...Jerrell Johnson 9/18/15 2B Social Issues Civil Rights Movement (1954-1972) 1960 Greensboro, NC Lunch Counter Sit-Ins In protest of local restaurants that refuse to serve African-American customers, a series of sit-ins is staged at lunch counters in Greensboro, North Carolina. 1. How did this impact the lives of Americans? How it impact a nation was it sparked a sit-in that movement that spread to colleges and, towns and many protesters were arrested for trespassing, disorderly conduct and so called disturbing the peace, but their actions have made an immediate and ever- lasting impact, which forced Woolworth’s and other establishments to change their segregationist policies. 2. How did the three branches of government respond to this event? How did the government respond the sit-ins were successful in achieving the desegregation of lunch counters and other public places. Nashville's students, who started their sit-ins a few days after the Greensboro group, attained desegregation of the downtown department store lunch counters in May, 1960 which then helped media picked up this issue and covered it nationwide, beginning with lunch counters and spreading to other forms of public accommodation, including transport facilities, art galleries, beaches, parks, swimming pools, libraries, and even museums around the South. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 mandated desegregation in public accommodations. 3. what are the social political climate...
Words: 1074 - Pages: 5
...On October 29, 1933 in Central Point, Virginia, Richard Loving was born. Central Point, Virginia was located in part of Caroline County, which had a wide horizon of ethnicities. Growing up in a diverse area, Richard had many connections to many people of different races. Caroline County still had many prejudice people as well. Mildred Jeter was born in Central Point too on July 29, 1930, where her family had deep roots. Because Mildred was African American and Native American, her family and herself faced discrimination from the prejudice whites in their county. While attending an all-black school, Richard and Mildred fell in love and started dating. By the time Mildred was 18, she was pregnant with their first child. During the pregnancy,...
Words: 704 - Pages: 3
...Loving v. Virginia A Landmark Supreme Court Case of Interracial Marriages Natasha Plotnikov GVPT 432 Professor Davis December 4th, 2013 Loving v. Virginia was a very important Supreme Court case. It played a significant role in the civil rights movement: the legalization of interracial marriage. The case evaluates the constitutional question whether a statutory law of Virginia is solely based on racial discrimination and if it violates the Equal Protection and Due process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Equal Protection Clause forbids states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws (Epstein, Walker, 2013). Nevertheless, for the couple it was just a fight to stay married and be treated as equal as every legally married couple. They were simply in love and never intended to be in the center of attention. Richard and Mildred Loving were residents of the small town of Central Point, Virginia. They had dated each other since they were teenagers. When they decided to get married Richard learned that marriage...
Words: 1572 - Pages: 7
...shuffled back to their ramshackle cars. Doors slammed, engines coughed, and they were gone” (Lee 206). This proves that one person or group can make a change in injustice by making an action. Mr. Cunningham noticed what he has done do he decided to change his thought, for making the change of thought all the men cleared out. As a result, Tom Robinson will not be lynched. Since Mr. Cunningham decided to move out he is changing his thought on how we treats African-Americans. The injustice on Tom was less since Mr. Cunningham told the men to clear out. Secondly. Ms. Maudie explains that Atticus is making a good difference in society. “Atticus Finch won’t win, he can’t win, but he’s the only man in these parts who can keep a jury out so long in a case like that. And I thought to myself, well, we’re making a step--it’s just a baby-step, but it’s a step” (Lee 289). This shows that injustice has changes a little bit because of one person. It is not all the way, but it is more than what they have had. Since Atticus defended a black man people changed their thoughts on how to respect them, even the jury. If Atticus would not have defended Tom, then the jury would not have took two hours to think about it. If it takes this long Atticus changed the minds of the people on African-Americans. By knowing what is right and acting upon it, Atticus is making a difference in...
Words: 808 - Pages: 4
...LOVING ET UX. V. VIRGINIA No. 395 381 U.S. 1 (1967) Facts: In June of 1958, appellants, Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter Loving, a black woman, both residents of Virginia, got married in the District of Columbia. Shortly after, they returned to Caroline County Virginia and established a home together. At the 1958 October Term of the Caroline County Circuit Court in Virginia, the grand jury issued an indictment charging appellants with violating the State's ban on interracial marriages. They were arrested for cohabitating in an interracial relationship. Appellants pleaded guilty on January 6, 1959 and were sentenced to one year in jail. The trial judge suspended the sentence for a period of 25 years on the condition that appellants leave the State and not return to the State together for another 25 years. Procedural History:...
Words: 533 - Pages: 3
...Case Law Brief Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) By: Jasmin Andrade ADJU 203 Concepts of Criminal Law Class March 7th, 2018 Professor Bryan Silva Administration of Justice Department Center for Advanced Technologies (CAT) Modesto Junior College Issue Before the Court: Did Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law violate the fourteenth amendment’s equal protection clause? Rule of Law: Yes, No state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws. Application of Facts (Analysis): Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving are an interracial couple, residents of Virginia. Because of Virginia’s laws against interracial marriage, the couple went to District of Columbia to legally marry...
Words: 301 - Pages: 2
...In 1883, the case of Pace vs Alabama involved an African American male, Tony Pace and a European or white woman Mary Cox. They were both residents of Alabama and they were arrested in 1881 because they violated the anti-miscegenation laws. They were both charged and sentenced to two years of imprisonment (Wallenstein, P 1998). They had been living together in Alabama at the time. The case went through the Alabama Supreme Court as well as the United States Supreme Court. The court eventually would rule that the law did not violate the fourteenth amendment because they were punished in the same way. The anti-miscegenation laws would stay intact for another sixty years (Wallenstein, P. 1998). In 1948, the state of California finally overturned...
Words: 333 - Pages: 2
...Lovings v. Virginia BackGround -- The Virginia marriage law recognized only two races of human beings: white and colored. The latter was based on the "one-drop" rule. A person was considered "colored" if they had as few as one non-white ancestor, no matter how many generations back that ancestor lived, we now understand that no one “pure”. Mildred and Richard loving (her maiden name being Jeter). Were married in 1959 then arrested for being a interracial couple, and for disobeying the state of Virginias anti-miscegenation laws. Ms. and Mr. Lovings had courted for many years before they became man and wife, the couple were also expecting a child, with all this Virginia Loving going on the couple wished to be married and so traveled to The...
Words: 652 - Pages: 3
...of happiness by free men”. These words were spoken by Chief Justice Earl Warren of the United States Supreme Court in the ground breaking civil rights case of Loving v. Virginia in 1967 (388 U.S. 1). The case focused on the interracial marriage of Mildred and Richard Loving of Virginia; at which during this time Virginia had anti-miscegenation laws in place prohibiting interracial marriages. Forty-Five years later, this case has forever changed the way American’s perceive interracial marriages or the integration of different cultures in this country. Now more than ever, marriages across racial and ethnic lines continue to thrive in United States. As interracial marriages become more common, public attitudes have become more accepting. However, even with this progress there are those who oppose such a choice and do not accept these civil unions. A recent article in the Cornell Chronicle by Ted Bosica suggests that “race plays a vital role in some romance”. Although this may hold some truth, there is one fact that remains. America is made up of all different types of people. Black people live in America. White people live in America. Asian people live in America. Therefore, we are all people! The way our country perceived interracial marriages nearly fifty years ago and the way live today are very different. The Lovings knew this better than most people in their time, they proved that no one can keep their love at bay and that everyone has the right to love. If they...
Words: 458 - Pages: 2
...Question 3 The case of Loving v. Virginia was a case where an interracial married couple got convicted of miscegenation in the state of Virginia in 1967. The two defendants were Richard and Mildred Loving against the state of Virginia. The two married in the District of Columbia. Shortly after they got married they returned to Virginia. The two were sentenced to jail for a year because of the state's ban on interracial marriages. The judge later agreed to suspend the sentence if the couple agreed to leave Virginia and not return for 25 years.(Loving v. Virginia.) This case is still prevalent today because of fear and discrimination of people of color all over the world. The fear comes from being afraid of stepping out of their houses because someone might think they're doing...
Words: 477 - Pages: 2
...There have been many supreme court cases that involve marriages in the United States. Three for example are Griswold v. Connecticut, Loving v. Virginia, and Lawrence v. Texas. Each of these cases have differ from one another but all tie into and issue with marriages. In the case Griswold v. Connecticut, the main issue was the use of birth control by a married woman. Estelle Griswold and Lee Buxton, were arrested 1961 and convicted as “accessories” for providing information, advice and instruction to married couples on how to prevent conception in violation of a state of Connecticut statute. At the time it was illegal for a married couple to use birth control. Buxton and Griswold were the Director and Executive Director for Connecticut’s Planned Parenthood league. Their claim was that couples not being allowed to use a form of birth control was a violation of the 14th Amendment. By definition, the 14th Amendment says, the constitutional amendment that concerns equal protection under the law, and the citizenship rights of Americans. Lower courts ruled in favor of the state. Therefore, it remained illegal for a married woman to use birth control. Griswold then took the case to the supreme court. The case started in early 1965. The Court lists the implied rights protected under each amendment of the Bill of Rights. The 1st Amendment includes the right to associate, the 3rd Amendment prohibits quartering soldiers in a person’s house without their consent, the 4th Amendment protects...
Words: 640 - Pages: 3
...up her seat to a white man. Black leaders in Montgomery organized the Montgomery Improvement Association and selected Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to be the leader. In 1955, Martin Luther King led the Montgomery Bus Boycott, African-Americans stopped riding the buses, and the bus company started losing money. During the 381 days of boycott, King was arrested, his home was bombed. On June 4th 1956, the court invalidated the Montgomery bus segregation law in the case Browder v. Gayle (1956). Although the state appealed the decision, the Supreme Court upheld the ruling of the district court on November 13, 1956. The Montgomery Bus Boycott was a significant milestone of the Civil Rights Movements, which ended the racial segregation laws for buses. In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), the establishment of separate public schools for black and white students became unconstitutional. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) took on the “separate but equal” provision in the case. Thurgood Marshall was selected to represent the Brown family of Topeka Kansas. In 1953, President Eisenhower appointed California Gov. Earl Warren to serve as chief justice of the Supreme Court. On May 7, 1954, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled the separate...
Words: 596 - Pages: 3
...Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, Now! Anthony Raphael Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Values and Ethics HUMN 330 Amanda Schooling May 01, 2013 Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, Now! Spanish philosopher, George Santayana quoted the phrase, “Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it” (Britannica, 2013, p. 1). Never has that phrase meant as much as it does today in the battle for marriage equality. The norm of a given society usually defines acceptable marriage. When the need arises to change that norm, it takes an opinion-changing event to effect the views of society. In early 1967, the Supreme Court ruled in a landmark decision clearing the way for interracial marriage (Loving v. Virginia, 1967). As ground breaking as that decision was, it did very little to diminish the opinions of people who were strongly against interracial marriage. In an era where the struggle for civil rights was an ongoing occurrence, not only did the law against interracial marriage need to be changed, but also the way society viewed it. In an effort to shed light on the underlying whispers of secret societal snubbing of mixed marriages, the movie Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (Columbia Pictures Corporation, 1967) was able to give our nation an opportunity to open a dialog. Today, we find a nation that is on the verge of repeating a similar course of action in the struggle for marriage equality. For the past few years, the fear, prejudice, and hostility against marriage...
Words: 2267 - Pages: 10
...County School Board of Prince Edward County case was in the court’s investigation into the freedom-of-choice plans developed during 1965-1970. Many school districts in states with school segregation gave the option for the students to choose between white and black schools. These plans did not comply with the Equal Protection Clause and hindered school integration due to the continued racial identity of the schools and African American parents’ and students’ fear of the reactions of the white parents and students. A notable example of this problem is shown through the case Green v. County School Board of New Kent County (1968). The case showed that the freedom-of-choice schools were not effective in abolishing their own segregated school system and thus violated equal protection. The effectiveness was deemed unlikely due to the fact that only a few African American students had transferred to the white New Kent school, while no white students had transferred to the colored George W. Watkins school. The expansion of the Equal Protection Clause in this instance was shown in the determined...
Words: 597 - Pages: 3
...blacks and whites was segregated and could not be equal. Until one man had a dream to change it all. Martin Luther King Jr. was a motivation speaker who traveled all around America fighting for equal rights for African Americans. He gave an “I had a dream” speech who not only open the eyes of one particular group but open the eyes of the whole nation. Around the year 1964 the segrrating died down and eventually had ceased. Although then People didn’t agree too much on interracial dating. They got along with people outside their race but they never can see them dating anybody that was. In July 18, 1954 a interracial couple of the names of Mildred Loving and Richard Loving, was both arrested because they were a interracial newlyweds. The law prohibits anybody being in a relationship outside of their race. When they found out that Mrs. Loving was...
Words: 841 - Pages: 4