...President Roosevelt had many pressure during the World War I ad many problems to solve. Though, having Japanese American citizens departed to camps wasn't t handled very well. Between 1861 and 1940 275,000 Japanese immigrated to the United States, and most of them settled in California. Many of the Japanese were denied to purchase land and denied of being citizens. It wasn't until President Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 that the Japanese were officially not considered American citizens. President Roosevelt was not justified in denying Japanese American there citizenship. February 19, 1942 is when President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066 authorizing exclusion. Therefore, 122,000 men, women, and children were moved to military...
Words: 294 - Pages: 2
...Was the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan justified? The dropping of the atomic bombs was justified because the Japanese were not willing to surrender, therefore Truman didn’t have much of a choice but to drop the atomic bomb. The US wanted Japan to surrender to reduce the number of American lives lost. The dropping of the atomic bombs was justified because Japan wouldn’t surrender, so Truman was left under pressure. Hiroshima was bombed on August 6, and Nagasaki on August 9. The two cities were part of the Japanese war effort. One was an army center and the other was naval and industrial (Document B). This explains why it was justified because Truman bombed the important places that would eventually attack the United States. The bomb...
Words: 427 - Pages: 2
...single option seems to be able to end this conflict for good. In World War 2 the United States dropped the Atomic bomb on Japan in order to make them surrender and end the war. The dropping of the atomic bomb was justified in World War 2 because of Japan’s refusal to surrender, it saved U.S. lives and it demonstrated U.S. power. World War 2 was a dark time for all countries involved and especially the United States. Following the war in Europe ending with the death of Adolf Hitler, the war in the Pacific raged on. The United States were fighting with Japan to avenge the bombing of Pearl Harbor which started World War 2. Pearl Harbor was a surprise bombing of a United States naval base by Japan. It killed thousands of people and destroyed large amounts of naval equipment. As the United States fought Germany in Europe, the conflict with Japan was on the backburner. Now with the war in Europe over, Japan is the main enemy. Japan’s military strategy was known to be very unorthodox. With suicide pilots attacking U.S. ships and their relentless mindset made it a daunting task for the U.S. to overcome. In the mainland the U.S. was holding Japanese Americans in internment camps to isolate them from the rest of society in fear they may be giving information to the Japanese. The United States did not see an invasion of Japan as a viable option so they considered the option of using nuclear weaponry. The first reason for the justification of the atomic bomb was because of Japan’s...
Words: 2409 - Pages: 10
...groups in American history is common. The Native Americans lost land and liberty, Jim Crow Laws enforced “separate but equal” mandates for African American, the Chinese Exclusion Act barred Asians from immigrating to America. The greatest example of racial suppression was the unjustified internment of Japanese and Japanese Americans during World War II. The forced evacuation and internment of U.S citizen was not justified and changed the lives of people of Japanese descent. Japanese American and Japanese were moved to internment camps racism and social reasons. Throughout the history of the United States of America, there has been evidence of racism. This can be seen through slavery, treatment of Native Americans, and imprisonment of Japanese Americans in internment camps. Racism was a key factor for the Japanese...
Words: 1082 - Pages: 5
...President Roosevelt was not justified for executive order 9066, which was the internment of Japanese Americans because he made this decisions on false and highly exaggerated statement. this cause the Japanese American to go through a great deal of horrible things. President Roosevelt made the decision of executive order 9066 based on statements like Robert commission which he gave January 23 1942. he said that there were Japanese spies in Oahu before Pearl Harbor. these statement were never proven correct.so president Roosevelt made this life changing decision on incorrect information. President Roosevelt did make this decision trying to protect his country but he probably should have looked into it a bit more before he went through...
Words: 291 - Pages: 2
...Was the U.S. justified in dropping atomic bombs on Japan? This question has been debated about for a long, long time. Both sides of this issue have very good arguments. But here I will be siding with the people who agree with the justification of dropping the bombs on Japan. I believe that America was justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan, but it was not purely for revenge on the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. If the bombs had not been dropped, and the Americans decided to invade Japan, the invasion would be long and drawn out, causing 2 million more casualties that are allied, 3 million more Japanese deaths including innocent civilians. But dropping the bomb also cost Japan 500,000 innocent civilians. So basically, it was we either drop the bomb and kill a few thousand people, or invade and let much, much more people die. In a way, America had saved more lives. The Americans were originally going to stay out of the war, but the Japanese had decided to attack Pearl Harbor, resulting in their loss. So the Japanese got what they asked for. Also, the people of Japan were warned of the bombs, but their leader had not yet given up until the second bomb. This was the ONLY way of making the Japanese surrender, as they were going under the saying _"death before dishonor"_. The Japanese also need to experience what they've done to others; they entered China and parts of Korea, raping women and killing men and children, causing havoc everywhere. So if America hadn't dropped...
Words: 353 - Pages: 2
...Dropping to atomic bomb on Japan can lead to many disadvantages. For instance, when other countries realize that America had help this type of power, they will began the race to develop their own. Thousands of innocent Japanese people will die from the impact of this bomb and millions more will be affected by the residual radiation. Japan will be close to surrender anyways, and dropping the bomb will definitely insult in a major way. Most of all, it will forever create a great amount of animosity and anger between the two nations, that will exist for many years to come. Overall, the way you are using the atomic bomb is not justified because along with many others, we believe such...
Words: 971 - Pages: 4
...The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: History's Great Miscalculation On August 6, 1945, a new step in technological warfare was taken when the first atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The impact of the bomb alone killed at least 66,000 people.1 This was an event that would not soon be forgotten in history. The Americans, who knew the devastating effects of their new weapon, still chose to use it rather than an alternative means to peace. Many people still argue whether or not it was necessary when Japanese surrender was considered to be a matter of time. Historians also dispute whether the campaign was a morally justified objective. This phrase alone brings up many interesting questions. Can killing thousands of innocent people ever be considered "justified"? Considering these circumstances, the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not militarily or morally justified. In 1939 Franklin Roosevelt, the President of the United States received a verysignificant letter from the famous physicist, Albert Einstein.2 Contained in this letter were details concerning the importance of nuclear research with regards to gaining the upper hand in the war. Roosevelt agreed and approved $6,000 in initial funding. Many scientists began realizing the importance of nuclear fission and in 1940 The National Defense Research Committee was formed. This group's purpose was to oversee research and provide more funding. Many of the world's best physicists...
Words: 2278 - Pages: 10
...After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, President Roosevelt immediately issued an investigation and the report led to the commissioning of the Executive Order 9066. President Roosevelt's ordering of the Executive Order 9066, which led to the internment of Japanese American citizens, was not justified because there was little to no evidence that showed signs of threat. It was based on misinformation and did more damage than good. Many Japanese Americans would lose their homes, businesses, families, and most importantly, their rights and freedom. It was written in the investigative report President Roosevelt issued that there were Japanese spies in Hawaii before the attack. According to Roberts Commission, before “December 7, 1941, Japanese spies on the island of Oahu... collected and, through various channels transmitted, information to the Japanese Empire" (www.digitalhistory.uh.edu). Many people became...
Words: 645 - Pages: 3
...Many would argue that the Japanese internment were unjustified. When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor almost all the Japanese people had to be moved to the internment camps. In my idea the Japanese were justified. Even though they were innocent and couldn’t really do anything about leaving to the camps they still had to do it. After the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 7, 1941 the U.S went into World War II with the Japanese. The government later had to relocate many Japanese people into a camp called Manzanar. This made it official for the government to move Japanese people into these relocation centers so they wouldn’t be able to get out and do harm for Americans during the war, since they were also guarded. The second...
Words: 325 - Pages: 2
...Japanese American Internment Japanese American internment was the World War II internment in "War Relocation Camps" of over 110,000 people of Japanese heritage who lived on the Pacific coast of the United States. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, government officials immediately placed Hawaii under martial law and became concerned about the Japanese-Americans who lived on the West Coast of the United States. Intelligence gathered before the attack indicated that Japan was recruiting spies and had already secured a spy network there. None of the Japanese Americans had been charged with a crime against the government. Two-thirds had been born in the United States, and more than 70 percent of the people forced into camps were American citizens. Roosevelt's action was supported by Congress without a single vote against it, and was eventually upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court. Yet many scholars came to believe that this order was a "day of infamy" as far as the Constitution and civil rights were concerned. The people forced into camps were deprived of their liberty, a basic freedom of the American Constitution. In 1980, under mounting pressure from the Japanese American Citizens League and redress organizations, President Jimmy Carter opened an investigation to determine whether the need to put Japanese Americans into internment camps had been justified by the government. He appointed the Commission on Wartime Relocation...
Words: 590 - Pages: 3
...population, furthermore it included war-related disease and starvation. On August 6, 1945 is when the Japanese generals refused to accept defeat, so the US unleashed an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. By August 8, 1945, Russia declared war on Japan and seized Manchuria that was powered by the Japanese. August 9 is when the US released the atomic bomb named FAT MAN on the city of Nagasaki, following on when the projectile LITTLE BOY descended on the city...
Words: 1461 - Pages: 6
...Justified or Not? When Harry Truman learned of the success of the Manhattan Project, he knew he would be faced with a tough controversial decision. The ability to end the war with Japan was in his hands, but it would involve unleashing the worst weapon ever known to man. American soldiers and civilians were weary from four years of war, and the Japanese military was refusing to give up their fight. The atomic bomb was key to ending the war, without too many Allied and Japanese casualties. American forces occupied Okinawa and Iwo Jima and were intensely firebombing Japanese cities. But Japan had an army of 2 million strong stationed in the home islands guarding against invasion. For Truman, the choice whether or not to use the atomic bomb was the most difficult decision of his life. First, an Allied demand for an unconditional surrender was made to the leadership in Japan. The Japanese military command rejected the request for unconditional surrender. So on August 6, 1945, a plane named the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. 70,000 Japanese citizens were vaporized. In the time that followed, an additional 100,000 died from burns and radiation sickness. On August 9, a second atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, where 80,000 Japanese people died. On August 14, 1945, the Japanese surrendered. Critics have charged that Truman's decision was “a barbaric act that brought negative long-term consequences to the United States”. Some military analysts insist that...
Words: 480 - Pages: 2
...Persuasive Essay October 29, 2009 Atom Bomb Justified? War, death, and fire are the only smells around you. Hundreds of your allies are lying in a dead rotting heap. Enemies are blowing their selves up right in front of you, throwing their guts and scorched body parts all over. War isn’t a welcome sight in the eyes of people, but some had to live in it and survive. When the United States was at war with Japan, soldiers saw many things like what was described. Some even saw worse. I believe that dropping the two atomic bombs onto Japan was justified. Too many people were dying because of the war, the cost of the war was skyrocketing, and U.S soldiers were given the harshest and most unreasonable punishments by the Japanese. Some were beaten, some were forced to kill their own, and some were buried alive. Over all, the total number of people killed from both atomic bombs adds up to be about 240,000. Many people died instantly, some later died from radiation and burns or other wounds. It is indeed sad that 240,000 people had to die but, compared to how many would’ve died if the war continued, 240,000 is nothing. It is estimated that if we just continued fighting the war and didn’t drop the bombs, then another million or so people would’ve died. Other actions could’ve been taken like negotiation, but the fighting style of the Japanese spoke for itself. They would rather take a grenade strapped to their chest than be touched by an American. Negotiating would’ve been inevitable. Dropping...
Words: 673 - Pages: 3
...Justifiable Terrorism in Total Wars Molly Thomson 201311503 Political Science 1000-03 March 18th, 2014 The word ‘terrorism’ instantly makes people shudder; the negative connotations and controversies surrounding terrorism in modern society are enough to spark a discussion of whether it is justifiable or not. In order to determine whether or not terrorism can be justified, a clear definition must be decided upon. Decades before the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001, the definition of the word terrorism was hard to define. Political figures around the globe argued and disagreed on what they thought should have determined the act of terrorism. Now, there are multiple different definitions originating from distinct cultures and societies, suggesting that terrorism is in the eye of the victim. One definition of terrorism is “any violent or criminal act planned for a political or ideological purpose”; while another claims that terrorism is understood to be a direct attack on innocents. Since both of these definitions have important components to them, it can be assumed that both traits are essential to defining terrorism. For the purpose of this paper, the definition of terrorism will be understood as ‘a violent attack on innocents for the purpose of political change’. It can be hard for most people to understand the act of injuring and/or killing hundreds, or maybe even tens of thousands of people, as justifiable. However, if the innocents are...
Words: 1878 - Pages: 8
