Free Essay

History of Warfare

In:

Submitted By eddielebar
Words 1344
Pages 6
Edward LeBar
November 25th, 2009
HIST 017
Prof: Dan Hambly
History of Warfare: Essay Assignment

The two key individual advancements of weaponry in warfare that I believe were most relevant to the change in warfare tactics were the Spears used by the Ancient Greek and Macedonian Phalanx (300 B.C.E) and the Long Bow used by the British (1300-1500 AD). Each of these weapons made a huge impact in warfare upon being developed and changed the course of history of their armies who wielded these weapons of excellence. Each weapon was wielded by soldiers slaying millions of people during many glorious historical battles still taught to students around the globe today about their importance to warfare.

“One of the earliest, and certainly the deadliest of these first purpose-made weapons, was the spear” (Weir, 2005). The spear was developed in early known warfare, and had an impact when the Ancient Greeks wielded the spear in their battles. The Spear was a simple weapon to make as it consisted of a wooden poll 6 to 8 feet in length with a sharp piercing arrowhead attached to the end capable of puncturing any enemy armor. The Ancient Greek’s developed the spear to be able to attack an enemy from a longer range than the sword and used the spear with tactics and coordination with a Hoplon shield protecting the Hoplite soldier which was later called a Phalanx. The spear proved to be very useful to the Greek Phalanx providing the Greek’s with many victories with this particular weapon. The spear was used in many campaigns with the Greek’s, and was in the battle between the Greeks and the Persians at Marathon in 490 B.C. In the Cambridge text book there is a picture of a Persian cavalry wielding a spear while engaging a Greek Hoplite with a spear as well depicting the battle at Marathon (Parker 2009). The Greek’s remained victorious in the battle against the Persians and many battles following Marathon. Later on the spear was further developed by the Macedonians developing these pikes that were very long spears, about twenty feet long in order to impale their enemies from a greater distance than the standard spear and having an advantage over the Greek Phalanx. The Pikes were a copycat of the Ancient Greek Spear but were made almost twice the length, an armor piercing arrowhead and used in a similar formation. When the Macedonians developed these spears they also developed new tactics to use these spears effectively during a heated battle to prevent the breakage of the Macedonian Phalanx ranks. In the Macedonian Phalanx the Soldiers wore very little armor and only had three feet diameter to move around with a twenty foot spear side by side other soldiers in many ranks of the Phalanx (Parker 2009). The Macedonian Phalanx proved to be a organized force with their longer spear having a greater advantage than the Greeks which ultimately ending with the Macedonians to be the victors. Overall the Spear had quite the history in warfare while it was altered many times with improvements, and proved to be an ultimate weapon of its time. The Long Bow was an impeccable weapon that was developed in the early ages which was eventually mastered by the British who wield this weapon and proved its superiority over other weapons during that period of time. The British took great interest in the longbow which led to the development of the long bow in hopes of creating a weapon to launch arrows at high velocity at their enemies from great distances and have amazing accuracy in hopes of weakening their opponents before engaging in battle, having bombarded their enemies with a massive amount of arrows. On the contrary, the longbow appears to have been on the British back doorstep for nearly 250 years before Crécy (I.B. Holley Jr., 2004). The Long Bow was made of many materials such as wood would be either Oak or Yew, and the Bow String would be made up of silk or hemp to make a sturdy string. The Bow would be made of a piece of wood that was bent backwards and held in place by the bow string to give the ultimate resistance. The bow was made this way to give a lot of pressure behind each shot to achieve maximum velocity for greater distance in each shot. The Longbow was well known for the level of accuracy this weapon possessed to be able to hit an opponent from 250 yards away whether the target was moving or not. The British Long Bow first appeared in the Battle of Crecy where the French Norman invaders met with the British forces at the town of Crecy where one of the most famous battles of the Hundred Years War began. The battle of Crecy started off with the Norman’s invading Crecy where the British forces were massively outnumbered by the Normans. The British had to form a good strategy to overcome this massive Norman army to weaken the Norman army before the two army’s swords were engaged. The British thought if they could pick off a lot of the cavalry and crossbowman since they would be out of range this would make the battle a fair fight. The Norman’s had hired crossbowman to take out the British from a far then allow the Norman Cavalry to Attack the British Forces. But the Normans were taken by surprise after they shot their crossbows that came up short and their crossbows took a really long time to reload leaving them defenseless. After the British Long Bowman realized their strategy was working and they were not in harm’s way the bombardment commenced upon the Norman troops with thousands of arrows eventually ending with a Norman retreat. This was a superb victory for the British thanks to their Long Bow and sparked further strategies for the use of the Longbow (I.B. Holley Jr., 2004). The Long Bow has proven to be a dominant weapon of its time as many weapons like the crossbow have tried to be superior but failed to the Longbows dominance. After the English used the Longbow and proved the dominance of this weapon it started to spread to a lot of nations all over the globe as a primary long range weapon during this period. Later on the long range weapons had further development by using gun powder to propel objects great distances and eventually ended the use of the Longbow and created the rifles.

The weapon that I believe had more of an impact on the change warfare would have to be the Longbow. I have chosen this weapon because this weapon changed many ways wars were fought. The battles would change from nobles only engaging in a fight with other nobles to armies fighting armies regardless of nobility. The Longbow changed the tactics of warfare and the strategies of defeating larger armies when you are outnumbered. The impact this weapon had turned impossibilities to victories, strictly because the bow could kill off so much of the enemies army before they could engage in battle with your army. The longbow was a weapon of sheer speed, accuracy, versatility, and precision on the battle field. I believe the British would have not been as successful without the longbow as this weapon change the fate of the British Empire if they had not developed this unusual weapon of mass potential.

Bibliography 1. The Cambridge Illustrated History of Warfare, Geoffrey Parker, 2009 2. Technology and Military Doctrine: Essays on a Challenging Relationship, I.B. Holley Jr., 2004. Provided by http://www.netlibrary.com.rap.bibliocentre.ca 3. 50 Weapons That Changed Warfare by William Weir, 2005. Provided by http://www.netlibrary.com.rap.bibliocentre.ca

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. The Spear, 50 Weapons That Changed Warfare, Page.10
[ 2 ]. Ancient Greece, Cambridge History of Warfare, Page.21
[ 3 ]. Macedonian Phalanx, Cambridge History of Warfare, Page.36
[ 4 ]. Long Bow, Technology and Military Doctrine, Pg.56
[ 5 ]. Long Bow, Technology and Military Doctrine, Pg.56

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Wester Way of War

...WESTERN WAY OF WAR (Name) (Institutional Affiliation) (Date) Warfare plays different roles. It is at times used as a way through which large empires are built. Civil war as another form of warfare is, on the other hand, what leads to the downfall of the empires. All societies and all historical periods have experienced war at one point in time. Different nations or militaries use diverse war approaches and tactics depending on their experiences and goals. Over time, different war approaches have been utilized by various regions across the globe. The Western Way of War has been instrumental in ensuring the long-standing dominance of the western nations all over the globe. In the last two centuries, it has turned out to be the prevailed and used by majority of the globes militaries. The ‘Western Way’ is defined by five main facets, namely: dependence on technological advancement, advanced training and discipline, capability to implement new technological innovations (innovativeness) and strategic vision. These aspects have been attributed to the supremacy of the western culture. A pioneer of war is Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden.1 He is highly regarded as an exceptional commander. Under his tenure, Sweden became very powerful, and his battles were won through innovativeness, superb and effective weaponry, impeccable training and government support.2 Gustavus Adolphus is arguably one of the highly respected generals owing to his outstanding military expeditions during his era...

Words: 1298 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Warfare Is Not a Necessity

...Warfare: An Invention— Not a Biological Necessity Margaret Mead Margret Mead writes an essay, “Warfare: An Invention-Not a Biological Necessity” to show us warfare and to summarize how warfare was invented. Throughout her essay, she writes of three different world views of warfare and how others might view it. She also shares her view on warfare and how other cultures have treated warfare. Mead shows us three different world views in this essay. The first view talks about an aggressive and competitive human nature who is down to the very basic of needs. Those who take this view Mead points out wish to outlaw war or at least find different ways of competing given that it is part of man’s nature to fight and go to war. The second view that Mead points out is that warfare is inevitable. Those who take this stance feel that there is a struggle for power and possessions unless we change our social system and completely change what we have between our lower class, middle class, and our higher class. They feel that if the classes simply disappear than there wouldn’t be any more problems. The third view that comes forth between the two major extremes is that each man’s biological determines his needs. When his needs are met because each culture had its own frustrations, war will be inevitable and natural. Moreover, Mead has her own view that she would like to share. She would like us to recognize that warfare can be between two groups as groups (and each groups fights...

Words: 475 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Atlantic Revolutions

...“Wars and warfare changed very little in response to the Atlantic Revolutions and the Industrial Revolution” In response to the Atlantic Revolutions and the Industrial Revolution, wars and warfare have changed significantly. Each revolution changed not only how war and warfare was conducted but had a remarkable impact on the character of war itself. Both of the Atlantic Revolutions and the Industrial Revolutions shaped warfare by instigating the implementation of a sense of nationalism, advanced technology, and tactics. The Napoleonic Wars, American Civil War, and the Crimean War are very good examples of how the Atlantic Revolutions and the Industrial revolutions influenced wars and warfare. Nationalism, an emerging movement, became increasingly noteworthy throughout the Napoleonic Wars, which was derived from the Atlantic Revolutions. The industrialization period prominently impacted on the American Civil War by bringing about vast improvements in technology and transportation, which deemed to have a profound effect on the social, economic and cultural conditions of the time. Enhanced technology and the evolution from pre modern warfare tactics are evident in Russia’s defeat by the British in the Crimean War. This again shows a direct correlation on how each revolution had a significant impact on how warfare is conducted. Throughout the Napoleonic period there was an immense surge in the numbers that armies were yielding. The growth in armies is parallel to the sense...

Words: 1562 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Technology and War

...heritage dating to classical times of combining decisive battle, superior technology that is the dividend of rationalism, group discipline, and notions of freedom, audit, and constitutional government.(1) Of course, there was a particularly American variant of Western military practice that grew up on a vast frontier and was the result of the impatient nature of American popular culture and its familiarity with machines manifested best in something like George’s Patton’s romp across central France in the summer of 1944, or the dash up from Kuwait to Northern Iraq in the spring of 2003. Cohen, however, believes the U.S. way of fighting is more complex, incorporating all sorts of non-conventional elements. To make that point, he reviews warfare of the eighteenth-century along the northeastern seaboard of the American continent that rugged two-hundred-mile corridor of mountains, forests, and lakes from Albany to Montreal dubbed the “Great Warpath.”(1) His investigations reveal two less appreciated sources for the way Americans currently fight. One was the birth of a unique, and less remarked upon strain of raiding, ambushing, subversion, living off the land, ad hoc alliance building with indigenous peoples, long-range reconnaissance, and patrolling behind enemy lines.(1) The other was a sort of military populism: non-traditional tactics, by which early colonialists survived against the superior numbers of the French, Indians, Canadians and later their erstwhile British allies...

Words: 1431 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

King of the Seas

...From the many inventions that emerged from the American Civil War, the Ironclad, designed by Captain John Ericsson and Robert L. Stevens, has impacted the world by advancing naval warfare technology. It gave America more influence in Europe and put America ahead of Europe in naval matters. The impact and influence changed naval warfare’s forever by forcing wooden ships to become obsolete. The Ironclad was among the first technological and modern tools of war. Its impact on technology in navies can still be seen today in the designs and the construction of naval ships.(Mac Bride,1) It has impacted technology in the way ships are built. Because of the ironclads the ships that are used in wars today are much safer. They are stronger and easier to maneuver. The first ironclad to ironclad battle between the Merrimac and the Monitor was long and drawn out. Although neither one emerged victorious, the world began to see what a major improvement in warfare these ironclads were. A reporter from the Norfolk Day wrote: “This work will create a revolution in naval warfare. America’s improvement has impacted naval history in a way that no other invention ever has!” Many times in United States history the major nations of the world, such as England, France and Germany, have ignored the United States in political matters but this invention and the ironclad to ironclad battle changed a large percentage of their attitudes toward the United States. It made America become feared and respected by...

Words: 1951 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Weapons of Mass Destruction

...systems * 3 Biological weapons * 4 Chemical weapons * 5 Nuclear weapons * 5.1 Non-proliferation * 5.1.1 By region * 5.2 Weapons limitation * 5.3 Cooperation (4) Nuclear (or) Atomic (4.1) Nuclear warfare * 1 Types of nuclear warfare * 2 History a. 2.1 1940s i. 2.1.1 Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ii. 2.1.2 Immediately after the Japan bombings b. 2.2 1950s c. 2.3 1960s d. 2.4 1970s e. 2.5 1980s f. 2.6 Post–Cold War g. 2.7 Sub-strategic use * 3 Nuclear terrorism * 4 Survival (4.2) Nuclear Weapons * 1 Types * 1.1 Fission weapons * 1.2 Fusion weapons * 1.3 Other types * 2 Weapons delivery * 3 Nuclear strategy * 4 Governance, control, and law * 4.1 Disarmament * 4.2 United Nations * 5 Controversy * 5.1 Ethics * 5.2 Notable nuclear weapons accidents * 5.3 Nuclear testing and fallout * 5.4 Public opposition * 6 Costs and technology spin-offs * 7 Non-weapons uses * 7.1 Civil engineering and energy production * 7.2 Physics * 7.3 Propulsion use * 7.4 Asteroid impact avoidance (5) Chemical (5.1) Chemical warfare * 1 Definition * 2 History * 2.1 Ancient times * 2.2 Early modern era * 2.3 Industrial era * 2.3.1 World War I * 2.3.2 Interwar years...

Words: 790 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Carnage and Culture

...the nine battles he uses support his claim; thus, making his theory agreeable overall. Furthermore, the title Carnage and Culture best illustrates Hanson’s theory on the western culture. The reason being why the west always wins their wars is due to the culture- “The Western Way of War”. This culture follows with characteristics in which represent the West: being freedom, individualism, civic militarism, superior weapons, organization, discipline, morale, initiative, flexibility, and command. All of these characteristics are shown through the West in the battles fought against the Non-West. Hanson talks about nine different battles in which helps back up his theory. Western warfare, a common foundation and continual way of fighting, that has made Europeans the most deadly soldiers in the history of civilization. With this being said, Hanson believed that with the western culture, the armies produce better quality arms and soldiers. Culture being such a big part of the Western way of life, the people believed in themselves and their rights to freedom. Although, for a long time the Western expeditionary forces were outnumbered and often deployed from their home they continued to fight off the superior enemies. This led to the Western culture to slaughter mercilessly their opponents. The cultural background is what Hanson’s theory is as...

Words: 1298 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Wars

...destruction. War should be understood as an actual, intentional and widespread armed conflict between political communities, and therefore is defined as a form of (collective) political violence or intervention. The set of techniques used by a group to carry out war is known as warfare. An absence of war is usually called peace. While some scholars see warfare as an inescapable and integral aspect of human nature,[1] others argue that it is only inevitable under certain socio-cultural or ecological circumstances.[2] For some, the practice of war is not linked to any single type of political organization or society. Rather, as discussed by John Keegan in his A History of Warfare, war is a universal phenomenon whose form and scope is defined by the society that wages it. Another argument suggests that since there are human societies in which warfare does not exist, humans may not be naturally disposed for warfare, which emerges under particular circumstances. The deadliest war in history, in terms of the cumulative number of deaths since its start, is the Second World War, with 60–85 million deaths, followed by the Mongol conquests.[3] Proportionally speaking, the most destructive war in modern history is the War of the Triple Alliance, which took the lives of over 60% of Paraguay's population, according to Steven Pinker. In 2003, Richard Smalley identified war as the sixth (of ten) biggest problems facing humanity for the next fifty years.[4] War usually results in significant...

Words: 307 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Chemical Weapons In The Vietnam War

...Source A “Charles T. Kamps Jr. (1988). The history of the Vietnam war, New York: The Military Press and Kenneth Macksey (1986). Gives good information about Strategy and the extent to which the American’s applied chemical weapons in the Vietnam War. Sources B Technology in war. New York: Prentice Hall Press gives information on the tactics used by the americans when deploying chemical weapons. Source C a website from The History Channel (Agent Orange - Vietnam War - HISTORY.com. 2015. [ONLINE] Available at:http://www.history.com/topics/vietnam-war/agent-orange. [Accessed 14 July 2015]. and a video from YouTube (Historic Archival Stock Footage - Vietnam War Airstrike 1 White Phosphorus Napalm - YouTube. 2015. [ONLINE] Available are the secondary sources have also compiled a visual source as a primary sources Source...

Words: 1562 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

End of Mayan Civilization

...collapse of the Mayan civilization, this would be both insufficient and impossible from a strictly theoretical standpoint. For example, Henry M. Sayre argues that by 900 A. D. (900 CE), Mayan civilization had been decimated as a result of not just one single factor, but, rather, as a result of a number of equally important factors. These factors included overpopulation and accompanying ecological degradation, political competition, and warfare (Sayre, 2012, p.392). Once again, it is essential to clearly articulate the fact that it is theoretically impossible to put forth only one single underlying factor in a theory offering a coherent explanation for the collapse of the Mayan civilization. However, one particular theory, a comprehensive theory focusing specifically upon drought as an environmental and climate factor, offers the best possible explanation for the Mayan collapse. As a fundamental environmental and climate factor, drought offers a more rational explanation than social factors such as overpopulation, political competition, and warfare. When tested and...

Words: 1150 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Review: the History of Terrorism

...Blin, Arnaud, and Gérard Chaliand. The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al Qaeda. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2007. Change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel. The form of a town changes more swiftly alas! Than the heart of a mortal. Charles Baudelaire, Le Cygne (The Swan) In The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al Qaeda, edited by Gérard Chaliand and Arnaud Blin, readers will find an excellent compilation of essays regarding the history of terrorism. Beginning with the earliest recorded manifestations of terrorism to the present day, the editors provide not only detailed accounts of terrorism through the ages, but valuable historical context that helps the reader understand the complexities of the terrorism we face today. Overall, the purpose of this book is to show that terrorism is used for political purposes, that it is psychological in nature, and that this has been the case throughout history. The editors organize this collection of essays into a roughly chronological order that provides continuity to the argument that terrorism has evolved throughout history, while maintaining signature characteristics that distinguish it from other types of warfare. Beginning with the Zealots and Assassins of pre-medieval history, readers will soon begin to make connections between the various eras of terrorism. Additionally, this chronological arrangement lends itself to understanding that from its earliest stages, terrorism has always...

Words: 841 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Psyops

...of terrorism, the psychological dimension assumes great significance, as terrorists use violence as a psychological weapon by terrorising the multitude, rather than physically affect a few, and in this sense, they fight a psychological war also. The relevance of psychological operations is much greater than the successful conduct of tactical operations. This article is an attempt to conceptualise the term PSYOPs in the Indian context. The changed dynamics of international relations following the end of the Cold War and changes in the South Asian strategic landscape, postSeptember 11, have made PSYOPs more relevant for the region. It is also important to know that differences between various related concepts like Propaganda, Information Warfare, and Perception Management are waferthin, and may lead to contested perceptions amongst various agencies working under the overall ambit of national security, if not viewed in the current perspective. Therefore, clarity of the concept will set the stage for an effective implementation of policies and help in setting up of a policy structure in India (which does exist today in loosely knit shape) for national level coordination of PSYOPs. Alongside the need for a disciplined, trained, and well-equipped manpower to combat national security challenges, it is also essential to have a comprehensive and effective machinery to conduct psychological operations. Such a machinery must then cover the entire spectrum of the socio-psychological threat...

Words: 5267 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

History of Military Technology

...Transformations of Military Technology Transformations of Military Technology The military is armed forces authorized to use lethal force, and weapons, to support the interest of the citizens, and the profession of soldiering goes many years back. The military’s primary reason of existing is to engage in combat and be victorious. This is the primary focus for all military throughout history. Tactics and methods are used for engaging and defeating the enemy in direct combat. However the soldiers and armies have come a long way from the spear, or the bow and arrow. The innovations along with changes in tactics and strategies were crucial to the evolution of warfare. In the middle ages the army, air force, marines, national guards, and navy did not exist. Medieval knights were the middle ages military. Knighthood was awarded to members of nobility. Normally a man must have been born the son of a knight in order to become one. At the age of seven or eight, a young knight would be sent away from home to begin formal knight training, in preparation to dominate the medieval battlefield. In this training, the most commonly used weapons for war were swords and the lance; by horseback riding knights wearing body-covering armor. In addition, the knights were taught to use a wide range of weaponry, from simple tools and farm implements to sophisticated acts of surrounding and attacking the enemy, for capture. Wounds inflicted on the battlefield were usually cuts to arms, legs and scalp;...

Words: 1714 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Biological Warfare In 18th Century North America Summary

...Elizabeth Fenn’s “Biological Warfare in Eighteenth Century North America: Beyond Jeffrey Amherst” is a paper that looks into the history of germ or biological warfare in the eighteenth century in North America, mainly during the colonization and Revolutionary War periods. They used Smallpox, a disease that has been cured in today’s world, but back then caused hundreds of deaths. When the colonists and British gave blankets and clothes to the Indians they came from Smallpox treatment centers and spread the disease to the Native Americans killing most of the natives. Fenn structured this paper by breaking it down into smaller chapter like sections that explain the history of biological warfare, how it was executed, the result of their actions,...

Words: 306 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Military Science and War

...Militaries are comprised of soldiers, characteristic of befitting the armed forces or the nation and are called “the army” collectively. Science is knowledge, general truths or particular facts, obtained and shown to be correct by accurate observation and thinking. When science is focused on the military, it is known as “military science”. How was military science developed? It is obvious that it is invented to fight against others and causes an opposition, which is called “War”. War is a conflict by force of arms between political bodies, the science or art of arms but also a terrible way to express a nation’s decisions or position. As we can observe that war directly pertains to military science, it is clear that wars are fought because of competition between nations in military science and the military science is improved because of wars. World War I and World War II are the biggest and most deadly wars so far between human beings; therefore they clearly support this statement. War World I was happened between 1914- 1919, and was fought between two group of power, Central Powers and Allies. The Central Powers were made of Austria- Hungry, Bulgaria, Ottoman and Germany; the Allies were formed by Britain, France, and Russia. They grouped together because of fear of militarism, imperialism and the ideas of nationalism. As Dr. James West Davidson states “Nationalism encourages unity, it also created mistrust and bitter rivalry between European nations”; “Imperialism...

Words: 2827 - Pages: 12