The rights of death penalty is a major problem in the world. Many people have very different views on death penalty. This even includes Judicial, Executive and Legislative branch. Death penalty still appears to be a common punishment for years to come, but will it last? This here are opinions and certain rules that have been established on thoughts of death penalty by the three branches.
The U.S Supreme court has issued many changes of rulings when related to the death penalty. One rule that has been established by Supreme Court in Texas was stopping the act of evaluating intellectual disability in death penalty cases. In Texas, Supreme Court in the Miller-EL v. Dretke case has also shown the Supreme Court to be racially fair when it comes to death penalty cases. They have redone trials before based off their thoughts of racial bias being used in trial. This is one reason why Judicial Branch gets a lot of respect among people.
President Obama is a man of the executive branch. His opinion on death penalty by his own words, is a “very difficult and troublesome” matter. Barack Obama does not see death penalty being …show more content…
Some people believe that it should be in all states. Others believe that the appeal process should be quicker. Many believe that a 20-year appellate process is outrageous. Many believe that it cost tax payers too much money, and if the time was shorter that we wouldn’t have this overcrowded jail problems. But on the other hand people oppose that the cost is too ridiculous. That in some places it costs more to execute a person than to give them life under maximum security. Also that it doesn’t even put a damper on the crime rate being pointless. Also that innocent people can be released if proven not guilty along the line. This being the case too many times in too many different