Premium Essay

How To Go To War In Tim O Brien's The Things They Carried

Submitted By
Words 812
Pages 4
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, it was no secret that being sent to fight in Vietnam carried a high chance of being killed or injured. Receiving a draft card was often a young man’s biggest nightmare. For some, the most appealing choice was to register as a Conscientious Objector, as seen in the case of Thom Nickels. Others fled to Canada, expecting to never be able to return to the United States. Tim O’Brien, author of The Things They Carried, tried this tactic only to find that he couldn’t convince himself to follow through with it. One more choice was to go to jail for two years for refusal to go to war when drafted. Of course, young men could simply accept their fate and go to war. Reasoning for willingly going to war varied from person to person, but usually fell along the lines of “owing it to” the country, or fear of embarrassment if they left the country. War, assuming one survives, could be an invaluable experience, as demonstrated by novels and stories from surviving soldiers in wars since the beginning of time. Tim O’Brien displays that times of extreme stress and uncertainty create unbreakable bonds in The Things They Carried. Upon receiving a draft card, I believe that I would have found the first available boat to Canada, and not …show more content…
Strong feelings of patriotism could lead some young men to lay their lives on the line for their country, even if the war was looked down upon by the public. Fear of embarrassment was enough to convince some, while others realized that they had no other real choice. This was O’Brien’s case, because he came to the realization that, for him, “Canada had become a pitiful fantasy. Silly and hopeless”(O’Brien 55). Aside from personal reasons, the facts were still laid out in front of each young man. The United States Army needed more young men to fight with, and the young men would be paid for doing that

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Secularism

...MANU/SC/0241/2007 Equivalent Citation: 2007(2)ALT1(SC), JT2007(2)SC1, (2007)3SCC184, [2007]1SCR317 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1 of 2006, Transferred Case Nos. 82 to 90 of 2006 and Writ Petition (C) No. 129 of 2006 Decided On: 10.01.2007 Appellants: Raja Ram Pal Vs. Respondent: The Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha and Ors. Parameter of judicial review in relation to exercise of parliamentary provisions Hon'ble Judges/Coram: Y.K. Sabharwal, C.J., K.G. Balakrishnan, C.K. Thakker, R.V. Raveendran and D.K. Jain, JJ. Counsels: For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Ram Jethmalani, P.N. Lekihi, T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr. Advs., Krishan Singh Chauhan, Indra Pratap Singh, Gyan Mitra, Chand Kiran, P.K. Jayakrishnan, K.C. Lamba, Sudha Pal, V.K. Shukla, Nischal Kumar Neeraj, Ashish Tripathi, K.K. Mohan, Nawal Kishore Jha, M.P. Jha, Harshvardha Jha, Ram Ekbal Roy, Rani Jethmalani, Harish Pandey, Samar Bansal, Abhik Kumar, P.R. Mala, Rajiv Kumar Tiwari, Rajesh Kumar, Sanjai Tiwari, Lata Krishnamurthi, Sachin Jain, Mukesh Kumar Tripathi, Lokesh Kumar, M.K. Garg, Meenakshi Arora, S. K. Mehndiratta, Pranav Sen, S.W.A. Qadri, Mahra, R.M. Sharma, Sushma Suri, Advs., Gopal Subramanian, ASG., Dayan Krishnan, Gautam Narayan, Satyakam, T.S. Murthy, Raghenth Basant, Aman Ahluwalia, Arunav Patnaik, Abhishek Tiwari and D.S. Mahra, Advs. Subject: Constitution Acts/Rules/Orders: Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Section 15, Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment)...

Words: 122434 - Pages: 490