Free Essay

Gauding Principal

In:

Submitted By Kamrul12
Words 12605
Pages 51
Questions and Answers for the
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry
NESHAP
40 CFR 63, Subpart LLL

What is the legal status of this guide?
The Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) and the Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assistance (OECA) of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have reviewed this document and approved it for publication.
When using this document, remember that it isn’t legally binding and doesn’t replace the final rule - “National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portland Cement
Manufacturing Industry” (published in the Federal Register, 6/14/99, 64 FR 31898 ) or any
State, local or tribal rules that may apply to your facility.
This document isn’t intended, nor can you rely on it, to create any rights enforceable by any party in litigation with the United States. The EPA may change this document at any time without public notice.
This document includes only requirements from the final rule published in the Federal
Register.

i

Contents
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Why should I use this document? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1

Is there anything I should know before using this document? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1

How do I get copies of this document? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1

Chapter 2 - Does This Rule Apply To Me?
What does this rule contain? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2

Does this rule apply to me? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2

How do I determine whether I have an area or major source? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2

How do I know if my plant is new, existing, or reconstructed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5

How do I know if my plant is a greenfield or a brownfield? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5

What parts of my plant does this rule cover? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5

By when must I comply? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9

Chapter 3 - What Are The Standards?
What standards must I meet? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
What emission limits must I meet? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
What operating limits must I meet? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
If I comply with this rule, must I meet the NSPS Standards? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

ii

Contents
Chapter 4 - What Does The Rule Require?
What are my requirements? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
What performance test and performance specifications must I use? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Are there any other requirements for conducting performance tests and performance specifications? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
What is a significant change in the raw materials or fuels? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
What are the requirements for installing, operating, and maintaining process equipment and control devices? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
What monitoring must I do? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
What are the requirements for an operation, maintenance and monitoring plan? . . . . . . . . 17
Can I change my required monitoring procedures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
How do I apply for alternate monitoring requirements? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
How will I know if the application is approved or denied? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
What records must I keep? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
How long must I keep records? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
What must I record for the quality control program procedures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
How long must I keep the quality control program procedures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
What notifications and reports must I submit? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
What must I include in my summary report? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

iii

Contents
Chapter 5 - How Do I Comply With the Rule?
What must I do to comply with this rule? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
How do I show initial compliance? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
At what time must I begin to comply? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
How do I calculate rolling averages during intermittent operations? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
How do I show continuous compliance with the rule? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

Chapter 6 - Other Requirements and Information
Who administers this regulation? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Do I need a title V permit? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
How do I change my permit to include this rule? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
What parts of the General Provisions apply? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

Chapter 7 - Getting Additional Help
Where do I go for help? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Can I get more information on the Web? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

Tables
Table 1. Test Methods for Determining Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3

Table 2. Parts of the Portland Cement Plant That the Rule Covers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8

Table 3. Compliance Dates for New and Reconstructed Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9

iv

Contents
Table 4. Emission Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 5. Operating Limits for D/F Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 6. Performance Tests and Performance Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 7. Installation, Operation and Maintenance Requirements for Monitoring and Control Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Table 8. Monitoring Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 9. Required Records for Continuous Monitoring Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Table 10. Applicability and Timing of Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Table 11. Required Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Table 12. Summary Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Table 13. Initial Compliance with Emission Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Table 14. Continuous Compliance with Emission Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Table 15. Continuous Compliance with Operating Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Table 16. Air Division Contact For Each EPA Regional Office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

Appendices
A - Contents for Subpart LLL, Final Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

v

1.0 Introduction
Why should I use this document?
This document can help plant owners and operators (you) understand the Portland Cement
Manufacturing Industry NESHAP (also known as Subpart LLL) by helping you determine five main things: C
C
C
C
C

If the rule applies to your plant and process
What your reporting requirements are
What to test, monitor, record and report
How to comply with the rule
Dates by which you must meet requirements

Is there anything I should know before using this document?
When using this document, remember that it doesn’t replace the final rule and covers only requirements published on or before 6/14/99. You should keep up with new requirements printed after this date by periodically checking the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR). You can download Federal Register notices by going to the Government Printing Office
(GPO) website at www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/aces140.html.
We’ve included a copy of the final rule in Appendix A (as published in the Federal Register,
6/14/99, 64 FR 31898), so you can reference the rule while you’re using this document.

How do I get copies of this document?
This document does not exist as hard copy. You can access this document at EPA’s Unified Air
Toxics Website (www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw). Look under Rules and Implementation, or www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw/pcem/pcempg.html 1

2.0 Does This Rule Apply To Me?
What does this rule contain?
This rule contains standards to reduce Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) emissions from Portland
Cement Manufacturing Industry plants.
C Standards include emission limits, operating limits, and opacity limits.
C There are 188 HAPs, which are listed in section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and at www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw/188polls.txt.
C A portland cement plant is any facility manufacturing portland cement.
This rule also contains the requirements for demonstrating initial and continuous compliance with each standard.

Does this rule apply to me?
This rule applies if you own or operate a portland cement plant that is a major or area source of
HAP.
C A major source of HAP is a facility that has the potential to emit 10 or more tons per year of any single HAP or 25 or more tons per year of all HAP. The rule defines a facility as
“all contiguous or adjoining property that is under common ownership or control, including properties that are separated only by a road or their public right-of-way”.
C An area source of HAP is any facility that has the potential to emit HAP but is not a major source. C This rule applies to each new, existing, or reconstructed portland cement plant.

How do I determine whether I have an area or major source?
Short Answer
Some of the standards of this rule only apply to major sources, and others apply to both area and major sources. The potential to emit (PTE) for all HAPs emitted from all sources at the plant site must be included in determining whether it is a major source. The rule allows you to use certain test methods to determine your potential to emit hydrogen chloride (HCl) and organic HAP. The methods to use to determine applicability are shown in Table 1. Methods 320 and 321 are new
2

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy test methods that were promulgated along with the final rule. If you want to establish that your source is an area source, the HCl data you present to your permitting authority must be obtained using either Methods 320 or 321. If you accept major source status, no up-front testing is required to establish that status.
Table 1. Test Methods for Determining Applicability1
If you are testing...

And you want to ...

Then you must use method...

HCl

Kilns, in-line kiln/raw mill and associated bypass stacks

Show that you have an area source

Method 320 or
321

HCl

Kilns, in-line kiln/raw mill and associated bypass stacks

Confirm major source status

Method 26, 26A,
320 or 321

Other organic HAPs
1

For the following part of your plant... Kiln, in-line kilns/raw mills, material dryers

Confirm major or area source status

Method 320 or 18

No testing is necessary if you choose to declare that you are a major source.

Long Answer
Although emission standards were established for PM as a surrogate for semi-volatile and non-volatile HAP metals; THC as a surrogate for organic HAPs; and (D/F), each facility owner/operator must make a major source determination that requires an estimate of the facility's potential to emit all HAPs from all emission sources. All HAPs (organic, HCl, metals, etc.) from all emission points must be included in determining major source status. So, it is necessary to obtain data that will allow summation of all HAP emissions to compare to the 10/25 ton per year thresholds specified in section 112 of the Clean Air Act. Hydrogen chloride and organic HAP emissions such as (but not limited to) benzene, toluene, hexane, formaldehyde, hexane, naphthalene, phenol, styrene, and xylenes are the main HAPs from the kiln that may cause facilities to be major sources, but HAPs emitted from all sources at the plant site should be accounted for in making a major source determination.
HCl and organic HAPs emissions are the main HAPs from the kiln that will cause a source to be a major source, but HAPs emitted from all sources at the plant site, including metals emissions
(discussed below) should be accounted for in making a major source determination. Accurate measurements of HCl in the kiln exhaust gases are necessary for major source determination.
Method 26 may have positive biases attributable to chloride salts rather than to HCl; and negative biases due to condensation and/or removal of HCl on the filter and/or in the sampling probe.
Therefore, the Agency has decided that Method 26 and 26A used without concurrent validation with Method 321 or Method 322 will only be acceptable for measuring HCl from non-hazardous waste kilns to confirm that the portland cement plant is a major source. Methods 26 or 26A may not be used to measure HCl in the determination that the source is an area source. Only the FTIR methods may be used in the measurement of HCl if the source claims it is not a major source.

3

Depending on site-specific circumstances, EPA Method 25 may not provide sufficient information to make an accurate summation of THC emissions. For example, a source's determination that its
THC emissions based on Method 25 or 25A are less than 10 tons per year does not necessarily signify that it is an area source; the source may be a major source based on the 25 ton per year criterion when all other HAP emissions are summed with the THC. If the source's THC emissions are over 10 tons per year, the source may choose to conduct emissions tests using EPA Method
320 to make a determination of actual organic HAP emissions. However, in lieu of conducting
Method 320 emissions tests, the source could use Method 25A, but the source would have to assume that the mass emission rate (as propane) from all combustion sources combined at the site is attributed to one organic HAP. This amount would then have to be compared to the 10 ton per year threshold for one HAP. To summarize, in addition to accounting for organic HAPs (either through Method 320 testing or assuming all THC is one organic HAP), accurate measurements of
HCl in the kiln exhaust gases would be necessary for major source determination, as well as measurements of HAP metals, to obtain data that will allow summation of all HAP emissions to compare to the 10/25 ton per year thresholds.
If the source determines that it is not major because it does not meet either the 10/25 ton per year thresholds based on the summation of HCl and organic HAP emissions from all sources at the plant, the source would need to determine its HAP metals emissions from all sources at the facility as well, to make a determination that it is not a major source. The use of a "one percent
HAP metals in PM" emission factor assumption will not provide definitive evidence that the source is an area source. However, the Agency would allow sources to forego the speciated HAP metals emission tests (through the use of Method 29) if it is assumed that 1 percent of the total PM emissions from all sources at the site are metal HAPs. This assumed amount of metal
HAPs emissions would be added to the amount of HCl and organic HAPs emitted (determined as described above), and this total amount would then be compared to the 25 ton per year threshold for all HAPs combined. To reiterate, each facility owner/operator must make a major source determination that requires an estimate of the facility's potential to emit all HAPs from all emission sources, accounting for HCl, organic HAPs (either through speciation of organic HAPs or assuming all THC is one organic HAP), and metals (either through speciation of metal HAPs or assuming 1 percent of PM is metal HAP), to allow summation of all HAP emissions to compare to the 10/25 ton per year thresholds.

How do I know if my plant is new, existing, or reconstructed?

4

C A portland cement plant is new if the construction or reconstruction commenced after
March 24, 1998.
C Any portland cement plant is existing if it is not new.
C A portland cement plant is reconstructed if the components have been replaced such that:
The fixed capital cost of the new components exceeds 50 percent of the fixed capital cost that would be required to construct a comparable new source; and
It is technologically and economically feasible for the reconstructed source to meet relevant standard(s) established in this rule.

How do I know if my kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, or raw material dryer is a greenfield or a brownfield?
Your kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, or raw material dryer is a greenfield if there were none in operation on or before March 24, 1998. If the source is not a greenfield, it is a brownfield.

What parts of my plant does this rule cover?
Table 2 shows which parts of your plant this rule covers. More parts of the plant are covered if you own or operate a major source than if you own or operate an area source. Key components of the plant are described below, and you can also find the exact description of each part of the plant in the definitions section of the rule, 40 CFR 63.1341.
Alkali bypass - A duct between the feed end of the kiln and the preheater tower through which a portion of the kiln exit gas stream is withdrawn and quickly cooled by air or water to avoid excess buildup of alkali, chloride and/or sulfur on the raw feed. This may also be referred to as the “kiln exhaust gas bypass”.
Bagging system - The equipment which fills bags with portland cement.
Clinker cooler - The equipment into which clinker product leaving the kiln is placed to be cooled by air supplied by a forced draft or natural draft supply system.
Conveying system - A device for transporting materials from one piece of equipment or location to another location within a facility. Conveying systems include but are not limited to the following: feeders, belt conveyors, bucket elevators, and pneumatic systems.
Conveying system transfer point - A point where any material, including but not limited to feed material, fuel, clinker or product, is transferred to or from a conveying system, or
5

between separate parts of a conveying system.
Facility - All contiguous or adjoining property that is under common ownership or control, including properties that are separated only by a road or other public right-of-way.
Finish mill - A roll crusher, ball and tube mill, or other size reduction equipment used to grind clinker to a fine powder. Gypsum and other materials may be added to and blended with clinker in a finish mill. The finish mill also includes the air separator associated with the finish mill.
Greenfield kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, or raw material dryer - A kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, or raw material dryer for which construction is commenced at a plant site (where no kilns and no in-line kiln/raw mills were in operation at any time prior to March 24, 1998) after March
24, 1998.
In-line kiln/raw mill - A system in a portland cement production process where a dry kiln system is integrated with the raw mill so that all or a portion of the kiln exhaust gases are used to perform the drying operation of the raw mill, with no auxiliary heat source used. In this system the kiln is capable of operating without the raw mill operating, but the raw mill cannot operate without the kiln gases, and consequently, the raw mill does not generate a separate exhaust gas stream..
Kiln - A device, including any associated preheater or precalciner devices that produces clinker by heating limestone and other materials for subsequent production of portland cement. New brownfield kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, or raw material dryer - A kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill or raw material dryer for which construction is commenced at a plant site (where kilns and/or in-line kiln/raw mills were in operation prior to March 24, 1998) after March 24,
1998.
Portland cement plant - Any facility manufacturing portland cement.
Raw material dryer - An impact dryer, drum dryer, paddle-equipped rapid dryer, air separator, or other equipment used to reduce the moisture content of feed materials.
Raw mill - A ball and tube mill, vertical roller mill or other size reduction equipment that is not part of an in-line kiln/raw mill, used to grind feed to the appropriate size. Moisture may be added or removed from the feed during the grinding operation. If the raw mill is used to remove moisture from feed materials, it is also, by definition, a raw material dryer. The raw mill also includes the air separator associated with the raw mill.
This rule does not apply to kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills that burn hazardous waste and are
6

subject to and are regulated under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart EEE, National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Waste Combustors. However, hazardous waste kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills that temporarily or permanently stop burning hazardous waste may be subject to the portland cement rule. Cement kilns that combust municipal solid waste, medical waste or other materials (other than hazardous waste) are subject to the Portland Cement rule.

7

Table 2. Parts of the Portland Cement Plant That the Rule Covers
If you own or operate a(n) ...

Then the rule covers these parts of the plant...

Area or major source

Kiln (except those subject to 40 CFR 63 EEE, the rule for hazardous waste combustors) In-line kiln/raw mill (except those subject to 40 CFR 63 EEE, the rule for hazardous waste combustors)
Greenfield raw material dryer

Major source

Clinker cooler
Raw mill
Finish mill
Raw material dryer
Raw material, finished product, or storage bin
Conveying system transfer point
Bagging system
Bulk loading or unloading system

On-site nonmetallic mineral processing facility at a major portland cement plant

All process units in the materials handling operations beginning with the raw material storage just before the raw mill.
This includes the transfer point associated with the conveyor transferring material from the raw material storage to the raw mill.
It does not include the primary and secondary crushers or any other equipment of the on-site nonmetallic mineral processing plant that precede the raw material storage. 8

By when must I comply?
C If you have a new or reconstructed source, you must comply according to the dates in

Table 3.
C If you have an existing source, you must comply with this subpart no later than June 14,
2002.

Table 3. Compliance Dates for New and Reconstructed Sources
If you initiate startup...

Then you must comply...

Before 6-14-99

No later than 6-14-99

After 6-14-99

Immediately upon startup of operations

9

3.0 What Are The Standards?
What standards must I meet?
This rule includes two types of standards--emission limits and operating limits. You must meet each standard that applies to you.

What emission limits must I meet?
You must meet each emission limit in Table 4 that applies to you. The total hydrocarbon (THC) emission limits only apply to new greenfield kilns, in-line kiln/raw mills and raw material dryers.

What operating limits must I meet?
You must meet each operating limit in Table 5 that applies to you. The operating limits are for kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills. The rule includes these operating limits to control dioxin and furan (D/F) emissions.
You must meet operating limits for the Particulate Matter Control Device (PMCD) inlet temperature and, if you have one, the alkali bypass inlet temperature. You must meet separate
PMCD inlet temperature limits for when the raw mill is and is not operating.
If you are using carbon injection, you must also meet the carbon injection rate and either the carrier gas flow rate or pressure drop limits. There is a separate carbon injection operating limit for the alkali bypass.

10

Table 4. Emission Limits
For the following part of your plant....

You must meet the following emission limits... All kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills at major sources (including alkali bypass)

0.15 kg particulate matter (PM) per Mg of feed (dry basis) (0.30 lb PM per ton, dry basis) 20 percent opacity

All kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills at major and area sources
(including alkali bypass)

0.20 ng per dscm (8.7 x 10-11gr per dscf) dioxins and furans toxicity equivalent
(TEQ), corrected to 7 percent oxygen

All kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills at major and area sources
(including alkali bypass) only if the average of the performance test run average PMCD inlet temperatures is 204E C or less.
[Corrected to 7 percent oxygen]

0.40 ng per dscm (1.7 x 10-10 gr per dscf) dioxins and furans (TEQ), corrected to 7 percent oxygen

New greenfield kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills at major and area sources 50 ppmvd total hydrocarbons, as propane, corrected to 7 percent oxygen

New greenfield raw material dryers at major and area sources
All clinker coolers at major sources

0.050 kg of PM per Mg of feed (dry basis)
(0.10 lb PM per ton of feed, dry basis)
10 percent opacity

All raw mills and finish mills at major sources

10 percent opacity

All raw material dryers; raw material, clinker and finished product storage bins; conveying system transfer points; bagging systems; bulk loading and unloading systems at major sources

11

Table 5. Operating Limits for D/F Standards
For the following part of your portland cement plant...

You must establish separate operating limits for...

You must meet the following operating limits...

All kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills at major and area sources
(including alkali bypass) PMCD inlet temperature for periods when the raw mill is operating

Maintain the rolling 3-hour average PMCD inlet temperature when the raw mill is operating less than or equal to the temperature established at the performance test when the raw mill was operating.

PMCD inlet temperature for periods when the raw mill is not operating

Maintain the rolling 3-hour average PMCD inlet temperature when the raw mill is not operating less than or equal to the temperature established at the performance test when the raw mill was not operating.

Alkali bypass (if there is one) inlet temperature

Maintain the rolling 3-hour average alkali bypass inlet temperature less than or equal to the temperature established at the performance test when the raw mill was operating.

Kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill activated carbon injection rate

Maintain the rolling 3-hour average activated carbon injection rate for the kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill no less than the rate established at the performance test. Inject carbon of equivalent specifications to that used at performance test.

Alkali bypass (if there is one) activated carbon injection rate

Maintain the rolling 3-hour average activated carbon injection rate for the alkali bypass no less than the rate established at the performance test. Inject carbon of equivalent specifications to that used at performance test. Carrier gas flow rate or carrier gas pressure drop

Maintain either the carrier gas flow rate or carrier gas pressure drop above the value established at performance test.

All kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills at major sources (including alkali bypass) when using activated carbon

If I comply with this rule, must I meet the NSPS Standards?
If you are subject to this rule, you are exempt from any applicable New Source Performance
Standard in 40 CFR 60, subpart F, except if...
You have...

Then you will be subject to the
NSPS...

For the following new or reconstructed parts of your plant...

An area source

PM and opacity limits

Kilns, in-line kiln/raw mill

Opacity limits

Greenfield raw material dryers

12

4.0 What Does The Rule Require?
What are my requirements?
The rule has requirements to ensure that you meet the standards. These requirements include:
C Performance testing and performance specifications
C Installation, calibration, operating, and maintenance requirements for process equipment and control devices
C Monitoring
C Recordkeeping
C Reporting

What performance tests and performance specifications must I use?
You must conduct the performance tests and performance specifications in Table 6.

13

Table 6. Performance Tests and Performance Specifications
For each...

You must test for the following pollutant(s)... Using the following EPA method or
Performance Specification

New and existing kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, alkali bypass, if there is one, and clinker cooler (that is subject to a PM standard)

PM

EPA Method 5
You must conduct three runs of at least one hour and the minimum sample volume must be
0.85 dscm (30 dscf).
You do not have to determine the PM in the impingers (back half) of the particulate sample train for the initial compliance test.
In addition to the initial performance test, you must also conduct a Method 5 test every 5 years. New and existing kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, alkali bypass, if there is one, and clinker cooler (that is subject to an opacity limit)

Opacity

Performance Specification 1 of 40 CFR part
60, Appendix B for a continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS)
You must test at the same time that you conduct the Method 5 test.

New and existing kiln, in-line
Opacity
kiln/raw mill, and clinker cooler that has a fabric filter or ESP with multiple stacks OR IF the control device exhausts through a monovent
OR IF it is infeasible to use a
COMS according to Performance
Specification (PS) 1

EPA Method 9 visual opacity readings.

New and existing kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, and alkali bypass, if there is one

EPA Method 23

You must conduct the Method 9 test at the same time that you conduct the Method 5 test.
In addition to the initial performance test, you must also conduct a Method 9 test every 5 years. D/F

Each run must last at least three hours and have a sample volume of at least 2.5 dscm (90dscf).
In addition to the initial performance test, you must also conduct a Method 23 test every 30 months. 14

Table 6. Performance Tests and Performance Specifications
For each...

You must test for the following pollutant(s)... New greenfield kiln, in-line kiln/raw THC mill, and raw material dryer

Using the following EPA method or
Performance Specification

Performance Specification 8A of 40 CFR part
60, Appendix B for total hydrocarbons
Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM)
You must test for 3 hours.

New and existing raw and finish mill, Opacity raw material dryer, and materials handling processes (raw material storage, clinker storage, finished product storage, conveyor transfer points, bagging, and bulk loading and unloading systems)

EPA Method 9
You must conduct the Method 9 test at the same time that you conduct the Method 5 test.
The Method 9 test must last 3 hours (30, 6minute averages). However, you may stop the
Method 9 test after 1 hour if there are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity and there are no more than 3 readings of
10 percent.

Are there any other requirements for conducting performance tests and performance specifications?
You must meet the following requirements for performance tests or performance specifications.
C You must conduct each run of each performance test under the conditions that exist when the portland cement plant is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur.
C Each time that a performance test is required for an in-line kiln/raw mill, you must conduct two tests: one while the raw mill is operating under normal conditions and one while the raw mill is not operating.
C If there is an alkali bypass associated with a kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill, you must simultaneously test the main exhaust and alkali bypass. However, you do not have to test the alkali bypass exhaust when the raw mill is not operating.
C You must repeat performance tests for opacity, PM, and D/F emissions from kilns and inline kilns/raw mills within 90 days of a significant change in the raw material components or fuels fed to the kilns.
15

What is a significant change in the raw materials or fuels?
Your State, local, or tribal permitting agency will decide whether a change in raw material components or fuels is significant enough to require a new performance test. These provisions are included in the rule to ensure that the emission limits will still be met if you change the material fed to the kiln or in-line kiln raw mill. Examples of a significant change would be a switch from burning coal to burning tires or the use of a new feed material.
Your permitting agency will include provisions in your permit for when you must notify them regarding a change in raw materials or fuels.

What are the requirements for installing, operating, and maintaining process equipment and control devices?
Any performance tests that are conducted must be conducted under conditions that are representative of normal operations, as required in the General Provisions at §63.7(g)(1).
Table 7 shows the requirements that you must meet.

What monitoring must I do?
You must conduct the monitoring in Table 8.
In some cases the rule gives you options for monitoring. For example, if you are using a fabric filter or an electrostatic precipitator with multiple stacks you may choose to monitor opacity using
Method 9 or a COMS.
If you are using carbon injection for your kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill, you must meet the requirements for carbon injection in addition to the requirements for PM control device inlet temperature measurement.
The requirements for using PM Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) have been deferred. You currently are not required to install or use PM CEMS. The PM CEMS installation deadline will be established in a future rulemaking. Until the PM CEMS requirements are promulgated, the PM performance test is the only PM compliance provision. Although opacity is a separately enforceable limit, it fills the need for PM monitoring.
If you are a major source, you must conduct an annual inspection of the combustion system components of kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills, and record the results.

16

What are the requirements for an operation, maintenance and monitoring plan?
You must prepare, submit, and implement a written operations and maintenance plan for the entire cement plant. You must include requirements for each part of the plant for which there is an emission limit or operating limit. Failure to comply with any provision of the operation and maintenance plan is a violation of the standard. The plan must include the following information:
C Procedures for proper operation and maintenance of affected equipment and air pollution control devices needed to meet emission and operating limits.
C Corrective actions you will take if you see visible emissions from the raw mill and finish mill sweep and air separator PMCDs during the required daily visual opacity observations. C Procedures for the yearly inspection of the combustion system components of each kiln and in-line kiln/raw mill at the facility.
C Procedures for monthly 1-minute visible emissions monitoring of materials handling sources using Method 22, including the conduction of Method 9 tests if visible emissions are observed.

17

Table 7. Installation, Operation, and Maintenance Requirements for Monitoring and
Control Devices
For the following...

You must...

COMS

Install, maintain, calibrate, and operate according to subpart A, General
Provisions, of 40 CFR Part 60 and according to PS 1 of 40 CFR Part 60,
Appendix B.
COMS must be installed at the outlet of the PM control device.

THC CEM

Install, maintain, calibrate, and operate according to subpart A, General
Provisions, of 40 CFR Part 60 and according to PS 8A of 40 CFR Part 60,
Appendix B.

Thermocouple or other monitoring device for measuring and recording exhaust gas temperature Install at the inlet to or upstream of the PM control device.

Activated carbon injection Install, operate, calibrate and maintain continuous activated carbon injection rate monitor and verify the calibration at least once every three months.
The rate measurement device must be accurate to within 1 percent of the rate being measured.
Install, operate, calibrate and maintain either a carrier gas flow rate monitor or a carrier gas pressure drop monitor.
Document carbon specifications.

18

Table 8. Monitoring Requirements
For the following part of your plant...

For each...

You must monitor ...

Kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills
(including alkali bypass) at major and area sources

Combustion system Combustion components by conducting an annual inspection and recording the results.

All kilns and in-line kiln raw mills at major sources (including alkali bypass)

COMS

Opacity using COMS at the outlet of the PM control device.
The COMS must sample and analyze opacity each 10-second period and record opacity for each 6-minute block period.

Clinker coolers at major sources
Method 9 daily visual opacity observations

Opacity daily using Method 9 for at least 30-minutes while the kiln is at highest load or capacity level.

Kilns and in-line kiln raw mills at major and area sources (including alkali bypass) Thermocouple or other temperature sensor

The temperature of the exhaust gases at the inlet to or upstream of the PM control device each minute. If there is an in-line kiln/raw mill, you must start a new monitoring period each time that you stop or start the raw mill.

Kilns and in-line kiln raw mills at major and area sources (including alkali bypass) Activated carbon injection

The rate of activated carbon injection each minute.

You must record the average opacity for each six-minute period during the 30-minute test.

You must also monitor either the carrier gas flow rate or pressure drop each minute.
If there is an in-line kiln/raw mill, you must start a new monitoring period each time that you stop or start the raw mill.
The requirements for activated carbon are in addition to the requirements for temperature monitoring. New greenfield kilns, in-line kiln raw mills, and new greenfield raw material dryers at major and area sources

Total hydrocarbon CEMS

Total hydrocarbons using CEMS. The CEMS must sample and analyze THC emissions each
15-minute period and record THC emissions for each 15-minute period. You must calculate the 30-day block average

19

Table 8. Monitoring Requirements
For the following part of your plant...

For each...

You must monitor ...

Kilns and in-line kiln raw mills at major sources (including alkali bypass)

CEMS for PM

These requirements are deferred unless and until the Administrator announces otherwise in the Federal Register.

Raw mills and finish mills at major sources Method 22 visible emissions test

The opacity of the mill sweep and air separator PM control device daily for six minutes while the unit is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur.
If you observe visible emissions during the Method 22 test, then you must initiate corrective action within one hour and conduct a Method 9 test for thirty minutes within 24 hours.

Raw material dryers; raw material, clinker, finished product storage bins; conveying system transfer points; bagging systems; and bulk loading and unloading systems at major sources

Method 22 visible emissions test

Visible emissions monthly using Method 22. If visible emissions are observed during any
Method 22 test, you must conduct a 6-minute Method 9 test within one hour.
You may test semi-annually if you observe no visual emissions in 6 consecutive monthly tests for that source. You may test annually if you observe no visual emissions in the semi-annual test for that source.
If visible emissions are observed in semi-annual or annual tests, you must resume monthly testing until you meet the requirements again for semi-annual and annual testing.

Greenfield raw material dryers at area sources Method 22 visible emissions test

Visible emissions monthly using Method 22. If visible emissions are observed during any
Method 22 test, you must conduct a 6-minute Method 9 test within one hour.
You may test semi-annually if you observe no visual emissions in 6 consecutive monthly tests. You may test annually if you observe no visual emissions in the semi-annual test.
If visible emissions are observed in semi-annual or annual tests, you must resume monthly testing until you meet the requirements again for semi-annual and annual testing.

20

Can I change my required monitoring procedures?
You can apply for alternate requirements to the monitoring procedure, except the requirement for using CEMS to monitor THC emissions. However, you may not alter monitoring until your requests are approved.

How do I apply for alternate monitoring requirements?
An application must be submitted with or before the notification of performance test. The application must include the following three main items:
C Data or information justifying the request.
C Descriptions of the proposed alternative including:
S
S
S
S
C

Monitoring parameter you are requesting to alter
Description of the alternate monitoring technique
New averaging period for the limit
An explanation of limit calculations

Data showing that the results of a new monitoring scheme will give at least equal assurance of compliance.

How will I know if the application is approved or denied?
You will be notified of approval or denial within 90 days of receipt of the request, or within 60 days of the receipt of supplementary material, whichever is later.
You will be notified of a pending disapproval and the reasons for it. You will also have the opportunity to submit additional information before the final action, within a given time limit.

What records must I keep?
21

You are required to keep the following specific records for all affected sources:
C Documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under
§63.1355
C All records of applicability determinations with the supporting analyses
C If you have been given a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements, you must keep information showing whether you are meeting the requirements for the waiver
C For each COMS, CEMS, thermocouple, and activated carbon injection system, you must keep the continuous monitoring system (CMS) records as listed in Table 9.
The CMS recordkeeping provisions are in the General Provisions at 40 CFR 63.10(c). These requirements apply to you if the Portland Cement rule applies to you. You must keep all records according to 40 CFR §63.10© and listed in Table 9.

How long must I keep records?
You must keep all information, including reports and notifications, readily available for five years.
Material from the most recent two years must be kept on-site. You may keep these records on paper, microfilm, computer, disk, magnetic tape, or microfiche.

22

Table 9. Required Records for Continuous Monitoring Systems
(as required under §63.10(c))
The records you must keep for continuous monitoring systems are... The records must include...

CMS measurements

All required CMS measurements, including monitoring data recorded during breakdowns and out-of-control periods

CMS inoperative periods

Date and time for each period
CMS was inoperative

CMS out of control periods

Date and time for each period
CMS was out of control

Identification of periods of excess emissions and parameter monitoring exceedances

Date and time of commencement and completion of each period of excess emissions and parameter monitoring exceedances for all periods, including startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions

Malfunction reason(s)

The nature and cause of any malfunction (if known)

You use startup, shutdown and malfunction plan instead if the malfunction reason(s) is included

Corrective action(s)

The corrective action taken or preventive measures adopted after malfunction You use startup, shutdown and malfunction plan instead if the corrective action(s) is included

Repair reason(s)

The nature of repairs or adjustments to the CMS that was inoperative or out of control

You use startup, shutdown and malfunction plan instead if the repair reason(s) is included

Total operating time

The total process operating time for the reporting period

Quality control program procedures The procedures that are part of a quality control program for a CMS under §63.8(d)

23

You do not have to keep these records if...

The inoperative period was a zero
(low-level) or high level check

What must I record for the quality control program procedures?
The General Provisions at 40 CFR 63.8(d) require that you keep a written protocol for the following quality control operations for each CMS:
C Initial and subsequent calibration of the CMS
C Determination and adjustment of CMS calibration drift
C Preventive maintenance of CMS, including spare parts inventory
C Data recording, calculations, and reporting
C Accuracy audit procedures, including sampling and analysis methods
C Program for correcting a malfunctioning CMS

How long must I keep the quality control program procedures?
The procedures must be kept for the life of the source, or until the source is no longer subject to these rule provisions. Superseded versions of the procedures must be kept readily available for review for 5 years. Where applicable, these procedures can be kept in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan to avoid duplicity.

What notifications and reports must I submit?
You must submit notifications as indicated in Table 10. The citations in the table refer to the
General Provisions at 40 CFR 63 Subpart A. The General Provisions contain additional requirements that apply to you. In lieu of the initial notification, you may submit a copy of your
Title V permit application if it meets the following requirements:
C It contains the same information as required by §63.9 (b)
C The State has an approved operating permit program under part 70
C The State has delegation authority from the EPA
You must submit the permit application by the same date as that for initial notification.

24

Table 10. Applicability and Timing of Notifications.
You must submit a(n) . . .

If you . . .

You must submit the notification. . .

Are subject to this regulation and have an initial startup before 6-1499

Not later than 10-12-99 (120 calendar days after 6-14-99)

Are subject to this subpart and have an initial startup on or after
6-14-99

120 days after you become subject to this subpart

Notification of intent to construct or reconstruct
[§63.9(b)(3-5)]

Plan to construct or reconstruct a new affected source that is a major or area source of HAPs

As soon as practicable before construction begins [§63.5(d)]

Notification of startup
[§63.9(b)(3-5)]

Have to submit a notification of intent to construct or reconstruct

Delivered or postmarked within 15 calendar days after startup

Notification of intent to conduct performance test
[§63.7(b)(1)]

Are required to conduct a performance test

At least 60 calendar days before the performance test is scheduled to begin so that the Administrator can review the site-specific test plan if requested and have an observer on site.
[§63.7(b)]

Site-specific test plan
[§63.7(c)(2)(I)]

Are asked by the Administrator to review the site-specific test plan before the performance test

At least 60 calendar days before the performance test is scheduled to begin with the notification of intent to conduct a performance test OR on a mutually agreed upon date.
[§63.7(c)(2)(iv)]

Notification of rescheduling of performance test
[§63.7(b)(2)]

You are unable to conduct the performance test on the date specified due to unforeseeable circumstances beyond your control As soon as practicable and without delay prior to the schedule performance test date and specify the date when the performance test is rescheduled. [§63.7(b)(2)]

Notification of opacity and visible emissions observations
[§63.9(f)]

Are required to conduct opacity or visible emissions observations and you are required to conduct a performance test

With your notification of performance test at least 60 calendar days before the opacity or visible emissions observation is scheduled to begin

Are not required to conduct a performance test or if visibility or other conditions prevent you from conducting the opacity or visible emission observations concurrently with the performance test Deliver or postmark the notification that you intend to conduct the opacity or visible emission observations at least 30 calendar days before they are scheduled to begin. [§63.9(f)]

Initial notification
[§63.9(b)(1-2)]

25

Table 10. Applicability and Timing of Notifications.
You must submit a(n) . . .

If you . . .

You must submit the notification. . .

Notification for sources with
CMS
[§63.8(e)(3)(I)]

Intend to conduct a CMS performance evaluation and the date that you intend to conduct it

At least 60 calendar days before the evaluation is scheduled to begin. You must submit it with the performance test notification if you are conducting a performance test. [§63.8(e)(3)(iii)]

2 (or 3 if the Administrator requests 3) copies of the written results of the COMS performance evaluation

Are required to install a COMS or are using a COMS to determine opacity compliance during a performance test

At least 15 calendar days before you conduct the performance test.
[§63.8(e)(5);
§63.8(e)(2)(ii);§63.10(e)(2)(ii)]

Notification of compliance status including the performance test results report
[§63.9(h)]

Have conducted a performance test under this subpart

Before the close of business on the
60th calendar day following the completion of the performance test.
[§63.10(d)(2)]

Notification of compliance status including performance evaluation results report
[§63.9(h)]

Have conducted a CMS performance evaluation

With the performance test report or before the close of business on the
60th calendar day following the completion of the performance evaluation if there is no performance test. [§63.7(e)(2)]

Notification of compliance status including opacity and visible emission observation report [§63.9(h)]

Have conducted an opacity or visible emissions observation and you conducted it at the same time that the performance test was conducted With the performance test results before the close of business on the
60th calendar day following the completion of the performance test.
[§63.10(d)(3)]

Were not required to conduct a performance test and conducted an opacity or visible emissions observation or if visibility or other conditions prevented you from conducting the opacity or visible emission observations at the same time that the performance test was conducted Before the close of business on the
30th calendar day following the completion of the opacity or visible emission observation. [§63.10(d)(3)]

Submitted estimates or preliminary information in the application for approval of construction or reconstruction in place of the actual emissions data or control efficiencies

With the first notification of compliance status that you submit
[§63.9(h)(6)]

Notification of actual emissions data or other corrected information [§63.9(h)]

26

Table 10. Applicability and Timing of Notifications.
You must submit a(n) . . .
Notification that emissions have exceeded 70% of the standard
[§63.8(f)(6)(iii)]

If you . . .

You must submit the notification. . .

Use an alternative to relative accuracy testing under
§63.8(f)(6), but CEMS data show that emissions have exceeded 70% of the standard for any averaging period No later than 10 calendar days after the exceedance occurred

You must also submit the reports described in Table 11. If a State, local, or tribal agency requires a report with the same information as any of these reports, a copy of the report for the agency may be sent instead.

27

Table 11. Required Reports
You must submit...

If you..

You must submit the report...

Results of performance tests

Conduct a performance test

With the Notification of Compliance
Status

Results of opacity tests

Conduct an opacity observation EXCEPT for:
C
daily observations of raw mill or finish mill sweep and air separator PMCDs

With the Notification of Compliance
Status

C

opacity for material handling systems

Progress reports

Receive an extension of compliance According to the schedule in the compliance extension

Startup, shutdown, or malfunction report Have a startup, shutdown or malfunction and the event was handled according to the startup, shutdown or malfunction plan,

Submit with summary report

Have a startup, shutdown or malfunction and the event was not handled according to the plan Submit by phone or fax within 2 working days

Written report of CMS performance evaluation

Conduct a continuous monitoring system performance evaluation

With performance test results

Written report of COMSs performance evaluation

Conduct a COMS performance evaluation With performance test results

Summary report

Are subject to this rule

Semi-annually, which is delivered or postmarked 30 days following the end of each calendar half.

Excess emissions and monitoring system performance report

If downtime for any continuous monitoring system is 10 percent or more of the total operating time for the reporting period

Quarterly so that it is postmarked or delivered 30 days following the end of each calendar quarter, until you are in compliance with the standards for at least 4 consecutive quarterly reporting periods and the Administrator has approved your request to return to semiannual reporting.

28

You must state the event and that you followed the plan in the semi-annual report. Submit a letter certified by a responsible official explaining the event, including Why plan wasn’t followed What must I include in my summary report?
The summary report must be titled, “Summary Report-Gaseous and Opacity Excess Emission and
Continuous Monitoring System Performance,” and contain the information in Table 12.

Table 12. Summary Report
You must include the following administrative information You must include the following monitoring information, in addition to that required in
§63.10(e)(3)(vi)

Company name and address of affected source

All failures to maintain activated carbon injection rate and carrier gas flow rate or pressure drop (if applicable). Identification of each HAP at the source

All failures to calibrate thermocouples and other temperature sensors.

The date of the latest CMS certification or audit

All exceedances of maximum control device inlet gas temperature limits

The total operating time of the affected source in the reporting period

All failures to comply with the operation and maintenance plan

The monitoring equipment manufacturer(s) and model Results of combustion system component inspections number(s) in the reporting period
Emission and operating parameter limits
Brief description of the process units
Beginning and ending dates of the reporting period

29

5.0 How Do I Comply With The Rule?
What must I do to comply with this rule?
You must demonstrate initial and continuous compliance with each emission limit, operating limit, and opacity limit that applies to you.
Initial compliance includes all the requirements to show compliance when you first become subject to the rule. The rule includes performance testing, performance evaluations, and other methods for demonstrating initial compliance. You must also meet notification, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements to complete your initial compliance requirements.
Continuous compliance includes monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, and other requirements to show that you are complying with the rule as long as it applies to you.

How do I show initial compliance?
C You must submit a written operations and maintenance plan for all affected sources.
C You must demonstrate initial compliance with each emission limit that applies to you according to Table 13.
C You must also perform the same compliance demonstrations every 2.5 years after the initial compliance demonstration for D/F limits and every 5 years after the initial demonstration for PM and opacity limits. You must perform the initial compliance demonstrations again for all limits when a significant change in feed or fuel occurs within
90 days of the change. Each time that you perform the compliance demonstration, you must meet the requirements in Table 13.

30

Table 13. Initial Compliance with Emission Limits
For each

For the following emission limit... You must demonstrate initial compliance by...

Kiln and in-line kiln/raw mill at a major source (including alkali bypass)

0.15 kg of PM per Mg of feed
(dry basis)

Maintaining less than or equal to 0.15 kg of PM per Mg of feed (dry basis), determined by conducting Method 5 testing, determining dry feed rate by a suitable method, and calculating emissions according to
Equation 1 of the rule.
If there is an alkali bypass associated with the kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill, you must calculate emissions according to Equation 2 of the rule.
You must conduct three runs of at least one hour and the minimum sample volume must be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). You must use the average of the three runs to determine initial compliance.

20 percent opacity

Ensuring that the maximum 6-minute average opacity during each of the three Method 5 test runs, measured using a COMS, is no greater than
20 percent.
The maximum 6-minute average opacity for each of the three test runs must be no greater than 20 percent.

20 percent opacity IF you are using a fabric filter or an electrostatic precipitator with multiple stacks; OR the control device exhausts through a monovent; OR you cannot install a COMS according to PS-1 of
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B.

Maintaining the maximum 6-minute average opacity during each of the three Method 5 test runs, measured using Method 9, at no greater than
20 percent.

31

The maximum 6-minute average opacity for each of the three test runs must be no greater than 20 percent.

Table 13. Initial Compliance with Emission Limits
For each

For the following emission limit... You must demonstrate initial compliance by...

Kilns and in-line kiln/raw mill at a major or area source (including alkali bypass) 0.20 ng dioxins and furans (TEQ) per dscm; OR 0.40 ng dioxins and furans TEQ per dscm when the average of the performance test run average PM control device inlet temperature is 2040
C or less (corrected to 7 percent oxygen) Maintaining the arithmetic average of the D/F concentrations measured for three runs using Method 23, no greater than 0.20 ng D/F per dscm.

New greenfield kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, and raw material dryer at a major or area source

50 ppmvd THC, as propane, corrected to 7 percent oxygen

Maintaining the average THC concentration (calculated from oneminute averages from CEMS) during the three hour performance test at less than or equal to 50 ppmvd, as propane, corrected to 7 percent oxygen Clinker cooler at a major source

0.050 kg of PM per Mg of feed
(dry basis)

Maintaining less than or equal to 0.050 kg of PM per Mg of feed (dry basis), determined by conducting Method 5 testing, determining dry feed rate by a suitable method, and calculating emissions according to
Equation 1 of the rule.

Each run must last at least three hours and have a sample volume of at least 2.5 dscm (90dscf). You must conduct a performance test every 30 months. You must conduct three runs of at least one hour and the minimum sample volume must be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). You must use the average of the three runs to determine initial compliance.
Clinker cooler at a major source

10 percent opacity

Ensuring that the maximum 6-minute average opacity during each of the three Method 5 test runs, measured using a COMS, is no greater than 10 percent. The maximum 6-minute average opacity for each of the three test runs must be no greater than 10 percent.

32

Table 13. Initial Compliance with Emission Limits
For each

For the following emission limit... You must demonstrate initial compliance by...

Raw mill; finish mill; raw material dryer; raw material, clinker and finished product storage bins; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading and unloading system

10 percent opacity

Maintaining the maximum six-minute average opacity, measured using
Method 9, at no greater than 10 percent
The maximum 6-minute average opacity for each of the three test runs must be no greater than 10 percent.
The Method 9 performance test must last 3 hours (30, 6-minute averages). However, you may stop the Method 9 test after 1 hour if there are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity and there are no more than 3 readings equal to 10 percent.

33

At what time must I begin to comply?
You must begin monitoring and recording no later than 12:00 a.m. on the initial compliance date
(June 14, 1999 or immediately upon startup for new sources and June 14, 2002 for existing sources) and determine compliance according to the averaging periods in the rule. The rule requires that your source be in compliance with the standards beginning at 12:01 a.m. on the compliance date. However, you must have enough accurate data to determine whether you are in compliance. Therefore, the standards become effective as a practical matter at the first time that you have enough monitoring data to determine compliance. For example, compliance with the three-hour rolling average temperature operating limits does not become effective as a practical matter until 3:01 am on the compliance date. Use this same approach for all continuous monitoring systems that the rule requires, including CEMS.

How do I calculate rolling averages during intermittent operations?
You may not use data from any time when operating parameters are not recorded for any reason
(e.g., source shutdown) to calculate rolling averages. For example, suppose your portland cement plant was shut down for yearly maintenance for three weeks. To calculate a three-hour rolling average temperature, you would add the first one-hour average value recorded for the parameter for the first hour of renewed operations to the last two one-hour averages before the shutdown.
This approach inhibits intentional interruption of the monitoring system to avoid unwanted parameter values.
You must use this approach to calculate averages for all CMS, including CEMS. There is an exception for instances when the in-line kiln/raw mill operating status is changed from off to on or on to off. The calculation of the three-hour rolling average temperature must begin anew in these instances. How do I show continuous compliance with the rule?
• You must comply with the provisions of the written operations and maintenance plan for all affected sources.
• You must demonstrate continuous compliance with each emission limit that applies to you according to Table 14.
C You must demonstrate continuous compliance with each operating limit that applies to you according to Table 15. If you are not in compliance with the operating limit, you are in violation of the D/F emission limit.

34

Table 14. Continuous Compliance with Emission Limits
For each...

For the following emission limit...

You must demonstrate continuous compliance by...

Kiln and in-line kiln/raw mill and alkali bypass, if there is one, at a major source

0.15 kg of PM per MG of feed (dry basis)

Continuously monitoring PM using CEMS and maintaining 0.15 kg of PM per Mg of feed (dry basis).
The continuous compliance requirements do not apply until the EPA has promulgated the PM CEMS standard.

Kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill and alkali bypass, if there is one, at a major source

20 percent opacity

Continuously monitoring using COMS.

Kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill and alkali bypass, if applicable, at a major source

20 percent opacity IF you are using a fabric filter or an electrostatic precipitator with multiple stacks; OR the control device exhausts through a monovent; OR you cannot install a COMS according to PS-1 of 40
CFR Part 60, Appendix B

Performing daily visual opacity observations of each stack using Method 9 for at least 30 minutes each day at the plant’s highest capacity level of the day.

Kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill and alkali bypass, if there is one, for an area or major source 0.20 ng dioxins and furans
Toxicity Equivalent (TEQ) per dscm; OR 0.40 ng dioxins and furans TEQ per dscm when the average of the performance test run average PMCD inlet temperature is 2040 C or less (corrected to 7 percent oxygen) Continuously monitoring and recording PMCD inlet gas temperatures. Maintaining the average opacity for each six minute block less than or equal to 20 percent.

Maintaining 3-hour rolling average PMCD inlet temperatures less than or equal to the temperature limits established at performance test.
You must not exceed the PMCD maximum inlet temperature when the raw mill is operating and when it is not operating. If there is an alkali bypass you must also not exceed a separate PMCD inlet temperature.
If carbon injection is used, continuously monitoring and recording rate of activated carbon injection. You must also continuously monitor either carrier gas flow rate or carrier gas pressure drop. Maintaining 3-hour rolling average injection rates no less than that of the performance test. Maintaining 3-hour rolling averages of either flow rate or pressure drop no lower than the minimum value established at performance test.

Green field raw material dryer, kiln, or in-line kiln/raw mill at area and major sources

50 ppmvd THC, as propane, Monitoring THC using a CEMS and maintaining the 30corrected to 7 percent day average THC concentration in exhaust gases less oxygen than or equal to 50 ppmvd (reported as propane corrected to 7 percent oxygen).

35

Table 14. Continuous Compliance with Emission Limits
For each...

For the following emission limit...

You must demonstrate continuous compliance by...

Clinker cooler at a major source

10 percent opacity

Continuously monitoring opacity using COMS at the outlet of the clinker cooler PM control device and maintaining 6-minute block averages of opacity at less than or equal to 10 percent.

Clinker cooler at a major source

10 percent opacity IF you are using a fabric filter or an electrostatic precipitator with multiple stacks; OR the control device exhausts through a monovent; OR you cannot install a COMS according to PS-1 of 40
CFR Part 60, Appendix B

Performing daily visual opacity observations of each stack using Method 9 for at least 30 minutes each day at the plant’s highest capacity level of the day. Six minute block averages of opacity must be less than or equal to
10 percent.

Raw mill and finish mill at major sources 10 percent opacity

Maintaining no daily visible emissions, measured for six minutes using Method 22, from the mill sweep and air separator PMCD. You must conduct the Method 22 test when the unit is operating at the highest load or capacity reasonably expected to occur during the day.
If a visible emission is observed during the Method 22 test, you must initiate and complete the corrective action in your operation and maintenance plan. You must also conduct Method 9 testing within 24 hours.

Raw material dryer; raw material, clinker and finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading and unloading system at major sources

10 percent opacity

Conducting test Method 22 according to the operations and maintenance plan.

36

Table 15. Continuous Compliance with Operating Limits
For each...

For the following operating limit...

You must demonstrate continuous compliance by...

Kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, and alkali bypass, if there is one, at area and major sources

Maintaining the threehour rolling average
PMCD inlet temperatures at no greater than the temperature established at performance test.

Continuously monitoring and recording PMCD inlet gas temperatures. Maintain the activated carbon injection rate at no less than the rate established at performance test.

Continuously monitoring and recording activated carbon injection rate.

Kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, and alkali bypass, if there is one, at area and major sources

Maintaining the 3-hour rolling average temperatures of gas at inlet to the kiln PMCD and alkali bypass PMCD less than or equal to that established at performance test.
Using and maintaining documentation that the activated carbon is of equal or greater quality than that used at performance test.

Maintaining the 3-hour rolling average carbon injection rate greater than or equal to the rate limit established at performance test.
Using and maintaining documentation that the activated carbon is of equal or greater quality than that used at performance test.

Kiln, in-line kiln/raw mill, and alkali bypass, if there is one, at area and major sources

Maintain either the carrier gas flow rate or the carrier gas pressure drop no lower than the value established at performance test.

Continuously monitoring and recording either carrier gas flow rate or carrier gas pressure drop.
Maintaining the 3-hour rolling average carrier gas flow rate or pressure drop greater than or equal to the limit established at performance test.
Using and maintaining documentation that the activated carbon is of equal or greater quality than that used at performance test.

37

6.0 Other Requirements and Information
Who administers this regulation?
Your State or local agency for air pollution control, or your EPA Regional Office, will administer the regulation. If your plant is in Indian Country, then your Tribe or your EPA Regional Office will administer the regulation. You may be under the jurisdiction of one or more agencies depending on whether they’ve been granted delegation of this rule.
Not all States have been granted delegation, or, if they have been granted delegation, they may not have been delegated all portions of the rule. Our EPA Regional Offices may also have retained certain rights even after delegation (for example, you may continue to have dual reporting requirements). You should check with your EPA Regional Office or State for the latest information. Do I need a title V permit?
You’ll need a title V permit if you’re subject to the Portland Cement Manufacturing NESHAP.

How do I change my permit to include this rule?
If you’ve already been issued a final title V permit and you have three or more years left on your permit, your permitting authority will reopen your permit within 18 months of the publication date of the final rule or final amendments. If you have less than three years left on your permit, update your permit during your renewal period. If your permit hasn’t been issued in final form, update your application or draft permit.
To summarize, your options are as follows:
As of 6-14-99, if you have . . .

Then . . .

Not been issued a final title V permit

Update your permit application or draft permit

Less than three years left on your permit

Update your title V permit during renewal

Three or more years left on your permit

Your permitting authority will reopen your permit within 18 months after the publication date of the final rule or final amendments A similar schedule would be followed for incorporating into your title V permit any promulgated
38

changes to the Portland Cement Manufacturing NESHAP, including final amendments concerning
PM CEMS.
Title V permitting rules may change after the publication of this document. Keep abreast of any changes by checking the Federal Register or visit our title V websites at www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t5main.html and www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/permits/.

What parts of the General Provisions apply?
The General Provisions were published in the Federal Register on March 16, 1994 (Volume 59, page 12408) and apply to all NESHAPs, including this Portland Cement Manufacturing NESHAP.
This means that when you became subject to this rule, you also became subject to the General
Provisions. Some sections in this rule over-ride the General Provisions. You’ll find that Table 1 of the final rule shows you which sections of the General Provisions apply to this rule and which don’t. General Provision requirements, except for notification, recordkeeping, and reporting, are not addressed in this document.

39

7.0 Getting Additional Help
Where do I go for help?
You can go to a lot of places for help, including all of the following:
C Your State, local or tribal agency for air pollution control
C Your State’s Small Business Assistance Program (SBAP)
C Local, regional, or national trade associations
C Your EPA Regional Office
State and local contacts can change frequently. To get the most current contact information, go to the STAPPA/ALAPCO website (www.4cleanair.org) and then the membership directory. The directory will give you the latest contacts for major air programs (that is, emission standards for toxic air pollutants, ozone, etc.) at the State and local level.

If you have questions about this rule, you should contact your State, local or Tribal agency before calling the EPA. Their rules may be more stringent than Federal requirements.

Trade Associations representing the portland cement industry are listed below. Trade associations sometimes have rule information for their members.
Trade Association

Telephone #

Address

American Portland Cement Alliance

(202) 408-9494

Andy O’Hare
1225 I Street, NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005

Portland Cement Association

(847) 966-6200

Ann Dougherty
5420 Old Orchard Rd.
Skokie, IL 60077-1083

40

Many States have a Small Business Assistance Program. If you’re a small business and don’t know who your SBAP is, you can call EPA's Control Technology Center Hotline [at (919) 5410800 or visit EPA’s SBAP at www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/sbap for help].
Contact numbers for EPA’s Regional Air Division Offices may also change frequently. To obtain the most up-to-date information, you may want to visit your Regional Office’s website. Table 16 lists each of our Regional Offices, the Air Toxics Division Phone and Address, and the Regions internet home page. Make all written inquiries to the attention of “Portland Cement NESHAP
Contact.”

Can I get more information on the Web?
You can get a wealth of information on the World Wide Web (WWW). Some of the more popular ways to get information on this rule include:
C

EPA’s Unified Air Toxics Website (www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw)
You can download copies of preambles, regulations, background information documents, policy memos, and other guidance materials here. All rule pages can be found under the
Rules and Implementation page. Portland cement can be found under www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw/pcem/pcem.html. C

EPA’s OAR Policy and Guidance Information (www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t3main.html)
This is another link to regulatory information.

C

EPA’s Applicability Determination Index (ADI)
(http://es.epa.gov/oeca/eptdd/adi.html)
EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) posts memos dealing with applicability and compliance at this site.

C

OECA Compliance Assistance Centers (http://www.epa.gov/epahome/business.htm)
You can find information on compliance with federal regulations at this site. There are centers for printing, automotive services and repair, agriculture, and metal finishing, chemical production, printed wiring board manufacture, transportation, and local governments. C

STAPPA/ALAPCO home page (http://www.4cleanair.org)
STAPPA/ALAPCO is the State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators
(STAPPA) and The Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials (ALAPCO) organization. STAPPA/ALAPCO has members representing each State and local agency for air pollution control.
41

You can get air pollution information at this site, including a document entitled “Communicating
Air Quality: A Compendium of Resources." It lists educational materials on air pollution that
State and local agencies have created.

42

Table 16. Air Division Contact For Each EPA Regional Office
EPA Region
Region I

Region II

Region III

States Covered
CT, ME, MA, NH, RI &
VT

NJ, NY, Puerto Rico
& Virgin Islands

DE, MD, PA, VA,
WV & DC

Division Phone and Address
Janet Bowen
Office of Ecosystem Protection
CAP
JFK Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203
Kenneth Eng
Air Compliance Branch Chief
290 Broadway, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10007-1866
Bernard Turlinski
Air Enforcement Branch Chief

Phone
Home Page
(617) 565-3595 www.epa.gov/region1 (212) 637-4000 www.epa.gov/region2 (215) 566-2110 www.epa.gov/region3 841 Chestnut Building

Region IV

Region V

Region VI

Region VII

Region VIII

Region IX

3AT10
Philadelphia, PA 19107
AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, Lee Page
NC, SC & TN
Air Enforcement Branch
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
IL, IN, MI, WI, MN
George T. Czerniak, Jr.
& OH
Air Enforcement Branch Chief
5AE-26
77 West Jackson St.
Chicago, IL 60604
AR, LA, NM, OK & John R. Hepola
TX
Air Enforcement Branch Chief
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
IA, KS, MO & NE
Don Toensing, Chief
Air Permitting Compliance Branch
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
CO, MT, ND, SD, UT Douglas M. Skie
& WY
Air and Technical Operations Branch
999 18th Street, 1 Denver Place,
Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2466
AZ, CA, HI, NV,
Barbara Gross
American Samoa, & Air Compliance Branch Chief
Guam
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105

43

(404) 562-9131 www.epa.gov/region4 (312) 353-2088 www.epa.gov/region5 (214) 665-7200 www.epa.gov/region6 (913) 551-7446 www.epa.gov/region7 (303) 312-6432 www.epa.gov/region8 (415) 744-1138 www.epa.gov/region9 Table 16. Air Division Contact For Each EPA Regional Office
EPA Region
Region X

States Covered
AK, ID, WA & OR

Division Phone and Address
Anita Frankel
Air and Radiation Branch Chief
AT-092
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101-1128

Phone
Home Page
(206) 553-1757 www.epa.gov/region10

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Better Mentoring

...success of the program. Those factors were finding the right mentor, Aligning instructional-support efforts and Partnering with principals. The first factor is finding the right mentor. Barlin points out that first and for most a good mentor has to first be good and effective teacher. The problem is that many schools and distracts are not equip or have the proper structure to asses who is highly effective or strong in student outcome. In those schools that can the problem them becomes willingness to pull that teacher out of the classroom to mentor. Aligning instructional-support efforts is the next key factor in a successful program. Barlin makes a connection with aligning instructional support with that of a communal tree. Everyone want to water it, in hopes to see it thrive but if there is not proper coordination then the tree will drown. Here the new teacher is the tree and the those willing to help water the tree are the literacy and math coaches, university supervisors, data specialists, special education counselors, technology coordinators, different frameworks and policies. The mentor and distract frameworks are there to support and coordinate all that want to water the tree so that the tree does not drown. Lastly, a program needs to partner with the principal in order to work. Barlin points out in the article,, that the job of the principal is evolving and demanding, often at times coming without...

Words: 736 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Role of Administrators in Advancing Student Learning

...effective leaders as well as their behaviors. Principle 1. Leadership for change is most effective when carried out by a small group of educators with the principal functioning as a strong cohesive force. Principal plus a strong leadership team operate as key players and working with a dedicated group of classroom teachers because teachers must be involved in day-to-day decisions that affect their day-to-day lives (Marzano, R. J., 2003). For example in creating a guaranteed and viable curriculum, it is important that the principal assumes the role of visible head of this reform effort with the ability to mentor and guide direction for a leadership team and all teachers. Time is a factor that yields success when information is shared in a routine and timely manner. Even though obstacles may arise, the principal can offer adequate information in time for planning the curriculum teachers are responsible for, such as assessments and activities for higher order thinking from students. Effective leadership is present when teachers know the principal is time conscious of what improvements are needed in the months to come and shares this in a collegial manner. With artifacts from the school year such as student reports, test reports, and other forms of reflection on components of the educational program, the principal can be conceptual in sharing information and evidence, leading the team and teachers to relevant changes for improvement ahead of a...

Words: 751 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Agency Law

...15, 2014 For this discussion board post we are to discuss the topics of Agency Law and the different principals and ideas that go along with it. There are three types of principles that exist; they are disclosed, undisclosed, and partially disclosed principals. A disclosed principle refers to when there is a 3rd party involved. The person/people are not hidden by the company to the person or persons that they are working with. For example, Let’s say you have a bill and you have not paid it, the company that you had the bill will originally may turn your account over to another collection agency and they would in turn contact you and let you know that your account has been turned over to their company to collect the debt on behalf of the original company. When it comes to an undisclosed principle, it’s just that, not disclosed, no information is given on that agent. They still are working either on their own behalf or through a company and do not want their information public. For example, if I was under an undisclosed principle I would not go into a meeting and say, “I am here on behalf of Yellowstone National Park”. This information would not be given out. For a partially disclosed principle, at the time of the deal, the person may know that the other person he is dealing with is portraying themselves as an Agent but does not know who the main source or principal is. For example, if I am speaking on behalf of a national park and I am trying to build a new park, if the...

Words: 598 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Nursing

...born in the religious house hold it was God first and then your parents. For those of us who grew up without knowing God it was our parents. Our first teacher and leader. We learned to function as a family unit when your parents instructed you to learn how to cook and clean. These actions allow for the parents to be freed to do other task. Performing these tasks showed us how to follow leadership and by performing these task lightened to load for our first leader – our parents. This is the same principal that applies now as adults. We learn to perform task at our jobs, this is to uplift the company and the reward for us is a pay check weekly, monthly, or biweekly. This should be the same attitude we present as Christians. If we believe that we are all one body in Christ we should be able to do anything we can to glorify Christ. Assisting our leadership is no different. If we believe that God has placed us in a church where there is leadership that follow God’s principals we should understand that anything that is asked of us as members comes straight from God and is utilized to edify the body of Christ. Sometimes we get stuck in our own way of thinking – the world’s way. But if we look at it in a biblical since we should understand that the things that we do for Christ will last. Cleaning the church, beautifying the church, are a couple things that bring God glory. The church leadership is unable to do it alone. We as members and leaders should always try and find...

Words: 484 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Addressing Dysfunctional Thinking

...(2002) noted, “One of the National Association of Elementary School Principals' six standards for what principals should know and be able to do calls on principals to put student and adult learning at the center of their leadership and to serve as the lead learner (2001)” (para. 17). If this premise is true, then it is safe to suggest that this situation is a learning opportunity for the entire community to understand who is in charge of the building. Alienating staff simply because of their experience within a particular building with complete disregard for their skill or knowledge level is destructive to morale and puts all the perceived power in the wrong hands. Of course Mr. Carroll might want to be conscious of Mrs. Douglas’s concerns, but that meeting should be centered around him telling her Mrs. Farmington is being appointed to run the Wordsmith competition. If the faculty decides who should do what and when and can keep others from participating at will, then the point of having a lead learner or leader in place at all becomes meaningless. Principal Carroll has to demonstrate his leadership by understanding he has to lead the entire school community and not just a select few. In every situation the right people with the right experience, attitude, and skill level have to be put into place so the school can thrive at maximum potential. The veteran teachers have to learn to be welcoming and Principal Carroll has to send the message that’s the expectation and his demand...

Words: 1384 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Premium Incentive

...Tournaments and Piece Rates Revisited: A Theoretical and Experimental Study of Premium Incentives Werner Guth Rene Levnsky Kerstin Pully Ori Weiselz June 22, 2010 Abstract Tournaments represent an increasingly important component of organizational compensation systems. While prior research focused on xed-prize tournaments, i.e., on tournaments where the prize or prize sum to be awarded is set in advance, we introduce a new type of tournament into the literature: premium incentives. While premium incentives, just like xed-prize tournaments, are based on relative performance, the prize to be awarded is not set in advance but is a function of the rm's success: the prize is high if the rm is successful and low if it is not successful. Relying on a simple model of cost minimization, we are able to show that premium incentives outperform xed-prize tournaments as well as piece rates. Our theoretical result is qualitatively con rmed by a controlled laboratory experiment and has important practical implications for the design of organizational incentive systems. JEL Classi cation: C72, C91, J33 Keywords: Tournaments, Incentives, Economic experiments Max Planck Institute for Economics, Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany. yEberhard Karls Universitat Tubingen, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Nauklerstrasse 47, 72074 Tubingen, Germany. zThe Hebrew University, Center for the Study of Rationality, Giv'at Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel...

Words: 5213 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Strategy & Scope Document

...1 Introduction Here you can write the assignment. You can also present yourselves. If there are certain remarks to make you can put them here. 2 Structure of the report Here you describe the structure of the report. Also you can explain the way of working, the approach to deal with the assignment and you're research. By describing this all coming chapters are not falling out of the air. 3 Research on RIA's? Here you present your research undertaken on the internet. If you want to put additional information in some appendices that's fine. Again: It is important if you state your ideas or findings to give some "evidence" by referring to internet or pages in a book (do not forget to mention the book). 3.1 Definition of a RIA 3.2 Technologies in the 3.3 Our choices 4 Site objectives What do we want to reach with this application (or website); What do we want to support and why? Where are the opportunities to persue? It is important to make clear what the investor wants to achieve with the site (or application). End this chapter with a summarization (requirements) and draw conclusions. 5 Environment analysis Which sites (applications) did you investigate (and why these?). What did we investigate? What were the examples or parts we liked (give proof to us)? What were the examples or parts we did not like? End this chapter with a summarization (requirements) and draw conclusions. You can give proof of statements you make...

Words: 482 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

My Paper

...Click here for the steps to follow Application for Selection Certificate Principal Applicant – Spouse or de facto spouse INSTRUCTIONS How to complete this form Answer all questions accurately. If you run out of space, please finish your answer on a separate sheet marked with the number of the section of the form to which it refers. Who is required to fill out this form? The principal applicant and the accompanying spouse or de facto spouse, if any, who are applying under one of the following subclasses (definitions on page 2): • skilled worker; • self-employed worker or entrepreneur; • foreign national in a particularly distressful situation, within the meaning of section 18c of the Regulation respecting the selection of foreign nationals: this subclass does not include refugees, persons in a similar situation, nor protected persons. Dependent children accompanying you who are aged 22 or older or who are married or de facto spouses must complete the form Application for Selection Certificate – Dependent child aged 22 or older or who is married or a de facto spouse (definitions on page 2). A child who is not a dependent must fill out this form as a principal applicant. Appendices, supporting documents and place of application submission You must send this form, along with the appendices and the necessary supporting documents to the immigration office responsible for files originating in your country. Closely examine the list of documents to append to your application for...

Words: 4551 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

Economie

...1 Introduction Marc MENOU Juillet 2007 M. MENOU / COURS D’ECONOMIE 1 TABLE DES MATIERES 11 L'économie est une science fondamentale _________________________________________________ 4 111 Une préoccupation pratique essentielle ________________________________________________ 4 112 Une problématique théorique fondamentale ____________________________________________ 5 12 L'économie est mal acceptée et mal connue ________________________________________________ 7 121 La science économique est critiquée __________________________________________________ 7 122 La science économique est refusée __________________________________________________ 10 123 La science économique est mal connue _______________________________________________ 13 1231 Des apparences superficielles ______________________________________ 14 1232 Méconnaissance de l'économique ________________________________________________ 16 1233 L'erreur humaine _____________________________________________________________ 20 13 L’explication de ce paradoxe __________________________________________________________ 22 131 Le réel ________________________________________________________________________ 22 1311 La définition du réel __________________________________________________________ 23 1312 L'existence du réel____________________________________________________________ 24 1313 La création et l’évolution du réel ________________________________________________ 24 1314 Les caractéristiques du réel _____________________________________________________...

Words: 19368 - Pages: 78

Free Essay

Factor Analysis

...Assemblage of factors affecting Success of Fast Moving Consumer Goods Parmindar Singh1 1 Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Chaudhary Devi Lal University, Sirsa. Abstract This paper has mainly focused to the study about the factors which affects on the success of Fast Moving Consumer Goods. Factor analysis is employed on data of 24 items that have main effect on the individual consumer. The major objective of this study is to determine the factors which affects the success of FMCG. The response of the 100 respondents has been selected for the purpose of the study. The findings indicate that factor 4 (v4) is at the top by which consumers make their opinion for use of buying in products with mean value (3.12) which is more effective in the comparison of the low mean value (1.31) of the factor 2 (v6) that is less effective in making the opinion for use of buying the products . Overall the analysis provides an understanding the consumer differ significantly by age, education and income level as consumer wise on intrinsic motivation. The results are important for the group of the consumers in making their purchase decision, companies selling their products and the various parties involve advertiser, investors etc. 1. Introduction Fast moving consumer goods is also known as consumer packaged goods. The Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) industry in India is one of the largest sectors in the country and it is at present the fourth largest sector with a total market...

Words: 6384 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

Ar-Rahnu

...This study examines the applicability of theory of reasoned action (TRA) in a context of Islamic pawnshop using structural equation modelling (SEM). The present study presents a simplified theory of TRA, hence it is intended to test whether the two constructs in the theory are acceptable or not in a newly context of Islamic pawnshop. The simplified theory is tested using survey data from 250 respondents. Out of these, only 221 questionnaires are found to be usable whilst the rest are omitted owing to the incomplete responses. The results reveal that attitude was significantly related to the intention to use Islamic pawnshop. Subjective norm was also significantly associated with the intention to use Islamic pawnshop. In sum, the present study provides us valuable insights for service providers to future planning of Islamic pawnshop businesses. Key words: Attitude, subjective norm, questionnaire-survey, theory testing, Islamic pawnshop, Malaysia. INTRODUCTION In this study, an Islamic pawn is normally noted as arRahnu. Ar-Rahnu is defined as a method of providing short-term financing to a person by pawning her jewellery to banks or pawnshops as a security. It is one of the micro financing facilities available for low and middle class income earners who are seeking financial assistance to meet two purposes. Firstly, for precautionary purposes, mainly when one encounters unexpected situations such as death and accident which required quick cash, and less cumbersome financial assistance...

Words: 4692 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

Agency Cost

...Agency costs in corporate governance The information asymmetry that exists between shareholders and the Chief Executive Officer is generally considered to be a classic example of a principal–agent problem. The agent (the manager) is working on behalf of the principal (the shareholders), who does not observe the actions, or many of the actions, or is not aware of the repercussions of many of the actions of the agent. Most importantly, even if there was no asymmetric information, the design of the manager's contract would be crucial in order to maintain the relationship between their actions and the interests of shareholders. Information asymmetry contributes to moral hazard and adverse selection problems. Agency costs mainly arise due to contracting costs and the divergence of control, separation of ownership and control and the different objectives (rather than shareholder maximization) the managers. Professor Michael Jensen of the Harvard Business School and the late Professor William Meckling of the Simon School of Business, University of Rochester wrote an influential paper in 1976 titled "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure".[3] Professor Jensen also wrote an important paper with Eugene Fama of University of Chicago titled "Agency Problems and Residual Claims".[4] There are various actors in the field and various objectives that can incur costly correctional behaviour. The various actors are mentioned and their objectives...

Words: 713 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Summary of Accounting Theory

...Agency theory is based on the assumption that the individuals act to maximize their own expected utilities Relationship between one person (principal) entrusted to another person (the agent) RESIDUAL LOSS *Loss associated with no being able to fully align the intrst of principal with their agent BONDING COSTS *cost borne by the agent as a result of the aligning their interst EG: i)agent prepare the fs(effort & time) ii)Constraints manaher xtvt MONITORING COST *the cost observing & monitoring the agent’s behaviour EG: I )auditing cost ii)Budget restriction iii) Operating rules Agency Costs -due to self interst, the agent may act for their best interest. -Agency problem give rises the agency costs JENSEN & MECKLING (1976) *Contract under which on or more (principals) engage another person (the agent) to perform some service on the principal’s behalf which involves delegating some decision making authority to the agent *Utility maximization by both parties (eg: there is no reason to believe that the agent will always act in the principal’s best interest.) Agency problem -problem of inducing an agent to behave as if he were maximizing the principal’s welfare. Focus on delegation of jobs from principal to the agent AGENCY THEORY POSITIVE -Descriptive, explanatory or predictive -describe how people do behave -largely dismissive NORMATIVE -Prescriptive -prescribe how people (acctnt) should behave to achieve an outcome...

Words: 480 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Eco 550 Check Your Understanding Chapters 1 and 2

...Chapter 1: Exercises 2, 3, and 6 2. Explain several dimensions of the shareholder-principal conflict with manager-agents known as the principal-agent problem. To mitigate agency problems between senior executives and shareholders, should the compensation committee of the board devote more to executive salary and bonus (cash compensation) or more to long-term incentives? Why? What role does each type of pay play in motivating managers? The dimensions of the principal agent problem are: Principals lack of knowledge, skill, and time than agent. The objective for principal and agent is difficult to align. Normally agent is looking for present value; principal is looking for long term return. Compensations committee should design a salary or bonus formula that can satisfy agent’s expectation. For example, if any investment decreases the present value but increase the long term value that should be considered to manager’s contribution and be reward in a monetary way. Therefore, manager would not radically to seek present value. The salary plays a role of manager’s daily work. The bonus plays a role of manager’s operation performance. Bonus should motivate manager’s decision for long term and short term consideration. 3. Corporate profitability declined by 20 percent from 2008 to 2009. What performance percentage would you use to trigger executive bonuses for that year? Why? What issues would arise with hiring and retaining the best managers? If the corporate profitability...

Words: 993 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Spss

...Comandos SPSS * Análise Fatorial: ANALYZE DESCRIPTIVE EXPLORE * Normality plots with tests Analyze Dimension reduction Factor Analysis Descriptives * Initial solution * Coefficients * KMO and Bartlett´s test of sphericity * Anti-image Extraction * Correlation matrix * Unrotated factor solution * Scree plot * Fixed number of factors * Maximum Iterations for Convergence Rotation * Direct Oblimin * Loading Plot Scores * Save as variables * Regression * Display factor score coefficient matrix TRANSFORM COMPUTE * Target Variable * Numeric Expression * Function group – All * Functions and Special Variables - Ln * Conglomerados: Graphs Legacy dialogs Scatter/Dot Simple * Y Axis * X Axis * Label Cases by Options * Exclude cases listwise * Display chart with case labels Analyze Classify Hierarquical Cluster Variables (s) Label Cases by Cluster * Cases Display * Statistics * Plots Statistics * Agglomeration schedule * Proximity matrix * None Plots * Dendogram * None Method * Nearest neighbor * Interval – Squared Euclidean distance * None Save * Single solution – Number of cluesters Analyze – Descriptive – Explore * Dependent List * Factor List * Display – Both Analyze – Classify – Kmeans * Variables * Label Cases by * Number of Clusters * Method – Iterate and classify ...

Words: 340 - Pages: 2