Free Essay

How We Treat the Animals We Eat

In:

Submitted By agroves1970
Words 1820
Pages 8
How We Treat the Animals We Eat
Angela M Groves
DeVry University

How We Treat the Animals We Eat
Are the factory farms we buy our meat from treating animals humanely? Animal mistreatment is illegal and we can make a difference to put a stop to it. According to Ethical Farms “Some of the largest US factory farms refuse to uphold humane USDA and OSHA standards, having unsanitary, unhealthy conditions and animal rights violations. In 1958, the US government composed the Humane Slaughter Act that is not enforced” (Ethical Farms, 2010). There are 7 statutes in effect that comprise the Humane Slaughter Act. Included in these sections are Congress' statement that livestock must be slaughtered in a humane manner to prevent needless suffering, research methods on humane methods of slaughter, the non-applicability of these statutes to religious or ritual slaughter, and the investigation into the care of non-ambulatory livestock. There are farms that follow the Humane Slaughter Act in raising their livestock that we can purchase our food from, like Humane Farms for example. By aligning our consumerism with Restaurants and grocery store chains that purchase from humane farms we can make an impact. Also, supporting an Animal Rights group like The American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals(ASPCA) or The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals(PETA) can make a big difference. You can support them either monetarily or by volunteering your time in your local area.
In Chapter 17 of the Omnivore’s Dilemma (The Ethics of Eating Animals), Pollan (2006), says that “Eating meat has become morally problematic, at least for people who take the trouble to think about it. Vegetarianism is more popular than it has ever been, and animal rights is rapidly finding its way into the cultural mainstream”(p. 306). The selections offered at most markets and grocery stores have expanded quite a bit in the last decade or two in order to accommodate the consumerism of a vegetarian making it much easier to choose this kind of diet. Also many fast food and quality restaurants have added vegetarian dishes to their menu. “The general consensus has always been that humans were indeed omnivores and, whatever spiritual or moral dilemmas the killing and eating of animals posed, our various cultural traditions resolved them for us well enough. For the most part our culture has been telling us for millennia that animals were both good to eat and good to think”(p. 306). I myself have never had an aversion to eating meat. I grew up in the country and we fished for food. I visited a pig farm in school and saw a pig being born; I didn’t see anything inhumane. Until I read this book I honestly did not give eating meat a second thought. When Pollan goes back and forth to himself about how he feels right when he first killed the pig, he was very proud of his accomplishment, to how he felt when he saw the picture with the spilled blood, which was so disgusting he could not look at it. He is very graphic in his writing and gave me a clear picture of something I had never thought about. There is an unusual amount of cultural uncertainty on the subject of animals in today’s society and that may be why people tend to look the other way. Many times while researching this topic I myself read things that I think I really would rather not know. Am I willing to change my shopping and eating habits in order to help make a difference? Right now the answer is Yes!
Many of us seem eager to extend the circle of our moral consideration to other species, yet in our factory farms we’re inflicting more suffering on more animals than at any time in history. Pollan also says that “In recent years medical researchers have raised questions about the good to eat part, while philosophers like Singer and organizations like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have given us new reasons to doubt meat is good to think—that is, good for our souls or our moral self-regard” (Pollan, 2006).
In an article called, Mistreatment of turkeys at Willmar hatchery is alleged by Humane Society, Polta describes how the Humane Society found evidence of abuse and cruelty through an investigation and demanded that changes be made. “Nov. 24--WILLMAR -- An undercover investigation by the Humane Society of the United States has documented what the organization alleges is routine abuse and cruelty involving newly hatched turkey chicks at Willmar Poultry Co.” The article states that “Among the allegations contained in the Humane Society of the United States report:
- Sick, deformed, injured and dying birds, as well as "leftovers" not needed for buyers' orders, are routinely disposed of by being thrown alive into a grinder.
- Sick and injured birds are left in boxes or on the floor all day until being killed.
- Chicks are routinely de-beaked without first being given a painkiller.
- Chicks routinely have their back toes clipped off without a painkiller.
The report alleges that baby turkeys get trapped and injured in conveyor belts as they're processed for shipment to farms. It also alleges that boxes filled with poults are sometimes stacked too high or unevenly and crash to the floor, scattering and injuring the turkey chicks inside” (Polta, 2010). This source is more evidence of the kind of abuse happening in factory farms and also shows that getting outside government agencies involved to help uncover the issues and pressure them to resolve the issues is one way to help. Abuses such as this case can not and should not be tolerated throughout the livestock and factory farm industries. National and World Organizations can go a long way to oversee and create changes within the industry. In the article, VanderSpek stated that the “National Turkey Federation guidelines also comply with World Organization for Animal Health standards”(Polta, 2010).
The Humane Slaughter act states: “Sec. 1901. Findings and declaration of policy
The Congress finds that the use of humane methods in the slaughter of livestock prevents needless suffering; results in safer and better working conditions for persons engaged in the slaughtering industry; brings about improvement of products and economies in slaughtering operations; and produces other benefits for producers, processors, and consumers which tend to expedite an orderly flow of livestock and livestock products in interstate and foreign commerce. It is therefore declared to be the policy of the United States that the slaughtering of livestock and the handling of livestock in connection with slaughter shall be carried out only by humane methods”(Humane Slaughter Act). These are the laws and guidelines set forth by congress and all livestock industries should abide by them. Those who do not follow the laws should be heavily penalized even as far as to shut them down until changes are made if the situation is bad enough. One solution is that you can contact your Congressman and request that he/she take steps to implement USDA animal treatment standards. Evidence that this can make a difference is found in an article by We Care. Contrary to what PETA finds in our factory farms, in that article, I read that “every day on farms across America, pork producers demonstrate responsibility and concern for the animals in their care. Today, pigs are raised on farms designed to promote the health and well-being of animals and the safety of the food produced” (We Care). This is evidence that we can produce meat from animal factory type farms without being inhumane about it. Other livestock industries can follow this pig industry’s lead in their humane practices of raising livestock for human consumption.
You can also send a letter to the USDA and urge them to uphold the Humane Slaughter Act. In an article by Ethical Farms; “Recently, Burger King implemented Humane Animal Treatment standards from their Poultry Suppliers, and stopped purchasing from factories that had excessive instances of abuse. You can also purchase meats exclusively from Humane Farms” (Ethical Farms, 2010). Taking the time to educate yourself on the companies that purchase from humane farms is important. Where we purchase our food from everyday can make a big difference.
Every day, animals endure mass torture, abuse and live mutilation without any conscience from the part of the producers, for the suffering that these animals endure. When we mistreat animals, we generally also worsen conditions for people. Animal-centered diets have been associated with: heart attacks, strokes, various types of cancer, and other diseases. An article by PETA states that; “When PETA went public with the findings of an undercover investigation at a pig-breeding farm that supplies Hormel in Iowa, we called on the company to ban gestation crates—pens so small that the pregnant sows who are confined to them can't turn around or even lie down comfortably—and then introduced a shareholder resolution to that effect. Less than two years later, the meat giant has announced that it will phase out gestation crates, which cause so much suffering, by 2017” (PETA, 2012). Although they did uncover animal abuse, they were able to do something about it to make things better for the animals being abused. I think it is important that there are real consequences for the factory farms that are irresponsible and choose not to follow the laws that were made to protect all animals. I have to admit that I do not agree with the extremism that PETA takes to this cause. The ASPCA seems to be much more reasonable to me in their efforts to prevent animal abuse in any environment. They were the first humane society to be established in North America. The ASPCA actually has legal authority to investigate and make arrests for crimes against animals. I think either joining or donating to the ASPCA along with purchasing from humane farms would make a great impact on the market and further the cause to humanely treat the animals we eat!

References
Pollan, M. (2006). The omnivore's dilemma: A natural history of four meals. New York: Penguin Books.

We Care Initiative. Caring for farm animals. Retrieved from: http://www.wecareanswers.com/gj5he/index.html?gclid=CN_Zvb7M864CFSWFQAodmmvmHg

Ethical Farms. (2010). Promoting cruelty free farming. Retrieved from: http://ethicalfarms.org/ People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals(PETA, (2012). A Little Relief, Finally, for Hormel Pigs. Retrieved from: http://www.peta.org/b/thepetafiles/archive/2012/02/02/progress-for-hormel-pigs.aspx

Polta, A (2010). Mistreatment of turkeys at Willmar hatchery is alleged by Humane Society. Retrieved from: http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.devry.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=2W6448392763&site=pov-live

Humane Slaughter Act (2012). 7 USC CHAPTER 48 - HUMANE METHODS OF LIVESTOCK SLAUGHTER 01/03/2012 (112-90). Retrieved from: http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/07C48.txt

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Position Paper

...Practical Stand on why it is Okay to Eat Meat. By: Francisco Ron For: Professor Hill January 22, 2012 As humans we recognize that we are at the top of the food chain. There are many contrasting views on the subject if it is morally right to eat animals. Anthropologists discovered that when humans learned how to cook with fire there was a major evolvement in the human brain. By cooking meat from dead animals that were hunted, a viable source of protein was introduced and adapted throughout our history. Obviously humans are so intelligent that we have now created a way to extract protein from other non-animal sources. Is that a justificatory defense not to eat meat? Eating meat is not wrong, but the whole process of how the meat gets to our freezers is not morally right. Animal rightist may say that the meat eaters are involved in speciesism. The discrimination of animals based on the belief that humans are superior. Animal rightist do not eat animals because they are living things and can suffer. Aren’t plants living things? And therefore, they may suffer when killed too. If that was the case, humanity will had starved to death long ago. So why is eating a cow or a chicken so wrong to these people? I would like to believe the reason behind animal rightist not eating meat is on the practice of how the meat is handled. There have been numerous reports about animal abuse and malpractice in farms and slaughter houses. I do not agree on how the cows, pigs, and chickens are treated...

Words: 687 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Should Animals Have Rights

...Should Animals Have Rights? Though the history of the world is often the subject of heated debates, there are a few facts that are undisputed. One of these facts is that animals inhabited our planet long before humans did. This, in a sense, makes animals a kind of “grandfather” of the planet Earth. Humans have, in fact, been dependent on animals for thousands of years. From Native Americans following buffalo herds, to long voyage travelers bring dried meat to fight scurvy; animals have played a vital part of our history. So one must wonder, why, as humanity progresses towards a bigger and brighter future, the way we treat animals is becoming increasingly cruel. While animals have always been seen as a resource, a steady supply of food and clothing, our treatment of them has become nothing short of appalling. Since humans are so dependent on animals for their well being, their comfort, and in some cases their religion; there should be a moral obligation to treat animals decently. We use animals to help us is a variety of different ways. We use dogs for seeing and guiding the blind. We use them for search and rescue; our mutually beneficial relationship is ever evolving. This includes but is not limited to, emotional, psychological, and physical interactions with people, other animals, and the environment. Pets may be the only daily companions for elderly and special needs populations, and occupy the role of physical and emotional care-givers for these people. According...

Words: 1426 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Sutter's Argument For Eating

...picture of any animal getting brutally treated badly? It’s sicken to the stomach right? I love eating meat who doesn’t love food? I Am right, but just because we need animals to feed our cravings doesn’t mean we go and hurt these animals and show them no respect. Imagine yourself in those animals places getting treated like that you wouldn’t like it one bit you would have so many emotions going through your body so why don’t we at least show animals some respect before we go and kill them. So what happens when we don’t have certain animals in the world to hunt for us to feed our cravings? Everyday animals go through harsh things without us humans thinking about the way they feel or look when they...

Words: 732 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Persuasive Essay On Eating Animals

...being able to fight back is absurd. As horrific as such scenario sounds, we are contributing to these dreadful acts. Factory farming is when large quantities of animals such as cattle, pigs, and poultry, are housed together for mass production for the pleasure of our consumption. As a consumer ask yourself, is the murder of an animal justified? Is wanting a hamburger more important than the suffering and torture of the animal which it came from? Though a large amount of people are for animal rights, most are uninformed of the suffering behind factory farming. If people knew the true conditions in which the animals live, the unacceptable lifestyle these creatures have, and the torturous process that contributes to having food on your plate, we would all be hostile to the practice. Factory farming is unacceptable and it should be abolished....

Words: 1472 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Describe The Differences Between Cohen And Norcross Research Paper

...was okay to eat the wub, but not to draw out it’s suffering. The wub is not a human and therefore by Cohen’s description the wub is an animal because it was grouped with pigs by the the crew on the ship. He makes a point that it is not okay to cause undue suffering to animals or experiment on them if there are other ways around it (pg. 90). I also think that he would not want to kill the wub as quickly as the captain did. Cohen talks about increasing animal...

Words: 496 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Animals Rights

...Animal Rights This argument about animal needing rights has been going on since the twentieth century. Until this day animals still do not receive he rights they deserve. Not all animals deserve to be locked up in a cage at a zoo or in a scientist’s laboratory. How we treat animals has shown an uncivilized community. Prejudice has a way of denying that animal rights have no expectations to the fact that they should be given the rights as we have for ourselves. Doesn’t matter what the case may be, prejudice is morally unacceptable, because think about it, you will eat a pig or cow but it’s in human to eat a dog. [pic] Eating animals isn’t bad but it’s on the wrong side. The way factories torture the cows, pigs, and chickens is the wrong way that we should be eating them. This book that I read Eat Like You Care:  An Examination of the Morality of Eating Animals By Gary L. Francione and Anna Charlton, explains that they agree that “unnecessary” suffering and death on animals are ridiculous. The book explains that there will be no different on how we make our meat. Another book by Gary L. Francione, Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog? This book explains that an animal should have rights to live without suffering, just how humans live without suffering. In the Los Angeles Times, there was an article Animal rights, writ too large? This article explains that you can be against animal abuse and animals having rights. But don’t be an hypocrite...

Words: 508 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Eating Meat

...to feed, or in other words our ‘survival instinct’ is one of the few traces that our ancestors have left the modern mankind today. Although mankind are not carnivores per say, we have evolved into thinking so. The majority of us have been brought up eating meat and presumably, have never questioned it. Taking these into account, how ethical is meat eating? One can argue that non-human animals also have the same rights and killing them for food and using them as a mean to human gratification, does not treat them respectfully.     The fact that one has been raised to eat meat is cannot be an explanation of why mankind started eating meat and it cannot justify the claim that eating meat is ethical. Yet most of us have no idea that when we eat meat, we are in fact making a subconscious choice. When we were growing up, forming our identity and values, it is fair to say that generally our parents decide on whether we eat meat or not and opposed to making our own choice. We were never asked to reflect upon this daily practice that has such profound unethical dimensions and personal implications. Eating animals were just a given; it was just the way things were. However, this kind of argument allows us to eat human flesh all that required is that one is raised in a cannibalistic tradition, because then we can say that ‘this is the way that things are! But what if in a culture eating human was ethically good? What if one was raised to cut people’s head off with a knife everytime...

Words: 1040 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Death Out Of Life 'In Alice Walker's The Food Movement'

...Loving Animals to Death The Food Movement: 1. The purpose of this section is to get the reader thinking about the where the food comes from that they eat. Many people care more about how that animal was taken care of, how it was grown, and what was pumped into it, rather than what part of the animal they eat. Individuals are wanting justice for animals and hoping for more local farms that treat their animals fairly. The goal of food movement is that it is healthy, accessible, and to eliminate the corporation farms. This paragraph raises some questions about how people should go about this, and even questions if farmers should stop raising animals for consumption completely. 2. The writer effectively makes his opinions clear by using the example...

Words: 1366 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Animals Right

...ethic for animals and construct a moral standard for how animals should be treated. They claimed that treating animals well and giving animals respect is the fundamental moral behavior for human beings. According to Kantian account, the moral principle is that people who treat animals in some ways, afterward, they would treat human beings in the same ways. It means that people will mistreat their friends, families or others after they were used to mistreat animals. We can imagine that if we get used to hurt animals in order to find excitement or release angry, as time passes, we will acquire a habit to get excitement or let off our indignant and dissatisfaction from making others suffering. I think it is a very horrible conduct, people will have a serious psychological problem, and it can lead humans to kill people to find higher excitement. Treating animals well means treating human beings’ well. Apart from the principle of treating animals, people also concern about how animals may be treated involved the ideas of cruelty. All of us have duty to protect animals, to prevent them from being treated cruelly. Animals are people’s close friends, they give us lots of help. For example, dogs help police to find out murders and help blind people to walk, some other animals were used in experiments by human beings to do study, and some medicines are made up of a part of some special and previous animals like snakes and lizards. We cannot hurt animals, which is...

Words: 674 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary

...Dear Editor, Jeremy Rifkin’s findings published in “A Change of Heart about Animals” made me realize that animals can undergo pain, suffering, and affection just like us. The society is indebted to Rifkin for showing that animals are actually more identical to us than we thought. Rifkin just stated the obvious and argued how we should give animals more care and respect. The research conducted on whether animals can experience emotions like pain and fear rationalizes the adoption of laws protecting animals from lab experiments or human consumption . I agree with Rifkin,animals should not get abuse, kill, or hit. They are just like humans who have family to go to, take care of, and feed. An example are pets because they know...

Words: 385 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Animal Captivity Research Paper

...Most people love zoos and attractions that involve animals. The happy and inviting atmosphere, however, hides many horrible truths. Animals in captivity are doomed to inadequate living spaces, an over dependence on humans, shorter lifespans, and even suffer from abuse and torture. Animals have feelings and keeping them captive in these environments hurt them emotionally. Animal captivity is a problem all around the world. From the killer whales in San Diego to the elephants in Thailand, animals are held captive to entertain us. As an animal activist, I strongly dislike captivity. I do not like that people force these animals to live their lives in small environments just for our amusement. I also find it heartbreaking to hear how they train some of the animals to do tricks for us. These poor animals...

Words: 901 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Jfdhgcn

...The argument for animal rights assumes that animals posses their own lives and deserve to be assigned rights in order to protect their wellbeing. This view insists that animals are not merely good utilized only to benefit mankind and they should be allowed to choose how they want to live their lives, free from the constraints of man. But if animals are given absolute rights, then surely they shouldn’t be allowed to kill each other, as this would be a violation of these rights. Should murderous animals be administered prison sentences or even…capital punishment? One method of preventing animals killing each other would be to provide animals with a vegetarian environment which caters for their every need. However, in this fictional vegetarian world wouldn’t the rights of the animal be suppressed as it is being held in captivity against its will? From an evolutionary point of view it is the natural right of a stronger animal to devour a weaker one. If this is acceptable then surely it is acceptable for us to eat meat too, as we humans are more evolved than the creatures we eat. But this argument implies that if you have physical power over someone or something then you should be allowed to do what you want. If this was the case, it would be perfectly acceptable for me to torture an infant, purely because I have the physical capacity to do so and if an alien race should happen to invade Earth with the intention and power to kill and eat us, they should also be allowed...

Words: 1527 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

S H J M S

...The Damned Human Race, Mark Twain compares the behavior of different animals to human beings to prove in contrary to the Darwinian Theory. Humans actually descended from higher beings. His essay proves a lot of good points. Humans are selfish and wasteful, while animals take only what they need to survive, humans are the only beings in nature that hold grudges and take revenge and that humans are the only beings with morals. I agree and disagree with Mark Twain’s essay. He did live in a different time but cruelty still exists the same. If you analyze the human race or all animals, you can find evil in both creatures. Humans and animals cannot be compared properly. Animals do some awful things to each other as well as human. Mark Twain just lists human’s bad traits. There are a lot of positive traits of humans; he goes into detail of only the negative traits of humans. If there are bad people, there can also be good people. It’s true today, and was also true in the time Mark Twain lived in. In the 1860s, around the time when Mark Twain lived, there was an American Civil War and this is probably why he was so ashamed of human beings. There is something he missed about humans. We have to look outside of all the bad and evil and recognize people who are becoming vegetarians to save an animal, going green to save the planet or people who become doctors to treat sick people. If we didn’t have moral sense, how would we be capable of doing these things? Mark Twain is pointing out too many...

Words: 933 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Why Eat Meat

...Why Eat Meat Matt Moffa DeVry University Why Eat Meat Think of it this way, if everyone turned vegan or vegetarian eventually there will be no fertilizer and then eventually no plants. If we were all vegetarians we would have to turn all our livestock covered farm land into edible plant fields, which means no livestock and therefore no fertilizer. Then we would have to invent some kind of chemical fertilizer to fertilize the fields, but then wouldn’t that being hypocritical? People should eat meat because it is healthy to eat meat and there is a good meat. People need to eat meat because eating meat is healthy for the body. The human body gets many consumption of meat that fruits and vegetables cannot give them. Many vegetarians or vegans could argue that you can substitute those nutrients with pills. This is a viable argument, but how do you think they created those pills? Most vegetarians would say that eating a vegetarian diet is healthier then eating any meat. Well how much healthier is it really? Beef, chicken and fish are all extremely high in protein. This protein, which is not found in plants, is said to improve the overall health of the body, repair and building of tissues, the production of anti-bodies used to strengthen the immune system and contains all the essential amino acids. Other nutrients found in meat are iron, zinc and selenium. Iron helps in forming hemoglobin that transports oxygen to different...

Words: 674 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Pamper All Pets

...lifestyle for all pets, all pet’s parents, all over the world. Pamper All Pets (P.A.P.) was established in 2001. P.A.P. is a pet care service that offers healthy products to all dogs, cats, small animals, birds and fish. All our products have been selected from quality manufactures. We at P.A.P. follow the strictest of pet food manufacturing guidelines to bring to your companion a product that is a benchmark in the industry. We have researched our manufactures to ensure our customers get only the best and safest products. We only work with manufactures that offer warranties and return policies. We use only the highest quality pet food ingredients in our dog and cat food. We apply the highest quality manufacturing guidelines to our production process. We never use artificial preservatives color or additives. When you feed your dogs and cats whole, natural foods: USDA-Inspected chicken, turkey and lamb, whole grain rice and barley, fresh fruits and vegetables and Grade A dairy products, we know your dogs and cats will be healthy. That is what your pet deserves. We have a customer service that is committed to your satisfaction. At P.A.P. our customer service not only cares for but pampers your pets. Unlike other pet stores, who only respond to the complaints by customers, we create a positive experience for all of our customers and their companions. I want to have a place where people can bring their pets and get them pampered. A place where you as a parent can come and...

Words: 952 - Pages: 4