Free Essay

Pepsi Crisis Case Study

In:

Submitted By realjade
Words 1820
Pages 8
PEPSI COLA CRISIS
Yeşim Ekici, M.Sc
Bahçeşehir University

CONTENTS
Brief History of Pepsi
Crisis
Crisis Management
Analysis and Comments
References

CONTENTS
Brief History of Pepsi
Crisis

Crisis Management
Analysis and Comments

Brief History of PEPSI
 1891- 1935: faced bankruptcy twice
 1898: becomes known as Pepsi Cola, formulated Pepsi-Cola

 1941: First signs of success
 Listed on New York Stock Exchange
 1964: formulated Diet Pepsi

 1965: PepsiCo, Inc. was established through the merger of Pepsi-Cola and
Frito-Lays
 Named one of the world’s top beverage companies CONTENTS
Brief History of Pepsi
Crisis
Crisis Management
Analysis and Comments

CONTENTS
Brief History of Pepsi
Crisis
Timeline of Crisis

Crisis Management
Analysis and Comments

CRISIS
 PepsiCo was entering peak sales season (Memorial Day to Labor Day)

 June 9, 1993: Syringe found in Diet Pepsi can (Tacoma, Washington)
 Hypodermic syringes in cans which cause HIV/AIDS
 When the crisis hit, days later on:
more than 50 new reports
in more than 20 states

with objects including: Syringes, a wood screw, a bullet, a crack cocaine vial and a broken sew needle

TIMELINE OF CRISIS
*2 more complaints reported
1 from Los Angeles; 1 from
Pennyslvania

*First complaint reported in Tacoma ,
Washington

JUNE 9

JUNE 10

*FDA (US Food and Drug
Administration) issues 5 states alert advising consumers to inspect their sodas by pouring

JUNE 13

JUNE 14

*Multiple complaints reported from multiple states
*PepsiCo crisis counselors address the public in regards to tampering complaints

TIMELINE OF CRISIS (cont.)
*2 more complaints reported
1 from Maryland; 1 from New
York

*Dozens of complaint reported in multiple states JUNE 15

JUNE 16

*Another dozen of complaints reported in multiple states

JUNE 17

JUNE 19

*PepsiCo annouced needle-incan scare over

CONTENTS
Brief History of Pepsi
Crisis
Crisis Management
Analysis and Comments

CONTENTS
 Brief History of Pepsi
 Crisis
 Crisis Management
 Getting Control of Situation
 Objective
 Crisis Plan
 Setting Up Their Crisis Management Center
 Gathering Information
 Understanding Media’s Mission
 Communicatıng Quıckly And Frequently
 Providing Closure
 Analysis and Comments

CRISIS MANAGEMENT- GETTING CONTROL OF THE
SITUATION
 When the first two complaints of syringes found in Diet Pepsi cans were reported in Washington state, PepsiCo considered it a regional issue.
 PepsiCo’s local management worked with their regional bottler to check the product line while the FDA tested the syringes for contamination.
 When a third syringe was reported (in New Orleans), PepsiCo realized that this was becoming a national issue and assembled their crisis team.
 PepsiCo determined that it was almost impossible that these tampering reports could be true. The real problem was how to stop the false reports and how to communicate to the public that there was no danger.

CRISIS MANAGEMENT- OBJECTIVE
Inform all publics tampering claims are false within the next two weeks

CRISIS MANAGEMENT- CRISIS PLAN
• PepsiCo had created a crisis plan with procedures for dealing with product tampering. • PepsiCo’s crisis team included employees from all the major divisions: scientific and regulatory affairs, manufacturing, public affairs, sales, marketing, and legal counsel.
• The goal of this team was to “ensure consumer safety and security while protecting 95-year old trademark and maintaining a positive image amidst a blitz of often negative media attention,” said
Craig Weatherup .

CRISIS MANAGEMENT- SETTING UP THEIR
CRISIS MANAGEMENT CENTER
 By Day 6 , June 14, PepsiCo’s crisis management team was gathered in a conference room at the company’s New York headquarters. This conference room became the crisis team’s headquarters for the duration of the crisis and also served as Mr.
Weatherup’s office during that period.
 Mr. Weatherup (CEO) was chosen as the spokesperson during the crisis because of his knowledge of the “complexity of the canning process”. He also communicated with PepsiCo Inc. Chairman D. Wayne Calloway several times each day throughout the crisis.
 Rebecca Madeira, Vice President of Public Affairs, became the crisis coordinator
 Other members of the crisis team included Public Relations Manager Ann Ward,
Product Safety Expert Dr. Jim Stanley (who had originally worked for the FDA), and
Manager of Public Affairs Andrew Giangola.

CRISIS MANAGEMENT- GATHERING INFORMATION
 Rebecca Madeira’s immediate concern was to determine whether or not the public was at risk: Once the FDA had tested the first two syringes and found that there was no risk of contamination. By day 5 -June 13, PepsiCo and the
FDA together decided that there was no need for a product recall.
 In the meantime, PepsiCo researched employee records, shipping and customer inventories, and consumer complaints to see if there were any indications that their production lines could have been subverted in any way.
 Based on their research and on the statistical improbability of such tampering occurring in numerous bottling plants over the span of several months, management and employees at PepsiCo were confident that the syringes reportedly found in their soda cans were not the result of product tampering but of fraudulent complaints.

CRISIS MANAGEMENT- UNDERSTANDING MEDIA’S
MISSION
 The media was creating a panic among consumers with its sensationalized display of a Diet Pepsi can with a syringe

 PepsiCo’s crisis team understood that they had to use this same media to deliver their own message to consumers: that they had determined with
“99.999 percent certainty” that the syringes could not have been inserted in a production line that fills thousands of cans per minute
 PepsiCo’s media messages were so effective that by Wednesday night, one day after Mr. Weatherup’s first television appearances, crisis team members noticed that news reports were beginning to use words such as “copycat” and “hoax” when reporting new tampering cases

CRISIS MANAGEMENT- COMMUNICATING QUICKLY
AND FREQUENTLY

 PepsiCo produced four VNRs during the crisis, including the first one showing the soda canning process.
 On Day 7 - June 15, PepsiCo asked one of their vendors, Robert Chang
Productions, to produce a video news release (VNR) showing the soda canning process. The video showed how each can was inverted, cleaned with pressurized water or air, and then flipped again and immediately filled with soda, all in less than one second. This first VNR was viewed that same day by 187 million viewers on 403 stations
 But the most powerful VNR was created using surveillance footage from a
Colorado retailer which showed a woman inserting a syringe into a can of Diet
Pepsi as the store clerk looked away.
 FDA arrests of individuals accused of filing false reports reinforced PepsiCo’s affirmations. CRISIS MANAGEMENT- COMMUNICATING
QUICKLY AND FREQUENTLY
 PepsiCo also made CEO Mr. Weatherup available for interviews with the news media. On Tuesday, he appeared on several evening news broadcasts including the MacNeil/Lehrer Newshour and Nightline with Ted Koppel, “quietly explaining how a syringe couldn’t possibly find its way into a can”. Mr. Weatherup was joined on Nightline by FDA Commissioner David Kessler, presenting a powerful message to consumers as both men assured the public that the tampering reports were unsubstantiated and that PepsiCo’s products were safe. The following morning, Mr. Weatherup appeared on several early morning network shows as well as CNN’s Larry King Live that evening.
 In addition to their efforts in the mass media, PepsiCo also kept other lines of communication open during the crisis: PepsiCo sent faxes to all of its regional bottlers twice daily to keep them apprised of any developments, and PepsiCo employees continued to respond to calls made to the company’s toll-free line from consumers, bottlers, and distributors.

CRISIS MANAGEMENT- PROVIDING
CLOSURE
 Within 11 days, the Diet Pepsi crisis was over.
 PepsiCo wanted to thank their constituencies for supporting them throughout the crisis and to officially declare the crisis over.

 From June 19 to June 21, PepsiCo ran ads in national newspapers declaring “Pepsi is pleased to announce … nothing!”
 On the weekend of the Fourth of July, PepsiCo printed coupons in newspaper ads that said, “Thanks America.”
 In all, sales of Pepsi and Diet Pepsi were reported to have dropped about 2% during the crisis but rebounded after the Fourth of July.

 The FDA had made several arrests for filing false tampering reports and there had been no substantiated cases of contaminated soft drinks. Between June and
September, 55 other people were arrested for making false claims and others started to retract their stories.

CRISIS MANAGEMENT- OVERALL ACTIONS DAY
BY DAY
DAY

ACTIONS TAKEN BY PEPSI

Thursday, June 10

Spokespersons chosen

Friday, June 11

A second reported syringe-in-a-can came to Alpac (bottler) directly

Sunday, June 13

The FDA issued its own advisory

Sunday, June 13

Pepsi urged companies not to remove the product off the shelves.

Monday, June 14

PepsiCo’s crisis management team was gathered at New York headquarters Tuesday, June 16

Revealed production process

Tuesday, June 16

Mr. Weatherup’s first television appearances

Thursday, June 19

«Impossible for syringe in the can», release news around the world.

CONTENTS
Brief History of Pepsi
Crisis
Crisis Management
Analysis and Comments

CONTENTS
Brief History of Pepsi
Crisis

Crisis Management
Analysis and Comments

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS
 PepsiCo’s response to the Diet Pepsi tampering hoaxes illustrates how crucial it is for a corporation to have a crisis management plan in place.

 Unlike other similar cases: no product recall  The media, unaccustomed to this course of action for an alleged product tampering of this magnitude, persisted in reporting "victims" claims and in looking to the Company for answers.  PepsiCo responded quickly and effectively to sensationalized media reporting that could otherwise have proved catastrophic.

 The crisis management team determined that the most effective method for communicating with PepsiCo’s constituencies was through the very media that was reporting the hoaxes. Once that decision was made, teams were mobilized to provide VNRs and news updates, and a corporate spokesperson was selected to present a calm and reassuring face to PepsiCo’s constituencies.

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS
 This is the first time a major regulatory authority has given such a public reaasurance (FDA).
 PepsiCo worked closely with the FDA to ensure that their products were safe.
 FDA’s involvement gave greatly enhanced credibility. Rebecca Madeira said that agency was the company’s crisis counsellor.
 HIV/AIDS hoax was very popular in USA.
 They reassured their bottlers and distributors by including them in their communication chain.
 PepsiCo took a situation that could have proved devastating to their corporate image and product line and instead emerged from the crisis “stronger and more united than ever,” said Craig Weatherup.
 In 1993 Pepsi-Cola profits surpass $1 billion
 Pepsi shows tendency for crisis due to use of celebrities.

THANK YOU

REFERENCES
 http://pepsibrattleboro.com/historyofPepsi
 Colin Doeg, 1995. Crisis Management in the Food and Drinks Industry: A
Practical Approach, Chapman&Hall, UK.
 Kathleen Fearn-Banks, 2011. Crisis Communications: A Casebook Approach,
Routlegde, NY.
 Norman R. Augustine,Anurag Sharma,Idalene F. Kesner,N. Craig Smith,Robert
J. Thomas,John Quelch,Greg Brenneman,Linda Hill
2000. Harvard
Business Review on Crisis Management, Harvard Business School Press, USA.
 Marcy Magiera, 2009. “The Pepsi Crisis: What Went Right.” Advertising Age 19
July 1993: 14-15.
 Regina Collins,2009. Corporate Communication Case Study, PepsiCo’s
Communication Strategy During Product Tampering Scare.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Syringe in Pepsi Can

...1- Discuss the implications of Pepsi's strategy, specifically. Putting Public First By putting public first, it show to the public that they care about this crisis seriously and they will treat this matter accordingly and their image become better when they get the consultation from the FDA, because they know that the FDA's credibility is high and people will believe what ever that FDA recommend them to do. In the meantime Pepsi also know that this problem is not come from their side but it just they want to gain back public trust and Taking full responsibility for solving the problem. By taking full responsibility, Pepsi has shown to their public that they listen to the their customer complain although they know that this complain is the absurd. They know that the problem are not come from their side. But as the result from their strategy, it will satisfied their customer dissatisfaction about the Pepsi product. Furthermore with this action, it show to the public that the quality and the safety of their product is the priority of the company Using the media to present the case. They know that there are no other option that they can use to change their customer perception unless they use the persuasion power. So the best way to use persuasion power is to use media power because it can disseminate information throughout country in the short period of time. By using media also, people will get the real picture what is really happen and this will make the customer...

Words: 1585 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Pepsi Co

...United states alone. Pepsi has many brands in soft drinks alone namely mountain dew, diet pepsi, mirinda etc. Also pepsi has expanded its reach to other products like quaker oats, Tropicana fruit juice, lays potato chips, cheetos, Gatorade etc. One of the Pepsi’s popular product was its ‘ Diet Pepsi’. It was introduced in 1964. Its main highlight was that it was a sugar free drink making it available to all larger section people. It had zero calories and also very less sugar content it and was an instant hit among the youth. PepsiCo is a leading company in soft drinks, snacks and foods and beverages. It has a revenue of more than 39 billion dollars and has employee strength of more than 1,85,000 people. PepsiCo company consist of mainly 3 companies. PepsiCo Americas Foods (PAF), PepsiCo Americas Beverages (PAB), and PepsiCo International (PI). PepsiCo’s products are one of the most recognized products in today’s world. PepsiCo’s increase in success is mainly due to high standard of performance, commitment, determination and hard work of each and every member of the PepsiCo family. Pepsi also follows one of the best marketing strategies and business practices. PepsiCo has faced many challenges in its history. It has had its toughest competition from its rival Coca-Cola. It also faced other challenges like bankruptcy in its early stages and sugar rationing during World War 2. It has also faced a similar kind of crisis in 1982 and their methods to resolve the crisis is all the rage...

Words: 792 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India.

...Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete In India. Summary of the case The case of Coke and Pepsi in India is a lesson that all marketers can observe, analyze and learn from, since it involves so many marketing aspects that are essential for all marketers to take into consideration. Both companies had many difficulties, especially Coca-Cola, and it's useful to observe how it dealt with the different aspects, stating from the political environment of the Indian market and the trade barriers it faced, going through the market entry and penetration strategies considered and the flexible marketing mix used and how it was placed to increase consumption and market share, ending with the change in the environment and market due to boycott campaigns for different reasons. Discussion Political environment and trade barriers: Until the early 1990s, India was considered unfriendly to foreign investors, especially in consumer goods sector. If an item could be obtained within the country, imports of similar items were forbidden. Due to this environment, Coca-Cola had withdrawn from the Indian market in 1977. Looking back at Coca-Cola's withdrawal we can notice: Coke's refusal to give the formula and withdraw from the market wasn't a clever decision, because as a big company, coke must expect to face many challenges. It should have believed in it marketing capabilities and its ability to position its brand as a unique one, different from others even if they claim they are...

Words: 1258 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

India 2003

...Coca-Cola India Teaching Notes Introduction The Coca-Cola India case offers students a unique opportunity to look inside a crisis for one of the world’s most important brands as it occurs inside a developing nation. The case focuses specifically on issues related to brand, reputation, and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and the intersection of all three. History reveals that companies with the strongest brands, most proactive policies of social responsibility, and deepest relationships with their consumers are the most attractive targets for NGO attacks. The very assets that define these leading companies provide the fodder NGOs are looking for to further their agendas. Global Exchange’s attacks on Starbucks over fair-trade coffee and against Nike over sweatshops in Asia, like the Center for Science and Environment’s (CSE) attack on Coca-Cola India, are all examples of NGOs using companies’ powerful reputations against them. Being an attractive target, however, need not imply vulnerability. Organizations and their leadership teams need to start thinking systematically, proactively, and strategically about their reputational risk from crises concerning CSR (corporate social responsibility) and take actions to mitigate these risks before they become reality. The CSE’s allegations of pesticide-contaminated Coke and Coca-Cola India’s response provide an important example of the world’s most important brand under attack and the steps taken in the aftermath...

Words: 2229 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Pepsi Case Study

...Pepsi Case Study In the summer of 1993, the Pepsi scare was one of the most widespread news stories in the entire country. This happened to be negative publicity for the Pepsi Company. There were cases being filed against Pepsi that there was syringes, needles, pins, screws, a crack cocaine vial, and even a bullet have been found in Diet Pepsi cans. The media would start to increase on this story as more reports would come in. “In one week’s time, more than 50 incidents had been reported to the police, the FDA or the media”. Pepsi was not sure of why these incidents were being reported. Pepsi had to research on why these claims were being made against their company. Pepsi was going to defend their company and not recall any of their products. Pepsi wanted to show the country that there was no possible way that these objects could end up in their products at the different factories. In this study there will be many different techniques the PepsiCo uses to explain to the country that this is impossible and these include: identifying the different publics, impact of communication on the public, the different PR communication tools and techniques, benefits and risks using these tools, how new technology would impact this case, and what is the companies status today in reference to this incident. Identifying the Different Publics In this study there are internal and external publics. Internal Publics are people that are involved in the company in any way. In this study the...

Words: 1705 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Cola Wars

...CASE STUDY : COLA WARS CONTINUE : COKE AND PEPSI IN 2006 The case study “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006” focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. ‘ Cola war’ is the term used to describe the campaign of mutually targeted television advertisement & marketing campaigns between Coke & Pepsi. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi goods which target similar groups of costumers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital. Both Coke & Pepsi have segmented the soft drink industry into two divisions, via – 1.Production of soft drink syrup. 2.Manufacturing & distribution of soft drinks at retail level. Coke & Pepsi have chosen to operate primarily on the production of soft drinks syrup,while leaving independent bottlers with more competitive segment of the industry.The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied, in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted in cannibalization. Because of this, the report is described from the perspective of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. This report focuses on increasing the overall share and finding new opportunities in the unrevealed...

Words: 1192 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Cola War Continue

...Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 Question: Identify the key marketing issues (Company weakness and the main opportunities and threats for company) met by Coke and Pepsi. SWOT | Cola | Pepsi | Strengths | * The flagship of soft drink global market share, approximately 40% * High profit margin by shifting some cost to bottlers * Strong marketing campaign * Expanded manufacturing and distribution system that kept prices low, Coke located in more than 200 countries. | * The biggest market share of non-carb productions in US and the second best selling soft drink brand in the world. * Aggressive marketing strategies using the target customer, Pepsi Generation. * Offered the product innovation. | Weakness | * Decreasing in CSD market. * Having a complex relationship with North American bottlers. * Reacting slowly with new market trends. | * Decreasing in CSD market. * Lack of sensitivity in expanding the global system. * Focusing only young people. | Opportunities | * The soft drink demand in Pacific-Asia Countries increases over 40% steadily. * Entry in the fast growing of energy-drink segment and new packages. * Dominating in Western Europe and much of Latin American. | * Positioning in the Middle East and Southeast Asia. * Growth in healthier beverages. * Growth in Tea Asia and functional drink beverages. * The younger generation structure of the global population. | Threats | * The powerful competitor Pepsi and the growth...

Words: 581 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Crisis Management

...Faculty of Economics Seminar paper on the subject: English 4 Crisis management June, 2012 Crisis management is the process by which an organization deals with a major event that threatens to harm the organization, its stakeholders, or the general public. The study of crisis management originated with the large scale industrial and environmental disasters in the 1980. Three elements are common to most definitions of crisis: (a) a threat to the organization, (b) the element of surprise, and (c) a short decision time. Venette argues that "crisis is a process of transformation where the old system can no longer be maintained." Therefore the fourth defining quality is the need for change. If change is not needed, the event could more accurately be described as a failure or incident. In contrast to risk management, which involves assessing potential threats and finding the best ways to avoid those threats, crisis management involves dealing with threats before, during, and after they have occurred. That is, crisis management is proactive, not merely reactive. It is a discipline within the broader context of management consisting of skills and techniques required to identify, assess, understand, and cope with a serious situation, especially from the moment it first occurs to the point that recovery procedures start. Introduction Crisis management consists of: * Methods used to respond to both...

Words: 6157 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Coca Cola in India

...Coca-Cola in India Coca-Cola is a brand name known throughout the entire world. It covers 60 percent of the $1.6 billion soft drink market. In 2006–2007, Coca-Cola faced some difficult challenges in the region of Kerala, India. The company was accused of using water that contained pesticides in its bottling plants in Kerala. An environmental group, the Center for Science and Environment (CSE), found 57 bottles of Coke and Pepsi products from 12 Indian states that contained unsafe levels of pesticides. The Kerala minister of health, Karnataka R. Ashok, imposed a ban on the manufacture and sale of Coca-Cola products in the region. Coca-Cola then arranged to have its drinks tested in a British lab, and the report found that the amount of pesticides found in Pepsi and Coca-Cola drinks was harmless to the body. Coca-Cola then ran numerous ads to regain consumers’ confidence in its products and brand. However, these efforts did not satisfy the environmental groups or the minister of health. India’s Changing Marketplace During the 1960s and 1970s, India’s economy faced many challenges, growing only an average of 3–3.5 percent per year. Numerous obstacles hindered foreign companies from investing in India, and many restrictions on eco-nomic activity caused huge difficulties for Indian firms and a lack of interest among foreign investors. For many years the government had problems with implementing reform and overcoming bureaucratic and political divi-sions. Business...

Words: 3912 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Coke

...The case study prepared by Archie B. Carroll entitled, “Coke and Pepsi in India: Issues, Ethics, and Crisis Management”, describes issues two major, well known multinational corporations (MNCs) have been facing in India over the past several years, since 2003. Coke and Pepsi are known competitors in the world of soft drinks, but have become allies given the situations they are facing in India. There are allegations of highly contaminated soft drinks, which claim to cause cancer and birth defects. An interest group in India, Center for Science and Environment (CSE) made the allegations and stated tests can verify the products contain high levels of pesticide residue (Carroll & Buchholtz, 2012, p. 649). Another special interest group, India Resource Center (IRC) raised concerns of an issue Coke experienced which is the claim of overconsumption and pollution of scarce water resources due to plant operations and production. This affected many cities and regions of the country, especially in the communities of Kerala and Mehdiganj (Carroll & Buchholtz, 2012, p. 649). In addition to the scarcity of water, there were also complaints of the water around the soft drink giant’s plants tasting and smelling bad. Donated waste to farmers for fertilizer tested positive for cadmium and lead creating toxic waste (Carroll & Buchholtz, 2012, p. 649). The allegations made by these groups were taken very seriously and believed valid because of the support of a very powerful and influential...

Words: 2047 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Cola Wars

...<Strategic management case analysis-“Cola wars continue”> 1. There are several reasons for soft drink industry to have been so profitable. To calculate profit, we use this formula “Profit=Price*Quantity-Cost”. The sales of soft drink soared after the 1970s based on its increasing availability and diverse flavors. People literally demanded soda more than any other beverages so it affected the quantity. Due to inflation that made overall price higher, consumers felt the real price of CSD lower than before so the quantity demanded went up. In accordance with this, in my personal opinion, other than the large sales quantity of CSDs, the cost of this category is very low. The materials for soda are mainly concentrate, sweetener, and water-and it costs very low. With certain price and this cheap cost, its gross margin is very high. 2. Concentrate producer’s most significant costs were for advertising, promotion, market research and bottler support. Due to its industrial properties, the concentrate manufacturing process needed little capital investment in machinery, overhead or labor as you can figure out from what its major costs are. Building one plant only costs about $25million to $50million which serves the entire United States. On the contrary, the bottlers purchase concentrate, add additional materials, bottle it and deliver it to customer accounts. As you can see, most part of the manufacturing cycle that we can think of occurs in the hand of the bottlers...

Words: 716 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Analysis Marketing Plan

...EXECUTIVE SUMMARY   Purpose of this project is to study the strategies which Pepsi is doing in Pakistani market for its product Pepsi cola. Pepsi International is a world renowned brand. It is a very well organized multinational company, which operates almost all over the world. In Pakistan It also has proved itself to be the No.1 soft drink. Now days Pepsi is recognized as Pakistanis National drink Pepsi's greatest rival is Coca Cola. Coca Cola has an international recognized brand. Coke’s basic strength is its brand name. But Pepsi with its aggressive marketing planning and quick diversification in creating and promoting new ideas and product packaging, is successfully maintaining is No.1 position in Pakistan. Pepsi is operating in Pakistan, through its 12 bottlers all over Pakistan. These bottlers are Pepsi's strength. Pepsi has given franchise to these bottlers. Bottlers, produce, distribute and help in promoting the brand. Pepsi also launched its fast food chain KFC i.e. "Kentucky Fried Chicken.” We also did analysis of the soft drink industry in Pakistan and worldwide. The soft drinks set to become world's leading beverage sector. Global consumption of soft drinks is rising by 5% a year. CHALLENGE Pepsi is doing new product development on frequent interval of times. The purpose of which is to refresh the brand. By new products and innovative ideas consumers can easily be attracted. In following ways Pepsi is doing new product...

Words: 1489 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Coke India Study

...and 25-30%2 year-to-date growth. Many leading clubs, retailers, restaurants, and college campuses across the country had stopped selling Coca-Cola3 and only six weeks into his new role as CEO, Gupta was embroiled in a crisis that threatened the momentum gained from a highly successful two-year marketing campaign that had given Coca-Cola market leadership over Pepsi. On August 5th, The Center for Science and Environment (CSE), an activist group in India focused on environmental sustainability issues (specifically the effects of industrialization and economic growth) issued a press release stating: "12 major cold drink brands sold in and around Delhi contain a deadly cocktail of pesticide residues" (See Exhibit 1). According to tests conducted by the Pollution Monitoring Laboratory (PML) of the CSE from April to August, three samples of twelve PepsiCo and Coca-Cola brands from across the city were found to contain pesticide residues surpassing global standards by 30-36 times including lindane, DDT, malathion and chlorpyrifos (See Exhibit 2). These four pesticides were known to cause cancer, damage to the nervous and reproductive systems, birth defects, and severe disruption of the immune system.4 In reaction to this report, the Indian government banned Coke and Pepsi products in Parliament and state governments launched independent investigations, sending soft drink samples to labs for testing. The Coca-Cola Bottling Company (Coke) stock dipped by five dollars on the New York Stock...

Words: 9264 - Pages: 38

Premium Essay

Coke in India

...25-30% 2 year-to-date growth. Many leading clubs, retailers, restaurants, and college campuses across the country had stopped selling Coca-Cola 3 and only six weeks into his new role as CEO, Gupta was embroiled in a crisis that threatened the momentum gained from a highly successful two-year marketing campaign that had given Coca-Cola market leadership over Pepsi. On August 5th, The Center for Science and Environment (CSE), an activist group in India focused on environmental sustainability issues (specifically the effects of industrialization and economic growth) issued a press release stating: "12 major cold drink brands sold in and around Delhi contain a deadly cocktail of pesticide residues" (See Exhibit 1). According to tests conducted by the Pollution Monitoring Laboratory (PML) of the CSE from April to August, three samples of twelve PepsiCo and Coca-Cola brands from across the city were found to contain pesticide residues surpassing global standards by 30-36 times including lindane, DDT, malathion and chlorpyrifos (See Exhibit 2). These four pesticides were known to cause cancer, damage to the nervous and reproductive systems, birth defects, and severe disruption of the immune system. 4 In reaction to this report, the Indian government banned Coke and Pepsi products in Parliament and state governments launched independent investigations, sending soft drink samples to labs for testing. The Coca-Cola Bottling Company (Coke) stock dipped by five dollars on the New York Stock...

Words: 9241 - Pages: 37

Premium Essay

Marketing Interligence

...techniques of assessing you customers responses 31 Design and complete a customers satisfaction survey 32 Review the success of a completed survey 31 Appendix 34 References 36 Task 1 Task 1 (Outcome 1) a. Describe the main stages of the purchase decision-making process within your chosen company * Refreshing drink is the basic human’s demand. Therefore, it is understandable when people expect to have a comfort drink to satisfy thirst. In Vietnam, Pepsi and Coca Cola took large amount of market share in beverage industry, applying consumer buyer decision process will help them a part in purchasing battle. * As usual buying decision process will cover through 5 steps. However, buying Pepsi does not need that much. Before any purchasing decision was make, the need awareness definitely appear first. Commonly, people will drink Pepsi when thirsty, be invited, habitual, etc (need recognition). They will totally ignore “Information search” because it not necessary for a common thing like a can of Pepsi. Which cost small amount of money and the demand will...

Words: 7107 - Pages: 29