Premium Essay

Gorgias

In:

Submitted By tonydiscoo
Words 2088
Pages 9
Gorgias is a detailed study of virtue founded upon an inquiry into the nature of rhetoric, art, power, temperance, justice, and good versus evil. As such, the dialogue both maintains independent significance and relates closely to Plato's overarching philosophical project of defining noble and proper human existence. It exists in the form of a mostly friendly (though at times scathing) conversation between Socrates and four fellow citizens. Chaerephon, an apparent contemporary of Socrates, is found speaking with Plato's teacher at the beginning of the dialogue, yet says little else throughout the conversation. Callicles, another of Socrates's peers (and here his harshest insulter), plays host to Gorgias as well as opponent to Socrates near the discussion's close. Gorgias is the famous orator (for whom this text was named), the questioning of whom serves as catalyst for the debates around which Gorgias centers. And Polus is Gorgias's inexperienced, overeager student. One must remember that although the dialogue depicts a fictitious interaction, Socrates was indeed Plato's teacher. As a result, this character's words for the most part should be taken as indicative of the actual Socratic framework and presentation, in addition to serving as an expression of Plato's own positions.

Though Plato himself did not split his writing into sections, the text nonetheless divides quite smoothly into general topics. The first vague section (ending at 466) finds Socrates and his friend Chaerephon discussing Gorgias's status as an imminent rhetorician. Socrates desires to question Gorgias about the scope and nature of rhetoric, so the two head towards the home of Callicles where the great Sophist can be found. The intense discussion that ensues leads to the more general consideration of true versus false arts (flattery/routine), a distinction based upon the good existing as

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Socrates Refuting Gorgias

...Kacey McClenny Civ II PLATO: GORGIAS Most people probably think that Socrates was innocent in refuting Gorgias and asking to clarify things, but I believe that Socrates had wicked motive all along. Was Socrates really being genuine? Also why would Socrates try and make a mockery of Gorgias in front of two other people? When Gorgias and Socrates talk about rhetoric at the beginning of Plato's Gorgias, Gorgias says that rhetoric is about speeches. Most importantly, speeches that are about other speeches. Gorgias did not mean every speech, because the speeches that only pertain to another form of art belong to that other art and not to the art of rhetoric (449E-451D). Gorgias tells Socrates that the speeches used for rhetoric are about “The greatest of human affairs” (451D). In the text, Plato’s Gorgias, page 41, section 457D, it may seem like Socrates takes the time to make sure that Gorgias does not get upset once he refutes what he once said during another speech. Socrates states, “I think that Socrates was trying to be snarky when he refuted Gorgias. Even though he goes into a long speech about how he would not be a good student if he did not refute him and he would want someone or Gorgias to refute him as well. Socrates states, “Because I consider a greater good, insofar as it’s a greater good to be set free oneself from the greater evil than to set someone else free, since I can imagine no evil as being so great for a human being as a false opinion about precisely those...

Words: 643 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gorgias Rhetoric Essay

...Gorgias was to many the father of Sophism; he originated from Leontini in Sicily but is best known for the speeches he gave in Greece. Gorgias made the journey to Athens as an ambassador for the people of Leontini who were in danger of attack from the much more sizable army of Syracuse. This of course would be devastating blow for his people which gave Gorgias urgency on his mission to retrieve aid from the Greeks. Once the Athenians heard this extraordinarily talented orator weave and rhyme his words to paint a picture in a way they had never witnessed before they were shocked and awed by this new form of speech craft. Gorgias was successful on his mission to convince the Athenians to create an alliance; a mission he was more than suited for....

Words: 546 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Summary Of Macintyre's 'Gorgias'

...Plato: The Gorgias In order to illuminate the conditions of rhetoric, MacIntyre explicates the two divergent styles of persuasion. MacIntyre, in essence, conveys that whether a person is persuaded by reasoning or by pressure, he or she cannot be held responsible for the behavior they conduct. This view of human responsibility is held by Plato’s Socrates and is challenged by the likes Gorgias, Polus and Callicles, all of whom are sophists. Sophists argue that persuasion does not require the orator to have knowledge of the concept but rather to be a just individual. Rhetoric used by the orator to convince a person to commit unjust acts cannot be labeled as “bad” as it is only the tool which the unjust orator utilizes. The tool, along with the person, are both to be regarded as...

Words: 591 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Dialectic Accomplishments In Plato's Gorgias

...Dialectic Accomplishments in Gorgias In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates tests the validity of Pollus’ opinion on whether Orators have great power. Socrates questions and defines what great power is through questioning every assertion made by Pollus. He imposes that the Orator’s job is do what they see fit. To do what they think will benefit people just as a person takes medicine for the benefits, people don’t take medicine when they are not sick. Socrates proves to Pollus that Orator’s do not have great power because they may have the power to put people to death but they are not doing it because they want to, they are doing it for the benefit. Socrates and Pollus continue there dialectic and test the validity of their opinions on justice and happiness. Socrates questions Pollus on his opinion on whether he thinks people who commit an unjust act are happy or not. Pollus believes that a person who commits an unjust act and doesn’t pay what is due can be happy. Socrates is completely opposed to this and believes anyone who commits an unjust act and pays their dues, is less miserable than the one’s who do not pay there dues. Suffering is also discussed when Pollus tells Socrates that it is better to cause suffering then receive it while Socrates disagrees. I claim that the dialectical conversation between Socrates and Pollus succeeds in testing the...

Words: 1437 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Rhetoric Analysis

...which Greeks saw change. Texts such as Gorgias’ Helen and Palamadeus, Antiphon’s Tetralogies, and Plato’s Gorgias have all displayed the immense influence in day to day life that sophists were gaining through rhetoric. Although the movement as a whole had great potential, the reality is that it was not used as a force for good. In order to understand the sophist movement it is important to identify who the first sophists were and how they changed the public’s view of rhetoric. A sophist is someone who studied rhetoric and made distinctions between physis and nomos. Physis can be translated to roughly mean nature and how things come to be naturally. On the other hand, nomos...

Words: 1550 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Socrates and Gogias

...In Gorgias both Socrates and Callicles believes that they are the true statesman. Socrates thinks that you should be respected and respect your people, while Callicles thinks that the strong should rule and the weak do not matter because they are weak. It comes down to selfish or selfless ideas of statesmanship. Throughout the years there have been many debates between those who practice different forms of statesmanship. Many of these debates have been between those who practice philosophy and those who are rhetoricians. One such debate between a philosopher and a rhetorician may be found in the Gorgias in which a debate between Socrates represents the philosopher and Callicles represents the rhetorician. Now it has been said that most, if not all of the what is believed to be radical thinking in the ways of politics, is instead merely the same things which philosophers were speaking of in the past. It seems that all political thought is just a case of the politician stealing the good ideas of change from the philosopher. A career in politics requires the use of the principles, categories, and metaphors of political philosophy. By acknowledging this it is understood that to be a successful politician one must also use the ideas of political philosophy. One may attempt to attain political power without the aid of political philosophy however; it is likely that this attempt will fail. In Gorgias Socrates is engaged in a debate, which begins in the streets and eventually...

Words: 1876 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Phil

... Week 6 In the article "On the Nonexistent", Gorgias introduces three concepts:1. Nothing exists;2.Even if something exists, nothing can know what it is; 3.Even if something can be known about it, it cannot explain or communicate to other men. These three concepts are the main points of the article. There concepts seem to be logical, practical and even inevitable. However, I have different opinion with Gorgias. The first argument is talking about the fact that nothing exists. Gorgias uses several examples from different sides to prove there is nothing exists. I don't agree with this conclusion. Here is an assumption I made. Suppose there are a person and a tree. The person is blind immediately when he sees the tree one eye. According to the Gorgias's argument, being is generated, so the tree is a being and exist. The person is blind forever so what he can see is the perpetual darkness. The image in the blind person's mind is all about the tree he saw just now. In this case, because the blind person cannot see anything anymore, so he cannot see the changes of the tree. The tree is always green in his mind and the tree will never grow or die .It just stand there forever. The tree for him is eternal. The tree is generate in the real world and eternal in the blind person 's mind. But they cannot happen at the same time eternal and generated. They are mutually exclusive of each other. Gorgias concludes :"Accordingly, if the being is neither eternal nor generated...

Words: 453 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Socrates Rhetorical Summary

...provided by the gymnastic. Therefore, he refers to cosmetics as the art of gymnastic cookery, which is the art of medicine sophistry, legislation rhetoric, or jurisprudence (Harold 4). If the body presides over itself without the guidance of the soul, then cookery, health, and medicine will mingle in indiscriminate. Socrates tends to argue that cosmetics are used to create a beauty that does not last. It is not inherent beauty of the human being, but a flattery meant to convince people that cosmetics make people to achieve beauty. In the Gorgias and Socrates discussion with other scholars, the superior nature of...

Words: 1464 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Socrotes

...In Gorgias both Socrates and Callicles believes that they are the true statesman. Socrates thinks that you should be respected and respect your people, while Callicles thinks that the strong should rule and the weak do not matter because they are weak. It comes down to selfish or selfless ideas of statesmanship. Throughout the years there have been many debates between those who practice different forms of statesmanship. Many of these debates have been between those who practice philosophy and those who are rhetoricians. One such debate between a philosopher and a rhetorician may be found in the Gorgias in which a debate between Socrates represents the philosopher and Callicles represents the rhetorician. Now it has been said that most, if not all of the what is believed to be radical thinking in the ways of politics, is instead merely the same things which philosophers were speaking of in the past. It seems that all political thought is just a case of the politician stealing the good ideas of change from the philosopher. A career in politics requires the use of the principles, categories, and metaphors of political philosophy. By acknowledging this it is understood that to be a successful politician one must also use the ideas of political philosophy. One may attempt to attain political power without the aid of political philosophy however; it is likely that this attempt will fail. In Gorgias Socrates is engaged in a debate, which begins in the streets and eventually...

Words: 1876 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Oprah and Sophistry

...well as the Platonic who define and emphasize rhetoric as speech based on knowledge and truth. Two of the most well known Sophist theories are Gorgias and Isocrates, Gorgias the orator as performer and Isocrates the orator as citizen. In a tribute to Rosa Parks, the philanthropist Oprah Winfrey strongly respected the Rosa by delivering a well mannered speech, with powerful compassionate words, which characterize her sophistic goals “he specialized in ceremonial oratory and, according to one tradition, could produce it extemporaneously on subjects suggested by the audience at his public performances”(Gorgias 42). Oprah’s ethical appeal has a lot on how people view her as, she is always willing to help the less fortunate. Considering her background and all of her accolades I have no doubts that people would question her genuineness in what she has to say to people. She was in Times magazine for most influential people in the 20th century. People would not only be honored to listen to her but will be engaged into what she has to offer. Although she was not taught by any of the Greek Sophist she has managed to do well on her own and off her own learning and has been “well endowed by nature and schooled by practical experience,” (Isocrates, 74). She learned to represent a sophistic way of delivering her eulogy. Both Gorgias and Isocrates along with most...

Words: 807 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Rhetoric In The Odyssey

...Philosophic rhetoric depended on discovering what was morally right in each argument, they did not just want to win. They wanted to win for something that was just. When you think of philosophers you will typically think of Plato and Socrates. Plato wrote the dialogues “Gorgias” and “Phaedrus”, which both criticized the sophists and emphasized why philosophic rhetoric is the more superior form of rhetoric. Plato and Socrates discuss what qualities you must possess to be a good rhetorician, “... he will never be able to speak about anything as he ought to speak unless he have a knowledge of philosophy.” Plato and Socrates believe that to be a true rhetorician or even just a good speaker in general you must have some background knowledge of philosophy. They continue to explain why you need a background in philosophy, because without philosophy you would not be able to decide what is morally right and wrong. “ ... he will make the same things seem good to the city at one time, and another time the reverse of good...

Words: 1003 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Socrates: A Just Form Of Rhetoric

...In the Gorgias and Phaedrus, Socrates, as portrayed by Plato, discusses the Good, the True, and the Beautiful and their divine relation to rhetoric. He defines the Good, True, and Beautiful as the most divine and perfect forms of goodness, truth, and beauty because they all seek to better one’s soul. Each of these elements can form a framework to distinguish the most just form of rhetoric. Defining justice as an action to better one’s soul, Socrates utilizes these characteristics to distinguish a just rhetorician from an unjust rhetorician. A rhetor’s motive determines whether the speech is pursuing the Good or if the rhetor prioritizes his own private interests. Applying this methodology to writings or speeches allows audiences to know when to trust the orator. For example, in Frederick Douglass’ speech, “What to The Slave is the Fourth of July,” Douglass...

Words: 838 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Bem: Justiça E Felicidade

... | | | |Disciplina: Ética I - Profº Luiz Eva | |Aluna: Ariadne Costa Cabral | |Dezembro 2013 | Este trabalho tem como referência a obra de Platão – Gorgias e trata sobre a justiça para Sócrates em comparação aos argumentos de Cálicles e de Polos. Para explicar seus posicionamentos, este ensaio discorrerá sobre as noções de bem, mal, felicidade e infelicidade que estão presentes em seus argumentos. O problema é investigar se é possível ser feliz praticando atos injustos, isto é, se um tirano pode ser feliz mesmo cometendo injustiças. Sócrates associa o bem e a felicidade à justiça, assim como o mal e a infelicidade à injustiça. No entanto, para Cálicles e Polos, há uma utilidade em ser injusto e que a felicidade não está necessariamente associada à justiça. As teses de Pólos e Cálices se contrapõem na medida em que Polos sustenta que um tirano é feliz porque não é punido e Cálicles sustenta...

Words: 3086 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

The Meno Socrates Questions

...Socrates forms the question of how can he do not know what it virtue is without without knowing what sort of a thing it is? The knowing in this context is used accurately to describe the condition of human excellence, and the inquiry will be laced with explanations of what sort of thing knowing is. 71b9-c7:) Socrates question is handed over to Meno, and he immediately pretends to be surprised at Socrates perplexity. Meno is dishonest through his conduct with Socrates. Meno tries to justify his claim to knowing what virtue is with the claims of other who say to know. Meno claims that the Gorgias know what virtue is, so Socrates eagerly petitions an explanation of with it is said to be. Socrates makes it clear that Meno must likewise, by association with the Georgians, know and be able to say what sort of thing virtue is. The situation is regardless of whether Meno answers on behalf of the Gorgias or himself, the explanation is asserted by Meno. 71c8-d3:) Socrates sets up the first part of an ironic argument at 71b1 after saying that without first knowing what sort of thing virtue is, nobody could know what specifically what virtue is. By 85d2-e2 the Socrates completes the irony of his first argument by explaining in clear reason that if you know, what is appropriate to the knowing of human excellence, that you’ll alway know. Of course the irony is that since neither man knows what virtue during the argument, and they could not come to knowing such in the development of the argument...

Words: 568 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Plato

...Plato declared that “rhetoric is the art of ruling the minds of men.” In this quote, we gather that persuasion is not a structured formula but a dynamic and nimble art. While many USP students believe that logical appeal is the predominant persuasion technique, Gorgias’ “Defense of Palamedes” successfully demonstrated that emotional and ethical appeals can be equally convincing if they are employed at the opportune moment. This paper argues that Palamedes actively manipulates his kairos, or timely and situational moments, which compelled him to deliver his ethic and pathetic appeals effectively. As a result, these appeals establish credibility in Palamedes, create emotional distress in the Jury and ultimately absolve Palamedes from his treason charges. Palamedes tactfully constructs his kairotic context of urgency in order to deliver his virtuous past record. In effect, this acts as a basis for him to substantiate his moral authority in his subsequent self-defence. For example, in paragraph 10 of “Palamedes”, he argues that the trial obliges “the accused” to put forward his credentials that “I must now speak...” The word “must” and “now” indicate the pressing necessity of situation that forces Palamedes to tout his credibility as a defendant there and then. In addition, he stresses that his ostentatious self-praise is “under the compulsion of self-defense.” Hence, Palamedes highlights once more the involuntary nature of such obligation while insinuating Palamedes as otherwise...

Words: 957 - Pages: 4