...1. Compare the business models and areas of strength of Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Apple: its business model that focuses on centralized control of all its hardware and software. Apple tightly controlled its smartphones and tablets. It means that only apps from its App Store will loaded for its devices, and will function only with Apple platform. Also, Apple is trying to increase its user base; some apps are free, and it allows bring consumers to the Apple marketplace. They even stopped Google in its plans to allow Google applications to work on Apple products (Google Maps). So, by doing it Apple is trying to capitalize on their loyal customer base. Google: its business model focused on the Internet and the Web. Google provides value to the user by using an inexpensive, flexible infrastructure to speed up Web searches and provide its users with a vast array of Web-based services and software tools. After, when Google bought Motorola, it gives Google the ability to make its own cell phones and tablet devices. However, when they tried to enter completely new territory their Nexus One smartphone was unsuccessful. Microsoft: its business model focused on the desktop computer running the Windows operating system and Office desktop productivity applications. While Microsoft is trying to expand its presence on the Internet, it still must try to keep customers bound to the desktop computer. 2. Why is mobile computing so important to these free firms? Evaluate the mobile platform...
Words: 785 - Pages: 4
...School/Portfolio | The Business School | Course Code/ID | BSMAN3007 | Course Title | International Business Management | Program(s) | Bachelor of Applied Management | Lecturer | Chirs Pan | Author | Wang Lin yu | Email | lynne.lowkey@gmail.com | FIN | G0961866Q | Date | 10 Jan 2013 | 1. Exective summary This case study discusses the business strategies used by Apple, Microsoft and Google in internet industry。Everyone know the Internet has developed into an enormous information infrastructure. This new economy is driven by a relentless force of technological and conceptual innovations stemming from an innumerable number of parties scattered around the globe. Its speed of change and innovation make it to a highly competitive arena. Apple, Microsoft and Google have been the most successful companies within this arena for a long time. Throughout the previous decades, they have internalized the economic laws and technological characteristics of the Internet in their business thinking. Their strategies and competitive moves did not only form the information economy as we know it today, but do also provide showcase examples of how profitable market positions can be achieved in the Internet. Table of content Introduction My report answers some questions: How did Apple, Microsoft and Google successfully navigate and define the competitive arena of the Internet? Which roles did their unique strengths play for their business strategies? Which...
Words: 5257 - Pages: 22
...BCIS 503 Ch 7 Case Study September 17, 2012 Google, Apple, and Microsoft Struggle for your Internet Experience 1. Compare the business models and areas of strength of Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Although they have different business models and strategies, Apple, Google and Microsoft are three major companies who seek to dominate the internet user’s experience. They come to the platform with their own proprietary strengths. In looking at business models, Apple’s business model focuses on the consumer and bringing them a personalized web experience through their hardware (iPads, iPhones, iPods and iMacs), their two major OS systems: Mac OS X and iOS, and through the internet. Although their model limits what type of software customers can access, they offer over 250,000 apps through their iOS app store. Next, with their browser and search engine, Google centers on advertising and democratizing information where they gain most of their profits. Through the companies Android platform they are increasing their market shares into the mobile market. Google seeks a market of open nonproprietary platforms where consumer can freely surf the web and openly enjoy the innovation of apps across devices. Finally, Microsoft business model concentrates on creating user-friendly operating systems, which 95% of all computers use. They have worked to make technology accessible to everyone. However, they are moving towards services and breaking into the search advertising market...
Words: 821 - Pages: 4
...1. Define and compare the business models and areas of strength of Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Apple: Its business model focuses on centralized control of almost all aspects of its hardware and software. It believes smartphones and tablets should have proprietary standards and be tightly controlled. It only allows apps from its App store, that have been vetted by the company, to be loaded to its products. Apple has a very loyal user base that has steadily grown and most likely will stay with Apple products in the future. Google: Its business model has always focused on the Internet and the Web. It began as one of many search engines. It quickly ran away from the pack with its copyrighted PageRank search algorithm which returns superior search results for Web users. It also has developed extensive online advertising services for businesses of all sizes. Google provides value to the user by using an inexpensive, flexible infrastructure to speed up Web searches and provide its users with a vast array of Web-based services and software tools. Microsoft: Its business model originally focused on the desktop computer running the Windows operating system and Office desktop productivity applications. The company and its products are staples for businesses and consumers looking to improve their productivity with computer-based tasks. While it is trying to expand its presence on the Internet, it still must try to keep customers bound to the desktop computer. 2. Why is mobile...
Words: 1413 - Pages: 6
...OUA Group Assignment Cover Sheet A Group Assignment Cover Sheet needs to be included at the front of each assignment submitted. Details of one group member is to be provided – this is where your group assignment will be returned once marked Address details Full name: Kirrily Alisia Loring Address: 516 Senate Road Port Pirie SA Postcode: 5540 Assignment details Unit code: ACG10 Unit name: Communication and Information Systems in Business Assignment no. 2 Due date: 28/04/2012 Assignment topic (as stated in the Unit Information Booklet): Case Study: Google, Apple and Microsoft Struggle for Your Internet Experience. Student names UniSA email ID 1. Kirrily Loring Lorky002@students.unisa.edu.au 2.Adrian Holmes Holai001@students.unisa.edu.au 3.Debra Evans Evady008@students.unisa.edu.au 4.Ana Irisari Iriap001@students.unisa.edu.au 5. Student Declaration We declare the work contained in this assignment is our own, except where acknowledgement of sources is made. We authorise the University to test any work submitted by us, using text comparison software, for instances of plagiarism. We understand that this will involve the University or its contractor copying our work and storing it on a database to be used in future to test work submitted by others. We understand that we can obtain further information on this matter at http://www.unisa.edu.au/ltu/students/study/integrity.asp...
Words: 4689 - Pages: 19
...IT Case Study 3 1. Describe the business (products, services, etc.), strategies, operations and innovations of Apple, google and Microsoft. 2. Why is mobile computing so important to these three firms? Evaluate the mobile platform offerings of each firm. 3. What is the significance of mobile apps, app stores and closed vs. open app standards to the success or failure of mobile computing? 4. Which company will prevail in this epic struggle? Justify your answer. In this triangular fight, at one point or another, each firm has allied with one of their two major foes to team up on the third. Two of the firms – google and Apple – are determined to prevent Microsoft from expanding its dominance beyond the PC desktop and onto the new mobile platform. But when it comes to mobile phones and apps, Google and Apple are enemies: both want to dominate the mobile market. Apple and Microsoft are determined to prevent Google from extending beyond its dominance in search and advertising. So Apple and Microsoft are friends. But when it comes to the mobile marketplace for devices and apps, Apple and Microsoft are enemies. Google and Microsoft are just plain enemies in a variety of battles. Google is trying to weaken Microsoft’s PC software dominance and Microsoft is trying to break into the search advertising market with Bing. http://techcrunch.com/2014/04/30/google-takes-on-microsoft-for-productivity-dominance-of-apples-mobile-platform/ http://www.pcworld.com/article/2026541/why-microsoft-must-become-apple-and-google...
Words: 350 - Pages: 2
...1. Compare the business models and areas of strength of Apple, Google and Microsoft. Apple: Unlike Google and Microsoft, Apple has made unique hardware devices such as iPhone, iPod and etc, with application like iTunes, Apple’s online store. Also one of greatest challenge became one of their strength as well, which was advancing new technology such as iPhone and Ipad. It was one of the conventional technologies that changed into new era of technologies. We also can see that Apple has always been trying new technologies like iMac, although, it was not successful like iPhone and iPad. Apple has always tried to provide elegant design and its feature, which also attracted to customer. To be honest, who thought that, phone can be used like a computer before smart phone was out. Steve Job used to say “I am selling my dream”, and I also do believe that his dream and believe changed into new era, which became one of the strength in Apple as well. Google: Apple and Microsoft have always determined to prevent Google from extending beyond its dominance in search engine and advertising. Google always provided free access to web information through its search engine to internet users. Its business model has always focused on the Internet and the Web. It also has developed extensive online advertising services for businesses of all sizes. Microsoft: dominates computer technology with its operation systems Window and many business software especially office, Exchange and etc. However, Microsoft...
Words: 875 - Pages: 4
...Case Study from Chapter 7: Apple, Google, and Microsoft Battle for your Internet Experience Business 5460, Management Information Systems March 30, 2014 Dr. Mical Ramim Provide a one page summary identifying major issues The battle between global giants, Apple, Google and Microsoft, is a fight that has been occurring for many years now. All three companies have been hugely successful in different aspects of their industry. However, as our society’s technology continues to develop each company has had to make drastic changes to adapt to new and upcoming trends. As discussed in the case study, the perfect example of this necessary adaptation is a trending statistic that predicts a majority of users will begin browsing the internet on mobile devices versus the traditional PC. This probable trend has led to a lively battle of innovation as each company struggles to be number one in the consumer internet experience. Throughout this battle to the top each company has experienced their fair share of issues. Microsoft is perhaps one of the most famous and respected companies in the world. The corporation was founded April 4, 1975 by Bill Gates, an inventor known for creating one of the first user-friendly operating systems for personal computers. Over the decades the company has been a huge success, but not without its failures which often seem to be as of late. What once may have been an internet experience that was easily dominated by Microsoft technology is now saturated with...
Words: 1052 - Pages: 5
...International Business Strategy II 1. Liu Shu 6509037 Introduction Google and Apple are giants in technology industry. These two companies provide innovate products or service and have unique organizational structure and culture. Under the increasing pressure of cost reduction and local responsiveness caused by globalization development, both Google and Apple are transforming into transnational organizations. This report will critically evaluate the comparative transnational effectiveness of Google and Apple in terms of motivation means and mentalities, layers of competitiveness, across boundaries management and corporation social responsiveness (CSR). 2. Motivations Means and Mentalities Initial incentives of Apple and Google expansion were different because of their distinct business focuses. Apple generates its profits by selling cutting-edge electronic devices, whereas Google even though has its own products such as some newly invented wearable devices, its benefit basically comes from their advertising. Therefore, Google do not have to secure key supply, and access to low-cost market. Nevertheless, seeking boarder market seems to be very important for both of these to enterprises. Moreover, the emerging motivations for Google and Apple are quite similar. After they began to expand, the forces which triggered the expansion in the first place, may turn into secondary when they make emerging global...
Words: 3708 - Pages: 15
...Question 1 Compare the business models and areas of strength of Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Answer Apple: It has the basis of creating a very strong hardware base for the internet future and thus logically they play their role in this battle by laying emphasis on the hardware that facilitates mobile computing. Apple has gone into the stance that applications, one of the major earners for tablet and phone manufacturers, should be device restricted. For example, one application should be unique to the brand of the device and should be allowed to function in another device from another separate brand. They even stopped Google in its plans to allow Google applications to work on Apple products. Thus by doing this Apple is trying to capitalize on their loyal customer base and create a Apple weds Apple scenario. Google: Google is the believer in the concept that in the future the devices used to run the applications and other internet options should be a fraction of what they are being charged now and instead the revenues generated should be from the in-app advertisements. Google even bought AdMob, an application advertisements development company, to work on such a concept. This future, Google and Microsoft have tried their hand at going hardware friendly but they still do not put the same emphasis on the hardware as Apple. Microsoft: Microsoft has laid its bet on the operating system on which the mobile computing devices shall run. Microsoft also has announced plans...
Words: 1745 - Pages: 7
...1. Compare the business models and areas of Strength of Apple, Google and Microsoft. Microsoft Strengths- Microsoft is still the leader in PC operating systems and desktop productivity software, but has failed miserably with smartphones hardware and software, mobile computing, cloud-based software apps; its internet portal. Apple Strengths- Examples are mobile devices, such as iPhone and tablets which combine and contribute 52% of apples business. They already have a head start on the mobile phone industry where they have over 250,000 applications. Apple controls 27% of the mobile market and is the highest grossing cellphone ever. Google Strengths- They dominate in advertising with their search engine. And their Android OS controls 41% of the mobile market share which is constantly growing 3 times faster than the iPhone market share. “They bought Android Inc. to enter the mobile market.” also bought out Motorola for 12.5 billion. 2. Why is mobile computing so important to these three firms? By 2012 it will be 200 billion dollars, with a 200% increase every 2.5 years. Therefore, it has been projected that by 2015 the mobile market will be worth 400 billion. It is important for these firms because they want to maximize profit and market share by being aware of changing trends. 70% of the mobile market is dominated by Apple and Google while Microsoft failed to put its name in the mobile market with less than 3%. People now want to use their mobile phone in the...
Words: 671 - Pages: 3
...Maastricht University | | | | School of Business & Economics | | | | Place & date: | 18-01-13, Maastricht | | | | Name, initials: | Hiddema, M. | | For assessor only | | ID number: | I6019815 | | 1. Content | | Study: | Fiscal Economics | | 2. Language structure | | Course code: | EBC1011 | | 3. Language accuracy | | Group number: | 5 | | 4. Language: Format & citing/referencing | | Writing tutor name: | Martin Millband | | Overall: | Fail | Writing assignment: | Micro-participation Course Assignment | | Advisory grade | | | | | Assessor’s initials | BW | Your UM email address: m.hiddema@maastrichtuniversity.nl Table of contents 1. Introduction 3 2. The competitive model in the Internet market 4 3. Google 5 4. Facebook 7 5. Amazon 8 6. Apple 9 7. Conclusion 10 References 12 The four Internet giants: competition and antitrust regulations 1. Introduction The Economist (2012) reported that rivalry between the four Internet giants, which included Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Apple, is increasing. All four giants have well-developed, powerful business models. Google has tied its search engine to the advertisement business while Facebook is connecting advertisements to the interests of people revealed on their Facebook page. Amazon started selling books at premium price but soon extended their business by selling everything from clothes to...
Words: 2954 - Pages: 12
...happen to so called storage, the whole system goes bust. And last but not least: any system can be a subject to a hacker attack. • Describe the business value of security and control When you lose data – you lose money, simple as that. Any information you have is relevant to your business, and when this information gets into wrong hands, the same hands will be chopping pieces of your profit in no time. • Describe the components of an organizational framework for security and control First step in developing security system would be that of assessing the risk. Establishing weak points and determining the strengths of the system is of an utmost importance. Second – a security policy needs to be developed. And finally, there always has to be a contingency plan, involving all the levels of informational infrastructure. • Describe the tools and technologies used for safeguarding information resources. Firewalls and Antiviruses prevent unauthorized access to private network from happening. The very basic tool of defending the privacy of information would be using passwords and other method of authentication will prevent the initial intrusion from happening. Apple, Google and Microsoft battle for your internet experience 1. Compare the business models and areas of strength of Apple, Google and Microsoft Apple creates it’s own exclusive platform and life style accessory. They are not even allowing...
Words: 717 - Pages: 3
...1. Microsoft’s business model is operating systems which 95%of all computers use worldwide. Apple’s business model mainly focuses on mobile devices; such as iPhones and iPads which account for 52% of apples profits. As for Google’s bas of the market from the mobile, advertising and operating systems. The strengths for Microsoft are that they are still the leader in PC operating systems and desktop productivity software. But has failed miserably with regards towards smartphone hardware and software, mobile computing, cloud-based software apps; its internet portal. The strengths for Apple are mobile devices, such as iPhone and tablets. These devices combine and contribute 52% of apples business. They already have a head start on the mobile phone industry where they have over 250,000 applications. Apple controls 27% of the mobile market and the iPhone is the highest grossing cellphone ever. The strengths for Google are that they dominate in advertising with their search engine. And their Android OS controls 41% of the mobile market share. This mobile market is constantly growing 3 times faster than the iPhone market share. “They bought Android Inc. to enter the mobile market.” also bought out Motorola Inc. for 12.5 billion. 2. Mobile computing is important to Microsoft, Apple and Google because by 2012 the mobile market will be 200 billion dollars, with a 200% increase every 2.5 years. Therefore, it has been projected that by 2015 the mobile market will be worth 400 billion dollars...
Words: 792 - Pages: 4
...Situation: Apple Inc. & Google Inc. I choose to review Apple Inc’s marketing situation after recently becoming an Apple user. The entire company and cult like following fascinates me, and in my opinion, Apple has one of the most successful marketing strategies out there. Perhaps the most successful component of their marketing situation is their branding strategy. The Apple brand is not just about customer loyalty, there is a real sense of community among users of its main product lines. Apple’s branding strategy focuses on emotions. “The Apple brand personality is about lifestyle; imagination; liberty regained; innovation; passion; hopes, dreams and aspirations; and power-to-the-people through technology. The Apple brand personality is also about simplicity and the removal of complexity from people's lives; people-driven product design; and about being a really humanistic company with a heartfelt connection with its customers” (Marketing Minds). For several years Apple's product strategy involved creating innovative products and services aligned with a digital hub strategy, where Apple Macintosh computer products function as the digital hub for digital devices, including the Apple iPod, personal digital assistants, cellular phones, digital video and still cameras, and other electronic devices. More recently, the full impact of a very well throughout brand strategy has come into focus - and one in which customer experience is central. Apple has price-premiums...
Words: 738 - Pages: 3
