...Lab13: *Evolution: change in allele frequencies in a population over time * The population does not occur if: A. The breeding population is large. The effect of a change in allele frequencies is reduced. B. Mating is random. Organisms show no mating preference for a particular genotype. C. There is no net mutation of the alleles. D. There is no migration or emigration of organisms. E. There is no natural selection. Every organism has an equal chance for passing on their genotypes. Dom allele (A)= p Rec allele (a)=q P+q=1 If no evolution there are expected: + freq of dom (AA)= p x p =P2 +freq of rec (aa)= q x q= q2 +freq of heterozygote (Aa or aA) = 2pq p2 + 2pq +q2 = 1 Ex1: If 98 out of 200 in a population express a recessive phenotype, what % of the population will be homozygous dominant? Q2 = 98/200 = 0.49 Q= 0.7 P+q=1 => p=0.3 => p2 = 0.09=9% Ex2: Brown hair (B) is dom to blond hair (b). If there are 168 with brown hair in a population of 200. What is the predicted freq of heterozygotes? P2 + 2pq = 168/200 P2 +2pq = 0.84 P2 +2pq + q2 =1 => q= 0.4 2pq =? 1-q= 1-o.4=0.6p => 2 x 0.4 x 0.6 = 0.48=> 48% Lab 12 GTE: + glucose: creates isotonic environment + Tris: pH buffer ( pH=8) ideal pH for DNA not RNA + EDTA: binds divalent cations inhibits Dnase: requires cations factor +SDS: denatures proteins ( irreversible) dissolves membranes +NAOH: degrades cell wall, denatures DNA ( reversibly) ...
Words: 471 - Pages: 2
...Global Economic Review Vol. 37, No. 1, 107Á123, March 2008 Performance and Capital Structure of Privatized Firms in Europe ´ ´ MARIA JOSE ARCAS & PATRICIA BACHILLER Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain ABSTRACT The objective of this paper is to analyze whether there are differences in performance between private firms and recently privatized firms in the European Union, as well as to determine whether ownership (state-owned versus private) and regulation affect capital structure. Focusing on economic reasons that justify privatizations, we analyze whether there are differences between recently privatized state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private firms in their profitability, leverage and efficiency during the period 1999Á2002. Also, we analyze the determinants of the capital structure of these firms. Contrary to previous studies, our results show that privatized firms are not less efficient than firms with private ownership. KEY WORDS: Privatization, efficiency, capital structure, regression, Wilcoxon test Summary In recent decades, the privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) has been one of the most common policies carried out in economies worldwide and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries have also been involved in this phenomenon. Many studies have focused on the impact of privatization on the performance of the privatized firms...
Words: 7717 - Pages: 31
...PowerShell for the IT Administrator, Part 1 Student Lab Manual (v1.1) Microsoft | Services © 2012 Microsoft Corporation Microsoft Confidential ITOE Educate Conditions and Terms of Use Microsoft Confidential - For Internal Use Only This training package is proprietary and confidential, and is intended only for uses described in the training materials. Content and software is provided to you under a Non-Disclosure Agreement and cannot be distributed. Copying or disclosing all or any portion of the content and/or software included in such packages is strictly prohibited. The contents of this package are for informational and training purposes only and are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, whether express or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement. Training package content, including URLs and other Internet Web site references, is subject to change without notice. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, the content should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented after the date of publication. Unless otherwise noted, the companies, organizations, products, domain names, e-mail addresses, logos, people, places, and events depicted herein are fictitious, and no association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, e-mail address...
Words: 37959 - Pages: 152
...New Horizons Computer Learning Center of Cincinnati OFFICIAL MICROSOFT LEARNING PRODUCT 10174A Lab Instructions and Lab Answer Key: Configuring and Administering Microsoft® SharePoint® 2010 New Horizons Computer Learning Center of Cincinnati Information in this document, including URL and other Internet Web site references, is subject to change without notice. Unless otherwise noted, the example companies, organizations, products, domain names, email addresses, logos, people, places, and events depicted herein are fictitious, and no association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, email address, logo, person, place or event is intended or should be inferred. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft® Corporation. Microsoft may have patents, patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights covering subject matter in this document. Except as expressly provided in any written license agreement from Microsoft, the furnishing of this document does not give you any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property. The names...
Words: 74170 - Pages: 297