Free Essay

Liability of Directors in Insolvent Liquidation

In:

Submitted By theega
Words 2096
Pages 9
Name
Corporation law assignment
Institution
Date

Abstract
According to Solomon v Solomon 1895 a company once incorporated becomes an independent entity free from its shareholder. A company can own property transact its own business and own property in its own name. Once established, company shareholders have limited liability to the extent of their shareholding. The responsibilities of a company are carried out by its board of directors. The board is mandated to carry out the transactions of the company while observing due care and diligence. In the event of insolvency, directors are required to take all the necessary steps towards protecting the assets of the company. At this juncture, they have a fiduciary responsibility to the creditors of the company. A director will be held personally liable in the event of fraudulent and wrongful trading by the directors. A director who has self interest or biased towards particular creditors may be liable for damages incase the company is wound up.

Introduction
Facts and Issues from the Story
Dart Limited (“company”) a company listed in the Australian security exchange was performing well till the y mid 2007, where it incurred a substantial debt to various banks. To reduce the debt, the company began selling assets. From early 2008, the expenses of the company exceeded the available recurrent income. The monthly interest payable to the banks was running at about $1 million, or $12 million per year, and corporate overheads (such as rent) totaled about $500,000 per year. Predicted cash receipts from the company’s only ongoing business operations were about $10 million. Alan Baxter was employed by the company in the year 2008 to prepare a list of creditors whom he thought would have more preference over the others due to their constant demands. Daniel Abbott, a director of the company, realized around early 2008 that the company’s ordinary business activities could be continued through the sale of assets for a period of one year. Abbott also indicated that the proceeds would be adequate to last the company till the end of the year 2008.
Early in 2008 Patrick Mann a recently resigned director, but still in the management of the company as a consultant realized that banks interest payments were due though he had not reviewed the books, he new the position of the company at that moment and new that the company could not continue relying on selling assets to meet its interest short falls. The company moved to a new premise in November 2008 where the rent payable was cheaper. It tried to borrow further funds in the same month from its existing banks but was not successful. A finance company gave the company some funds for a limited time but in early 2009 the company was placed in liquidation.
Baxter, Abbott and Mann are liable for failing to prevent insolvent trading by the company. The three should have been able to determine the solvency of the firm using the 14 indicators of insolvency. According to ASIC v Plymin (2003) 46 ACSR 126 if a company displays any of the mentioned indicators, a directors of the company should seek for further advice on how the difficulties can be addressed. These indicators are; continuous loses throughout the period that started from the year 2007 according to the case. The liquidity ratio is below 1 indicating that a firm cannot meet its debts when they fall due. Another indicator is overdue taxes due to non repayment. Poor relationship with existing banks which was indicated by their refusal to award loans to the company (Chris 2012).
An inability to raise additional equity capital or access alternative funds. Suppliers demanding payments on their deliveries immediately or before making further deliveries. When a firm is insolvent, creditors are paid outside their trading terms. Cheques from the firm are dishonoured by banks mostly as a result of insufficient funds. A company may result to issuing post dated cheques. There are times where the company makes special arrangements with creditors. Summonses, solicitor’s letters, judgements or warrants issued against the company. Creditors may be paid rounded figures that are irreconcilable to specific invoices. Companies may even be unable to produce timely and accurate financial information indicating the company trading performance (Chris 2012).
Section 588G of the corporation act 2001gives the directors of a company the following responsibilities or duties to prevent insolvent trading. The section applies if a person at the time of incurring a debt is a director of the company; the company at that time is insolvent or becomes insolvent after incurring the debt, or multiple debts including that one. At the instance there is reasonable ground to make it possible to suspect that the company is insolvent or this will be the case in the future, at that time, this act has commenced. All these conditions hold for Dart Limited (“company”) which before the commencement of the act was doing well financially. By the time of insolvency, Daniel Abbott was a director of the company and he continued incurring debts that led to the insolvency of the company. Abort had all the information that made him know that the company was insolvent but he decided to sell the company assets to meet short term financial needs (corporations act 2001, n.d).
Liability of Abbott is also supported by the following statement of which he disregard in totality. Directors are required to stop operations and start suitable insolvency procedures. Directors need to make an informed decision on whether projected cash inflows will be adequate to repay loans that are outstanding. Are managers left to inefficiently balance of rescuing the company or protecting the creditors and do such activities rather than personal interest call for personal liability? (Insolvency: a guide for directors, 2008).
A manager may use assets of a company in a desperate move of gambling to trade out of the situation and save his/her job. In this case they will take large risks inefficiently as the largest risk bearers that are the shareholders followed by creditors. A manager will also be acting in a way that is likely to prejudice the creditors granted loans earlier in the operations of the company. Managers are also likely to act in a way that is against the interest of the shareholders because of their superior knowledge as compared to the creditors. A manager in this case is faced by two problems that of agency cost and following the provisions of section 214 of the act. Section 214 may be used as a control device that has a low control impact as well as effect having low deterrence and finally poor compensation (Finch 2002). According to corporation act 2001 sec 182, a director, company secretary, an officer of the company or employees must not use their positions in an improper way with the aim of gaining own or someone else’s advantage. They must not cause any detriment to the company. Any of the above persons who result to the violation of the above provisions will be personally liable for a civil penalty. This provision of the act makes Alan Baxter liable to the company even though he was not a director of the company because his actions were beneficial to a small number of creditors especially those who pressed much for the payment of their dues. He personally compromised the position of the creditors by determining who got paid and who was not paid (corporations act 2001, n.d).
Section 184 of the same act provides that a director or officer of a company should work in good faith and use his position as well as position in the best interest of the company. According to this section, a reckless or dishonest director will be criminally liable for any charges that are brought against them. This section provides that a company director or offices commits an offence by using the information dishonestly with an aim of gaining an advantage either directly or indirectly for themselves or others or to cause some harm to the organization (corporations act 2001, n.d). Directors of a company which has gone into liquidation due to insolvency are in a position of facing legal implications against them. Directors who have been involved in wrongful trading may be compelled by the court to contribute to the lost funds of a company. In some instances they may face disqualification of up to fifteen years. The directors may also face misfeasance proceedings or at times, they may even be criminally liable for the offence. When a company director allows fraudulent trading, they will be criminally liable for the offence because creditors are protected by fraudulent trading provisions. In this case directors are not protected by the corporate veil and make the directors personally liable for any offences that have been committed. Directors are in this case prohibited from using funds payable to creditors in the event that the company is liquidated (Preetha 2011). Directors are at all times required to know the state of solvency of their company and in case they continue trading in disregard to this, they would personally be made liable for loses that arise due to the continued trading of the company. Directors would be called upon to reimburse the shortfall arising to the creditors in liquidation of a company. This is illustrated in the case of Dorchester finance co ltd & Anor. v Stebbing and ors where three directors run the company and two were non executive who left the company but continued signing blank cheques for use by the remaining director but did not inquire on how funds were obtained or used (Martin 2006).
It was found that the two non executive directors were liable of not using skill and care while performing their duties when the company failed. Equally the remaining director who was a qualified accountant did not exercise skill and care and misapplied the assets of the company. The three directors were held liable for damages. This case indicates that Patrick Mann was liable for failing to give the necessary direction to the director of the company even though he was not a director at the moment but was acting as a consultant of the company. Though he gave out a directive on the company’s financial position, he gave it too late when nothing much could be done to protect the company (Martin 2006).
Directors’ are at the same time required to act bona fide in the company’s interest. The fiduciary interest requires directors to take the interest of all the creditors equally together with the interest of the shareholders. A director in this instance is not required to differentiate between dominant and non dominant creditors. A director would be personally liable if they hold creditors at bay while proceedings are underway to rescue the company by paying some debts and not others due to strategic reasons (Finch 2002).

References
Chris Cook, Partner Worrells Brisbane, 2012. 2012 guide to corporate insolvency Worrells, solvency and forensic accountants [pdf]. From <http://www.worrells.net.au/Portals/0/factsheets/2012_Corporate_Insolvency.pdf>. [Accessed on 23 may 2012].
“Corporation act 2001,” (n.d),Commonwealth consolidated acts [online] from <http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/>. [Accessed on 25 may 2012].
Finch Vanessa, 2002. Corporate Insolvency Law: Perspectives and Principles, [e-book]. Cambridge University Press. From <http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=0nqS8tWHwuwC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=liability%20of%20directors%20&f=false> [Accessed on 23 may 2012].
“Insolvency: a guide for directors”, 2008. Australia securities & investment commission, [pdf]. From< http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/pdflib.nsf/LookupByFileName/Insolvency_guide_for_directors.pdf/$file/Insolvency_guide_for_directors.pdf> [Accessed on 23 may 2012].
Martin David, David M. Martin, 2006. The Company Director's Desktop Guide. [e-book] Thorogood Publishing. From < http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=EDMD2JUqeYsC&dq=case+studies+in+wrongful+trading&source=gbs_navlinks_s> [Accessed on 23 may 2012].
Myron M. et.al, 2004. Fiduciary duties of directors of a corporation in the vicinity of insolvency and after initiation of a bankruptcy case, [online]. From < http://business.highbeam.com/127/article-1G1-127934901/fiduciary-duties-directors-corporation-vicinity-insolvency> [Accessed on 23 may 2012].
Preetha s, 2011. The fraudulent trading offence: need a relook [pdf]. From <http://www.nujslawreview.org/articles2011vol4no2/preetha_s.pdf> [Accessed on 23 may 2012].
Silkin Lewis, 2012. Directors’ conflicts: the impact of the Companies Act 2006 [online].legal 500. From < http://www.legal500.com/developments/2856> [Accessed on 23 may 2012].

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Assignement

...Tutorial Week 13 Blackboard Questions and Solutions Chapter 21: Insolvency and Liquidation REVIEW QUESTIONS 1. Outline the role of an administrator appointed to a company which is insolvent. Once an administrator is appointed, what roles do the directors of the company have? If a company is insolvent, the directors can get themselves into serious trouble with the Law if they allow the company to continue to trade. According to Section 436A of the Act, directors are expected to appoint a voluntary administrator to the company even before it becomes insolvent: (1) A company may, by writing, appoint an administrator of the company if the board has resolved to the effect that: (a) in the opinion of the directors voting for the resolution, the company is insolvent, or is likely to become insolvent at some future time; and (b) an administrator of the company should be appointed. Section 437A(1) spells out the role of an administrator: (1) While a company is under administration, the administrator: (a) has control of the company’s business, property and affairs; and (b) may carry on that business and manage that property and those affairs; and (c) may terminate or dispose of all or part of that business, and may dispose of any of that property; and (d) may perform any function, and exercise any power, that the company or any of its officers could perform or exercise if the company were not under administration. According to ASIC’s website and s. 438A of the Act, the...

Words: 1871 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Business

...‘The most efficient way to treat insolvent companies INTRODUCTION: The adverse effect of the collapse of corporate enterprise is the principal concern of Corporate Insolvency Law. Its dramatic implications on the society at large, both locally and internationally, are so drastic, that corporate insolvency law, putting the repercussions of this cankerworm into serious considerations, is always torn between the two options of either protecting the private rights which is basically maximizing returns to creditors on the one hand, or preservation of the company or its business [1] , considering the effect of such on the public at large. In a bid to strike a balance between the above alternatives to ensure that best results are achieved in addressing the insolvency issues, Insolvency Law, following the recommendations of the cork report [2] , which is the bedrock of modern corporate insolvency regimes, legislations including the Insolvency Act 2000( as amended) and the Enterprise Act 2002, has made provisions for five insolvency regimes [3] ,that can be applied in the case of a financially distressed company depending on the state of such company. This essay attempts to provide an exposition on liquidation, which is the oldest and the eventual outcome of a financially distressed company, and to critically analyze it as the best option for an insolvent company. To begin with, the origin, fundamental principles and objectives of this insolvency regime will be discussed, bringing out...

Words: 5085 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Company Law Winding Up

...formed in numerous ways. To be specific, the main concentration shall be placed on formation of a company by registration. Registered companies are formed by registration under the Companies Act CAP 388. This is the most common way of forming a company. According to Section 13 of the Companies Act, There are two main types of companies; public company and private company. Private companies are divided into three different types. A private company limited by shares; a company limited by guarantee and an unlimited company. Types of Registered Companies A private company limited by shares, usually called a private limited company (Ltd.) has shareholders with limited liability and its shares may not be offered to the general public, unlike those of a public limited company (plc). It is a company whose liability to creditors of the company is limited to the capital originally invested, i.e. the nominal value of the shares and any premium paid in return for the issue of the shares by the company. A private company limited by guarantee is an alternative type of corporation used primarily for non-profit organisations that require legal personality. A company limited by guarantee does not usually have a sharecapital or shareholders, but instead has members who act as guarantors. The guarantors give an undertaking to contribute a nominal amount (typically very small) in the event of...

Words: 2352 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Director's Liability

...DIRECTORS' DUTIES – THE INSOLVENT TRADING ISSUES FROM A LAWYER’S PERSPECTIVE 1. OVERVIEW The aim of this paper is to: provide an overview of the insolvent trading provisions under Australian law; look at the liabilities which might be imposed on a director for breach of those provisions; examine the defences and in particular: when directors can rely on someone else to tell them about the solvency of their company after Manpac v Ceccatini and Scott v Williams; and the loss of the Southern Cross Interiors defences; look at the decisions in the Solomon; Murawai and the Clark v Perkins cases and the potential for de facto or shadow directors to be exposed to an insolvent trading action; and finally to look at the potential for directors to set-off any exposure they have to a company for insolvent trading from any liability owed by the company to them such as unpaid salary or outstanding loan repayments. 1.1 So what is insolvent trading? Section 588G of the Corporations Act (the Act) imposes liability on a director of a company who allows the company to incur a debt at a time when the company is insolvent when at the time that the debt was incurred there existed reasonable grounds for suspecting that the company was, or may become as a result of incurring the debt, insolvent. A director will be liable if at the time the debt was incurred he or she was actually aware of the existence of reasonable grounds to suspect insolvency or a reasonable person in...

Words: 11734 - Pages: 47

Premium Essay

Business Law Exam Practice

...Alvin and Derrick are directors and shareholders of Condos Pty Ltd, a condominium construction company. The market for condominium construction is very competitive and so each of the directors devise expensive advertising campaigns. Unfortunately, Irene, Alvin and Derrick are not very good financial managers so they have employed a financial accountant, Angela, to manage the financial side of the business. Angela is in charge of paying Condo’s subcontractors. Angela advises Irene, Alvin and Derrick them to cut back on their advertising campaigns as the company’s cash flow is in peril. The directors tell Angela not to interfere with managerial decisions. Angela finds it increasingly hard to pay Condo’s creditors, and starts only paying select creditors to allow the company sufficient cash to continue operating. In frustration, Angela resigns. The directors realise the position that Condos is in and put the company into voluntary liquidation. The liquidator investigations the action of Irene, Alvin and Derrick in the months leading up to the liquidation. Advise the liquidator as to whether the directors may be liable for insolvent trading. Answer Issue Have the three directors, Irene, Alvin and Derrick breached the insolvent trading provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act)? Rule Section 588G applies to impose liability upon a person if (relevantly for the facts in question): (a) the person is a director of the company when...

Words: 1143 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Corporate Lae

...:Topic 1:Introduction and Regulatory Framework- Regulation can relate to two things: Regulate what an organisation can or must do (eg trade, pay tax, employ staff, pay debts), Regulate how an organisation functions (eg how it comes into being, how it is managed and operated and how and when it ceases to be). Why are corporations used (good and bad)? To allow for investment, To allow capitalism to flourish, To permit the sharing of risk, To permit investors to shelter from risk, To permit investors to deny responsibility, To distribute responsibility, To misallocate resources, To allow efficient allocation of resources. Two theories: Contractualist theory, Stakeholder theory. Regulation tends to try to connect the two theories by acknowledging the importance of the corporation in encouraging economic growth and appropriate risk taking BUT also recognising that there should be some control over corporations given their importance to society (as a conduit or pipeline through which resources are channelled into goods and services). Where is this regulation?-Corporations Act 2001, Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, These are both federal or commonwealth (central government). Subordinate legislation also (regulations under these Acts plus ASX listing rules, statements and Guides, Accounting Standards). Finally, A lot of the important principles relating to corporations and their responsibilities have evolved via case law. The (Corporations) Act has been described...

Words: 11028 - Pages: 45

Premium Essay

Director’s Duties and Obligations

...5 Application of Law 6 Conclusion 6 The Director’s Liability for insolvent Trading 7 Principle of Law 7 Application of Law 9 Conclusion 9 The Director’s are under the obligation to ensure the goods were insured in their duty to act with due care and diligence. Area of Law The area of law involved in this particular case to prove director’s duty to take due care is the Corporation Law. Principle of Law The Director’s duties fall under two categories the fiduciary duty and the duty to exercise care, diligence and skill while they are discharging their duties under the position. The Corporations Law provides that that a Director has to exercise reasonable degree of care and diligence while he is exercising his or her duties (Section 232 (4), The Corporation Law n.d.). If there is a failure to comply with the provision of 232(4) it leads to an offence punishable with fine up to $5000 and shall also lead to civil proceedings (Fisse 1992). Austin J was the first to review the statutory duty of care and diligence where the entire history of the same begins (ASIC v Vines 2003) (ASIC v Rich 2003). The circumstances which ae necessary in such a case are the size and the nature of the business, whether it is a listed or an unlisted company, the constitution of the company, the board composition and the manner in which work has been distributed among the board and its various officer (ASIC v Rich 2009). A director or any other officer of the corporation must always guarantee...

Words: 2871 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Case Study 1

...responsibilities and liabilities of directors factsheet factsheet The duties, responsibilities and liabilities of directors RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE: The board of directors of a company is primarily responsible for: • determining the company’s strategic objectives and policies; • monitoring progress towards achieving the objectives and policies; • appointing senior management; • accounting for the company’s activities to relevant parties, e.g. shareholders. The managing director/chief executive is responsible for the performance of the company, as dictated by the board’s overall strategy. He or she reports to the chairman or board of directors. APPOINTMENT The first directors of a company are appointed at the time of its registration. On registration, the persons named in form IN01 will be deemed to have been appointed as the first directors. Subsequent appointments (which are made on form AP01) are governed by the company’s articles of association but any Shareholders Agreement should also be checked. Typically the articles will provide for the board of directors to fill any casual vacancies or to appoint additional directors up to the maximum number specified by the articles. On appointment a new director will be asked to provide certain personal information (i.e. full name, address, date of birth and business occupation) to be included in the relevant form which he/she will be required to sign to signify consent to act as a director. It is possible for a director to file a service...

Words: 1819 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Company Aacount

...1. Outline the role of an administrator appointed to a company which is insolvent. Once an administrator is appointed, what roles do the directors of the company have? If a company is insolvent, the directors can get themselves into serious trouble with the Law if they allow the company to continue to trade. According to s. 436A of the Act, directors are expected to appoint a voluntary administrator to the company even before it becomes insolvent: (1) A company may, by writing, appoint an administrator of the company if the board has resolved to the effect that: (a) in the opinion of the directors voting for the resolution, the company is insolvent, or is likely to become insolvent at some future time; and (b) an administrator of the company should be appointed. Section 437A(1) spells out the role of an administrator: (1) While a company is under administration, the administrator: (a) has control of the company’s business, property and affairs; and (b) may carry on that business and manage that property and those affairs; and (c) may terminate or dispose of all or part of that business, and may dispose of any of that property; and (d) may perform any function, and exercise any power, that the company or any of its officers could perform or exercise if the company were not under administration. According to ASIC’s website and s. 438A of the Act, the administrator, after taking control of the company, must investigate and report to creditors information as to the company’s business...

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Insolvent Traiding

...The liability protection provided to directors as a result of incorporation is referred to as the "corporate veil". However, there are exceptions to this general rule at Common law and under Statute law, which allow lifting the veil and making the directors liable for breach of their duties. For instance, there is a duty placed on directors by the Corporations Act 2001 to make sure their company does not trade while it is insolvent. A director has a duty to prevent the company from incurring a debt if the company is insolvent at the time the debt is incurred or becomes insolvent by incurring the debt, section 588 G of Corporations Act 2001. Section 588 G does not apply to officers other than directors. However, s. 9 of the CA defines a director as a person who is appointed to the position of a director or is appointed to the position of an alternate director and is acting in that capacity, regardless of the name that is given to his or her position. The definition is broad but it is clear that s. 588 G will be applicable to both shadow and de facto directors. It is also clear that s. 588 G of the CA is designed primarily to protect the interests of creditors because when company becomes insolvent, unsecured creditors might be unable to get their funds back. Determining whether a company is insolvent predominantly involves using a cash flow test, but must be determined by reference to the facts of each case. A number of factors that a reasonable person would take into account...

Words: 1784 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Corporate Law Duties of Directors

...discussing the issues that are confronted by the directors of Hampton Park Pty Ltd (HP). The directors, William, Jack, Susan and Gail had their company liquidated shortly after declaring the dividend to their members. Unbeknown to the directors, the Chief Financial Officer of HP, George has been withholding information regarding the company’s deterioration of their financial position. Although late in realizing, George also failed to inform the board regarding the change in the dividend payment rules before the signed off their financial statement in 2010. The new payment rules that was enforced on 28 June 2010 stated in s254T of the Corporations Act 2001 points out that the company’s asset must exceed the liabilities immediately before the dividend is declared and the excess must be sufficient for the payment of the dividend. The company than went into liquidation after the dividend was paid. These issues will be discussed in further detail throughout the essay by examining the directors’ duty of care and the directors’ duty to not trade whilst insolvent and whether there is any breaches of these duties. These duties are set up to allow directors hold accountability and to minimize risk of wrongful or illegal behavior. Duties of a “Director” The term “director” is clarified under s 9 of the Corporations Act 2001, which states that “definition of a 'director' includes those appointed to the position of a director, an alternate director and those acting in the position even if not...

Words: 2108 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Why Did Icesave Fall?

...Cover Title of report Subject for which the report was written Class Team number Titel Page Title of the report Initials and surname of writer Course IBMS Date of completion Class Team number Executive Summary See writing report skills Table of contents See report writing skills Introduction In October 2008 Iceland was one of the first countries to be seriously hit by the international financial crisis and the consequences were enormous. In Iceland, around 85% of its banking system collapsed in just a few days. One of these banks, a privately owned commercial bank named Landsbanki Íslands had been operating an online savings brand, Icesave, in the UK since 2006 and the Netherlands since 2008. After the bank was taken into receivership in October 2008, more than 400,000 Icesave deposit holders in both countries were unable to access their online accounts. The UK and Dutch authorities announced that all deposits would be guaranteed. According to Directive 94/19/EC deposits were guaranteed up to 20,887 Euros per account.[1] The UK authorities decided to pay out to depositors in full, while the Dutch authorities paid up to 100,000 Euros. It became clear that the Icelandic Deposit Guarantee Fund, established under EU legislation to cover losses in the event of a bank failure, was not in a position to cover the losses incurred by Icesave depositors. Talks therefore started on the aspects of the payout by the UK and the Dutch authorities...

Words: 1424 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Forgiving a Director’s Breach of Duty

...recession, directors may well be concerned that their conduct will be scrutinised should they be involved in a corporate collapse. Honest directors risk becoming embroiled in litigation and face “the associated reputational damage and the potential for ultimate financial ruin”2. A director must make commercial decisions. These decisions often involve some form of commercial risk and are sometimes made on the basis of limited information. It would be unjust to hold directors personally liable for a breach of duty, regardless of the situation. Section 1318 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) provides some protection for company officers3 against the consequences of a breach of duty in limited circumstances4. The section confers a discretionary power on courts, which reads: If, in any civil proceeding against a person to whom this section applies for negligence, default, breach of trust or breach of duty in a capacity as such a person, it appears to the court before which the proceedings are taken that the person is or may be liable in respect of the negligence, default or breach 2 John Story, Chairman of Suncorp and Tabway quoted in the article “Directors urge overhaul of corporate law” published in The Australian Financial Review on 10 May 2008 Section 1318 applies to an officer or employee of a corporation, an auditor of a corporation, an expert and a receiver, a receiver and manager or a liquidator. The focus of this paper is on company directors. I have used...

Words: 10736 - Pages: 43

Premium Essay

Canon 15

...seppuku, whether or not its financial condition was due to the fundamental unsoundness of its business or merely a temporary run in with bad luck. This lack of any real corporate rescue vehicle characterized the legal environment that prevailed under the regime of Act No. 1956 (otherwise known as the “Insolvency Law”) from the time of its enactment on 20 May 1909 until the early 1980s1. Act 1956 by itself introduced major changes to corporate law and removed the distinction in the Spanish system between “insolvency” and “bankruptcy.” Nonetheless, the Insolvency Law’s approach to corporate rescue was simply to provide a “solvent but illiquid” debtor temporary relief from payment of its debts while an “insolvent” corporation was forced to undertake a gradual and organized liquidation process2. The Insolvency Law of the Philippines is in fact a derivative of even older laws from other jurisdictions, such as the California Insolvency Law of 1895 and the American bankruptcy Act of 1867 [See Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. Frank B Ingersoll, et. al.; GR No. 164758 (November 1921)] 2 1 The three main remedies under Act 1956 are: a) Petitions for the suspension of payments by an individual, sociedad or corporation under Section 2 of the Insolvency Law: Section 2. The debtor who, possessing sufficient property to cover all his debts, be it an individual person, be it a sociedad or corporation, foresees the...

Words: 10185 - Pages: 41

Premium Essay

Miss

...Employees Government Interest Groups Owners Lenders Types of Company Company’s Characteristics: P 1.05 Separate legal entity Limited liability Perpetual succession Under Corporations Act 2001 “Upon registration, a company becomes a separate and distinct entity from its members / shareholders, directors and officers. A company can sue and be sued in its own name. The property of the company does not belong to its members, but to the company alone. A company exists in perpetuity until it is deregistered. Type A: Limited Liability Company Companies limited by Shares P 1.06 Characteristics: Most common type Liability is limited to the amount outstanding to the company when the share were issued; Any amount that is owed by the shareholder is available only to the liquidator upon the winding up of the company to pay the company’s creditors e.g. if a share issued at $1.00 is paid to only $0.25, the shareholder would owe the company 75 cents per share in the event of liquidation. 2. Companies limited by Guarantee P 1.06 Characteristics: They are restricted to being public companies The company does not have a share capital and members are...

Words: 3291 - Pages: 14