Free Essay

Human Nature

In:

Submitted By OliviaTeasdale
Words 3028
Pages 13
Arguable the most controversial subject in human history is what truly defines the human species. Through the growth and evolution of the species, humans have displayed destructive behaviours within society that differentiates this genus from all others. Practiced by the unique act of genocide, humans have embraced a love for brutality against opposing social groups and the annihilation of fellow man. The institutions within the species’ society encompass unsurpassable expectations that have resulted in the self-destruction of millions. Humans have collectively destroyed the Earth’s natural resources through over use and depletion, making it impossible for the environment to remain sustainable; therefore, characterizing humans as the uniquely destructive species that they have come to exist as today.

Genocide is a form of destruction unique to the human species that has been repeated throughout history as the yearning for power and the love of cruelty surpasses human controversies. “Genocide is often waged by one group against another and not the other way around. It is this unprovoked brutality that stems from human nature that is truly frightening” (Dimijan, 2010). This brutality was noticeably witnessed in World War II Germany during the Holocaust when Nazi leader Adolf Hitler exterminated more than 6 million Jewish men, women and children. The Nazis, who came to power in January 1933, believed that Germans were "racially superior" and that the Jews, deemed "inferior," were an alien threat to the so-called German racial community (Wright, 2009). The Jewish population never upheld such a threat and therefore became the victims of an unprovoked attack, waged from one side. This systematic annihilation of one category of people by another is unique to humans; nonetheless, it has recurred time and again in the history of the species’ existence.

For centuries, our society has been built on the deliberate killings of large assemblies of people. Joseph Stalin, one of the most murderous dictators in history, was the supreme ruler of the Soviet Union for a quarter of a century. His regime of terror saw the death and suffering of tens of millions of Italian citizens (Black, 2005). Stalin was power hungry and displayed an enormous lack of humanity during his rule in order to maintain that power. Stalin instituted a campaign against alleged enemies within his regime, called the Great Purge, in which hundreds of thousands were executed after being convicted of plotting to overthrow Stalin (Macionis & Gerber, 2003, p.345). As well as directly executing hundreds of thousands of people, Stalin’s rule also resulted in the death of millions due to his economic decisions. Stalin forced the collectivization of Soviet agriculture, which led to widespread famine across the Soviet Union for over a decade (Macionis & Gerber, 2003, p.352). This pitiless form of intolerance, resulting in the death of millions, is entirely unique to the human species. Sadly, genocide is not only in the history books; the latest annihilation of a people occurred not more than 20 years ago in Rwanda.

Hundreds of thousands of lives are lost due to one group of people opposing another and turning to violence. This brutal form of racism and ethnocentrism, that is unique to humans, violates nearly every recognized moral standard (Macionis & Gerber, 2003, p.340). This is displayed within the Rwanda genocide of 1994 that resulted from the conscious choice of the elite to promote hatred and fear to keep itself in power. At this time, Rwanda’s population of 7 million was composed of three ethnic groups: Hutu (85%), Tutsi (14%) and Twa (1%). Hutu extremists within Rwanda’s political elite blamed the entire Tutsi minority population for the country’s increasing social, economic, and political pressures (Dimijan 2010). 8000 Tutsi people were killed in their homes per day for 100 days. The women were systematically and brutally raped and it is estimated that as many as three quarter of the Tutsi population perished (Tittle, 2013). Solely humans have participated in this unique form of mass murder, making it a defining representation of the species. In fact, genocide is present in human history as far back as fifteenth century American.

Genocide is not only the destruction of people, but also the extermination of culture. It occurs when one group denies the humanity of another due to lack of cultural similarities. Dehumanizing overcomes the natural human revulsion against murder (Pearson, 2006). The Spanish settlers of the 15th and 16th century encountered diverse Native American cultures after traveling to America, consisting of over 300 languages that were deemed inferior to the European way of life. The Native Americans were quickly enslaved and mass exterminated by the Europeans in order to claim the land and the resources that once belonged to the Native American’s. The Spanish colonists wrote of the horrors inflicted on the indigenous people; including, mass hangings in trees, and hacking the children into pieces to be used as dog food. The population of the United States prior to European contact was greater than 12 million. Four centuries later, the count was reduced by 95% to 237 thousand (Randy, 2009). It is this kind of vicious attack that differentiates humans from any other species that has ever inhabited this planet. The boundless cruelty that is the mass extermination of a classification of people can not be found anywhere else but within the society that humans created. Humans not only directly killed millions of people through violence, but have also created a society that indirectly leads to the self-destruction of approximately one million people every year.

Social expectations are often set simply too far out of reach. When these expectations are not individually met, it can lead to a sense of failure and lack of self worth. Emile Durkheim, a French sociologist, saw suicide as a manifestation of the changes in modern society that were altering the fundamental bonds that connected people to one another and to the community (Tollman, 2013). This is notably seen with the increasing social expectations surrounding education. Suicidal college students often exhibit a drop in grade point average before they commit suicide. This creates the feeling that they were falling below what society had come to expect from them. Students often feel they have parents who expect a certain level of performance, and the students feel as though it is impossible to meet these expectations (Baumeister, 2013, p.7). The killing of one’s self is a phenomenon created and defined uniquely to humans. It is because of constantly mounting expectations and pressures within the education system that many humans have developed a sense of worthlessness, resulting in suicide. The society that is supposed to sustain the human race is also slowly deteriorating it. It is not only expectations to academically succeed that leads to self destruction, but also the pressure to conform to a certain lifestyle that society tells the individual is socially acceptable.

Through media and cultural precedent, society presents the ideal lifestyle that human’s are supposed to mold themselves to. It is when indiviuduals can not conform to that mold that suicide rates are the highest (Baumeister, 2013, p.5). The group that faces the highest suicide rate is LGBT youth. Research has shown that suicidal tendencies within this group are increased when individuals are considered to be immersed in a heterocentric culture (Kenneth, 2005, p.320). This is present in U.S states where homosexual marriage is illegal. Studies have found that risk of suicide attempt for homosexual teenagers range from 3.5 to nearly 14 times that experienced by heterosexual counterparts. Most of these attempts occurred after the person had self-identified as gay, but before publicly identifying themselves as gay for fear of rejection (Kenneth, 2005, p.322). Suicide is the ultimate self-destructive act created solely by humans as a result of not meeting the expectations set for them by society. Even though suicide is unique to humans, there are an endless amount of contributing factors to it, including work related stress.

Work related expectations can be highly demanding and stressful. The workplace is one of the key environments affecting mental health and well-being. Unfortunately, the workplace can also be the source of nonproductive stress that lead to physical and mental health problems, including suicidal thoughts and behaviours and ultimately suicide (Tollman, 2013). Work related suicides accounted for over 25% of suicides in 2011. Unrealistic expectations are what break these workers down and leave them with a feeling of worthlessness (Baumeister 2013, p.7). In 2003, Chung Mong-hun, 55, an executive of South Korean car group Hyundai, leapt 12 storeys to his death from the company's office building in Seoul, reportedly due to work related stress. No other species experiences the same kind of pressure within their social group that would lead to killing one’s self. It is this destructive flaw in the human based society that defines the species. Suicide is not only a result of unmet expectations, but also the various influences placed upon a person from society.

In recent years, Aboriginal people in Canada have suffered from a much higher rate of suicide than the general population. Sociologist Emile Durkheim had a theory that the suicide rate in a country or region varies inversely with the degree of integration of domestic society (Tollman, 2013). This is notably seen in Aboriginal communities that have come from colonization, forced assimilation, and relocation. Aboriginal youth on reserves are 5 to 6 times more likely to die of suicide than their peers in the general population (Tollman, 2013). The most common factors are substance abuse (especially alcohol), suicide of a family member or a friend, history of physical or sexual abuse, family violence, unsupportive and neglectful parents, poor peer relationships and social isolation (Tollman, 2013). These factors all exist within the society that the person was born into. It was society’s attempted westernization of the Aboriginal population that caused the hardships still faced today, possibly contributing to the high suicide rate. The human society is one of the most destructive forces to ethnic and social groups. In no other species’ has one group tried to force the conformity of another that resulted in such self-destructive tendencies. Humans have not only actively destroyed themselves, but also the environment that is relied upon for the species’ survival.

Only humanity has the power to destroy all natural resources that are essential to the species’ survival. The depletion of the global fishing fleet is merely one way humans are making it impossible for the environment to remain sustainable. According to the World Wildlife Federation, the global fishing fleet is 2.5 times larger than what our oceans can support. More than half of the world’s fisheries are already gone, and one-quarter are ‘overexploited, depleted, or recovering from collapse (Holmes, 2013). Overfishing resulted in the collapse of the cod industry in Canada in the early 1990’s. Technological advances allowed Canada to start bringing in over 1 million tons of cod each year starting in the late 1970’s. It is estimated that offshore cod stocks are now at 1% of what they were in 1977. It is because of society’s economic greed that the Canadian cod industry is virtually destroyed. This environmental disaster also had economic repercussions for thousands of people in Nova Scotia whose livelihood depended on the fishing industry. Humans are the only species to take advantage of natural resources to such an extent that they are no longer considered sustainable. This destructive force is what consistently continues to define humanity. The species continues to put societal wants before environmental needs by utilizing industrialized machines and technology that are destroying the atmosphere.

In the last century, Earth has experienced a change in global climate patterns that are largely due to the increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, produced by human’s use of fossil fuels. In the 20th century alone, the population increased from 1.65 billion to 6 billion (Flores, 2014). That is an increase of 4.35 billion more people now utilizing electricity and transportation methods which together account for 58% of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions. A single car emits 12,000 pounds of carbon dioxide a year. It would take 240 trees to offset that amount (Francis, 2009). The human species is deteriorating the environment because of inventions (such as cars) that society has created and consider more valuable than the environment. Green house gases are the cause of warming temperatures throughout the Earth’s atmosphere. In 2011, warmer-than-average temperatures were recorded across the world for the 30th consecutive year. Increasing average temperatures are melting glaciers and polar ice caps and raising sea levels, putting coastal areas at greater risk of flooding. Even though humanity is aware of the human-induced climate change phenomenon, yearly emissions of greenhouse gases have continued to increase by more than 20% since 1990. Earth’s environment is the victim of the largest destructive force in history, the human species. While other species’ cherish and sustain the environment, humans have only left a negative impact on it. The environment has not only had to face the destructive qualities of green house gases, but also the disastrous effects of oil spills.

The Earth’s environment has faced immediate and long-term environmental damage due to human error resulting in oil spills. Some of the environmental damage caused by an oil spill can last for decades after the spill occurs. There have been over 152 reported oil spills resulting in approximately 25 million tons of oil put into the environment (Holmes, 2013). When large enough, oil spills have been considered one of the most devastating human-cause environmental disasters. In 1989 Alaska, an 11 million gallon oil spill in Prince William Sound resulted in the death of 250,000 seabirds, 2,800 sea otters, 300 harbor seals, 250 bald eagles, and 22 killer whales (Holmes, 2013). It is the largest known oil spill in human history and Prince William Sound is still faced with the long-term effects from the spill today. A research team from the University of North Carolina reported in 2010 that, “species as diverse as sea otters, harlequin ducks and killer whales suffered large, long-term losses and that oiled mussel beds and other tidal shoreline habitats will take an estimated 30 years to recover” (Yung, 2013). This brutal destruction of one species by another has only ever occurred with humans and the detrimental effects placed on the environment by the species’ existence. This form of large-scale destruction is unique to the humans and is repeated in the on going deforestation of the Earth.

Throughout the past two centuries, humans have cleared Earth’s forests on a massive scale. Areas the size of Panama are lost each year due to clear cutting and the Environmental Protection Agency estimates that 5,180 square kilometers of Appalachian forest will disappear by 2015 (Homes, 2013). The biggest drives for deforestation are agricultural and economic. More crops are needed to sustain the rapidly growing human population, but the sustainability of the Earth’s forests are being destroyed in the process. Deforestation has many negative effects on the environment. 70% of Earth’s land animals and plants live in forests, and many cannot survive the deforestation that destroys their habitats (Kipling, 2014). Trees also play a critical role in absorbing the greenhouse gases that fuel global warming. Fewer forests result in larger amounts of greenhouse gases entering the atmosphere (Kipling, 2014). As humans are increasing green house gas emissions and decreasing forest density, the environment has virtually no chance for sustainability. The species’ is not only slowly deteriorating the environment that sustains all life, but also directly destroying the habitats of thousands of other species. This never-ending destruction is seen solely in one genus of Earth and is a defining characteristic as to what that truly is the human species.

Society and the destructive behaviours that stem from it, create the largest impact on the idea of humanity and what separates the species from any other. Humans are the only species to plan and execute mass murder repeatedly throughout history. Suicide is also unique to the species as a result of failure to meet the expectations society up holds. Society not only results in self-destruction but is also responsible for continually damaging the environment, which is needed to sustain the species. Without these characterizations, the species would not be what it is today, for it is the destructive influence of society that defines the human species.

References

Baumeister, R. (2013). Social Psychology and Human Nature, Comprehensive Edition. London: Cengage Learning.
Black, D (2005). Joesph Stalin. Historical Figure. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/stalin_joseph
Dimijian, G. (2010). Abstract. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Francis, P. (2009). Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change, and Energy. Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov
Flores , M. (2014). World Population Clock: 7 Billion People (2014) – Worldometers. World Population Clock: 7 Billion People (2014) - Worldometers. Retrieved from http://www.worldometers.info/world-population
Holmes, B. (2013). Human Health Impacts & Adaptation. EPA. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/impacts-adaptation/health.html
Kenneth, A. (2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Chicago: Pine Forge Press.
Kipling , S. (2014). Deforestation Facts, Deforestation Information, Effects of Deforestation - National Geographic. National Geographic. Retrieved from http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/deforestation-overview
Macionis, J., Gerber, L. (2003). Sociology. Toronto: Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Pearson, A. (2006) Genocide Watch. Genocide Watch. Retrieved from http://www.genocidewatch.org/genocide
Randy, P. (2009). Native American Genocide. American Genocide. Retrieved from http://www.iearn.org/hgp/aeti/aeti-1997/native-americans.html
Roy, W. (2010). Joseph Stalin. History.com. Retrieved from http://www.history.com/topics/joseph-stalin
Tittle, A. (2013). Rwanda Genocide. Genocide. Retrieved from http://www.unitedhumanrights.org/genocide
Tollman, M. (2013). Why Do People Commit Suicide?. POPULAR SOCIAL SCIENCE. Retrieved from http://www.popularsocialscience.com/2013/08/13/why-do-people-commit-suicide.html
Wright, A. (2009). Introduction to the Holocaust. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Retrieved from http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php
Yung, S. (2013). Smithsonian Ocean Portal. Smithsonian Ocean Portal. Retrieved from http://ocean.si.edu

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Human Nature

...In the following essay I will examine the arguments for and against the idea that there is such a thing as a fixed and essential human nature. This is a debate which goes back to antiquity, to the time of Socrates and to his idea that a person must endeavor to know oneself. Thus founding the first philosophy, which was the study of man and of human nature. Firstly I will examine the argument for a fixed human nature in the form of the theory of argument from design and also determinism. Then I will proceed to examine the argument against a fixed human nature, in the theory of existentialism. Lastly I intend to show the evidence, as to why I conclude that there is no such thing as a fixed human nature, and that the theory of existentialism is the plausible argument. I will examine now, the idea that all humans have a fixed human nature. Plato and Aristotle were the first to concur on metaphysics as the first point of study. They differed to each other in so far as Plato had a dualistic approach and believed in a world outside of the changeable physical world, that we exist in. He thought this world, was just a world of appearances' another world known as the world of ideals or forms. Plato thought the only way we come to know the world of forms was through the intellect. Aristotle however was concerned only with the material world and what he could learn about through his senses. He rejected Plato's idea of an immaterial reality and was concerned only with this world as the...

Words: 2330 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Mencius Human Nature

...Mencius and others on human nature Mencius is best known as the teacher for knowledge and wisdom he explains the problems how we work on issues. Mencius explains the moral sense that makes human suffering. Mencius explains the good and bad life. We live in a cold world when become more selfish and unhappy suffering, pain. Mencius developed the concept of human nature for example The Confucian way the righteousness out of the righteousness and anyone would have an immediate no reflective out reaction Benevolence. Mencius said all people possess within them moral sense that cannot bear the suffering of others. He explains people do not like to suffer or they want to feel loved. Mencius said everyone possesses four moral senses that possess their four limbs. People who lack a moral sense of right or wrong could not be a person. Some people do not know their wrongs accuse others on their wrongs (http://www.indiana.edu/p374/Mengzi3)....

Words: 596 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Frankeinstein's Human Nature

...Mary Shelley’s novel portrays human nature in many ways by using the monster’s feelings and writing about his thoughts when he came to life. Human nature by definition is the way humans act and feel and is shared by all humans. The monster is not human but he starts to possess the characteristics of humans by observing others and learning from books. Throughout the story, the monster starts to develop natural characteristics that attribute to human nature such as curiosity, love, and jealousy. At the start of the story, curiosity is what drives Victor to learn about life and the creation of the monster. The monster develops this basic instinct of human nature as well by wanting to know more about his surroundings. He sees the world but wants to understand it because he is driven by his unknowing of what lies ahead. The monster’s curiosity led him to learn how to speak and realize what he truly was. He describes it as “I cannot describe to you the agony that these reflections inflicted upon me: I tried to dispel them, but only sorrow increased with knowledge” (Shelley 85). By wanting gain knowledge he realizes that once he’s attained it, it’s not what it seems and sometimes it’s better to be left clueless. He still stays and watches the Delacey’s because he is interested in the way they live and sees their love for eachother. Which he starts to wonder about as well. The monster sees how the family shows their love for eachother and realizes he is alone and unwanted because...

Words: 798 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Nature of a Human

...The Nature of a Human Every person in the world has their own understanding of human nature, which can be defined in a multitude of ways. The way in which it is interpreted depends greatly on the person who is interpreting it. People from different cultures and backgrounds are bound to understand things differently than each other. The main reason people fail to understand others is not that some people act oddly or in a strange way but its because most people aren't aware of their own human nature. Because of our human nature we always make the mistake of trying to fill gaps with the information we have without thinking for a moment whether the information we have is enough or not. By using The Book of Genesis as a reference, I can agree with the idea that humans are sinners by nature. Even though Eve knows that eating the fruit from the forbidden tree is a sin, she cannot help herself and does it anyway. This helps to understand why people sin and act in ways they should not. In my life, there have been many times where I have either witnessed someone sin or committed a sin myself. Usually, when a person commits a sin it seems to be completely irresistible in that moment. Sometimes, we even sin by instinct. It seems that anything that can possibly happen instinctually is natural and a part of human nature. This brings me to the next point that I agree with from The Book of Genesis. This point is that humans always want what they cannot have. This is shown through the...

Words: 473 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Human Nature Analysis

...Human Nature Harlow, so out of touch with normal human nature himself, shed so much light on the subject. Being an odd boy infused with drama went into so much detail in explaining our human nature using monkeys, an animal that is not human. Answers born from a paradox. Testing on the monkeys to see what their level of love was held to, as it turns out, not much. They could attach emotionally to just about anything, but the lack of connection with something living limited their social level. Monkeys still needed to be taught within their instincts and they need to be comfortable with living connections. Love is a very difficult subject because it is not concrete. To test something you cannot see you have to come at it from every angle to try and build something you metaphorically can see, so with love comes cruelty. To start with his early conceptions that the monkeys needed something soft to bond with was true but they were not socially acceptable, which is understandable. As a baby, it is common to latch onto something that is there, i.e. a blanket but that blanket cannot raise us. Even with something else providing nutrients, a blanket cannot teach up what is acceptable and how to go about living a daily life. I assumed that would be common sense, but...

Words: 582 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Human Nature

...When faced with forewarnings of events too disastrous to comprehend the magnitude of, humans will almost always, out of nature, never act upon warnings immediately, given that there is already a sense that a period of peace in the known and mundane exists. Incapable of always conceiving the possibilities behind every breath, heartbeat and blink, humans are enabled to live life, ignoring the unknown, subconsciously battling to remain in the dark—to remain in what they believe to be harmony. Humans in society begin to develop a false sense of pride and many will go to such lengths to preserve their own sense of dignity that they would maintain their perception of themselves than to confess that, which through the trials of schools and workplaces, are influenced and deemed to be childish and uncharacteristic or too cliché for them as humans of a gender, race or any other group. Humans will never understand the reality of death and love until after they’ve already been forsaken to a life of sorrow. Therefore, it is absolutely never an excuse to ever allow any thought or mindset, no matter how obstructing, incomprehensible and severe to prevent one to, through any means possible, confess their inner and strongest love to another. There is no greater pain than that which where one cannot forgive their soul for letting the other die without ever letting them acknowledging one’s own feelings. That is damnation: though however possible that, that other person understands...

Words: 346 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Philosophical Argument on Human Nature

...Human Nature Human nature is an intangible idea that no one seems to agree of that which it consists, yet many seem to agree that it does exist. Some philosophers will debate that human nature is inherently good while others will deem human nature as inherently evil. Others think that human nature is to seek the greatest good, happiness, or a moral life. So what makes us human? What separates us as a species yet unites us as well? When searching for universals of humans, many physiological aspects of life can be cited. Human mortality is a largely recognized aspect of being a human. However anything with life, whether it is a plant, animal, man or other, is mortal and has a beginning and an end. So while mortality is something that is found in all humans, it is not exclusively a human quality. We need nourishment to grow and live, but again, so do most other things that have life. We are physically similar, meaning that while there are differences among us, we are all the same species; just as any other species is similar to others in their own species. However, I would consider these qualities as nature, not just human nature. Human nature I believe is something that goes beyond our physiological side. Before I present my argument, I must first define human nature. According to the Oxford Dictionary, human nature is the general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans. In...

Words: 1934 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

The Human Nature

...As Bernard Rosenberg once said, “Man is a biodegradable but nonrecyclable animal blessed with opposable thumbs capable of grasping at straws.” (Bernard Rosenberg. p. 96) Human Nature consists of an evolving body and an immaterial mind that has an essence which is the result of a highly complex brain; Both the body and mind die, however, while living, they make their own choices and create their own outcomes because of their immaterial mind; The memory and body are what makes a person who they are and without either of them, the same person does not exist; We make our own choices but without others, we would be unable to define ourselves. The Dualist view of human nature is similar to these ideas. Dualism is the “view that human beings are immaterial minds within material bodies.” (Velasquez. p. 105) The man that ran this show was René Descartes (1596-1650). He claimed that if we can conceive of one thing without the other, than they are not the same thing. He used this notion to state that the self and the body are different. From this, it can be reasoned that there is a soul, which endures. Human nature accepts the idea of an immaterial mind and a material body because of the fact that they can be viewed as separate things. In the words of Descartes, body is: …all that which can be defined by a specific shape: something which can be confined in a certain place, and which can fill a given space in such a way that every other body will be excluded from it; which can be perceived...

Words: 3909 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Enlightened Literature on Human Nature

...Enlightened Literature on Human Nature The Age of Reason, also known as the Enlightenment, was a movement in which the power of reason was employed to rethink and reform society as a whole as well as various other concepts of human existence. During that time period (about 1650-1800), numerous thinkers such as John Locke, Isaac Newton and Voltaire exercised reason to challenge the basis of their society, which was built on the premise of an Almighty God. Prior to the Enlightenment, the answer to countless questions was only known to God and God alone; however, with the deterioration of this presumption, man was left to discover everything he once believed to be incomprehensible. These noble men questioned religion, science, mathematics and eventually came to question how men should be governed, how money and economics should function and how the human race should operate. The examination of mankind led to many varying philosophies that depicted men as wild, blood-thirsty beasts of passion or sensible, upright creatures, creating juxtaposition. Many forms of writing were directly influenced by the social and philosophical measures this time period contained. Articulated in the literature was man’s questioning of every idea that was once certain, promoting the desire to examine human nature. The influx of knowledge and reason combine with the rebuttal against the idea of an omniscient deity heavily influenced Enlightenment literature. With the invention of the printing press...

Words: 1519 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Human Nature

...Environmental Chain Reaction Environmental Chain Reaction Human nature is what makes people real and shapes who they are. It is composed of their thoughts, feelings, behaviors and beliefs. This allows for others to see what type of person someone is based off how one may act. It is human nature to judge others by their actions and not be aware of influential factors like the environment that have shaped a person the way they are. For this paper, I will express my opinion on how the environment is the driving force behind feelings, behaviors, thoughts and beliefs strictly based on my own life experiences. Based on that I will conclude as to why people seek therapy and what my role as a counselor is. This is an evaluation of my own life philosophies that will give me a better understanding of my own personal theory. Personality Freewill versus Determinism Life is full of opportunities, what someone will make of them is mainly up to their determinism. I believe that sixty percent of determinism makes up a person’s personality while the other forty percent is free will. It is my opinion that free will has to originate from someone’s genuine desire for change. I believe that many people lack free will because it takes a lot of will power from within; something that people struggle with.. This is why I believe that determinism plays a bigger role in a person’s personality because before a person can do things on their own, their environment and or biology are the...

Words: 2801 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

What Is Human Nature Arguable?

...According to Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary, human nature is defined as “the nature of humans, especially, the fundamental dispositions and traits of humans” (Dictionary). Efforts to identify the exact nature of humankind date back centuries ago, as numerous thinkers and theologians debate the topic. The issue whether human nature is programmed in humans’ brains or if it is a decision based on beliefs, society, and the culture is very arguable. Philosophers throughout history, such as Thomas Hobbes, have offered their viewpoints of human nature, eventually reaching Sigmund Freud and other modern philosophers. However, in A Clockwork Orange, Anthony Burgess writes a story of a dystopian future version of Britain with the story revolving...

Words: 1191 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Mencius and Xunzi on Human Nature

...Mencius and Xunzi on Human Nature Mencius and Xunzi both follow Confucian philosophy yet have a dramatically different understanding of human nature. Additionally, the two philosophers make their arguments in strikingly different literary methods. Mencius believes that the “goodness of human nature is like the downward course of water” (147) in that people are naturally inclined to be good, and he makes this argument through conversations among friends and public figures. In contrast, Xunzi staunchly argues that “Human nature is evil” (179) and through essays claims that human nature’s only “goodness derives from the conscious activity” (179). The two philosophers both use many metaphors to explain their own interpretation of human nature in different ways. By exploring the philosophies of these two great Confucian thinkers, one better understands the multitude of ways human nature can be explained in Confucianism throughout Chinese history. As the “single most influential contributor to a view of human nature in Confucianized East Asia” (116), Mencius’ philosophy is fundamental. Mencius argues that human nature is good, and “ru” teachings furthered natural tendencies. To explain the natural goodness of human nature Mencius shows that “the goodness of human nature is like the downward course of water.” By this he claims, “there is no human being lacking in the tendency to do good, just as there is no water lacking in the tendency to flow downward” (147). Furthermore he...

Words: 1022 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Shakespeare's Othello-The Fault Of Human Nature

...The Fault of Human Nature Throughout history and mankind, human nature has played a major role in the conflict between others, as it creates a deceiving sense of trust, where nothing but pure hatred is present. Furthermore, this can be proven, as there will always be humans who will secretly hate each other for what they cannot be, out of sheer envy. Moreover, if this statement is true, the simple assumption is: who can absolutely be trusted in the reality. As a result, it is prominent that total trust can never be assured, as long as hatred exist throughout humans in this world. Overall, the human nature has greatly contributed to the conflict of countless people, by acting as a source of deception, only fueling those consumed with hatred and jealousy into seeking revenge. According to the English fiction play Othello written by...

Words: 866 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Mencius on Human Nature

...Mencius' philosophy about human nature improves upon Taoism and Confucianism in that it is more rational in concern with the human's development in relation to it's environment. Taoists believed that humans did not need cultural refinement, adjustment, or molding based on an external environment, but that it was only their pre-existing natural inborn goodness that needed to be tapped into. Confucians (like the Xunzi for example) thought that people were born innately evil. Mencius improved upon both of those by claiming the natural genetic state of humans is good only with the potential of the environment to develop that natural goodness. Mencius' message did not entail that all humans are born good, but that humans are born with certain positive instinctual temperaments that are made good by personal development and molding from interaction with the environment. Within the analogy of the four germ sprouts, Mencius states four potentials that are hardwired into human genes; “From the feeling of commiseration benevolence grows; from the feeling of shame righteousness grows; from the feeling of courtesy ritual grows; from a sense of right and wrong, wisdom grows. People have these four germs, just as they have four limbs”. These views on human behavior point more toward modern psychology/sociology because they accept that innate human states are less significant than their position within the context of an influence from their environment. Mencius responds to Gaozi's...

Words: 349 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Human Nature In The Minister's Black Veil, And The Raven

...Human nature can be defined by many traits and characteristics. Human nature is also considered to be the feelings and the behavior traits that every individual has. For example, nature can change an individual's way of viewing life. In the stories, “The Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne, “The Raven” by Edgar Allan Poe , and “The Masque of the Red Death” by Edgar Allan Poe, various kinds of human traits are shown. Although, human nature can be defined by many traits, it is best defined as fear, it is showed throughout the stories by the way that individuals express their feelings and by their behavior traits. One way in how human nature is best defined as fear, is shown in the story, “ The Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne....

Words: 320 - Pages: 2