Premium Essay

Pase for Small Entities

In:

Submitted By Akcium
Words 3311
Pages 14
APB ETHICAL STANDARD PROVISIONS AVAILABLE FOR SMALL ENTITIES (REVISED)

(Revised December 2010)

Contents

paragraph

Introduction Alternative provisions Economic dependence Self review threat – non-audit services Exemptions Management threat - non-audit services Advocacy threat – non-audit services Partners joining an audited entity Disclosure requirements Effective date

1-4

5–6 7 - 11

12 – 14 15 - 19 20 – 23 24 – 26 27

Appendix: Illustrative disclosures

ES - Provisions Available for Small Entities (Revised)

PREFACE

APB Ethical Standards apply in the audit of financial statements. They are read in the context of the Auditing Practices Board’s Statement “The Auditing Practices Board – Scope and Authority of Pronouncements (Revised)” which sets out the application and authority of APB Ethical Standards.

The terms used in APB Ethical Standards are explained in the Glossary.

2

THE AUDITING PRACTICES BOARD

ES - Provisions Available for Small Entities (Revised)

INTRODUCTION
1 The APB issues Ethical Standards which set out the standards that auditors are required to comply with in order to discharge their responsibilities in respect of their integrity, objectivity and independence. The Ethical Standards 1 to 5 address such matters as: • How audit firms set policies and procedures to ensure that, in relation to each audit, the audit firm and all those who are in a position to influence the conduct and outcome of an audit act with integrity, objectivity and independence; • • • • Financial, business, employment and personal relationships; Long association with the audit engagement; Fees, remuneration and evaluation policies, litigation, gifts and hospitality; Non-audit services provided to audited entities.

These Ethical Standards apply to all audit firms and to all audits and must be read in order to understand the

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Ifac Principles-Auditing

...IFAC’s recently released Revised Code of Ethics applies to all professional accountants - whether you work in practice, in industry, in academe, or in government. It is effective from June 30, 2006. Accountancy Ireland asked ICAI member, Richard George, Chairman of the IFAC Ethics Committee to explain the background to the development of the revised code and to give our readers a brief overview of what it covers. Many Irish Chartered Accountants are probably only vaguely aware of the existence of IFAC - the International Federation of Accountants - as a global body that sets professional standards for the accountancy profession and of which their Institute is a member. A much smaller number would have any detailed knowledge of what these professional standards cover or of how they impact on local requirements as promulgated by their own Institute. This article is about ethical matters and the activities of the IFAC Ethics Committee. Besides ethics, IFAC Boards and Committees develop international standards on auditing and assurance (ISAs), on education and on public sector accounting. Each of the member bodies of IFAC - there are 163 currently from all parts of the globe - undertakes to use their best endeavours, subject to national laws and regulations, to implement the standards issued by IFAC in each of these fields. So, ICAI - and indeed, the other UK and Irish based accounting bodies that have members in Ireland - have obligations to promulgate IFAC standards and to monitor...

Words: 2222 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Efectos Del Sistema de Ahorro Para El Retiro En México

...Proyecto de Finanzas Carlos A. Sámano Caballero Matrícula A0101841 Efectos del Sistema de Ahorro para el Retiro en México. El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo describir brevemente los sistemas de pensiones y aquellos que han servido como base para el sistema que actualmente tenemos en el país, para posteriormente comparar las condiciones y restricciones del modelo aplicado en Chile – paradigmático entre los sistemas de contribución modernos- con el que se ha adoptado en México. Se reconocen los importantes beneficios que el sistema ha generado, tanto para los trabajadores como para la economía en su conjunto, a lo largo de los 16 años transcurridos desde su entrada en vigor, así como los logros que se han alcanzado en materia de incentivo al ahorro voluntario, mas bien parcos, para a continuación comparar el sistema mexicano con el chileno. Las diferencias sustanciales que aparecen casi a primera vista, se ven reflejadas en los rendimientos de largo plazo que los sistemas han ofrecido y que no favorecen al modelo en México, por lo cual es importante buscar las modificaciones que permitan que el rendimiento crezca a tasas mayores a las actuales, ya que de otra manera los montos de las pensiones que tendrán los trabajadores serán muy limitados. Por otra parte se concluye que la Secretaría de Hacienda ha sido el regulador único para el sistema de fondos para el retiro, elemento que dado el mandato financiero y fiscal de la secretaría, no transita por el de previsión...

Words: 8167 - Pages: 33