Research indicates that language development begins as early as the first few months of life and that speaking comes as naturally to children as eating and sleeping. Parental interaction plays a big role. [Home Edition]
Summary
Researchers now