Free Essay

Philosophy and Religion

In:

Submitted By dasein
Words 2996
Pages 12
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
In this chapter the researcher will give the topics that he will discuss. The topic of this chapter includes an introduction of the topic, statement of the problem, significance of the study, delimitation and methodology.
1. Introduction
The rise of modern science had created a great impact in the lives of each individual especially in the environment where human being lives. Inclusive of this great impact, innovations in every aspect was rapid. Looking at the different angles of innovations of modern science greatly affect individuals by putting man at the center of the world.
The growth of technical knowledge through application of scientific discoveries has brought human beings the luxury of spoiling their resources. Man focused more on the thing that can make him happy, feel comfortable, relax and even more have an easy life. Without all of these, he is being driven to do inhumane things like killing for the sake of having such. The absence of technology for man is misery.
In this time of modern age, man is being blinded from the effects of the innovations that the modern world had introduced. He does not have any idea of his termination in the world while exhausting his body to the luxury of technology. That’s why, at certain events, man’s close encounter of death confronts him. “How many of us, though, can succeed in feeling these truths as consolations? We are not good at coping with death, especially in our contemporary materialistic age, with its pretence that we live indefinitely and that the fountain of happiness is purchasing power. Few face the fact of death squarely, or consider its nature clearly” (Grayling 32).
It is always been a mystery for man to inquire about the beginning and the end of his life. His existence had created a conflict of meaning between his existence and its end.
As for the beginning of human life, the question of when does life begin always confronts individual into the reality of his being in the world. Man has different questions regarding the world he lives in. The unfamiliarity of his life tends to give birth to the questions about his existence in the world.
At some point, people find themselves wondering about the perplexity of life. They often fall into a certain kind of puzzlement, beyond those goals of everyday living asking if their life has meaning. Life as not worth living or wasting their time giving meaning to their life was somehow makes a person worry as he struggles to live in the world where uncertainty is always there. And to some, a certain absurdity in life was produced in their minds. And this profound sense of absurdity about life is often triggered by our concept of death. Death is an aspect of human life that we become familiar sooner or later.
To some people, death is an inevitable reality that human beings cannot escape. It gives a satisfying meaning to one’s life, that life is ends. And to some, without the concept of death life would be meaningless. “It is a common place, but an important one, that death and decay are the servants of life. Fallen leaves change into humus on which next year’s seedlings feed: so the death and transformation of autumn is essential to spring. Death is therefore a condition of life and constitutes half its rhythm” (Grayling 29).
Different definitions of death had evolved. From the perspective of religion, Catholic, death started in the time of Adam and Eve when they have eaten the forbidden fruit at the Garden of Eden. And throughout the ages, different views had spread concerning death. Different religions, culture, vision, perspectives and others had given color to the meaning of death. For others, it is the path that connects two different worlds called life and “afterlife”; it serves as a punishment for those who violated the law, a threat to one’s existence and a way to attain either heaven or hell. These are just some of the existing concepts of human beings about the future event they fear and refuse to talk about. “Most religions premise an afterlife. Some of them teach that it begins with a judgment bringing punishment or reward… some people find such notions psychologically supportive, others find that they make death more terrible- for them death becomes a strange country ruled by dangerous powers, into which we venture ill prepared” (Grayling 31).
Who is not afraid of death? “When I ask you what you are afraid of when I talk about death and dying, you will probably say you are afraid of pain, of suffering, of nothingness, or of leaving loved ones behind” (Wyschogrod 19). One of the inevitable realities which human beings cannot escape in his existence, from the moment of his birth, is the fact that he is bounded by termination, an impending doom, a death. Despite its inevitability, discussing the topic of death is often a difficult one. How one viewed death can be influenced by many factors such as personal experiences, personal beliefs and values and our upbringings that are derived from different understanding. Historical and cultural context of death in which one lives mainly influence one’s perception of these experiences. One does not have the idea of how what kind of death he will undergo, it may be painful or not. One does not have the idea about the ‘real’ nature of death. “What seems frightening is the prospect of dying. But dying is an act of living; it is something only the living do, and like most other such acts – eating, walking, feeling happy or ill - it might be pleasant or otherwise… we experience death only in losing others, and the experience is one of grief” (Grayling 30). “Dying and death are events that happen to each one of us. We can postpone, gain reprieves, but ultimately we all must die, hora incerta, mors certa. And with world events being what they are, life’s temporality tends to move even further into the foreground” (Feifel xi).
Death is not something new. It has been existing since the beginning. Everywhere one can find it from newspapers and television up to the first-hand of our experiences – close encounter. “A reaction to loss- that is, the breaking of an attachment to bond- is common to all peoples. In a world where televisions brings the tragedies of people of one culture into the living rooms of millions of people of another culture, the similarity of anguished faces of loss is apparent. The skin may be of a different color, the clothing may be unusual to the viewer, the funeral rites may be unfamiliar- but the walling lament of a mother holding a dead child looks and sounds the same everywhere” (Jeffreys 25). The truth that human beings cannot escape death brought them from fearing it. Human beings have already cultivated on their mind that death is fearful. Human beings fear death. Death usually connotes suffering, pain, sorrow, heartache – this is the moment that a person leaves behind his or her loved one. It marks a loss to all the possibilities.
All human beings who exist will be confronted by death sooner or later.
One cannot fully achieve a complete or meaningful life of existence unless one confronts his own mortality. Thus, Martin Heidegger calls an “authentic life” to be that of man’s realization of his own finitude and temporality. It is an awareness of a human being about death, that he is finite and temporal. The awareness of death is the beginning of an understanding of man’s temporality. “Naturally we have on hand for every eventuality one or two suitable banalities about life which we occasionally hand out to the other fellow, such as “everyone must die sometime,” “one doesn’t live forever,” etc.” (Feifel 4). Death would always mean or simply known to be the end, the inevitable ending of individual existence.
The critical question concerning death is the question of how each one of us relates on the knowledge of death itself, that death is certain. The certain of all uncertainty. “Throughout man’s history, the idea of death has posed the eternal mystery which is the core of our religious and philosophical system of thought. And it is quite possible that this idea is also the prototype of human anxiety” (Feifel xi). The distinctive capacity of human beings to grasp the concept of a future and inevitable death to which present behavior does not only depend on the past but also, possibly on the point of reference of human beings towards future events. Human beings encounter of death also reveals man’s hunger for immortality.
Thus, there are many thinkers from different fields from the position of psychiatry, religion and philosophy that placed their theoretical outlook on death towards a better understanding and an elucidation the role it plays in the life of human beings.
According to Ladislaus Boros, it is a strange thing that the search for some content in life and some continuity in human existence should have to start off as an enquiry into the meaning of death! This is difficult to do nowadays. “The violent primitive process of death is becoming so obscured by our general forgetfulness of the meaning of all natural processes that we are no longer disturbed by it” (Boros vi). There is such time to which man had grown so blind to the fact that we are to die. When man forgets death, he also forgets life because death is part and parcel of human existence. The knowledge of man about one’s death would always be his striving force to see light and live. Thus, a man who is aware of death is also aware of his life.
Death is a natural event of human life that must be accepted. It is a part of life and it will always confront human existence. (Concluding to the thought of death being natural, what more can we say?) Human beings would always confer to the idea of its being natural, and they stop there. But the question is how can one really know death itself? The fact that there is no one who dies and at the same time lives then no one can really talk about it. What more can one say? There are a lot of things that one can look at death – a reviewed perspective. The way human beings would encounter death is an event where it unveils all the possibility of existence. Then, what is the problem of human beings about death? Why they fear death? Behind their knowledge of death as being natural, the problem is that when man was haunted by fear, he lacks the capacity to look at death as it is. Death in man’s ordinary view means “loss”. Death thus, means “end”. What is it in death that man was being haunted by it? The question that lies in it is, does man have really fear of death? Is it really a fear of death or a fear for someone?
“These problems of the nature and meaning of human existence become really acute when the issue is its end and finitude, that is, human death” (Thielicke 5).The question of the finitude and temporality of human existence affected by death would always be a sensitive part on human existence. Since death that eliminates all the works and existence of human beings, what is the point of human life then? Life arises to this very world where in fills itself with experience, knowledge, and understanding and to a sudden point it vanishes, it dissolves as if nothing happened. Life becomes, then, an unbearable absurdity. Spending a lot of time cultivating and filling oneself will be changed or rather will come to nothing. What is, then, the point of human life? Why should man still look for meaning and conquer the world if everything would just pop up and vanish in the process. “Why-we ask- was all this given to us if we are not eternal but the next moment will vanish into nonbeing without even dreams remaining? Is not this life that is extinguished in death a fantastic nightmare?”(Thielicke ). “Marcus Aurelius, the roman emperor who was also a stoic philosopher, said in his Meditations that when we die we lose only the present moment, for the past has ceased to be and the future has not yet come; so to comfort ourselves we have only to look around and ask, ‘is this present moment really worth keeping?’”(Grayling 30). Death is a mandatory thing. One could ever escape it no matter how he/she planned to escape it. Death will always find its way to confront man. No one can excuse himself from death no matter what status in life he has. Death is death. Death is the one man cannot escape. According to ladislaus boros, we shall not, however, limit ourselves to merely descriptive account of their thought. We too shall endeavor to be creative and to progress further along the lines they indicate, taking their insights to their final consequences. (Boros 20) “Death is one of these things that occur within the world; many people die every day; one day we shall die too; yet right now it has nothing to do with us yet. Secondly, one dies; death is an indefinite something which proximally is not yet present-at-hand” (Kockelmans 194).

2. Statement of the Problem
As human beings, it is already embedded in one’s existence that everyone will die. And this became a sensitive topic to talk about. In this paper, the researcher will expound more on the existence death. Death is a topic to which man had suppress his mind of talking about it while he is busy working on the rapid change of his living. Ever since, humanity had gained reprieve on the topic of death. The obscurity of his knowledge of death had brought him to conundrum. Despite its difficulty to discussed, death has something to tell to man. The call of death would always haunt man someday. Perhaps, this research may help each individual to have knowledge on the understanding of the concept of death.
The researcher is working on the topic of death mainly on the concept of death of Martin Heidegger. He will be using Heidegger’s magnum opus “Being and Time:” The researcher will work on the essential views of Martin Heidegger on death and look for a deeper understanding about it. The researcher wants to find out and explain the essential views of Martin Heidegger with regards to the death itself and the fear of people on death. The researcher also wants to find out on how human beings face death? How human beings face life in the face of death? The researcher will work mainly on the topic concerning: 1. Who is Martin Heidegger? 2. How is the concept of death evolved and discussed in Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time? 3. What Martin Heidegger says about man’s fear of death?
3. Significance of the Study
As soon as man lives he is bound to die. It is already part of human nature to be terminated in the world he is into. A personal encounter of death had been already posed on our existence. We grieve the loss of a certain individual. Death is multi faceted concept that medium of experience can be of help in understanding its meaning. All the things existing in the world ceases to be so as man. But the death of man is different from the things around him. Our capacity to think brought us to knowledge and an awareness of the existence of death. Different gear such as media influences brought us to an encounter of death. It is very relevant topic to discuss death because of its facticity that all will experience death itself.
The study about on Heidegger’s views on death is very essential to which it discusses an inevitable truth human beings cannot escape. It is an everyday event where man has not talked about or rather feared to talk about. This research will show reasons and ideas that will give us a clearer view about death.
The researcher finds the research very significant because of his interest and curiosity of death especially in the realm where man had gained knowledge for self-preservation by the use of technology and the massive issues on crimes that individual’s committed. The researcher wants to find out the answers to the questions he had in mind upon doing this study that would help him and encourage him searching for a clearer and deeper understanding about death.
The researcher also found the study significant to those people who do not have a deeper understanding on death.
The research is also significant to those people who fears death and all people who are not exempted to experience death by providing knowledge that will give them the understanding on how to interpret the human experience of death. This research will try also to answer the questions about death such as what it is in death that man’s fear? What really death is?
4. Delimitation
The main focus of the research is to philosophically explain and analyze the essential views of Martin Heidegger regarding death. The researcher will present a deeper knowledge on death using Heidegger’s concept.
5. Methodology
The researcher will use the expository method as a tool on his research. The researcher will expose and reveal the essential views of Martin Heidegger regarding death and how these views can be used to elucidate and have a better understanding on the reality of death. This method is of great help for the researcher discussing and exposing Heidegger’s view on death. The researcher will also use different philosophical views through different books published regarding death. The researcher will use Heidegger’s philosophical book Being and Time to which Heidegger mentioned ideas about death which will provide ideas about death.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Philosophy of Religion

...Introduction Philosophy of religion is a branch of philosophy concerned with questions regarding religion, including the nature and existence of God, the examination of religious experience, analysis of religious vocabulary and texts, and the relationship of religion and science. It is an ancient discipline, being found in the earliest known manuscripts concerning philosophy, and relates to many other branches of philosophy and general thought, including metaphysics, logic, and history. Philosophy of religion is frequently discussed outside of academia through popular books and debates, mostly regarding the existence of God and problem of evil. The philosophy of religion differs from religious philosophy in that it seeks to discuss questions regarding the nature of religion as a whole, rather than examining the problems brought forth by a particular belief system. It is designed such that it can be carried out dispassionately by those who identify as believers or non-believers. Religion: A Part of Metaphysics Philosophy of religion has classically been regarded as a part of metaphysics. In Aristotle's Metaphysics, the necessarily prior cause of eternal motion was an unmoved mover, who, like the object of desire, or of thought, inspires motion without itself being moved. This, according to Aristotle, is God, the subject of study in theology. Today, however, philosophers have adopted the term philosophy of religion for the subject, and typically it is regarded...

Words: 1759 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Philosophy of Religion

...RST3709 Assignment 1 Write an essay on the God of the philosophers. Who or what is God according to traditional Classical philosophy? Refer in your answer specifically to Plato and Aristotle’s objective idea of God. Also refer to Augustine’s response to Classical philosophy. Conclude your essay with your own critical assessment. Do you agree or disagree with the philosophers? Use Chapter 4 of your prescribed textbook (‘The God of the Philosophers’) in order to answer the question. Contents 1. Brief summary of the God of the philosophers 2. The traditional God and gods 3. Plato and Aristotle’s objective ideas of God 4. Conclusion 5. References 1. Brief summary of the God of the Philosopher: In the book ‘God: A guide for the perplexed’ Keith Ward goes into fascinating debate and detail of ancient philosopher, their writings and the way the world understood them. Each philosopher mentioned in Chapter 4; Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Augustine had their own image and debate on what the godswere and how they perceived them and how they believed they came to be and what they are capable of. Plato, when learning about the Greek gods, never understood why they were there or where they came from. He believed that good was the only essence that mattered in all the beliefs and religions and ways of life. He believed in a god that was faultlessin everything he did and that is why the universe was created. (Ward 2002: 145) Socrates on the other hand...

Words: 831 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Philosophy and Religion

...Philosophy and Religion are both things that are heavily discussed by individuals involved in the study of philosophy itself. There are many different opinions about religion and philosophy, because philosophy itself is something that can be seen from different variations. On one hand, there are those that are considered realists, and they believe that religion can indeed exist in the discussion of philosophy. On the other hand, there are those who are considered non-realists, and these individuals do not believe that there is any proof or evidence to show that religion actually exists. The arguments of realists versus non-realists are based on the fact that some people in philosophy are simply going to have a different opinion about different things. For example, in the world there are many people with different views about different things. One individual may feel that Jesus Christ is God, while another individual may feel that Buddha is their God. Different opinions are shared around the world every day, and the study of philosophy is no different considering that many philosophers have different opinions relating to the topic of religion and philosophy. According to Meister, logical positivism was something that was very popular in philosophy during the early parts of the twentieth century because many philosophers felt that actual logic, mathematics and statements that had proven to be factual were the only parts of philosophy that belonged in philosophy in general. However...

Words: 1357 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Philosophy and Religion

...Albert Rosales Professor: Gill Intro Philosophy: 213 In writing this paper, I was apprehensive by the immensity of the task that was required of me, having never studied Philosophy and philosophers before this class and not having a good understanding of it. I could not begin to comprehend Metaphysics, Ethics Epistemology etc. if it was not for this course. This may sound ignorant but I had never really given any thought to my worldview. If asked what I believed about something I would give my belief and that was that. What exactly is a worldview? A worldview is what it sounds like. It is the way one may see the world or as Nash puts it in his book Life’s Ultimate Questions “the sum total of a person’s answers to the most important questions in life(392).” Everyone has a worldview whether we realize it or not. How does one get their worldview? Our education, our upbringing, the culture we live in, the books we read, the media and movies we watch, all can help shape our worldview. Nash says, “Worldviews contain at least five clusters of beliefs, namely, beliefs about God, metaphysics (ultimate reality), epistemology (knowledge), ethics and human nature (14).” Using these five sections I will share my worldview. In general my worldview is a Christian one. I believe that there is one God who exists in three forms who created the Heavens and the earth. In the Bible Genesis 1:1 tells of how God is the beginning of everything; he created the heavens and the earth out of nothing...

Words: 2495 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Philosophy of Religion

...Plato Review Plato’s distinction between body and soul in the foundation unit so that you can make comparisons with the thinking of Hick and of Dawkins. John Hick Philosophy of Religion (1973); Death and Eternal Life (1976) • The soul is a name for the moral, spiritual self formed by the interaction of genes and environment. The human is a psychophysical person with a divine purpose. • The person shall be resurrected through a divine act of recreation or reconstitution in resurrection, rather than reincarnation as Plato would have it, through God’s creative love. • The new body is not the old one brought back to life but a spiritual body inhabiting a spiritual world just as the physical body inhabited a physical world. • Hick conducts a thought experiment with a hypothetical person called John Smith. Smith disappears from the USA and reappears in Calcutta, India. He is physically identical with the same memories, emotions, fingerprints, and so on. People would agree he was Smith. If he died and reappeared in this world, again identical, people would agree he was Smith. If he died and reappeared in another world with other resurrected people, he would be Smith. This is called the replica theory. • God is not restricted by death and holds man beyond natural mortality. • Martin Luther wrote: Anyone with whom God speaks, whether in wrath or mercy, the same is certainly immortal.’ Richard Dawkins The Selfish Gene (1976); River out of Eden (1986);The Blind Watchmaker...

Words: 601 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Philosophy-Religion

...Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Does God exist? If so, why is there evil? Like St. Augustine, I do acknowledge that ``God exists”. In order to explain his ideology, Augustine refers to the life of a tree, rock, dog and human beings. He argues that among the things aforementioned, only human being posses the ability to think and act thus meaning that among the creations on earth, the human being is the intelligent creature. Further, he expounds his argument by stating that if another being is intelligently superior to human beings, then it has to be God. However, St. Augustine acknowledges the presence of evil. St. Augustine’s opinion of sin is linked to the freedom to exercise ``freewill” by individuals an aspect that results to ``moral evil”. Free will forms the basis by Augustine that God should not be blamed for ``the existence” of sin. To expound on his argument, Augustine informs his readers that he like many other people has been subject to sin due to his desire to realize what sin entails and urges the people not to dwell so much on sin rather than the existence of God(pg,164). In conclusion, I support Augustine’s argument that no one can understand the thinking of God thus we should focus on his goodness rather than sin existence. Are Human Beings Selfish? I believe that every ``human being” is selfish. The selfish nature of human beings is evident from the daily activities that we engage in during our lifetime and routines. In the current society, it is common...

Words: 901 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Philosophy of Religion

...The Cosmological argument argues for the existence of God a posteriori based on the apparent order in the universe. For Aristotle, the existence of the universe needs an explanation, a cause, as it could not have come from nothing. Nothing comes from nothing so since there is something, there must have been some other thing that is its cause. Aristotle rules out an infinite progression of causes, so, that led to the conclusion that there must be a First Cause. Likewise with motion, there must have been a first cause; Aristotle calls this the ‘Prime Mover’. There is a God, says Aristotle -for how else does motion begin? Whilst this argument does generally offer some support for the existence of God, it does not prove his existence. Aquinas believed that, since the universe is God's creation, evidence of God's existence can be found in his creation using intellect and reason, as such a concept of God is beyond all direct human experience. Hence, he devised his 'Five Ways,' 5 a posteriori arguments for the existence of God, based on our empirical experience of the universe. The Cosmological argument rests on the first three of Aquinas' Five Ways. The first way is called the argument from motion or ‘change’. It is in this first way that Aquinas follows Aristotle’s ‘prime mover’ thesis. The first way (The 'Kalam' argument) follows as: • Everything in the world is moving or changing • Nothing can move or change by itself • There cannot be an infinite regress of things changing other...

Words: 949 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Philosophy Religion Essay

...Philosophy of Religion Essay: Religious experience at Ram Mandir Hinduism is one of the oldest religions since the beginning of time and has grown from its ancient roots to become the third largest religion in the world. The majority of its followers originate in India and Nepal. Hinduism is a religion based on traditional values and philosophies that have evolved in India over period of more than a thousand years. On my visit to the Ram Mandir while I experienced a puja, “which is a name for prayers in Hinduism”. (V,2011) among the people, I noticed two different patterns that they follow, and observed that Hinduism has related the patterns to Emilie Durkheim’s and Stuart Hall’s theories of social solidarity and culture respectively through use of prayers and congregations, which is going to be the main focus of my essay in Hinduism the distinct patterns while performing the prayers. The two patterns are congregation who came together for the ritual performed by the Pundits( priests) and the book that priest themselves distributed to the people. The first pattern that was visible to me in the Ram Mandir was based on the congregation who came together for the ritual performed by the Pundits (priests). This gathering of people had a majority of Asian descendants which were mostly North Indians that spoke Hindi. Also, there were different languages that were being spoken by south Indians that are dark skinned, which were easy to distinguish. Since, Hindi is the most common...

Words: 1703 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Buddhism: Religion And Philosophy

...Buddhism is a religion and philosophy that developed the teachings of buddha. About 3 million people believe in the religion of Buddhism. Buddha is known as to teach the purpose of life and the teaching lead to true happiness. Buddha was a teacher in Northern India. People became interested in Buddhism because it is thought to answer many of the worlds answers and a deep understanding of the human mind. Buddha was not claiming to be a God or was Buddha was just a man who taught his own path and way of life. One of the major beliefs is Karma. Karma is that everything you do has an effect. If you spread good karma so you do good things to people around you something good will happen to you. If you spread bad Karma then something bad will happen...

Words: 368 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Religion Nd Philosophy

...Adalah.  Concepts of accountability, transparency and trustworthiness 2 . What do you understand by the Worldview? INCEIF 3 WORLDVIEW Worldview explain how man perceives this world. It denotes “a set of implicit or explicit assumptions about the origin of the universe and the nature of human life”. INCEIF 4 SECULAR WORLDVIEW  Every community or system is controlled or influenced by its own worldview. different worldviews among communities or among systems lead to dissimilar end means of human life.  The MAN’S WAY OF LIFE FROM SECULAR VIEW  Separation between religion and other aspects of life,  Materialistic,  Individualistic,  Less socio-economic justice,  Less public relations,  less concern with the Hereafter life. 6 INCEIF MAN’S WAY OF LIFE IN ISLAM Belief in a dual worldviews: this world & the hereafter.  Religion is part of his/her daily life.  Maslahah of the ummah (public benefit),  Accountability,  Trustworthiness,  Transparency etc.  7 INCEIF WHY ALLAH (SWT) CREATED MAN? INCEIF 8 CONT. WHY ALLAH CREATED MAN?.  According to Islamic belief, Allah has created man (and jinn)only to worship Him. INCEIF  The word worship here encompasses all permissible human activities and intentions as part of the general act of acceptable worship (ibadah). Within the...

Words: 1880 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Philosophy vs Religion

...FirstName LastName Instructor’s Name Course Name Due Date (01 January 2000) Title of Paper Begin your paper here. Your first paragraph should introduce your topic and give the reader an overview of what you plan to discuss. Don’t skip lines between paragraphs or hit enter after each of your lines. Word will do this for you. Be sure to indent your first line of each paragraph a ½ inch (use the Tab key). There shouldn’t be any information in the rest of your paragraphs that isn’t mentioned in your introduction here. After your introduction, you will need body paragraphs to support your topic. The number of body paragraphs you have will depend on the amount of information you have to cover. Be sure to check the minimum length of the assignment to ensure you have met the minimum requirement. If your paper requires outside sources, “You will need to include quotes like this” (LastName 99). You can also include paraphrases of someone else’s work, as long as you cite the information in the same way (LastName 22). Remember that Wikipedia is never a reliable source! Anyone can go to Wikipedia and edit the information there. While the information there might be true, it might also be totally incorrect. Since it isn’t a reliable source, it should not be used as a source in academic writing. However, a good Wikipedia article should have outside sources listed at the bottom. If you follow those links, you should get access to more reliable sources. Your last paragraph should...

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Philosophy Of Religion Research Paper

...PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION Philosophy of religion is the examination of the core concepts and themes involved in religious practices. Searching for a rational and logical explanation for every aspect of religion it also investigates the significance religion and spirituality plays on society. (Taliaferro, 2007) The examination of forms of religion and spirituality including geosophical and theosophical, analysing an argument that support these core values includes the cosmological argument where interconnected yet divergent notions are established. Geosophical religion and spirituality is profoundly linked to the land. Through a mental, physical and spiritual connection by which the land and people are interconnected, all objects are alive and share the same spirit. (Grieves, 2015) This argument is demonstrated through Australian aboriginal spirituality in which their behaviours in everyday life are a clear reflection of their beliefs....

Words: 606 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Philosophy

...Faith Philosophy has had a powerful influence on human beliefs and reason. It asks questions about the meaning of life and the purpose that humans have in the world. These philosophical ideas have carried much interest regarding religion and the underlying concept of God. Faith and reason have played a fundamental role in advocating religious beliefs for people of all different religions. There are various distinct religious beliefs around the world, but there are also people such as Atheists, who do not believe in the existence of a higher power. Religion has been a pivotal topic of discussion for individuals such as Kierkegaard, who used his faith to prove the existence of God as opposed to atheists such as Sigmund Freud, who denied the existence of any religion or belief in a higher power. To begin with, Kierkegaard proclaimed that faith was an essential factor in his belief of God. Faith is such a powerful force for religions who believe in a higher power that is far beyond our human understanding. Many philosophers find so much uncertainty in religious advocates of Christianity because there is so much question and uncertainty in proving that God does exist. In class, Professor Embree stated, “The issues of religion and philosophy are highly overlapping. Philosophy focuses on questions. Religion is based on faith. Faith is sometimes antagonistic to philosophy. Don’t question it, you will lose your faith” (February 6, 2014). What humans believe will influence everything...

Words: 606 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

David Hume

...Renaissance to Revolution Term Paper Abbas Ali David Hume and the Fallacy (Philosophy) of Religion David Hume is considered the greatest philosopher Britain has produced and an intellectual hero to many atheists. His arguments against religion are clear, incisive and devastating. However, some people have misconstrued his agnosticism to represent faith and claim that while Hume challenged conventional religion, he himself believed in God. In this paper I will attempt to refute some of these claims by briefly highlighting some of Hume’s most compelling arguments against religion and showing how they leave little room for belief. I will also delve into some of the context surrounding Hume’s work to show how speaking against religion was a dangerous game in those times and restricted Hume’s ability to speak freely. Some of the primary sources used for this paper include Hume’s most famous works on religion, including The Natural History of Religion and Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. Secondary and tertiary sources include scholarly critiques of Hume’s texts as well as reviews and journals interpreting his work one way or another. To start with, lets have a look at an excerpt from, The Natural History of Religion, published in 1757. In the following passage, Hume summarizes his views on religion as “sick men’s dreams”: What a noble privilege is it of human reason to attain the knowledge of the supreme Being; and, from the visible works of nature, be enabled to infer...

Words: 1858 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Phil201 Study Guide Lesson 16

...Study Guide: Lesson 16 Philosophy of Religion: Introduction Lesson Overview: With this lesson, we begin our unit on philosophy of religion. Religious questions are among the most important for the vast majority of persons: Is there a God? Is there an afterlife? Why does God allow evil and suffering? How can we know God? Are miracles possible? What is the relation between faith and reason? In this first lesson, we explore exactly how philosophy and religion relate to each other. Can we objectively explore religion from a philosophical vantage point? We will critically examine 2 extreme answers to this question and then arrive at a proposed way that religious beliefs can be philosophically investigated. Tasks: Read chapter. 1 of Philosophy of Religion: Thinking About Faith, “What is Philosophy of Religion?” As you read, make sure you understand the following points and questions: * Explain the distinctions between philosophy of religion and sociology, history, theology, and religious philosophy. * Explain the arguments for and problems with fideism. * What 2 factors do Evans and Manis raise in answering the fideist claim that critical reflection about religious beliefs is arrogant and presumptuous? * According to Evans and Manis, is it possible to be completely neutral, and is it valid? * How is critical dialog a balance between fideism and neutralism? * What are some criteria for testing basic religious beliefs, suggested in Evans and Manis’...

Words: 259 - Pages: 2