4.2. Comparison
While considering our application which we wanted to simulate the using the any of the above simulation tools. But while choosing simulation tools for the network simulation, accuracy of the simulator is considered. But still then, no one conclude that which tool is more accurate from the above listed tools. Although many researchers did the simulations using different network simulators in order to find out their accuracy, it was concluded that the results were not showing any proper clarifications about the accuracy of simulation tool which has most. Still we have to choose one of the above simulation tools for the simulation of our research and all. We will choose the simulator depending on the simulator availability, flexibility and kinds of services that simulator will gives us. As per …show more content…
5) Energy Consumption: The metric is measured as the percent of energy consumed by a node with respect to its initial energy. The initial energy and the final energy left in the node, at the end of the simulation run are measured. The percent energy consumed by a node is calculated as the energy consumed to the initial energy. And finally the percent energy consumed by all the nodes in a scenario is calculated as the average of their individual energy consumption of the nodes. Percent_Energy_Consumed = (InitialEnergy − FinalEnergy) / InitialEnergy *100 Average_Energy_Consumed = Sum_of_Percent_Energy_Consumed_by_All_Nodes / Number_of_Nodes

4.4. Scenarios
There are three main modules considered in this project those are listed below:
Module 1 [40 %]
Routing Protocol: AODV
Number of mobile nodes: 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300
Outputs:
- Packet Delivery Ratio vs. Number of mobile nodes
- End to End Delay vs. Number of mobile