...bibliography, whether brief or long, contains 3 elements: rhetorical information, a summary of the content, and the writer's evaluation (Ramage 156). This includes context like what was discussed in DBQ 5, the author's argument, as well as the writer's critical thinking on the problems and usefulness of the source. One of these elements was missing from each of the sources, but it is also of note that I'm not sure how detailed these summaries need to be. After a good amount of inner monolog debate between summary 1 and summary 3, I decided that summary 1 was the correct annotation. Summary 1 concerning the women's correctional facilities contains the author's purpose for the article, a summary of the authors' argument, the strengths/ weaknesses of the source, and how the source is going to be used for the writer's argument. However, there is no clear genre or audience noted in the summary, just a laundry list of authors' careers in prison and social work. Comparatively, summary 3 concerning the NCAA stat's gives the website's purpose, a summary of the website's information, and the...
Words: 489 - Pages: 2