Free Essay

Give Back the Land

In:

Submitted By Fourpealis
Words 787
Pages 4
Give The Land Back Native Americans have been subjected to some of the most inhumane atrocities. What about the land we walk upon makes it ours to occupy? Hundreds of years ago, one of the greatest forms of violence nearly wiped out America’s original owners from existence. What’s worse is that the bloodshed of the Native peoples has become almost invisible to the everyday American, while what’s left of the previously­indigenous population feeds off of the scraps White society has left for them. With this in mind, the most ethical actions the United States can do is return its stolen land. Thus, the United States federal government should give the land back to the Native Americans. The land that we currently reside on doesn’t belong to us, we stole it from the indigenous tribes that populated it before our arrival. Americans are so unaware of their own history that they don’t even recognize the atrocities committed against the Natives. The federal governments owes the Natives their original land, the reservations they currently live in are a testament to the oppression that occurred since Columbus sailed the seas. If not for the federal government who can say what the Natives could be doing now, it was our hand that saw to their demise. To exterminate a society like theirs, we began with supplementing Abrahamic religions for Indian culture, this effectively made Indian culture

disappear. Culture was not the only victim in our oppressive actions, the Trail of Tears slaughtered over 2,000 Choctaws and that was only the first removal (4). The federal government owes the Native people for the oppression that has transgressed.A society built off of the blood of Native bodies can do nothing but perpetuate oppression. The denial of the Native genocide has allowed the United States to construct a history of violence ­ the enslavement of Africans, destruction in Korea and the Philippines, as well as countless acts of unjust violence, precisely because it has never been forced to account for its imperialistic and destructive nature. It has upheld the notion that that which is different ­ non­White, uneducated, etc ­ is lesser, and is manageable, and able to be dominated. In other words, giving the land back isn’t just a simple act of land return; this process would trigger a deeper investigation of American entitlement, White privilege, and destruction that allows the United States to continue bloodshed today (1). We have forgotten the past for far too long, and as a result have been doomed to repeat it. The beginning of the Indian relocation started in 1830 and delegated insufficient land to accommodate the Native peoples. After the Indian Removal act of 1830 most indians were forced to move from the land they were just granted, these Natives were granted land east of the Mississippi River. The land granted to the Natives was too valuable so they were systematically removed from their land again. They were moved again and again until the Federal Government was satisfied. These poor living arrangements are the progenitors of the reservations today, these reservations are below the living standard of any able­bodied person. Reservation drop­out rates are a staggering 70% (3). Most reservations of today have a stiflingly high poverty rate, averaged around

40% (2). The Indian reservations are so bad that they’ve even been addressed before, in 1953 the federal government instituted an employment and relocation program that coincided with a termination legislation. The termination legislation saw to it that reservations ceased to exist as independent political entities (2). The actions the federal government has taken to destroy the Native people are very real and have halted societal advancement, the only way the United States can ever hope to redeem itself is to try and rectify past oppression. By giving the land back to the Natives we can ultimately force the United States to confront its cultural imperialism as well as halt a systemic form of violence against the United States’ original inhabitants. The United States has gone on long enough oblivious to the oppression it subjugates, it’s high time that equality wasn’t preached for and was actually achieved.

CITATION PAGE (1) Street, Paul “Those Who Deny the Crimes of the Past: Reflections on American Racist Atrocity Denial” (2004) Web. 06 Nov. 2012. (2) Sandefur, Gary D. "American Indian Reservations: The First Underclass Areas?" N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Nov. 2012 . (3) Frank, Ka. "Native Americans in the US Today: Oppressed and Ignored." Frontlines of Revolutionary Struggle. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Nov. 2012. . (4)Len Green. "Choctaw Removal was really a "Trail of Tears"". Bishinik, mboucher, University of Minnesota. Archived from the original on 2008­06­04. Retrieved 2008­04­28.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Should The Government Give Money Back To Native Americans Essay

...government should give money back to native american groups. To compensate for the Land they took from them. I will give 3 clams supporting that the united states government should give the native americans money. Also i will give 3 counterclaims that will support the other side. On how the united states government should give the native americans there land back. One reason why the united states government should give money back to native american groups. Is because they deserve some respect for the discrimination we have given them over the years. As obama said “The biggest problem that we have in terms of race relations, I think, is dealing with the legacy of past discrimination against blacks and Native Americans which has resulted in extreme disparities in terms of poverty and income for these groups. This is basically states that we should help native americans because the nation has not treated them equally as other races. Some people believe we should give them their...

Words: 624 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Native American Land Research Paper

...I believe they should give land to the native americans because all of this land were on now was always theres and we took it away from them why not give some back. They should give land because they have a small space not to know what else is out there in the world. has asked the US government to return some of the land stolen from Indian U.S. has taken more and more land, and they've lost huge territories. There are clear examples of broken treaties Another strong reason is the land has more of what people want and what people need If the Black Hills were returned to the tribe, the Reservation would have natural resources, and a way to earn enough money to survive. i think they should get land back. In my opinion Why i think they should...

Words: 363 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Comparison Of Palestinian Statehood And Israel's 'Right To Exist'

...As of now the Jews believe in Zionism, which allows them to believe Palestine should not have a state because that is Israel's Land. Israel is self-determined to get the land they are entitled to back in their possession. Since Israelis and Palestinians cannot agree on diving land to resolve disagreement there is the need a mandated two-state solution that gives Jews their own land. With this solution, Israelis and Palestinians can both exist together as a nation. Whereas some may want to give all the land to either Palestinians or Israelis if they each have their own land there will be less conflict. As the both coexist, it becomes the two-state solution. By doing this, it will get rid of both places becoming one nation and reduce the amount of disputes and war. With separate land they can try to work on their own conflicts as their own states with their own regulations. Borders...

Words: 917 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Rationale for Crusades

...honored Christian conquest to reclaim the Holy Land back from the Muslims. Like history, the Crusades cannot be itemized into one set place; there are many different views. Looking at the first Crusade, there are the views of the Franks (Western Christians), Byzantines (Eastern Christians), and the Muslims. Texts giving insight to these views include: Pope Urban at Clermont by Fulcher of Chartres, The Alexiad by Anna Comnena, The Damascus Chroncile by Ibn al-Qalanisi, The Capture of Jerusalem by the Crusaders by Raymond of St. Giles, and The Conquest of Jerusalem by Ibn Al-Athir. Even though the idea of the first Crusade is clear, the reason why many ‘crusaded’ has to do with many different reasons and many different people. These texts describe views on Muslim accounts, Byzantine, and Frank accounts of how the Crusade affected them. One of the different people involved was the Franks. Out of the three so-called people of the first Crusade the Franks had the most to win. If they were to gain the Holy Land, that would give them more land to rule which was probably highly favored in the eyes of kings, nobles, and vassals. In Pope Urban II eyes this gives him a chance to extend the church’s power. So when the Byzantine Empire asked for help against Turks, the idea of a crusade was imminent. Urban II stated in Fulcher of Chartres, “Manifold evils were growing in all parts of Europe because of wavering faith” (Reilly 354). This text gives reason for a crusade to lift up the church and...

Words: 1530 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Guadalupe Hidalgo

...Mexican territory. I have been given land by the King of Spain and have recently received the details of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The treaty portrays insincerity and presents us with an unjustifiable position. The result of the treaty would put us in an even worse situation than we are in now. My points should be recognized because I am very knowledgeable about the treaty, my family has been living in the territory of New Mexico for many generations, I am a strong follower of God, and I know what is best for Mexico. We, as the country of Mexico, can’t sign the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo as we will lose much of our land for a small cost, we will not be given U.S. citizenship immediately, and our land grants will not be honored which will lead to an abominable future for the country of Mexico. Mexico would be giving up an immense amount of land by signing the treaty. The treaty states, “The boundary line between the two republics shall…” The United States is telling us what land to give up, instead of giving us a choice. Although the U.S. is willing to pay us $15 million for some of our land and pay for war-related damages, this amount of money is not large enough. The treaty proposes we give up our land between the west coast of California to the Rio Grande. There could possibly be gold in this land worth more than that price. The U.S. would be basically stealing this land. The United States have already taken a large amount of land from France during the Louisiana Purchase...

Words: 755 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Roll Of Thunder Hear My Cry Research Paper

...Big Ma, Stacey, and Christopher John. The family is colored and they struggle with racism, night riders, and lynchings but they preserve through all they hate that gets pushed towards them. They have a large amount of land that they are thankful to have and would never let the land go. Throughout the novel they show whoever's reading that you can give up and you have to have courage to do the scary things in life. Courage is the quality of mind or spirit that enables a person to face difficulty, danger, pain, etc., without fear; bravery....

Words: 1244 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Abrahamic Covenant Chart

...compose the Covenant: | Development in the Book of Genesis: | Any Change in Content or Emphasis: | Genesis 12:1- Now the Lord had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will show thee: | Abraham | God’s call for Abraham to move from Haran to Canaan. | Abraham moved from Haran to Canaan--land. | Started with a call from God to Abraham. | There is emphasis put on faith as God’s call to Abraham required faith. | Genesis 12:2- And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing. | Abraham | God’s call for Abraham to move by faith. | God’s promise of blessing/seed | Abraham’s call | “I will bless thee.” | Genesis 12:3- And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed. | Abraham | Again God’s call for Abraham’s move of faith. | God’s promise of blessing. | It continues in the beginning stages of development from 1 and 2. | God’s emphasis on who will be blessed and who cursed. | Genesis 12:7: The Lord appeared to Abram and said, “To your offspring I will give this land.” | Abraham | God promises to give Abraham’s descendants the land of Canaan | God’s promise to Abraham’s offspring. | God’s reward to Abraham for faithfulness. | God’s...

Words: 3170 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Historical Report

...had even called them animals. The people had come over from Europe, but yet, they wanted the natives off of their own land. The natives had lived in America for thousands of years and had lived in relative peace among each other. The tribes would sometimes have squabbles, but it was usually to get something back or out of revenge sometimes it was even territorial. At the time of the early settlers, there was an estimated population of natives set at 10 million. The settlers decided that because the natives worshipped different God’s then they did, that they were heathens. The settlers decided that they wanted the native’s land for the gold, silver, iron, and land in general. The settlers started a campaign against the natives through the government, and treaties were formed that the natives had to agree upon whether they wanted to or not. The first treaty was in 1778, the government promised to give the natives rights, and benefits, if the natives agreed to give up some of their land. The settlers decided that the land that they had received was not enough for them, and as they moved west ward they wanted more land. The settlers then decided that the natives did not have any rights as far as blocking progress, which meant that the natives were supposed to give up more of their tribal land. The relocation act was another way of the settlers claiming more land. The government decided that they would relocate the natives to another part of America, that way they could seize...

Words: 1221 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Mexican Cession

...Mexican Cession By Hannah Wilson What is Cession What does Cession Mean? It means to give up or surrender something Mexican Cession means that Mexico gave up large amounts of land such as California and New Mexico to the United States. History behind Mexican Cession In December 1845 the United States voted to make Texas the 28th State. Mexico thought that we had the boundaries wrong and that part of Texas still belong to Mexico. The United States thought the line was the Rio Grand River, but Mexico thought it was another river far inside of the Texas border. The United States President James K. Polk wanted to meet with Mexico and settle the argument about where the Texas line was and talk about buying more land from Mexico. Mexico refused to meet. Mexico had a new president Santa Anna who did not want to talk. What Happened Next… When Mexico refused to meet with the United States President Palk order our military to the border. On April 25, 1846 the Mexican Calvary crossed the Rio Grande river into Texas and began fighting with our military and that was the beginning of the Mexican American war. That event was very important in history because it would determine how much land Mexico would eventually have to give up. (Reference -Social Studies for Kids, website cited below) 1. Mexico gave up over 500,000 square miles of territory to the United States http://www.socialstudiesforkids.com/wwww/us/mexicancessiondef.htm How did the War...

Words: 698 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Tabl1710

...if he is legally entitled to the extra $20,000 and a share in the farm as promised to him by this father Choy, for continuing the operations on the farm. Billy gives up a year of study at university to do so and in return is promised $30,000 and a share of the land by Choy. After three months of working he experiences conflict with Choy’s wife, Maggie, but is promised another $20,000 by Choy if he stays. To determine whether Billy is entitled to the extra $20,000 and a share in the farm we are to first explore whether a contract is formed, and if promissory estoppel would apply in this situation and the relevant terms attached to this contract. Using the common law of contract we can answer these questions, and Billy’s entitlements. a) Is there a contract? Before Billy can be sure he is entitled to anything we first must establish that Billy and Choy have entered into a legally binding contract. For a legal contract to be held, all essential elements of an offer, acceptance, consideration and intentions to enter into a contract, must be present. First there must be an offer for a contract to exist. The offer is made by Choy to Billy, for Billy to give up a year of his study and help out on the farm as Choy is away to look after his sick mother, and in return Billy is promised $30,000 and a share of the farm land. We assume that Choy’s offer is communicated clearly and well. Although Billy does not verbally accept the offer, as silence is not a form of acceptance, Billy...

Words: 2037 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

How Did Andrew Jackson Disobeyed The Supreme Court

...The first account was when Jackson disregarded the Supreme Court’s ruling over Native American removal policies. When the Cherokee filed a court case over the matter of unfair laws in Georgia rather than resorting to violence, it was eventually escalated to the Supreme Court. They sided with the Cherokee and found the laws unconstitutional. Instead of enforcing the decision, Jackson supported Georgia and helped them move Cherokee off their land. It is very controversial because Jackson was a man of the common american people, which Cherokee were not, he still should have enforced the Supreme Court’s ruling and upheld the constitution. The second account occurred over the matter of the Second National Bank. The Supreme Court found the bank constitutional. Jackson once again did not uphold the Supreme Court’s ruling and continued his political war on the bank. Because of this, Jackson caused a horrible economic depression. On both of these accounts Jackson went against the presidential oath he took when he was sworn in to office and should have been impeached for not withholding the...

Words: 960 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Robert V. Remini: The Integration Of Native American Indians

...Module 6 Discussion Assignment Yes Robert V. Remini believes the removal policy enacted by Andrew Jackson did indeed benefit the Native American tribes that were forced to move westward off their lands. Remini’s main reasoning behind his belief is that the tribes would’ve been virtually annihilated if they had stayed. Remini concedes that Jackson was a racist who did not think of the “red man” as his equal, but did have concern for their welfare. Jackson thought white expansion into previously protected lands was inevitable and clashes between the Indians and whites would most certainly result in the deaths of many Indians. The white settlers were also rapidly encroaching and destroying resources on lands integral to Indian way of life (210-11)....

Words: 547 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Poor Barney Case Study: Joint Ownership

...Specifically, joint tenancy with rights survivorship is a type of co-ownership when one owner dies, the surviving owner or owners become the new owners the deceased share or title of property (Garber, 2014). This is important to Barney because the legal rights to his property were put in jeopardy by one of his co-owners Andy had left interest in a will to his son Opie. Opie took out a personal loan and used is presumed interest in the property as collateral. Opie then defaulted on the loan and the lender tried to foreclose on the land (Tailer, 2014, para.3). North Carolina house Bill 799 (2009) states If joint tenancy interests among three or more joint tenants holding property in joint tenancy with right of survivorship are held in unequal BAD START TO RETIREMENT 3shares, upon the death of one joint tenant, the share of the deceased joint tenant shall be divided among the surviving joint tenants according to their respective pro rata interest and not equally, unless the creating instrument provides...

Words: 1364 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Arod

...Alifbay, where Haroun Khalifa lives with his father, a famous storyteller, and his mother. One day, Haroun arrives home from school to learn that his mother has run off with his upstairs neighbor. This neighbor had often been critical of Haroun's father, Rashid, because he did not understand the usefulness of stories. In anger, Haroun assails his father for the uselessness of his stories. This crushes his father. Haroun finds it difficult to concentrate on schoolwork and so his father decides to take him on a storytelling job he is performing for some politicos in the Land of G and the Valley of K. When Rashid attempts to tell his stories, however, no words come out, and the politicos get very mad. Haroun and Rashid board a mail bus bound for the Valley of K. It is driven by a parrot-looking man named Butt who stutters and speaks in riddles. Rashid makes a deal with Butt to drive them on the dangerous road between the Land of G and the Valley of K. Butt drives dangerously and Haroun is worried that he will die. When they reach the beautiful sights of the Valley of K, Rashid tells Haroun that it all reminds him of "khattam-shud," an ancient concept that means silence. When they reach K, Haroun and Rashid meet Mr. Buttoo, the politician, who takes them to his boat on the Dull Lake. As they depart on the lake, they are engulfed in a thick mist. The mist smells very bad and Haroun realizes that it is a Mist of Misery brought on by his father's foul mood. When the sea begins to rock...

Words: 1624 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Research

...California Dream is the idea that if one were to move to California there is a chance for that person to reinvent themselves and release their own potential. Many believe the “California Dream” is perfectly displayed throughout Disneyland because it shows a land of opportunity, it exemplifies the glamour that many seek, and it displays the laid back life style that people only dreamed of. Although many may not think of it as a land filled with opportunity, some pursue the “California Dream” within Disneyland. One man believed that there was the land of opportunity in California. That talented man was Walt Disney, his “California Dream” was to create a place where families could come and have fun together. He once said, “All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them” (brainyquote.com). His idea of Disneyland has proven to be one of the greatest opportunities that anyone has ever taken in California. Walt Disney is one the role models of the “California Dream” as he has expressed his own idea of what the “California Dream” is, by taking the opportunity to create Disneyland. He has spread the “California Dream” throughout the world from his Disney creation. Many opportunities within Disneyland aren’t just the land itself but what’s inside. Dawn McKay is a blogger and she writes about every experience she has going somewhere and she so happened to go to Disneyland and writes about her opinion of the place, for example, “Disney Cast Members exhibit a level of professionalism...

Words: 1347 - Pages: 6