Throughout my 8th grade writing career, I have changed a lot. I used to despise writing assignments, and I always procrastinate when I have to work at home. Now I find myself enjoying some of the writing tasks. I still think some papers are pointless, but I have started to enjoy prompts such as narrative writing. In fact, I have even started to write my own story for fun. As a writer, I’d say I use pretty good language. I can describe things well, I’m good at organization, but I can improve on all of these. I also need to work on concentrating so that I don’t have to work late.

A writer always has room to grow. While one may be excellent in some parts of writing, they’re not the best at everything. For me, I’d say I’m good at descriptions, …show more content…
The first thing I noticed was an inconsistency in spacing. This paper was hard for me. A lot of the evidence was stretched which I think led to my editorial not being as convincing. However, one evidence I like is in the beginning when I was deconstructing a quote. I said: “In basic terms, this means that art is created to address concerns, entertain, and express your being, so to censor it is to ruin it.” I’d say that this is my best evidence. It is clear, concise, and makes sense. Others, not as much. For one of my points I was addressing the effect of art on small children. I said: “While art is meant to cause reactions, the way it is shown may be inappropriate for children. When you are a child, though, stuff you don’t understand generally flies over your head.” This is bad evidence, and not entirely true. This speaks of a minority of children. Most of the time children are curious and inquisitive. If they hear a new word or see something they don’t understand they’ll be curious, especially if it is hidden from them. Like any paper, this one had strengths and weaknesses. I will improve from this by researching more, and finding better evidence to support my