Many people have had the thought in their mind of, “Should the government be allowed to see what I’ve been doing?” The government wants to keep us safe and with doing that comes a price of giving up some of your phone privacy. One reason is to keep us safe from attackers. Another reason is to know “who did it”. In addition, the government only listens to keywords and does not monitor everything that happens on a device. In 1918, The Republican minority in Congress argued that sedition laws violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects freedom of speech and the press. President John Adams took away the rights of the people by passing these acts. The acts included new powers to deport foreigners as well as making it harder for new immigrants to vote. The connection to this subject is not a similarity. The connection is a difference between the two. The government did not take away any rights of the people. Even though most Americans believe that …show more content…
They can find out easily who murdered who and when it happened and who else was involved. Just like the Patriot Act that was enforced on October 26, 2001, there are 2 sides to this issue. According to ww2.kqed.org, “The Act allowed searches detention of illegal immigrants and allowed the FBI to search phone and email records without a courtroom case”. The quote explains that the acts were used without any of the public’s input. That it kept everyone safe, but the people had to give up some of their privacy. These acts would be quite useful in this situation. They do not state that the government has a right to all of your personal information, it states that they will look over any illegal phone/email records. It will not only keep us safe, but they will figure out who sent the messages, who received them, and bring them to justice. Some people believe that the government watches us every second, however that’s not exactly