Free Essay

Government in 1984

In:

Submitted By crystalsaube
Words 2284
Pages 10
Crystal Asube Asube 1

Mr. Bird

ENG4U1-01

30th September 2013

The Tyrannic Government Orwell Warns About

The well being of a population depends on the conduct of a justified government, where decisions are made based on what would benefit the citizens. Their purpose in a civilization is to implement laws, promote ethics, and provide facilities and institutions to satisfy the basic needs of their people. Most importantly, a justified government will tend to the desires of the majority of a population to the best of their ability, by taking in consideration consequences and feelings. Opposite of a fair society, George Orwell, predicted a future in 1984 where life is a depressing trial for citizens in the dystopian civilization of Oceania. Manipulated by propaganda, irrational enforcements of policies, infinite surveillance, and revision of the past leads civilians feeble to the oppression of their government. They are governed by a potentially fictional dictator, whom they address as “Big Brother.” The citizens fear him and adore him. Although, Orwell’s predictions for modern culture after World War Two may seem drastic and extreme, it has been evident that the inhabitants of our world currently mimic the ignorance of the party members in Orwell’s vision. In the patriotic nation of the United States of America, the rights and freedoms of their citizens are disregarded in ways that are undetected by majority of the population. If we are consistently warned about our future by thinkers such as George Orwell, how do governments remain in power and sustain this cycle? Presently, the American government Asube 2 exploits its citizens for the sake of power; and they do this in much the same way Orwell envisioned, through the invasion of privacy and the perpetuation of war hysteria. Governments control people by restricting their rights and freedoms. Privacy is often the first right to be compromised. In 1984, the Thought Police scour the land to eliminate any dissidents among the people. The majority of the population is left poor and disconnected from reality while the few surviving intellects ponder a way to rebel. Technology enhances a government’s ability to access personal information in both 1984 and 2013. In Oceania, every public and private place is compromised by “telescreens.” This enables the Inner Party to monitor every facial expression, word and move: “Any sound Winston made, above the level of a whisper, would be picked up by the telescreen; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard.” (Orwell 6)
Being monitored continually constricts the expression of individuality, and complicates making personal decisions based on innermost desires. This is depicted when Winston is hesitant to write in his journal, fearing the Inner Party. Living in fear, leads to less creativity and spontaneousness, which is exhibited in characters like Winston’s wife, Katharine. In an era where technology is deliberately improved, devices such as computers and cellphones are so common in our daily lives, that we do not recognize its downfalls. The rise of technology provides governments with the knowledge of our personal information, and location. Unwilling to contribute to the government’s infringement on privacy, Edward Snowden, a former member of the National Security Agency (NSA), is now facing conviction for contravening the Asube 3
NSA’s policy. Snowden revealed how the U.S government defeats internet privacy security by collecting internet communications and records through Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Youtube, and AOL. On the contrary, in 2005, Obama claimed that President Bush’s Patriotic Act, “Seriously jeopardizes the rights of all Americans and the ideals Americans stand for.”(Newstatesman) In a democracy where freedom, which includes the freedom to be private, is highly valued, it seems that the government contradicts its own proclaimed values. The U.S National intelligence director says that surveillance keeps America safe, but how safe can citizens be in a nation where they cannot trust their leaders? Additionally, the governments abolish the feeling of comfort and safety that inhabitants have within their homes. Winston describes life in Oceania: “In the far distance a helicopter skimmed down, between the roofs hovered for an instant like a blue-bottle, and darted away again with a curving flight. It was the thought police, snooping into people’s windows.” (6)
The Thought Police have the authority to enter anyone’s house who may pose a threat to the Inner Party, without a warrant or even any solid evidence. The Inner Party defeats the purpose of a home, because the citizens no longer have a place to confide in. A single, open-concept building, with no individual apartments, with patrols encircling the area would serve the same lack justice. Not only does it strip people of the respect they are entitled to, but it leads to the conviction of innocent people. The Thought Police exist today. Inhabitants of Deer Tail, Colorado are disturbed by the infiltration of surveillance drones hovering above their homes. Phillip Steel, a local resident, has
Asube 4 drafted an ordinance to allow citizens to shoot down the drones, in an effort for them to reclaim their civil liberties. The drones are fitted with thermal technology enabling them to further monitor people, even in environments of complete darkness. Additionally, corporations may benefit from the use of drones to collect data from their customers. In an interview with Vice, Phillip Steels declares, “Obama declared war on us, so we’re fighting back. He fired the first volleys. Our Second Amendment is in place so we can fight against a tyrannical government.” In both 1984 and 2013, we question the sanctity of our private lives. How ignorant are we to the government’s devious methods of ensuring its own security? Although, scrutiny in Oceania is more arbitrary, and universal, it is evident that circumstances in 2013 are similar enough to catalyze rebellion of citizens. Bureaucrats claim the transgression of personal privacy is necessary for protection against terrorism. In all likelihood, bureaucrats and allies shroud the rules of society to conserve the power and privileges of politicians and executives. Above all, the most insidious tool the governments use to maintain power in both 1984 and 2013 is the war. War is intended to propagate hysteria; it is an effect rather than a cause. The main cause it serves is for the greater good; to end violence and tyranny in distant countries. Given that it is illogical to combat violence with more violence, it is reasonable to believe that rulers are more interested in the propaganda, patriotism, and economic surplus that accompanies war. Orwell predicts that there will be a continuous interchange between allies and enemies so the masses remain in perpetual fear. An eternal war with one country is unrealistic, so by alternating between enemies and allies, the masses are more likely to believe they are always in danger. The ignorance of the party members allows them to be easily manipulated and accept the
Asube 5 change without acknowledging it. Winston is the only one is aware of the sudden change of enemies as he takes part in a demonstration in Victory Squares. He notes: “At just this moment it had been announced that Oceania was not after all at war with Eurasia. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Eurasia was an ally. There was, of course, no admission that any change had taken place. Merely, it became known, with extreme suddenness and everywhere at once, that Eastasia and not Eurasia was the enemy.”(148)
It is shocking that the Inner Party has enough control over the individual mind that they are capable of rectifying even the most recent memories. Tragically, Americans are no smarter than citizens of Oceania. Their unawareness of America’s role across seas, allows the U.S government to praise their accomplishments, but neglect their faults. In particular, they contributed to eradicating the governments in over sixty nations. Much like the switch of allies and enemies between the three superstates, President Obama now seeks that Americans become allies with Al-Qaida against Syria, after denouncing Al-Qaida as responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Having discussed this, in both situations, if peace is made with one country, immediately, war is initiated or threatened against another nation. Yesterday’s enemy is today’s ally. War is perpetual. It keeps the military machine rolling, and prevents the standard of living from rising. If peace is made with one country, war is initiated or threatened against another nation to keep the military machine running. Like Oceania, American military forces move from one military conflict to another. Winston learns from Goldstein’s book, that the war is fabricated by the Inner Party so that they remain in power. They are interested solely in keeping power,
Asube 6 nothing else for the purpose of eliminating individualism. In the past, a war was something that eventually ended but in Oceania its function in society has changed: “The war, therefore, if we judge it by the standards of previous wars, is merely an imposture. It is like the battles between certain ruminant animals whose horns are set at such an angle that they are incapable of hurting one another. But though it is unreal it is not meaningless. It eats up the surplus of consumable goods, and it helps to preserve the special mental atmosphere that a hierarchical society needs.”(158)
The Oceanic government fires rocket bombs on their own country to instill fear. As a result, the citizens view Big Brother as their protector. Essentially, the act of war is the destruction of goods. Goods are produced to fuel industries, but not distributed to prevent people from becoming too wealthy and independent. By repeating this cycle, the chances of the Inner Party being defeated is very little. Today, war is used for the same purposes. If a war is won, then it ends. When a war ends, the money stops. Thus, acts to put an end to war and promote peace are useless. Military conflicts will continue to be endless because the nation’s most powerful political and economic organizations and business’ benefit enormously from its continuation. By giving the impression that America is fighting a war to protect and maintain order, they receive support and affection from their people. The only way a war has a possibility of ending is if Americans realize the vast costs they are offering so that oligarchs and political elites may prosper and be empowered. As prices increase, and the life span of items decreases, the standard of living is kept at a minimum, prohibiting the powerless to ever rise to authority. Proclaimed by Readers Supported News, “ Asube 7
Washington clearly has no fear that such realizations are imminent. They are moving in the other direction: aggressively planning how to further entrench and expand this war.” An expansion of war propagates implications for the future such as initiating a World War Three, and sending the human population into another disheartening period. Commencement of the expansion of war and the creation of an unnecessary enemy is already being taken place by the attack on Syria for the use of chemical weapons. Syria’s objection to abide to Israeli-American control may peak a World War Three if other nations choose to follow their actions. All things considered, the statement said to Winston by O’Brien, “The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power,”(217) is proven to be true in 1984, as well as the twenty-first century. The American government manifests their hunger for power by violating of human rights and freedoms, and waging an endless war based upon false motives entirely for their own advantage. They are only capable of doing so, through the submission of their citizens. Orwell’s prophecies in 1984 are valid, because the strength of the party in relies on the ignorance of the masses. Generally, if the masses learn to worship their leader, and feel vulnerable without the dictation of their rulers, governments can sustain the cycle to maintain power. Needless to say, not all American citizens are uneducated and easily convinced, take Snowden and Steels for example. However, Snowden is incarcerated and Steels is currently charged for damaging government property. If higher authority continues to lock away the few people courageous enough to rebel against their unorthodox methods to ensure peace and security, the future of America does not look bright. The bigoted opinions majority of
Asube 8
Americans hold against those they are informed to believe are enemies should be reconsidered. In reality, Americans are equally oblivious as the civilians of Oceania are of their suppression. Will Americans reclaim their sense of dignity and freedom? Or will they mimic the party members of Oceania and learn to love and submit to their servitude?

Asube 9
Work Cited
Barrett, Kevin. "Will US Military Be "al-Qaeda’s Air Force" in Syria on September 11th?" Veterans Today. N.p., 7 Sept. 2013. Web. 04 Oct. 2013.
Duff, Gordon. "Breaking: Afghanistan – America's "Total Lie War" Veterans Today. N.p., 2 Sept. 2012. Web. 4 Oct. 2013.
Francey, Matthew. "The Colorado Town Promising to Shoot Down Obama's Surveillance Drones." VICE. N.p., Sept. 2013. Web. 4 Oct. 2013.
Greenwald, Glenn. "'The War On Terror' Is Permanent." Reader Supported News. 07 May 2013. Web. 08 Oct. 2013.
Hasan, Mehdi. "On Wiretaps and Drone Strikes, It's Time for Liberals to Accept That Obama Is Worse than Bush.” Newstatesman. N.p., 13 June 2013. Web. 4 Oct. 2013.
Jura, Jackie. "3. Surveillance." Orwell Today. Web. 04 Oct. 2013.
Orwell, George. “1984.” New York, NY: Published by Signet Classic, 1977. Print.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

1984 Government Control

...George Orwell uses 1984 to show how the government can control everyone in the country and remain in control by exploiting the people’s right to privacy, their right to social life, the right to access accurate information to have an opinion. When the government can maintain absolute power over the people, it is possible to stop any kind of revolution against them. In the today’s world, technology is the same as the government from 1984. The government exploits the right of privacy by watching over everyone at every moment, having children to be loyal to the government and controlling people’s thoughts. The government watches over everyone by an electronic object called telescreen. When Winston is at his home, “Any sound that Winston made,...

Words: 1696 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Totalitarian Government In 1984 By George Orwell

...those societies led by a totalitarian government found in the futuristic books and movies? Many seem to agree since technology has advanced to point where it can do as much or even more as the aged books have foretold. In the novel, 1984, the author, George Orwell, wrote about a distant future where everything was controlled by one person known as Big Brother. The main protagonist in Orwell's story, Winston Smith, believes that things are not as they should be and explains how they were always being watched by the Inner Party which consisted of less than 2% of the entire population. Proles, as they were named, consisted about 80% of all the population, including the Party. The Outer Party, where Winston is,...

Words: 1006 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Do You Agree with the View That the Prime Cause of the Miners Strike in 1984 Was the Conservative Governments Determination to Reduce Trade Union Power?

...view that the prime cause of the miners’ strike in 1984 was the conservative governments determination to reduce trade union power? The fact that the Conservative government wanted to reduce trade union power was indeed a factor which led to the miners’ strike in 1984 but not necessarily the biggest one. It is relevant to state that the Thatcher Government was concerned over the general power that the unions held and had taken action to curb union powers with the introduction of the Employment Act 1982. Source 1 highlights the fact that the strike was the culmination of a long conflict between the Conservative Party and the mineworkers union. The National Union of Minors (NUM) was the strongest and most powerful union and it was widely accepted that it had been responsible for bringing down the Edward Heath Conservative Government following the minors’ strike of 1973-74. In 1972, the NUM led by Arthur Scargill had put forward a joint bid to gain wage increase and to highlight the increasing number of pit closures that threatened its members livelihood. In order to succeed Scargill had used minors from across the country to bring the movement of coal to a standstill. Heath believed that the government would survive the strike longer than the miners. He cut electricity which led to ordinary people being without light and heating for long periods. Heath held an election as to who ran the country, the miners or the government. The answer of the electorate was not what he expected...

Words: 795 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Two Views of Totalitarianism

...Two Views of Totalitarianism George Orwell’s 1984 and James McTeigue’s “V for Vendetta” are very similar, but have some distinct differences in the plot. “V for Vendetta”, a futuristic version of a totalitarian government is taken over and destroyed by a masked man named V. Orwell’s 1984 is similar in this respect except that Winston, the protagonist of 1984, doesn’t seem to be as successful as V. Orwell was one to speak of how he sees the battle to be. Orwell has written several novels on the idea of revolutions against a superior government; one example would be 1984. He has inspired others to write there ideas on the thought of the future revolution from a dictatorship of extreme power. The film V for Vendetta is one example of an Orwell inspired story. In both Orwell's novel 1984 and the film V for Vendetta the protagonists Winston Smith and V live in similar difficult lives with extreme and controlling governments where they try to fight against there governments for the greater cause of freedom. There are many similar events and people in these two pieces of literature. In 1984, propaganda is broadcasted via telescreens. Similar to this, false news is broadcasted throughout the city of Oceania in 1984 by way of televisions. Both scenes have posters. 1984 has the posters with the phrase “BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU” similar to “STRENGTH THROUGH UNITY, UNITY THROUGH FAITH” in “V for Vendetta”.1984’s Winston and “V for Vendetta’s” Evey both experience the loss of their...

Words: 521 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

1984 in Todays World

...Joseph Torres Ms. Maldonado English 2 6 October 2013 1984 In Today’s World “1984" was a book that foreshadowed what was going to happen in the future. It seems that some ideas from the book are here in our world today. In "1984" government surveillance was everywhere. No matter where u went, the government knew your every move. Free speech was taken away completely and is possibly eroding in today. The idea of history being manipulated to help shape the government to be one hundred percent correct is also used today. Today, we may not have monitoring systems in our homes but there could be a time where we might have to have a type of telescreen in our house just like the novel “1984”. Because the government has an increasing power to invade your privacy by possibly having our internet activities monitored, and our phone calls tapped we can lack on having a lot of privacy. The police could barge into anyone’s house if they really wanted to; nobody would stop them. On the internet there are many news articles of people having their home searched by police for no reason; one lady had hers invaded just because she is an anti-immigrant activist. Being an anti-immigrant activist is not a crime which means that there was no reason for the police to invade her home. Everyone has the right for free speech but apparently they didn’t care. In "1984", Winston kept a diary where he wrote down all his thoughts that were treasonous. He was too afraid to act on them or speak about them...

Words: 712 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Similarities Between 1984 And V For Vendetta

...Dystopian societies commonly feature in literature, representing what humanity could amount to if corrupted people acquired power. George Orwell’s 1984 is one of literature’s classics, exposing a dystopian society where control over one’s life is removed. V for Vendetta, adapted by James McTeigue, is one of many films based on the themes and ideas of 1984. Both texts exhibit how the Government abuse its power of science and technology to manipulate its people and control their lives by falsifying information, and confiscating their freedom. Invasion of privacy, manipulation in broadcastings and erasing people from existence are considered normal under the government’s forcible reign. Controlling everyday aspects of life to manipulate society...

Words: 999 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Technology In 1984

..."If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." This quote from the book 1984, by George Orwell, portrays a theme that is consistent throughout the novel: freedom. Imagine a world where you have no freedoms; you cannot state your opinion and even having your own thoughts could be detrimental. Well, George Orwell decided to take this idea and create a story out of it called 1984. This novel is definitely worth the read and deserves to be discussed. First, I will assess the importance of reading this novel. Then, I will compare Orwell's vision of the future to our reality by looking at the government's power, our civil rights, and how technology advancements have affected our freedoms. Although...

Words: 1174 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Patriotism In 1984

...The year 1984 is now 32 years in the past and the world has come a long way since George Orwell penned his nightmarish envisionment of the future in 1949. However, the society depicted in 1984 is closer to society today than anyone would like to think. For example, take a look at the PATRIOT Act put in place just after the September 11, 2001 attacks. The three key things it allows are roving wiretaps, executing surveillance on people suspected of terrorism that do not harbor ties to any terrorist organization, and searching business records. It also allows the FBI to search through financial, telephone, and email records without receiving a court ordered warrant. However, this is controversial because the American people are supposed to be...

Words: 639 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Manipulation of Love

...manipulated, love will come. Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and 1984 by George Orwell are both dystopian novels in which a totalitarian government manipulates its citizens’ relationships to inhibit love and therefore conserve the status quo of society. Brave New World and 1984 possess certain similarities and differences in the manner by which each government controls relationships to preserve its society. The main goal of relationship manipulation in both novels is to prevent couples from becoming too attached to each other. In each dystopia, one of the roles of the government is “to prevent you from loving any one person too much” (Huxley 237), because both governments fear that an allegiance to another human could compromise allegiance to the ruling power or create a love stronger than the government itself. Mustapha Mond, society’s engineer in Brave New World, states, “There is no such thing as dual-allegiance” (Huxley 237). This means that it is not possible for one to have a perfectly unequivocal allegiance to the ruling power if he or she is plagued with another allegiance. Both novels describe governments which strive to expunge the idea of dual-allegiance; however, Brave New World and 1984 use different means by which they achieve their goal. 1984 sees a starkly contrasting view on monogamy compared to Brave New World. Marriage is the norm in 1984, but marriages have to be approved by the government and solely exist to engender an allegiant party member. Each...

Words: 817 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

None

...Ben Burrows English 12 Daulerio George Orwell's famous book 1984 was written as a political novel to warn people of the dangers of facing Communism in a totalitarian government. This book not only warned the world of potential dangers of being ruled this type of government, but it also presented some controversial new societal trends and technological advancement ideas for the future. Little did society know that Orwell's technology predictions in this book would actually come true in the near future. Orwell was especially concerned with the technological role in these governments, allowing them to control and keep an eye on their citizens. People in the time period that this book was written had a hard time grasping what Orwell was predicting. Many of his ideas and concepts were said not to happen for thousands of years, some were even claimed impossible to be done. In actuality, as we know today, a good amount of Orwell's predictions in the book 1984 have already became a reality. Orwell presented these ideas to warn people of what might be ahead and to be careful, but it may have created an opposite effect. His ideas may have actually had society work towards making his predictions come true. Orwell's book 1984 revealed how powerful technology could be, as the Party, or "Big Brother", used its complex technology to monitor and implement fear into those it identifies as its enemies. One of the devices the Party used for this purpose was the "telescreen"...

Words: 1367 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Importance Of Freedom And Security In 1984

...Benjamin Franklin said, “Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.” This quote highlights one radical side of the debate over how much freedom and security are necessary to have a balanced government. Some would rather have a very secure, but limited for freedom society, similar to the one portrayed in 1984. People should exchange freedom for security to some extent, but not to the extent in 1984. A government should not always watch and monitor their citizens, people should have the right to say, read, and write what they want, even if it doesn’t agree with the government. (Look on pages 2-4 for quotes about the gov. monitoring). In 1984, Winston shows that actions can be hidden from the government,...

Words: 522 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

George Orwell 1984 Themes

...The themes in 1984 relate to some of issues or problems happening around the world today. Even though Oceania was a totalitarian government some of the tactics used to control its citizens are being used currently. The themes of 1984 occur in the present. Orwell wrote 1984 to give an example of what totalitarian country would be like in the future. At the time during World War II where dictatorship governments were all around the globe. Some of the things that the government did actually happens today. For example, Oceania used telescreens to spy on the citizens. In America there are cameras anywhere there are buildings and stop lights. Oceania also controlled what news and history the citizens were supposed to know about. Americas government...

Words: 434 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

V for Vendetta vs 1984

...However, they are on your trail. Once you get caught, there is no hope. This was what life was like for the inhabitants of 1984 and V for Vendetta. It was an existence full of ironic satirical tragedies, fruitless hope and rebellion. The people that are living in George Orwell’s 1984 and Wachowski brothers’ V for Vendetta are both the victims of a dystopian society. The society of 1984 and V for Vendetta heavily influenced by the possible alternate future in which Germany and the Soviet Union wins WWII and the conquered Great Britain is forced to become a fascist or a communist state. The government is shown to be playing a manipulative puppet-master role to the people in both societies. The two governments have gained absolute power over their people due to psychological motivation by the use of propaganda. Humanity is often criticized to be nothing more than evolved Neanderthals, striving for our own survival. These two novels show that human will turn a blind eye to any wrong-doing if there is a benefit for them. It analyzes how extreme human greed can be and how humans have great amounts of weakness. Both the text 1984 and V for Vendetta is a satire that ridicules the enemy leaders of World War II, exaggerates government manipulation, and criticizes humanity. The two satires ridicule the World War II leaders and the tactics involved. The society in 1984 is a ridiculed society that support communism; this is similar to the Stalin Russia in WWII. “… the Russian Communists came...

Words: 1671 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Student

...Name Tutor Course Date In the modern world, government control has been limited by democracy in an important way. As a matter of fact, the world has come a long way. Considering the case of 1984, we are able to appreciate the struggle that has been done in different countries across the world. Democracy is essential in regulating government actions. Democracy is applied in making decisions concerning politics, economy and social issues. In democratic societies, people are allowed to join civil groups that advocate for human rights and equality. The citizens are supposed to have their views put into consideration before major political decisions are made. Managing democratic governments is not easy, patience is important because everybody want to be heard. In the recent past, we have seen a wave of unrest in Arab countries such as Libya and Egypt. This means that people are tired of the old way of doing governing countries like in the case of 1984. Winston experiences difficult time in dealing with government that exercises total control. Although he is not happy with the government, he has no choice. This form of government exercises total authority over her citizens. This is evident when the author says, “Party’s parading of political enemies through public squares is a demonstration of psychological manipulation” (Orwell 25). This shows the mindset of people who are supposed to act the way government demands. In today’s world the case is different. Democracy has taken...

Words: 1809 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

An Analysis Of George Orwell's '1984' By George Orwell

...If ‘1984’ by George Orwell had been written in a different time and place, how and why might it differ? The novel ‘1984’ by George Orwell, written in 1948, is a tragic illustration of what the world would be without the freedom to think independently. The internal context of the novel, which is set in London in 1984, whose protagonist is a rebellious low ranking party member called Winston Smith, is meant to portray a world of government domination defined by fear, hatred and ultimate control. The mode of the novel is written and the tenor is close as the story is told in limited third person. The target audience of the novel is people interested in reading and politics. Orwell wrote ‘1984’ as a warning against totalitarian tendencies and...

Words: 999 - Pages: 4