Free Essay

Healthsouth: Corporate Governance

In:

Submitted By socaladvisor
Words 1942
Pages 8
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY HealthSouth Corporation is the nation’s largest provider of inpatient rehabilitative healthcare services1; it was founded in 1984 by Richard M Scrushy along with four other people as Amcare, Inc., it opened its first facility in Little Rock Arkansas and another one a year later in Birmingham Alabama. In 1986 the company went public and was listed on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange under ticker symbol HSRC. Throughout the 1980’s and 1990’s the company expanded rapidly through mergers and acquisitions. By 1992 the company had $400 Million in annual revenues and by the end of 1999 the company’s annual revenues exceed $1 Billion and it had expanded to 118 inpatient rehabilitation hospitals, 5 medical centers, 1,379 outpatient rehabilitation centers, 230 surgery centers, 129 diagnostic centers and 124 occupational medicine centers.2 HealthSouth has always participated actively in the Medicare program and they’ve received Medicare reimbursements since the eighties and nineties, to extent that over 40% of their revenues came from the Medicare program and beneficiaries in that time period, and in their more recent filings this percentage has increased to a whopping 70% in 2010.3-4 HealthSouth’s stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol HLS, with a December 9, 2011 closing price of $16.94, a market capitalization of roughly $1.61 Billion. In 2010 their revenues were $1.99 Billion and their Net Income $899 Million.5 From 1996 to 2002 CEO Richard M. Scrushy received approximately $267 million in compensation from HealthSouth, including more than $7.5 million in base salary, more than $53 million in bonuses, and stock options valued at more than $206 million when exercised. He also received valuable benefits including company loans, and the use of automobiles, aircraft, and other HealthSouth assets.6
THE SALE The first sign of trouble surfaced in 2002, when Scrushy sold HealthSouth shares worth $75 Million on May 14 and $25 Million on July 31, prior to releasing a market warning on August 27 indicating that quarterly earnings would not be in line with expectations because a change in Medicare legislation that could “significantly lower reimbursements”.7 The disclosure caused the stock to fall more than 50% while the sale triggered the FBI to open a criminal investigation against Scrushy for “possible securities violations”,8 while at the same time a number of HealthSouth shareholders filed civil lawsuits against the CEO for insider trading. 9 An independent law firm concluded the sale was not directly related to the loss, but investors should have taken the warning.
THE ALLEGATIONS AND THE CHARGES On March 18, 2003 the FBI served search warrants and raided HealthSouth’s headquarters in Birmingham, Alabama and left with an unspecified amount of financial documents.10 A day later the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged HealthSouth and Scrushy with accounting fraud by inflating earnings by at least $1.4 Billion since 1999,11 later the Justice Department identified another $1.1 Billion in overstated earnings, and finally in November of the same year a federal Grand Jury indicted Scrushy on 85 counts including conspiracy, securities fraud, money laundering and charges related to overstating HealthSouth’s earnings to meet analyst’s earnings estimates. According to federal investigators, the company overstated earnings to meet analysts’ earnings estimates, while hiding the accounting fraud from the auditors.12 The investigation centered on Scrushy and the role he played in “cooking the books”, however the role of Board of Directors in corporate governance, the role of the auditors, the effect of conflict of interest between the accounting firm and its consulting arm on auditing, whether the relationship between an investment bank and a company affects the quality of the bank’s research reports on the company; whether the executive compensation that overly relies on company’s earnings provides an incentive for committing such fraud; whether a strong leader can silence all voices of reason in an organization were highlighted.13 The SEC explained the scheme involved meetings (quarterly) among some senior company officials, prior to earnings releases, to create “dirt” to fill the earnings hole to meet Wall Street analysts’ earnings expectations and hide firm’s true financial condition, thus fixing the “problem”. HealthSouth’s senior accounting personnel convened meetings of so called “family members” to “fix” the earnings. These entries primarily consisted of reducing a contra revenue account, called "contractual adjustment", and/or decreasing expenses, (either of which increased earnings), and correspondingly increasing assets or decreasing liabilities. Essentially, to balance the company’s books, false increases in earnings were matched by false increases in company’s assets. Since, the contractual adjustment accounts are based upon an estimate of the difference between what the company billed a patient and the amount of money insurance companies reimbursed HealthSouth, there was a limited paper trail and it was very difficult for the auditors to verify individual entries.14

HOW THE ETHICAL DILEMAS STARTED It is my argument that the accounting fraud didn’t happen overnight. In order to understand how it snowballed to $2.7 Billion, I ask that we back almost 25 years to 1986, a couple of months before HealthSouth would go public. At that time, CEO Richard Scrushy and CFO Aaron Beam met with their investment banker so he could review the company’s financials prior to underwriting the public offering, the banker asked Beam how he was treating the start-up costs, to which he answered he was “expensing” them, the banker suggested a more aggressive approach, that he should “capitalize” which would make HealthSouth’s financials profitable from day one, the accounting adjustment was made and the HealthSouth went public. I consider this to be one of the crucial turning points in the accounting scandal although no fraud was even perpetrated15; Scrushy learned accounting could be “flexible” and “changed to your benefit”. This small concession would lead to a greater compromise and eventually fraud. In the late 80’s and early 90’s HealthSouth was growing at a pace of 20%-30% per year, but as the company matured it was getting harder to meet the analysts’ earnings estimates, the company was growing but at a more modest rate than the one estimated by analysts, this was primarily due to changes in Medicare that modified the way they reimbursed costs and also competition were getting more aggressive, the company then moved to a more aggressive style of accounting by lowering their reserves for bad debts which would increase income, and continuing to meet analysts’ estimates16-17. During the 2nd Quarter of 1996 the company was falling well short of analysts’ estimates. CFO Aaron Beam and Controller Bill Owens met with CEO Richard Scrushy to inform him that quarterly earnings would not meet analysts’ estimates, to which Scrushy adamantly answered that was not going to happen and they were not going to report “bad numbers”, he argued in an intimidating fashion that the numbers could be “fixed” because it had been done before and, he also argued that if earnings were not met their own stock options would be worthless, their names would be tainted and investors would be disappointed. This was the point of no return, as the three men conspired to report false earnings, with the help from Owens, who was a former CPA for HealthSouth’s auditing firm, he knew auditors would not scrutinize any accounting entry under $5000; finally Owens created hundreds of false entries totaling $4 Million to meet analysts’ estimates18. This was the time to notify the regulators to avoid prosecution, but the prospect of enriching and benefiting themselves proved to be enough motivation to forgo their ethical values to fraudulently inflate their operation and the financial condition of HealthSouth. In 1997 after four quarters of fraudulently inflating the numbers CFO Beam quit, albeit he didn’t report the wrongdoings immediately, and over the next couple of years the company went through several CFO’s, Michael Martin (97-00), William Owens (00-01), Weston Smith (01-02) and Malcolm McVay (02-03)19. HealthSouth’s fraud is distinguished by its size, complexity, length and the number of overpaid CFO’s who participated and contributed to the fraud20. On July 30, 2002 US Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in large part as response to the Enron-Arthur Anderson fraud; one of the most important provisions included was Section 302 which created new responsibilities for company executives. Both CEO and CFO had to sign and attest under oath that all the information contained in the filing was true21. By the time SOX was passed Weston Smith had taken over as CFO, he and William Owens went to Scrushy in an effort come clean and finally release the correct information about earnings, to which the CEO argued the same guilt and sob story he had previously told former CFO Beam to get him to inflate the earnings, but this time Smith found out that Scrushy was in the midst of selling some of his stock options and he could not afford to have any bad news about the company because he would lose a significant portion of this profits. A couple of weeks later, Smith decided he was not going to sign the new SOX attestation, he was threatened by Scrushy and ultimately signed based on the fear that something bad could happen to him and his family.22 In August 2002 Smith finally gave in and signed the attestation, which is a direct violation of Sarbanes-Oxley, a couple of days later HealthSouth announces the drop in profits for quarter. HealthSouth shares dropped two thirds; this prompted an SEC investigation into the timing of the announcement and large sales of stock by CEO Richard Scrushy in May and July, as possible insider trading. 23 In March 2003 CFO Weston Smith decides to contact federal investigators and come clean, however they had already been contacted by Controller William Owens months before and on March 18, 2003 the FBI raided the headquarters of HealthSouth. CEO Scrushy is indicted on November 4, 2003 on 85 counts from securities fraud to conspiracy. As a result of Securities and Exchange Commission charges, the Justice Department charged HealthSouth for overstating its earnings but additionally for submitting fraudulent Medicare cost reports and fined the firm in excess of $450 Millions in 2003.24
CONCLUSION
HealthSouth’s case should teach us a powerful lesson on corporate governance, business ethics, corporate fraud and corporate social responsibility. It highlights the pitfalls in corporate management when the various actors - directors, auditors, investment bankers, company executives – work solely in the interest of a few and ignore the interests of other shareholders. Too many corporate managers, auditors, and analysts let the desire to meet earnings expectations override good business practices. There were several warning signs that investors should have detected, but the most distinct one was that HealthSouth matched analysts’ earnings expectations for 48 consecutive quarters from 1998 to 2002, which simply doesn’t happen. Ethical issues occur in all professions but the accounting profession has experienced arguably the deepest crisis in its history with the discovery of fraudulent financial reporting scandals at companies such as Enron, WorldCom, Tyco and HealthSouth to name a few.25 The passing of Sarbanes and Oxley, after decades of self-regulation for accounting professionals is the step in the right direction; however it is also pertinent to mention the importance of auditing, morality, ethics (both personal and corporate). HealthSouth was able to keep their scheme going for 7 years because there was collusion at the highest levels of management which made the crime very difficult to catch.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Healthsouth: Fraud, Greed & Corporate Governance

...HealthSouth: Fraud, Greed & Corporate Governance Marilyn J. Bordeaux HCS 5339 Rachael Kehoe HealthSouth: Fraud, Greed & Corporate Governance During the 1990s, Richard M. Scrushy, the former CEO of HealthSouth Corporation, engineered many acquisitions of rehabilitation clinics, outpatient surgical care operators, nursing homes and other health care companies. In 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused the company and Scrushy of inflating earnings to the tune of $1.4 billion since 1999. In November 2003, a federal grand jury indicted Scrushy on 85 counts including conspiracy, securities fraud, money laundering and charges related to overstating HealthSouth’s earnings by nearly $3.0 billion. According to federal investigators, the company overstated earnings to meet analysts’ earning estimates, while hiding the accounting fraud from the auditors. However, questions were raised whether the auditors failed to find or simply overlooked the fraud at HealthSouth. Central to the investigation was the issue of what role Scrushy played in “cooking the books.” However, as the case unfolded, it highlighted many other issues such as: The role of Board of Directors in corporate governance; the role of the auditors; the effect of conflict of interest between an accounting firm and its consulting arm on auditing; whether the relationship between an investment bank and a company affects the quality of the bank’s research reports on the company; whether the executive...

Words: 3204 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

The Scrushy Way

...INTRODUCTION This paper discusses the HealthSouth Case including the activities and subsequent prosecution of its CEO, Richard Scrushy. “During the trial of former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy, federal prosecutors argued that Scrushy must have known something was amiss with HealthSouth’s financial statements since there was a discrepancy between the company’s financial and nonfinancial performance.” Over a ten-year period from 1987 to 1997, HealthSouth enjoyed above–average growth at a rate of 31 percent per year. (Jennings, 2012, 2009, p. 183) This phenomenal growth was due, in part, to a series of mergers and acquisitions let by the efforts of the company’s CEO, Richard Scrushy who ran the company with an iron fist and has at least one recorded conversation directing a CFO to fix the numbers over time. The fraud lasted for seven years and totaled approximately $2.7 billion. Mr. Scrushy denied knowing anything about the fraud, claimed it was all done by the people around him and was ultimately found not guilty of the fraud at HealthSouth but was convicted on bribery and corruption charges. Mr. Scrushy was ordered to pay $2.9 billion in restitution in a civil suit. “From at least 1996 until 2002, HealthSouth senior management perpetrated a financial statement fraud primarily through the use of nonstandard journal entries.” (Carmichael, 2010, p. 64) “Scrushy, once a high school dropout, worked as a gas station attendant and a bricklayer before retuning (sic)...

Words: 2339 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Acconting Ethics

...of all corporations must go to extreme measures to maintain due diligence in every aspect of their duties in managing corporations. Any corporate transgressions can be immediately disclosed to the world through television, radio or internet. These perceptions of misconduct, whether true or false, can greatly affect the corporations’ position. Because of the critical affect that inappropriate conduct on the part of directors and corporate management has on the future of the corporation in addition to the adverse effects on all of its stakeholders, the United States government passes the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This act was initiated in order to create a specific framework for auditing all functions of Board members to circumvent corruption as well as to encourage improvements in the stock market. Improving the confidence of stockholders in the United States was also a major consideration in the implementation of this legislation (Thompson, 2005). The passage of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has developed a specific set of auditing tools and guidelines for directors. Directors now have a legal responsibility to follow these guidelines and their corporate bylaws or, as evidenced by the aforementioned scandals, face public scrutiny as well as criminal and civil action. According to John Nash, president of the National Association of Corporate Directors, directors are now being mandated to “be more accountable, to hold executives more accountable” to align themselves with the...

Words: 867 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Healthsouth- Summary

...Teaching Notes HealthSouth Corporation: Fraud, Greed and Corporate Governance Case Summary During the 1990s, Richard M. Scrushy, the former CEO of HealthSouth Corporation, engineered many acquisitions of rehabilitation clinics, outpatient surgical care operators, nursing homes and other health care companies. Mr. Scrushy had been a respiratory therapist who spotted a niche in the health care market and utilized his entrepreneurial talents, marketing skills, and super salesmanship to set up and run what became the third largest publicly held company in Alabama. Eventually, HealthSouth became the largest provider of ambulatory surgery and rehabilitative health care services in the United States with 1,700 facilities and 51,000 employees. In 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused the company and Mr. Scrushy of inflating earnings to the tune of $1.4 billion since 1999. In November 2003, a federal grand jury indicted Mr. Scrushy on 85 counts including conspiracy, securities fraud, money laundering and charges related to overstating HealthSouth’s earnings by nearly $3.0 billion. According to federal investigators, the company overstated earnings to meet analysts’ earning estimates, while hiding the accounting fraud from the auditors. However, questions were raised whether the auditors failed to find or simply overlooked the fraud at HealthSouth. Central to the investigation was the issue of what role Mr. Scrushy played in “cooking the books.” However, as the case...

Words: 362 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Finance

...HealthSouth Corporation: Fraud, Greed and Corporate Governance Manmohan D. Chaubey, Ph.D. The Pennsylvania State University One College Place Du Bois, PA 15801 (USA) Tel: 814-375-4846 Fax: 814-375-4784 Email: mdc13@psu.edu Case for ICMC2006 International Conference on Management Cases 4-5 December 2006 IMT Ghaziabad, India HealthSouth Corporation: Fraud, Greed and Corporate Governance During the 1990s, Richard M. Scrushy, the former CEO of HealthSouth Corporation, engineered many acquisitions of rehabilitation clinics, outpatient surgical care operators, nursing homes and other health care companies. In 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused the company and Scrushy of inflating earnings to the tune of $1.4 billion since 1999. In November 2003, a federal grand jury indicted Scrushy on 85 counts including conspiracy, securities fraud, money laundering and charges related to overstating HealthSouth’s earnings by nearly $3.0 billion. According to federal investigators, the company overstated earnings to meet analysts’ earning estimates, while hiding the accounting fraud from the auditors. However, questions were raised whether the auditors failed to find or simply overlooked the fraud at HealthSouth. Central to the investigation was the issue of what role Scrushy played in “cooking the books.” However, as the case unfolded, it highlighted many other issues such as: The role of Board of Directors in corporate governance; the role of the auditors; the...

Words: 3975 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Effects of Unethical Behavior

...HealthSouth was one of the largest provider of outpatient surgeries in the United States. Not only the largest provider of outpatient surgeries in the United States but also the largest diagnostic and rehabilitative health care service in the United States. This was until March 19, 2003, when the Securities and Exchange Commission charged the company and Richard Scrushy with fraudulent account reporting of company finances. Scrushy and other executives from the finance and accounting departments (15 total) were later indicted in November 4, 2003. Richard Scrushy became the first CEO of any Fortune 500 company to be tried under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for any accounting fraud. During court proceedings other practices involving HealthSouth were uncovered. Things such as unethical behavior and corporate governance involving the Board of Directors (banks and creditors were suspected to be involved but were not indicted, only civil suits). Richard Scrushy was charged with money laundering, conspiracy, securities fraud, overstating HealthSouth's earnings, and 81 more counts. "The Commission's complaint, which was filed in the federal district court in Birmingham, Ala., alleged that since 1999, at the insistence of Scrushy, HealthSouth systematically overstated its earnings by at least $1.4 billion dollars. This was because they needed to meet or exceed Wall Street earning expectations" (n/a, 2013). Prosecutors believed that Scrushy intentionally allowed...

Words: 510 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Fins 3616

...The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 - In the US, corporate governance is determined predominantly by legislation in the form of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX") and detailed regulations which SOX required the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and NASDAQ to draw up. -What is The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002?It is a U.S federal law that set new or enhanced standards for all U.S public company boards, management and public accounting firms. - It established a series of requirements that affect corporate governance in the U.S. and influenced similar laws in many other countries - The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is mandatory. ALL organizations, large and small, MUST comply - Historically, Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) was passed to combat corruption at big public companies like Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, Adelphia, Global TelLink, HealthSouth, and Arthur Andersen. But small and not-for-profit companies are finding they have no choice but to adopt many of the same standards if they want to get insurance, attract investors and donors, and repel lawsuits. The law has five main objectives : 1) To strengthen the independence of auditing firms. 2) To improve the quality and transparency of financial statements and corporate disclosure. 3) To enhance corporate governance 4) To improve the objectivity of research 5) To strengthen the enforcement of the federal securities laws, including the use of criminal penalties. Major element in SOX - A new regulatory...

Words: 386 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Examining a Business Failure

...Examining a Business Failure - Tyco International Ltd Organizational behavior is defined as the study of the behavior of individuals, groups and structure and the impact to an organization. Organizational behavior uses the information gathered from this study to improve the organization’s effectiveness (Robbins, 2011). Organizational behavior focuses on a number of areas including the behavior of leaders, inter-personal communication, processes and structure within the organization, conflict and employee motivation. The behavioral disciplines of psychology, social psychology, sociology and anthropology form the basis for the study of organizational behavior. Psychology and social psychology studies the impact of conditions in the workplace and the impact to the employees’ performance. Within these sciences, learning theorists also studies the impact of change and how to reduce the challenges of change in the work environment [ (Robbins, 2011, p. 12) ]. According to the authors, sociology, and anthropology contributes to the study of organizational behavior by focusing on the relationship of employees as a group and the impact to the organizational structure. The culture and group dynamic of the employees will direct the level of motivation that in turn will negatively or positively impact the performance of the organization [ (Robbins, 2011, p. 12) ]. Psychology evaluates changes in individuals’ behavior and the impact to learning, Emotions, leadership, and decision-making...

Words: 1292 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Governance

...Best Practices: Nonprofit Corporate Governance One of the most significant and valuable developments of the post-Sarbanes-Oxley Act environment has been the emergence of governance “Best Practices” proposals designed to enhance and improve corporate responsibility and governance. These proposals have come from a wide variety of sources, ranging from self-regulatory agencies (e.g., NYSE, NASDAQ) and business groups (e.g., The Business Roundtable, The Conference Board, National Association of Corporate Directors) to professional associations (e.g., the American Bar Association) and major corporations (e.g., General Electric, WorldCom, TIAA/CREF). While most of these Best Practices proposals have been recommended for adoption by public companies, their relevance as an aspirational goal for nonprofit corporations and non-public companies is widely recognized. From these and other resources, we have developed the following set of guidelines as “food for thought” concerning governance “Best Practices” to assist nonprofit corporations in responding to the current “corporate responsibility” environment. To set the proper perspective, a few important caveats are in order. First, these are Best Practices guidelines, and do not in most instances, reflect current legal requirements. Instead, the guidelines reflect our perspective on evolving trends in nonprofit governance and law. In many circumstances, adoption of, and adherence to, “Best Practices” may reduce a nonprofit corporation’s...

Words: 4165 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Leg500 Assignment 1

...Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Act Student Name College or University Name LEG500 – Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance Professor’s Title Date Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley The federal government passed and put into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) to primarily protect whistleblowers from retaliation for reporting corporate fraud and financial malfeasance to the government. The negligence became apparent in the 1990’s when corporations such as Enron, HealthSouth, Tyco and WorldCom were found to have grossly overstated their earnings. This cost billions of dollars in losses to shareholders and caused the near-collapse of the stock market (Prentice, 2010, p. 17). The companies were able to hide, scam or misrepresent their earnings due to the dot-com boom, soaring investments, and auditor fraud. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act contains many sections, sub-sections and creation of other agencies to enforce it. It was a sweeping change to standard reporting practices and was created to restore investor confidence, hold corporations and auditors financially and criminally accountable, and protect whistleblowers. Prior to the creation of SOX the whistleblower had no protection from retaliation by the organization. Whistleblowers had fears of criminal prosecution, bodily harm and job loss if they reported the misdeeds of their employer both publicly and privately. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 redefined the whistleblower. An examination of the characteristics of a whistleblower...

Words: 1159 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Sox and Its Effects on It Security Governance

...Journal of Smart Home Vol. 3, No. 1, January, 2009 SOX and its effects on IT Security Governance Rosslin John Robles1, Min-kyu Choi1, Sung-Eon Cho2, Yang-seon Lee2, Tai-hoon Kim 1 School of Multimedia, Hannam University, Daejeon, Korea 2 Dept of Information Communication, Sunchon Univerity, Sunchon, Korea 3 Fumate Inc., Daejeon, Korea rosslin_john@yahoo.com, secho@sunchon.ac.kr, yslee@fumate.com, taihoonn@empal.com Abstract The Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act is a United States federal law enacted on July 30, 2002 in response to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals including those affecting Enron, Tyco International, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems and WorldCom. This paper discusses the effects of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act on corporate information security governance practices. The resultant regulatory intervention forces a company to revisit its internal control structures and asses the nature and scope of its compliance with the law. This paper reviews the implications emerging from the mandatory compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act. Issues related to IT governance and the general integrity of the enterprise are also identified and discussed. Industry internal control assessment frameworks, such as COSO and COBIT, are reviewed and their usefulness in ensuring compliance evaluated. 1. Introduction Accounting scandals at some of the big corporations like Enron, HealthSouth, Tyco and WorldCom had a devastating impact on investor confidence. Clearly, it was possible...

Words: 3348 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Recent Accounting and Corporate Governance Scandals

...REPORT RE: RECENT ACCOUNTING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SCANDALS Contents INTRODUCTION: 3 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 5 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN IRELAND 5 RESPONSE FROM REGULATORS TO THE MOST RECENT SCANDALS IN BANKING SECTOR 7 US CORPORATE GOVERNANCE at a time of Tyco scandal 8 RESPONSE FROM THE REGULATORS -SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002 9 AUDIT 10 EXTERNAL AUDIT 10 INTERNAL AUDIT 11 INTRODUCTION TO ANGLO IRISH BANK 12 The Scandals 12 Loans to Sean Fitzpatrick 13 Irish Life and Permanent Depositing Funds 14 Corporate Governance Situation of Anglo 16 Ernst & Young – External Auditor 17 Impact on Shareholders & The Public 18 Company Law, Financial Regulator, Accounting Standards IFRS and GAAP 19 TYCO INTERNATIONAL 20 DETAILS OF TYCO’S SCANDAL 21 ACCOUNTING ISSUES IDENTIFIED 22 THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE WEAKNESSES AT TYCO 22 PERFORMANCE OF EXTERNAL AUDITORS 23 CONCLUSION 27 The Main Reasons for The Scandals 27 Steps taken afterwards-will they prevent similar events happening in the future? 33 END REFLECTION 36 Bibliography: 37 Appendices: 41 INTRODUCTION: Accounting and corporate governance scandals have been a growing problem in the recent years. Many believe that the blame for those scandals should be borne on two groups of people. Those responsible for managing a company and those whose duty is to provide assurance on the accounts prepared by the directors (auditors), both of whom failed to perform their jobs adequately...

Words: 12288 - Pages: 50

Premium Essay

Document

...NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS A member of a company's board of directors who is not part of the executive team. A non-executive director (NED) typically does not engage in the day-to-day management of the organization, but is involved in policy making and planning exercises. In addition, non-executive directors' responsibilities include the monitoring of the executive directors, and to act in the interest of any stakeholders. Also called external director, independent director and outside director. ROLE OF NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS * Provide objective and independent advice to the Board to enable it to make better decisions in the interest of all shareholders * Bring a genuine independent perspective to enhance decision making * Provide value added input to strategy and strategic development * Act in the best interests of the company as a whole rather than any one particular group of shareholders * Assist in carrying out the duties of the Board, such as: * reviewing, approving and on-going monitoring of the strategic plan * reviewing organizational capability in relation to stated objectives * reviewing financial performance against targets * raising capital * reviewing any major changes in the company, such as financial and organization structure * providing advice on major investments/divestments to be made * monitoring legal, ethical, risk and environmental compliance where appropriate * Act as a catalyst for change...

Words: 727 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

1234

...-the relationship of the leader to the board has a tremendous impact on the organization’s ability to fulfill its mission. -they work with to create the most effective, strong, and healthy boards possible to serve the organizations that they lead. -The chapters provide a brief overview of the best practice and its relationship to board development. -Join this journey of exploring the best practices of strong and effective boards. guiding the reader from a solid starting point of development by establishing role, purpose and function of the board to knowing and communicating the organization’s mission, vision and values. -Board members intentionally and routinely engage in mutual accountability, communication, evaluations and board development while taking the necessary time to process decisions eliminating unnecessary surprises. Boards unite and resolve to work together through change and transitions for the good of the Kingdom, the advance of the Gospel, and the prosperity of the organization. -to exhibit generosity as board members and to be outstanding examples of giving regularly and sacrificially to the church, college or organizations they serve in order to establishment a culture of board development that embraces the principle of “passing it on,” by developing new board participants that will lead to a strong and healthy future for the organization. - as a board member or as leader of an organization can take your present board environment and develop it into...

Words: 739 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Roles of Ethics and Compliance in Starbucks

...The role of ethics and compliance in Starbucks is set in place to ensure that all of Starbuck’s staff from the baristas working the front counter to the corporate staff are all abiding by federal laws and regulations. Ethics in financial practices are sometimes hard to believe. The agency problem is the result of conflict of interest between stockholders and the managers of a firm (Titman & Keown, p. 15, 2011). “A conflict of interest is a situation in which a person has a private or personal interest sufficient to appear to influence the objective exercise of his or her official duties (“Business Ethics”, n.d.). An example of a conflict of interest would be if the CFO attempted to acquire a property or investment from a friend or family member without acting in the best interest of Starbucks and it’s shareholders. Corporate advisors, in this case a CEO or CFO are legally required to make fair and ethical financial decisions. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act or SOX, passed by Congress in 2002 holds corporate advisors that have access to influence company decisions legally accountable for any instances of misconduct (Titman & Keown, p. 11, 2011). The SOX act is in effect in order to protect corporate shareholders against financial misconduct and accounting fraud. According to Starbuck’s Code of Ethics for CEO and Finance Leaders are required to follow the following seven duties: act with honesty and integreity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest, provide internal...

Words: 459 - Pages: 2