...(Nissan automobile manufacturing unit exists in Chennai, India. Following points are written by assuming that Nissan Motors is currently not operating in India.) 1. Background: Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. is a Japanese car manufacturing company established in 1933, manufacturing vehicles in 20 countries and providing services in more than 160 countries. {The present workforce consists of 23,605 workers globally.} 2. Automobile Manufacturing industries in India: In order to effectively establish the Nissan Motors industry we need to do a thorough market study of India Automobile Industry. India is presently, the sixth largest passenger vehicle producing country in the World. We need to identify whether: a. Is it feasible to establish the Nissan Industry in India considering all factors like: current global economy, political scenarios, etc.? b. Who are the major competitors in India? Which other manufacturing industries have firmly established them in India? We also need to study their respective current statistics. c. What quality and price range is required? i. What is the target consumer base for which Nissan is aiming? ii. Once identified, how many units per annum will be manufactured? 3. Obstacles: d. Identifying the operations of Nissan in India: iii. Whether to set up a plant in India iv. Import assembled vehicles in India e. Political permissions/issues : v. We need to do a...
Words: 361 - Pages: 2
...Ejemplo de empresa japonesa Toyota Es un fabricante de automóviles japonés con sede en Toyota (Aichi), Japón. Toyota fue el mayor fabricante de automóviles en 2012 (por producción) por delante del Grupo Volkswagen y General Motors,2 y tuvo ventas mundiales aproximadas de 9,98 millones de vehículos en 2013.3 Es una de las "tres grandes" empresas automovilísticas japonesas desafiando a los fabricantes de automóviles estadounidenses que también incluye Nissan Motors y Honda Motor con gran éxito. Produce automóviles, camiones, autobuses y robots (no para la venta al público); es la quinta empresa más grande del mundo. La sede de la empresa se encuentra en Toyota, Aichi, yBunkyō, Tokio (Japón) con fábricas y oficinas alrededor de todo el mundo. La empresa fue fundada en 1933 por Kiichiro Toyoda. Proporciona servicios financieros a través de su subsidiaria Toyota Financial Services y participa en otras líneas de negocio. Fabrica vehículos vendidos en los Estados Unidos bajo las marcas de Toyota, Scion y Lexus. Toyota también posee grandes inversiones en Daihatsu e Hino, y un 8,7% de Fuji Heavy Industries, que fabrica vehículos Subaru. Toyota tiene una amplia cuota de mercado en los Estados Unidos, Europa y África y es el líder del mercado en Australia. También tiene cuotas de mercado significativas en varios países del Sureste Asiático de alto crecimiento. Conclusión En la cultura japonesa en los negocios, se considera al trabajo como un destino compartido. Todos los empleados...
Words: 264 - Pages: 2
...Individual Analysis Paper Chairman and CEO of Nissan and Renault – Carlos Ghosn Chao Ru chao.ru@laverne.edu University of La Verne Graduate School of Business BUS 586 – CRN 1354: Leadership for the Future Professor John C. Sivie June 28, 2012 I. Table of Contents I. Table of Contents 2 II. Background and Award of Carlos Ghosn 3 III. Important Contributes for Nissan from Ghosn 4 IV. Doing the Right Things of Carlos Ghosn 5 V. Learn from Carlos Ghosn 7 VI. References 9 Chairman and CEO of Nissan and Renault – Carlos Ghosn II. Background and Awards of Carlos Ghosn Background Information of Carlos Ghosn: Carlos Ghosn is the president and CEO of Nissan Motor Co. Ltd., a global automotive company with 180,000 employees and $83 billion in revenue. He joined to Nissan in June 1999 as its chief operating officer. And then, he became Nissan’s president in June 2000, and also became the chief executive in June 2001. Carlos Ghson is also the president and CEO of Paris-based Renault, SA which was named in May 2005. Both companies together produce more than one in 10 cars sold worldwide. He is also Chairman and CEO of the Renault-Nissan Alliance, the strategic partnership overseeing the two companies through a unique cross-shareholding agreement (Wikipedia, 2012). Currently, he is not only the president and CEO of Nissan and Renault. He also serves on the board of director at Alcoa Automotive, Inc and Closure Systems International, Inc. He serves these...
Words: 2957 - Pages: 12
...Nissan is one of the world's leading automakers. Jidosha-Seizo Kabushiki-Kaisha("Automobile Manufacturing Co., Ltd." in English) was established in 1933, taking over all the operations for manufacturing Datsun from the automobile division of Tobata Casting Co. LTD, and its company name was changed to Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. in 1934. There were numerous good and bad times the company has faced but it became consistently with the progression of time and now it has turned into one of the main company of making automobiles in the world. The following is a SWOT analysis based on the case study provided of Nissan Motor Co. LTD. Nissan has a number of strengths, one of the most important strength is that it operates globally. After the second world war, Nissan developed steadily, growing its operation internationally. It's got to be particularly fruitful in North America with a lineup of littler gas productive autos and little pickup trucks as well as sports coupe cars. Nissan was extremely remarkable for its advanced engineering and technology innovation, plant productivity, and quality administration. It is because the combination of these strengths the company has held its position over the world. The Nissan company has many strengths, on the other hand it also has weaknesses. One of these is that wrong estimation of customers wants. Customers like stylish, innovative cars, but Nissan thought they preferred good quality cars. As opposed to reinvesting in new product...
Words: 964 - Pages: 4
...Nissan case notes Taking on the challenge - Renaults cash injection 5.4 billion us - Renault would get access to North America and Asia - Nissan would get access to Europe and Latin America - Renault would get access to Nissans’ Engineering and Manufacturing expertise - Nissan would get access to Renaults’ Marketing and Design flair - Nissan had posted global losses in six of the previous seven years. - Nissans 4 out of 43 models were profitable - Daimler insiders afraid of Japanese resistance to change - Renaults credibility - referring to the Volvo merger, fueled by cultural problems. - Renault 44% state owned. - An analyst thought that the DaimlerChrysler cultural problems were nothing compared to if RenaultNissan. - Both Renault and Nissan: Nationalistic and Patriotic - News of Renault-Nissan negotiations resulted in a drop in Renault shares. - Nissans’ problems were evident: • Too many plants (some running at 50% capacity) • 25 expensive chassis (compared to volkswagens 4) • Too many suppliers (3000, compared to 300 at ford) • Too many dealers in Japan. • Japanese Culture: - Lifetime employment - Close ties with suppliers - Renaults STAKE: • The power of VETO, meaning that people were afraid of making changes due to the stakes. Building the team - Cross-cultural challenge (mainly French and Japanese) 1 - Ghosn had one condition: He would have full control, and he did not have to seek approval from France. - And he got to handpick 20 or so executives who would accompany...
Words: 2022 - Pages: 9
...A Concise Research on Siemens AG and Nissan Contents I. Introduction………….…………………………………………………...…………….….1 II. Finding…………………………………....……………………………...…………...…...2 2.1 A concise background of Siemens AG and Nissan………………..…2 2.2 The high performance culture of Siemens….…………….….…………….........2 2.3 Comparison of organisational structure and culture…………….………………...…..2 2.4 Effectiveness of different leadership styles………………………………………......3 2.5 Approaches to management among Siemens AG and Nissan………………………..4 2.6 Factors influence individual behaviour at work………………………………………5 2.7 Different motivational theories………………………………………………………5 2.8 Nature of groups and group behaviour of Siemens…………………………………..6 2.9 Factors to the development of effective teamwork at Siemens………………………6 III. Conclusion…...……………………….………………………………………..………8 3.1 Structure and culture affect the performance of Siemens…………………………..8 3.2 Explanation of the leadership of Siemens AG……………………………………….8 3.3 Organisational theory influences the practice of management……………………8 3.4 Different leadership styles motivate organisations in periods of change……………9 3.5 The usefulness of motivational theories for managers………………….…………10 3.6 Impact of technology on team functioning within Siemens……………………10 Reference………………………………………………..………………….……….……….12 I. Introduction All my research is about two huge companies: Nissan Motor Company and Siemens AG. One topic has already been set...
Words: 3408 - Pages: 14
...Quality Practices at Nissan Motor Company Management 532 Table of Contents TITLE PAGE………………………………………………………………………..1 TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………..2 ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………….3 CHAPTER I – INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………4 CHAPTER II – PLAN DEVELOPMENT………………………………………..5 CHAPTER III – ANALYSIS……………………………………………………….7 CHAPTER IV – OUTLINING FINDINGS………………………………………..8 CHAPTER V – SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS…………………..9 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………….11 Abstract Nissan Motor Company, Limited, is a global corporation with three automotive businesses (Nissan, Datsun and Infiniti) and a marine business (Nissan Marine). Nissan Motor Company and its sub-companies practice quality management using a Field Quality Center concept with 7 seven centers located around the world to serve customers. This group project discusses Nissan Motors Corporation’s history, recent quality downturn and their attempt to “expedite improvements that exceed customer expectations” to regain their lost reputation for quality. We will examine what and how quality practices have been developed and implemented by the Nissan Motor Company in response to these recent trends. In addition, we will determine if adopted quality practices have been successful in fostering a...
Words: 2891 - Pages: 12
...turning Nissan around from his appointment of COO at a very critical time in Nissan’s history. After many years of success, Nissan began facing difficulties in the 90s and Carlos Ghosn was invited to help turn the organization around. Both national and organizational culture was very strong in Nissan and made changes difficult, but Ghosn’s management style enabled him to implement the Nissan revival plan (NRP), which turned the company around to profitability. Background The case revolves around Nissan and its management. The company was established in 1933 under a different name, but quickly changed to Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. Following the Second World War, Nissan expanded its operations around the world and grew steadily. By 1991 Nissan was highly profitable and had four out of the top ten cars in the world. The success didn’t last though. In the years 1993-1999 Nissan had seven consecutive years of losses and credit rating services were threating to lower their status from “investment grade” to “junk”. Part of the problem was the managerial decision to emphasize short-tem market share growth rather than long-term success. Inspired by local Japanese culture and customs, especially keiretsu, Nissan invested heavily in suppliers. This was done to encourage loyalty and cooperation between members of their value chain. Unfortunately, the Asian financial ended up devaluating the yen from 100 to 90 yes = 1 dollar, a 10 % decline in valuation. Obviously, Nissan were...
Words: 1695 - Pages: 7
...Article Discussion Title of Article: Ghosn Creating Value across Cultures ___________________________________________________________________ ___ 1. What is the author’s/authors’ purpose in writing this article? The author, presenting the alliance between Renault and Nissan, wants to make perfectly clear that partnering globally is an opportunity. An equal relationship with two winners. He explains the benefits which are produced by the relationship between the two at a corporate level, and the positive effects at the workforce as well. Learning through differences is essential is the send message. Moreover, the author is warning us of the hidden risks. Losing the corporate identity will have as consequence a lack employees’ motivation. Lastly, the author states that motivation is the engine of performance. 2. Name and discuss three major points on which the author(s) focus in their discussion of their primary purpose. Learning through differences: The author describes the different skills of the French, the Japanese and the Americans. The combination of these skills can disentangle difficult situations more easily and multiplies the possibilities of having Eureka Moments. I find this cross cultural consociation remarkable, people from the two edges of the world, coming from different cultures, having different expertise and knowledge, working together, creating a harmonious relationship, allowing to achieve things which differently would need much more time,...
Words: 611 - Pages: 3
...Why was the former Nissan Management unsuccessful in turning the company around? Why could they not prevent the slide of Nissan’s ranking market share, etc.? The former managers of Nissan had been struggling to turn Nissan into a profitable company for eight years. Nissans major problem were the extremely low margins due to its lack of brand power and the very unprofitable cost structure (especially regarding purchasing costs). Nissan’s organizational and financial structures where very traditional and typical Japanese (e. g. the cross-shareholdings within the kereitsu structures). All previous Nissan CEO’s where Japanese , probably each of them with a long tenure and history in the company. Each CEO was surely skilled and experienced in leading an international company. But it can be speculated that it is much harder for a Japanese CEO to make fundamental changes in Nissan's long-standing operating practices and behavioral norms of Japanese society that are deeply integrated in the corporate structure. The former managers were simply stuck in their Japanese organizational structures and no one wanted to break with their own tradition. In addition, the company advisors, a group of senior managers without line responsibilities, made sure that Japanese business practices were implemented and pursued. Some examples of these country specific, traditional structures are the kereitsu partnerships and the predominant seniority rule: Nissan was consistently strapped for cash and...
Words: 2177 - Pages: 9
..."Leading Change – Carlos Ghosn at Michelin, Renault, and Nissan Motors" case is an example of how one person was able to turn around three different companies from the brink of failure, and implement change through effective leadership. Carlos Ghosn exemplified strong leadership through three interrelated notions, one, affecting the behaviors of others, two, mobilizing employees to encourage commitment, and three, by mobilizing adaptive behaviors. His success can be attributed through the five core tasks that are the “heart of effective change leadership.” Those core tasks are to develop, and communicate purpose, establish demanding performance goals, enable upward communication, forge an emotional bond between employees and the organization, and develop future change leadership. This paper will explore how Ghosn used the five tasks of change leadership to revitalize Michelin, Renault, and Nissan Motors. One of the first strategies Ghosn established was to get all employees to work towards the same common goal. Within each of the companies mentioned above, he developed cross-functional teams. Cross-functional teams allow people from a diverse group to exchange information to solve problems. Michelin-South American personnel had two groups from different cultural backgrounds-French and Brazilian employees. He believed by creating cross-functional teams, it would create teamwork to re-energize employees to work together. He stated, “a cross-functional team was fundamental...
Words: 954 - Pages: 4
...Honda has assigned a woman, Kunii to its board for the first time and given a major promotion to a foreigner in a sign the automaker wants to change perceptions of a hidebound corporate culture. Honda Motor Co. announced Monday that technology expert Hideko Kunii, 66, will join the board, and Issao Mizoguchi, a Brazilian of Japanese ancestry, has been appointed operating officer. These appointments require shareholder approval at the June meeting of the establishment. The company has come under fire in Japan does not advocate any person other than Japanese men. Honda officials clearly stated that Kunii was chosen is because her’s ability and she is the right person but not because of the gender issue. Among Japanese companies, Nissan Motor Co., allied with Renault SA of France, has been the most progressive in promoting diversity. However, this has not yet appointed a woman to its board of directors. Placing women in leadership positions is a motive of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's policies to rescue the moribund Japanese economy. Japanese society is expected to lose its potential for growth and innovation, if it does not do more to encourage women to enter the labour market, because its population is aging and shrinking. This is because Japanese is a high masculine culture country which the society is driven by competition, achievement and success, with success being defined by the winner in field. This culture make women hard to climb up the corporate ladders in Japan with their...
Words: 280 - Pages: 2
...Develop and Articulate clear and consistent sense of purpose and direction for the organization Ghosn was only moderately successful in articulating an organization purpose. In presenting his first analysis of Nissan, he identified the challenge of “save the business without losing the company” while simultaneously presenting the goal of “ do everything in my power to bring Nissan back to profitability at the earliest date possible and revive it as a highly attractive company”. While the combination of saving the business and returning Nissan to attractiveness is an appropriate organizational purpose, the discussion of profitability goals appears to veer into the strategy arena, which would be more specific. While he is able to establish a common sense of direction and goals for all employees, saving the company, there had to have been questions regarding what not losing the company meant in the context of returning it to profitability. Additionall, a clear purpose is generally supported by decentralized and autonomous decision making. Ghosn makes a point of referring to everything that is in his power which seems inconsistent with establishing high levels of coordination and teamwork. Establish Demanding Performance Expectations Ghosn was successful in creating demanding performance expectations. Similar to the tactics employed by Jack Welch at GE, Ghosn worked to instill the concept of “stretch”. Stretch goals are those that cannot be achieved by incremental or...
Words: 1158 - Pages: 5
...Chapter 7 FORBES.COM PRIVACY STATEMENT Revised and posted as of: July 17, 2013 Forbes.com is committed to safeguarding your privacy online. Please read the following statement to understand how your personal information will be treated as you make full use of the Forbes.com website and services. The Forbes.com website is owned and operated by Forbes.com LLC. Forbes has been awarded TRUSTe's Privacy Seal signifying that this privacy policy and practices have been reviewed by TRUSTe for compliance with TRUSTe's program requirements including transparency, accountability and choice regarding the collection and use of your personal information. TRUSTe's mission, as an independent third party, is to accelerate online trust among consumers and organizations globally through its leading privacy trustmark and innovative trust solutions. If you have questions or complaints regarding our privacy policy or practices, please contact us by email at privacy@forbes.com. If you are not satisfied with our response you can contact TRUSTe here. Forbes complies with the U.S. - E.U. Safe Harbor Framework and the U.S. - Swiss Safe Harbor Framework as set forth by the U.S. Department of Commerce regarding the collection, use, and retention of personal data from European Union member countries and Switzerland. Forbes has certified that it adheres to the Safe Harbor Privacy Principles of notice, choice, onward transfer, security, data integrity, access, and enforcement. To learn more about the...
Words: 4264 - Pages: 18
...The 10 Best Car Brands of 1990 This page provides two rankings of the Top 10 car brands sold in North America between late 1984 and 1989. Each ranking employs a different method of computation. The statistics used in the computations for rating and ranking the brands are those found within the April 1990 issue of Consumer Reports. The two sections providing the necessary statistics are CR's Used-Cars-To-Avoid list and its reliability charts. Reliability is defined by the magazine as the infrequency of serious problems, which it measures annually by a subscriber survey. The first ranking of the car brands is based on each brand's infrequency of trouble-prone models. This ranking provides a measure of how well each brand's models successfully avoided the bottom end of the model-quality spectrum. The second ranking of the car brands is based on the average of the overall reliability ratings of each brand's models. The second ranking provides a measure of how well a brand's models performed over the entire model-quality spectrum. Brand Quality by Infrequency of Trouble-Prone Models: The Top 10 To form a brand-quality measure from the 1990 list of Used Cars To Avoid, the first step is to count each brand's entries on the list. Each model year of each model is treated as a separate entry. Next, as the number of automobile models sold under a brand name varies greatly from brand to brand, it is necessary to take account of the fact that a brand with more models has a greater...
Words: 8396 - Pages: 34
