FINAL
(1) Is an employer liable for racial discrimination because she terminates a black male who refuses to abide by the "no-beard" rule? Why or why not? The employer can be liable to racial discrimination because she terminates a male who refuses to abide the rules. The discrimination in which is indeed a couple of industries where beard would have adverse the effect of safety. The representational policies for certain duties apply regardless rate in racial discrimination in which an employer can still fired for wrong reasons. If the rule is applied for all employers then someone can exclude certain rules because the race has nothing to do with it.
(2) Is it a violation of wage and hour laws for an employer to hire his 13-year-old daughter to pick strawberries during the summer? Why or why not?
The federal labor laws restrict the types of jobs in which a 13 year old can perform a certain action like picking strawberries during summer. It also states that an employer hire his own daughter to pick strawberries which shows the violation of wage and hour laws. There are certain exemptions in child labor laws which reduce the moral crime where child employment is a major issue. The state health and safety codes must still follow in family employment policies and family
(3) Is an employer liable when a supervisor sexually harasses an employee, but the employer knew nothing of it? Why or why not? It appears to be very bad in a ridiculous situation in which the employer could not possibly know this in advance. The lawyers have created this situation a long-term process because they need large amount of money as fess from the pursuing cases. In certain situation the immediate action done by the employer is to fire the supervisor so this type of sexual harassment can be avoided in future proceedings. Sometimes women labors can be sexual harassers but it