Premium Essay

Freedom Depends on Your Point of View

In:

Submitted By lejlakartal
Words 670
Pages 3
Freedom depends on your point of view.

Freedom is a very subjective concept that depends on an individual’s point of view. This point of view is created and reinforced by several factors in one’s life. Many of these factors present themselves in ideals such as cultural values and social expectations, but also within personal experiences and the manner with which they were dealt.

Cultural values and social expectations contribute greatly to the attainment of freedom. The environment in which one is brought up creates the basis of the values and expectations that one grows accustomed to. This fundamental experience forges the personal ideas that shape one’s thoughts and actions. The discontent that Chris McCandless (Into the Wild) experiences is inversely reflected upon his parents’ expectations of him, shown in the scene where Chris is standing outside a restaurant and peering at the man within. The expectations that his parents held of him pushed Chris into the direction of the man he sees within – wealthy, successful and socially respected. However, by stepping away from this, be his disregarding his upbringing, his fundamental values and the expectations held of him. This leads to the deep unhappiness and discomfort that restricts one’s attainment of freedom. Freedom cannot be achieved if one’s fundamental point of view, forged by cultural values and expectations, is disregarded.

One’s point of view is largely influenced by past experiences in life. These experiences and the manner with which they are dealt help create the psyche that shapes the individual’s thought processes. It is with these ingrained thought processes that an understanding of the world is created. This situation is presented in Into the Wild as the audience is introduced to the nature of Chris’ childhood and adolescence – in particular, the point at which his mother is explained to be

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

My Freedom

...FREEDOM OF LEARNING IN BUDDHISM Buddhism does not prevent anyone from learning the teachings of other religions. In fact, the Buddha encouraged His followers to learn about other religions and to compare His Teachings with other teachings. The Buddha says that if there are reasonable and rational teachings. The Buddha says that if there are reasonable and rational teachings in other religions, His followers are free to respect such teachings. It seems that certain religionists try to keep their followers in the dark, some of them are not even allowed to touch other religious objects or books. They are instructed not to listen to the preachings of other religions. They are enjoined not to doubt the teachings of their own religion, however unconvincing their teachings may appear to be. The more they keep their followers on a one-track mind, the more easily they can keep them under control. If anyone of them exercises freedom of thought and realizes that he had been in the dark all the time, then it is alleged that the devil has possessed his mind. The poor man is given no opportunity to use his common sense, education, of his intelligence. Those who wish to change their views on religion are taught to believe that they are not perfect enough to be allowed to use free will in judging anything for themselves. Religious Freedom in the Context of Human Rights In a recent article that I have read,it is stated that the Human Rights speaks of "the right to freedom...

Words: 2729 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Existonalism

...lot of criticism as many existentialists have regarded many traditional philosophies as abstract and remote less from humanness. Soren Kierkegaard was one of the first one to put his views in regards to this subject-Existonalism but he did not use the term Existonalism but rather described that a human is solely responsible for giving motive and finding ways to make his life purposeful and the society and religion have got no shares to play authenticity. An odd movement it was, because to all those most practical and intellectual thinkers in the world claimed existentialists, denied it almost all the times. Existonalism out of no doubt is one of the most arduous terms to outline and comprehend. The movement is termed odd in relevance to the following delegates- Soren Kierkegaard and Fredrich Nietzsche whom everybody claims and points to be important to the movement, they denied as the members of the movement. It was not only these big figures who denied being the part of the movement but also some really big names like Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus and few other names also come to the list of all those who at least once, denied on being ever a part of the movement. The basic philosophy of existentialism is discussed below with concern to the following terms and points. 1. Freedom- freedom and choice are very much emphasized under the philosophy of existentialism. Every human is free to make choice of his matter regardless of social and relational barriers the society offers...

Words: 1495 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Freewill

...first supportive argument for this claim by Aristotle is that we are all responsible for our actions (Aristotle & Taylor, C.C.W. 2006) and also we also responsible to the formation of our character. The second argument to support that free will is not an illusion, whether we like it or not we are free as stated by Sartre arguing that we are condemned to be free (Bernasconi 2007). Together with this view Augustine argue that there is a higher power but we are still free to make choices, those who are predestined to the heaven and those who are not. However this does mean we have free will but it’s a matter of clarification of how this relates to our free will. If determinism were to be right and that some of our decisions are predetermined it is true to say that our decisions are also based upon fate. In a certain aspect, by the person that we are, our gender, race, and religion and status and past experiences, we have been explained that these things do affect our decisions, and that we always have a minimum of two choices for everything we need to do. If someone at any point of time, anywhere was to make a choice that is truly free and voluntary then it can be proved that we have free will. Libertarianism argues that free will is an action involving true devised commands where human beings are free in their action as they are able reason without any physical effect. However being on the strong side, hard determinists state that free will is an illusion and everything happen...

Words: 1500 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Comparison Of Patrick Henry's View Of The American Dream

...it? Is it a goal someone will be able to achieve? One thing people know for sure is that the American Dream is common for everyone but the views of it differ for each individual. It depends mainly on your surrounding and someone’s social status. Americans have seen this ‘American Dream’ in everything from F. Scott Fitzgerald’s book ‘The Great Gatsby’, to Thomas Jefferson’s ‘Declaration of independence’, and even to Martin Luther King’s ‘I Have a Dream’ speech. All of those individuals are have the same idea of the American Dream throughout their piece but their view on what that Dream actually is differs. Patrick Henry does an exceptional job on portraying his view on the American Dream through strong imagery, allusions, tone, and appealing...

Words: 1168 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Enchiridion Epictetus Analysis

...Enchiridion, written by Epictetus is a short manual of Stoic ethical advice. There is a bunch of different types on subjects, such as, that happiness requires freedom. Yet, to be free means to be happy. Epictetus argues about a problem, how does one become free? Being free means to focus on the stuff that needs to depend on us. We should not give any acknowledgement to what does not depend on us. Epictetus offers his knowledge between things that we depend on, such as, our judgements, what we dislike and what we want; he also shares on things that do not depend on, which is our body, the power we gain and etcetera. While we are applying these things, we actually have no power in knowing if we will be happy in the end with our judgments, and the disappointments along the way could or will make us unhappy. In...

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Immanuel Kant's Every Timely And Ever Timeless

...Every Timely and Ever Timeless There are lots of question in our minds that cannot be answered by human reason alone, our mind is not capable of answering and knowing these uncertainties not because of our lack of willingness to know things but through the minds limitations, it’s a fact that there are things that we know and things that we don’t know, to support this statement, The critique of pure reason according to Immanuel Kant is that to point out a knowledge based on experience according to him as posteriori knowledge and that of the universal knowledge we individually experience in turn is the Priori knowledge, my point is that we cannot stop wondering of things since we are imperfect human beings who were not fed with all the mysteries...

Words: 4495 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

We Do Not Possess Any Genuine Freedom to Act Ethically (a Grade Essay) : )

...There is clear evidence to verify we have freedom to act ethically, we see this through our strong sense of rationalisation through our conscience (Enrich Fromm). There are major flaws to this statement as it could be suggested that ‘ethical’ behaviour is an influence of external factors such as natural laws, religion, primary and secondary carers and prior events. Therefore, the question could be raised, do we actually any have any freedom to act ethically or is it just a result of what we have already learnt (Piaget)? Then again, what is ethical behaviour to begin with? A universal idea of what is right or wrong that is decided by a group of people? The concluding opinion that will be formed is: we do have a genuine amount of freedom however this notion is only supported to a certain extent as I believe we are influenced by external factors. This essay will discuss points that would approve and disapprove of this statement because I believe it is a combination of both, going with a soft determinist approach. Hard determinists would suggest our choices are determined by prior events. This is a logical statement because a choice we make today could affect the choice we would make tomorrow. For example, a levels are picked accordingly due to prior grades we received in GCSE. Aquinas’s cause and effect theory is applicable to this notion of everything have an efficient cause: nothing can be efficient or cause itself. However, despite this approach making total sense as it is...

Words: 1488 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Essay

...NOTE TO TEACHERS This Teacher's Guide is also available as a pdf download. Please click on the "PDF" link below to download your complimentary copy. Hisham Matar’s In the Country of Men is a strikingly balanced novel. While set within the complicated and highly charged political landscape of Libya in the late ‘70s (the setting of the author’s own early childhood), the story’s narrator is a young boy still preoccupied with games, just beginning to open his eyes to the possibility of love, still considering —and misinterpreting—what it means to be a man. By constructing the story around this strange interplay of innocence and corruption, the author is able to open up a dialogue about duality, addressing both the light and dark elements of humanity and exploring an impressive range of themes such as freedom and identity, justice and injustice, loyalty and betrayal, exile and identity, addiction and the nature of truth. While the following guide provides suggestions for addressing the historical and political elements of the novel, it also provides a means to examine the story from a variety of other viewpoints. In considering Matar’s work, readers of all backgrounds should quickly realize that, while they may not have been previously acquainted with facets of Libyan history such as the rule of the Qaddafi revolutionary regime, there is no need for apprehension. While politics and history do often fuel the dramatic action of the story, the universal themes, simple structure, and...

Words: 4925 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Claiming Responsibility for Your Freedom

...do, you doing moral philosophy. Your moral converations may be very personal – whether you should return the five dollars extra change the clerk gave you at the video store – or very broad – whether national security is more important than personal freedom. Whatever your moral conversations are about, it is likely there is a body of literature that would be useful in clarifying your thoughts on the issue. It may be a good idea for you to read a basic textbook on moral philosophy to review or familiarize yourself with the way philosophers have thought about some of the moral issues that almost everyone encounters. It is especially useful to be familiar with the terms and concepts of moral philosophy so you can express your views precisely and intelligently. Some of the major moral theories are briefly summarized in the Primer of Moral Theory that follows. You will find most of them are discussed in more detail in any basic moral philosophy text, although you may find them listed under slightly different titles. As you consider each theory, use the “Where Do I Stand” box to mark your position on it. Include a brief explanation of the reasons for your position. The purpose of this exercise is for you to decide for yourself what moral theories and standpoints make the most sense to you and to locate your own moral standpoint within the formal framework of established moral thought. As you continue thinking about moral theories, you may find that your standpoint changes. This is normal...

Words: 16176 - Pages: 65

Free Essay

Nrega and Rti

...Q: “What is human development? Critically summarize the views of Mahbub ul Haq on how human development can be realistically attained within prevailing socio- economic conditions. What in your view is the significance of human development as a contemporary vision for social reorganization?” Discuss the nature of this significance with the help of one or two examples that illustrate your points. A: Human development is well-being concept and wider range of the human context. It is included the studies of human conditions. Human development meaning comes at last twenty-five years. Human development is like approach, which is define conditions of human life. Human development means not like that only growth of economic expansion, its growth in opportunities in every field. Development of kind which allows people their respective choices. There are two dimensions of sketch of human development. First dimension is directly enhancing of human abilities, and other is creating conditions for human development. Directly enhancing of human abilities included long and healthy life, knowledge, and decent standard of living. Creating conditions for human development included like participation in political and community life, environment sustainability, human security and rights, gender equality. Human development is concept of totally development of the people. Human life should be based upon their choices, not insisting that they make use of them. It is true that no one can guarantees...

Words: 812 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Sam Harris on Free Will Outline

...wills are determined by a long chain of prior causes And we are not responsible for them Or they are the product of chance And we are not responsible for them Or they are some combination of determinism and chance No combination allows us free will Example: Murderer As sickening as I might find the persons behavior, I have to admit if I were to trade places with him, atom for atom, I would be him. There is no extra part of me that could resist the impulse to victimize innocent people. Nobody picks the life influences which shape the development of their nervous system You are no more responsible for the micro structure of your brain than you are for your height The role of luck appears decisive Imagine the murderer was found to have a tumor in the place of the brain that would explain his impulses We would view him as a victim of biology A brain tumor is a special case of physical events giving rise to thoughts and actions Deeper than cause and effect We have a subjective experience of free will which cannot be mapped onto physical reality The subjective experience is also intangible Thoughts simply appear in consciousness --- what...

Words: 1086 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

On 'Existentialism Is Humanism' by Sartre

...In his essay Existentialism is Humanism Sartre develops an atheistic moral system. In this paper, I will examine the moral system that Sartre presents. I will attempt to provide the most plausible interpretation of this morality and determine if this moral system can work in a society. I will conclude that there are several problems with Sartre’s account of morality that make it inadequate. And I will try to provide a possible solution to these problems. In order to understand Sartre’s account of morality we should first examine the basis upon which it is developed. Sartre develops his account of morality from a perspective of what he calls a “consistently atheistic” existentialism. The “consistently atheistic” existentialism maintains that God does not exist. This means that there can be no universal moral values, but it also means, and this is very important for Sartre’s account that man’s existence comes before man’s essence. If God does not exist then there can be no universal moral values because such values, at least in the European morality, come from the “commandments of God”. We use these commandments to define good and evil, and upon these two opposing concepts we base our morality. Furthermore if God does not exist then man was not created according to a divine plan, his essence was not defined a priori, and therefore there is no such a thing as “Human nature”. Sartre defines his phrase “existence precedes essence” as applied to man...

Words: 2725 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Ethics and Values

...important human values as courage, generosity, self-control, temperance, self-control, sociability, modesty, fairness or justice, are all virtues that he discussed and that he believed were acquired through this kind of habituation. And although in order to develop such values one must spare a lot of his time and effort, once they are acquired virtuous behavior comes easily and naturally. Recently, a considerable number of thinkers have returned to Aristotle's views, claiming that we should place greater emphasis on the development of the moral values. Those who have advanced this claim hold that contemporary philosophy stresses too much action what people should and should not do - and that much more attention must be paid to people's character - what a human being should be. Some of them even argued that humans should not waste time on other aspects of ethics but should concentrate their efforts solely on trying to understand and develop the virtues that make a person a morally decent human being. Although this extreme view was accepted by few philosophers , still a large number have begun to devote considerable energy to analyzing human values and some have produced analyses of...

Words: 2216 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Personal Writing: The Importance Of Being A Writer

...can have flexibility and freedom express yourself, but in the end, you must learn about people needs, and what they like to read. That means as a writer you must know your audience, their favorite, their point of view, etc. You can write everything you want on the internet right now, but in the end, you need a conversion on your writing platform. You need money to run your platform, except if you just write for your hobbies. First Thing You Must to Know Being a Writer is a Full-Strategy Job (Learn Audience, traffic, the...

Words: 789 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Ethics

...between utilitarianism and Kantianism but some can confuse some people. However, there are important differences between the two philosophies that I will try to explain. In Utilitarianism this philosophy believes that consequences of action are responsible for people judging that action as morally right or wrong. Thus, a believer of utilitarianism would say that the outcomes of the actions that is deemed morally right would be good. The theory says that people choose actions that help in maximizing happiness and at the same time remove misery, pain and agony. The worth of any human action depends upon its utility or value. Now with the view on Kantianism was put forward by Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher he focused on the duty he believed his philosophy take the position that the morality of an action is dependent upon whether the individual has adhered to the rules or not. Here are some points or highlights why Kantianism vs. utilitarianism. * Attitude towards what is right or wrong is what constitutes the basic difference between utilitarianism and Kantianism. * Utilitarianism says that an act is justified if maximum numbers of people are deriving happiness out of it. This simply means that end justifies means. And that act is justified if the end is happiness for all. On the other hand, Kantianism says that the end does not justify means. Whatever we do inside our obligations is morally good. * Lying is universally wrong and thus is wrong in Kantianism too. However...

Words: 1541 - Pages: 7