Free Essay

Pols

In:

Submitted By veiga001
Words 1961
Pages 8
COMPARATIVE FOREING GOVERNMENT

The US Political system- principles, institutions, rules and performance * A Democratic Republic * Political power, authority and legitimacy resides in the ¨we the people¨ * Officeholders serve specified terms and face regularly schedule elections * Political office cannot be inherited or conferred (no monarch, no nobility) * A constitutional system * A single document defining government powers, institutions and their functions, electoral procedures * Short and difficult to amend * Flexible and adaptable to changing circumstances (¨living document¨) * Widely perceived as legitimate by ¨we the people¨ * A representative democracy * Elected representatives –not ¨we the people¨-- make national law and policy (no referenda, recall, or ballot initiative) * The rule of law * Power of government over citizens explicitly limited (bill of rights) * The judiciary (federal courts) is on independent brunch of government whose members are protected by interference * All the elected are subjected to the law * Appointed officials are accountable to elected officials and to the courts * Institutional characteristics * /Separation of power/ divides political power and governmental authority among three branches having distinctive powers * Checks and balances allows each branch to offset the powers of the others * A powerful bicameral legislature with a meaningful upper house * A presidential system with an (indirectly) elected chief executive and administration independent of the legislature * Autonomous courts exercising judicial review * /Federalism/ shares sovereignty between national and state government * Existence and prerogatives of states protected * The senate represents the three states as such and equally in the legislative process * The states are primarily responsible for important aspects of public policy (education, police)

1 | 2 | 3 | HOUSE 435SENATE 100 | POTUS/UP | SLDTU(I) | | CABINET | CIRCUIT(B) | | BUREOCRAZY(MILITARY) | DISTRICT 94 |

The US Electoral System * Electoral System: General Characteristics: * States are responsible for registering voters and conducing elections * No single, uniform national registration and voting process exist * Registration is not automatic and voting is not mandatory * Voters must register their selves where they live * Rates of registration are and turnout are low by comparison to other developed democratic countries, esp. in primaries * Lack of uniformity in voting technologies and procedures can impair effective voting and increase opportunity for fraud * In caucuses and primary elections, political parties choose candidates to run for office * In the general election, the office is taken by a single winner by plurality vote (SMP or FPTP) * A 2-Party System * Wanting not to waste it, voters choose candidates having a realistic chance in SMP/FPTP races. * Seeking recognition, credibility and money, candidates adopt a major party label * Parties other than the established ones have great difficulty attracting and keeping supporters and candidates * The formation and perpetuation of only two national political parties of real political significate in a very large and diverse country * The Electoral College * POTUS/UP Indirectly elected via electoral college on a state-by-state basis * Each state has elections totaling the number of representatives + number of senators * Electors are expected (not required) to cast all of their state votes for candidates winning the popular vote in that state (except Main and Nebraska) * Winner of popular vote can loose election (Al Gore 2000) * Votes for a candidate loosing a state are effectively ignored * Voters in /safe states/ lack incentives to cast ballots * Candidates/Parties may ignore /safe states/ campaign only in battlegrounds * Voters in smaller states have greater relative impact * Artificial impression or ¨red¨ vs ¨blue¨ country * Established parties control of presidential politics perpetuated * Independent candidates discouraged from running, voters reluctant to support them (Ross Perat, Ralph Nader) * ¨Big Tent¨ parties fail to articulate and respond to specific voters concerns, number and size of interest groups increases (¨Hyper-Pluralism¨) * Parties don’t control who runs under their labels as candidates for office * Incoherent ideology, platforms and policy agenda * Unable to impose party discipline on representatives and senators once in office * Restricted range of choice for voters * Citizen alienation from political system (low levels of efficacy) * Policy-making unresponsive to citizen needs * Sharing Power Divided Government (1948-2012) * 64 years, 17 elections, 12 presidents * 6 democrats (32 years) * 6 republicans (36 years) * 38 years of divided government

Institutional Characteristics and Electoral System * Institutional Characteristics: consequences: * The process of making a law and policy often is lengthy and cumbersome * Divided government and parties on polarization complicate or stymie policy-making * Initiative of and responsibility for policy-making is diffused and among the three branches and the three states * Absence of meaningful limits on spending in election can overwhelm candidates, parties and voters
The United Kingdom and Great Britain and Northern Ireland * The UK. What’s in a name? * Plantagenet, tutors, Stuarts consolidate the English monarchy * Wales united the kingdom of England (1535) * Act of Union links Scotland with England to form Great Britain (1707) * Kingdom of Ireland added to form United Kingdom (1800) * Republic of Ireland going independence (1922) ;6 countries of Northern Ireland (Ulster) remain in the UK * The UK * Constitutional monarchy * Representative democracy * Parliamentary system * A constitutional monarchy * The British political system has envoled over centuries * Unlike the US, the UK has no single document that severs as its constitution * Hereditary monarch (Queen Elizabeth II) formally shares power with an elected legislature (parliament) * Power of parliament has increased at the expense of the crown * The monarch is the official ¨Head of State¨ of the UK AND THE Commonwealth; a purely ceremonial office * Real political power, authority and legitimacy reside in sovereign parliament (Westminster model) * A Representative Democracy * Broad franchise elect members of parliament from among parties and leadership to express and implement the will of majority * ¨Loyal Opposition¨ expected to provide viable alternative to government in power * independent media analyzes and critiques public figures and policies * The Parliamentary System: Bicameral in Name ONLY: * The House of Commons embodies and exercises effective political power * The authority and legitimacy of the House of Lords has been gradually and cumulatively reduced * The Government in Parliament * 650 seats [England=533, Scotland=54, Wales=40, Ulster=18] in commons * elected from single member district by plurality vote (SMP/FPTP) affirmed in 2011 referendum. Page 69 * MP´s elected for 5-year terms (maximum length) * The party winning the most seats (not necessary a majority) in commons earns the right to form ¨His/Her Majesty´s Government¨ (HMG) * Leader of majority party or coalition parties becomes prime minister (PM) * PM picks cabinets from among party MP´s (and Lords) to govern collectively * Legislative and executive powers are fused through MP´s, PM and Cabinet (the government [page 59]) * The government must maintain the confidence of parliament (commons) or resign * ¨Shadow Cabinet¨ of opposition leader debates, questions, challenges government; presents alternative vision and policies * Party in power can change it´s own leadership in office (Thatcher/Major, 1990; Blair/Brown, 2007) * Legislative process * Government (PM and Cabinet) and civil service (White Hall) formulate policy proposals * Legislation is considered by parliament in readings and debate * Legislation proposed by the government is virtually assured of parliamentary approval (no ¨divided government¨ or ¨gridlock¨) * Lords can delay but not prevent legislation from passing * Reforms (Esp. since 1998) reduced number and influence of * If policy proposed is very controversial, cabinet members may resign and/or ¨back benches may defeat * Dissatisfied MP´s can have a ¨no confidence¨ vote, forcing a new government or election
The French Fifth Republic * A constitution of 1958 * A democratic republic, but with executive autonomy and power enhance at the expense of the legislature * A hybrid of the presidential and parliamentary forms of representative government * A semi-presidential system * The constitution divides executive authority between… * A directory elected (1962 referendum) president * A prime minister (PM) and government accountable to the legislature * Their relationship varies according to electoral results * The president appoints as PM the leader of the largest electoral block in the National Assembly (NA) * The possibility of the cohabitation (p.100) affects the dynamics of the entire political system * Super-presidential alignment confers both executive powers and governing authority to the president * Cohabitation creates a typed of divided government, relegating the president to his role as head of State (p.107) * Electing the president * 5-year term of office (2000 Referendum), limit 2 consecutive (2008 constitutional reform) * Two rounds of voting possible (and nearly certain) * * Majority (+50%) in first round wings outright (has never happened) * Top-two candidates move on to 2nd round * Majority winner * Allows for a variety of candidates in first rounds, which can produce big surprises (Le Pen 2012, p. 89-90) * Single member districts, two rounds of voting (strutting uninominal a decut forms) * * Any member of candidates can run on first ballot * Majority (+50%) in first run wins outright * * 12,5% threshold to move on to the second ballot * plurality wins in second round * Encourages inter-round electoral alliances among parties * Has produced consolidation of two large blocks on left and right
Germany
* 3rd Reich defeated (May 1945) * Allies (US, USSR, UK, France), occupy Germany * Holocaust ¨revealed¨ to allies, world * ¨Death Camps¨ opened, filmed * Nazi records detail systematic slaughter of millions of Jews, Untermenschen * Germany as the focus of emerging Cold War divide * Divided capitol in soviet Quachant; Berlin blockade and airlift (1948-49) * Allies split German territory, population; create two states * Western allies combine 3 zones into Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) in 1949: 1. De-Nazified (Nuremburg Trials, other prosecution) 2. Democratized (elected leaders, rule of law) 3. Demilitarized (Germany military subordinate to NATO) * Germany divided during the Cold War * German Democratic Republic (GDR) created, dominated by soviets as key element of East Block (1949) * Berlin wall built (1961) to keep population in GDR, East Block * Germany and the Cold War * FRG, GDR reach economical and political accommodation as separate states (1970´s) * Gorbachev withdraws soviet supports, GDR, East Block regime collapse (1989) * Germany (re) unified (1990) under FRG´s Basic Law * Foundations of the FRG * Basic Law, Democracy and Federalism * Basic Law (1949) established as foundation for a wholly new regime * Founded on the rule of law and the guarantee of civil rights and personal liberties * Grounded in democratic and republican principles * Based on representative-non-direct-public participation * A parliamentary system fusing legislative and executive powers * Federalized politically and administratively * Institutions of the FRG (p.150)- President, Chancellor, Cabinet, Legislature, Lander * The German President: Joachim Gauck * Head of State having a mostly formal or ceremonial role * Distinguished political indirectly elected for five-year, 2 limit terms * Provides unity and continuity in times of political turmoil, unless it is self-inflicted * The Budestag (lower house) * A parliament fusing legislative and executive authority * At least 598 (currently 631) members elected for 4 year terms
-no term limits- can’t serve more than 4 years without election * Initiates, debate, passes legislation * Elects Chancellor; can dismiss him/her and the government but only on a ¨consecutive vote of no-confidence (p.151)
-have to vote for another Chancellor before old can resign * Supervise, questions and investigate government actions and policies * Elects one-halve of the members of the Constitutional Court * The Chancellor and Government * Chancellor elected by a majority of the Bundestag, usually the leader of the party having the most delegates * Appoints ministers (Cabinet) to formulate and propose legislation, direct national policy * Governments are formed by coalitions of party leaders (CDU/CSU-FDP) * Chancellor can ask president to dissolve Bundestag and call new elections (Schroeder, 2005) * Elections to vote the Bundestag * A two-ballot combining single-member district, plurality elections (FPTP) and proportional representation (PR) voting * One part of the ballot (1st vote) selects delegates from 299 single-member districts * The other part (2nd vote) selects a party for representation * Split-ticket voting possible and common
Federalism German Style * The role of the Bundestag * Upper house represents the 16 Lander (states) * Delegations made up of state government officials (elected or appointed); must vote as blocks
-69 total members-delegations range from 3 to 6 * composition of delegations based on Lander electoral results

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Pol Pot

...Evaluate the impact of the Khmer Rouge on Cambodian society from 1975-1979 Cambodia became one huge labor camp under the Khmer Rouge. After deposing Lon Nol on 1975, the Khmer Rouge, led by Pol Pot began one of the most brutal regimes in human history. This not only changed the Cambodian society but also ultimately destroyed it. This was due to the extreme vision of communism, which Pol Pot wanted to implement for a perfect and a peaceful society. Prince Norodom Sihanouk always tried to maintain Cambodia’s neutrality. But with Laos and Vietnam as its borders, he knew this was impossible. After the assassination of Diem in South Vietnam, Sihanouk condemned America’s policies; in turn he allowed Viet Cong bases in Cambodia. America in regard to this started ‘Operation Menu’ from 1969, to destroy the Viet Cong bases. When Sihanouk went to visit China on 1970, the CIA deposed him because he allowed North Vietnamese and Viet Cong to have sanctuaries in Cambodia. Sihanouk was replaced by pro-American and anti-Communist Lon Nol. This marked an end of a peaceful era in Cambodia. As soon as Lon Nol gained the power, he ordered the communist to leave Cambodia. The Khmer Rouge and the Viet Cong in retaliation to this launched an attack against the Lon Nol government. After a five year civil war between Lon Nol’s Royal Cambodian army, Viet Cong, North Vietnamese and the Khmer Rouge and over 600 000 Cambodians died, Lon Nol left Cambodia on 1st April 1975. Seventeen days later the...

Words: 1701 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Pol Pot

...Saloth Sar also known as Pol Plot intended on building a revolution, but he installed in one full swoop, communism. The Khmer Rogue became rulers at that time and started a revolution that Pol Pot was to take full blame for. During that period, the government was barely holding on. A hundred to a million people were killed during pol pot’s days and Pol Pot and his communist Khmer Rogue started it. Pol Pot and his communist Khmer Rogue movement led a terrorizing reign in killing everyone who knew or believed in the old program. Pol Pot’s plan was to kill everyone who knew and wanted what was right ( the educated and elderly) and get everyone to do what was clearly wrong. ` Pol pot and the Khmer Rogue led as a communist regime. As the...

Words: 679 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Pol Pot Research Paper

...Between the years 1975 and 1978, Cambodia was probably one of the worse places to be. Pol Pot was in control and killing millions of Cambodians in those years. In his reign, over 1.5 million Cambodians were killed. Pol Pot was never really brought to justice, because he died in 1998. Pol Pot was actually born as Saloth Sar in Cambodia. Before becoming a leader, he was a school teacher. During his time as a teacher, he joined the proto-communist Khmer People’s Revolutionary Party (KPRP). After joining the group, he became the secretary general. He became afraid that he would be arrested and fled. He came back after the U.S. bombings, which were supposed to prevent communists from taking over Cambodia. Him and the Khmer Rouge army took over and started to create what they thought of as the new Cambodia. Pol Pot started evacuating cities and forcing the citizens to live in rural, farming areas, after being impressed by China’s Cultural Revolution. During this evacuation, over two million people were moved from Phnom Penh. This whole evacuation was pretty bad, because men, women, children, and...

Words: 560 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

An Analysis of Pol Pot's Regime in Light of Machiavelli's the Prince

...matters of the Vietnam civil war by giving favors on both sides. When Lon Nol took over, however, Cambodia suddenly became a part of the Vietnam battlegrounds. He allowed the American troops to bomb away suspected hideouts of South Vietnamese guerillas located in southern Cambodia, resulting bombings that took almost 750,000 lives (http://www.ppu.org.uk/genocide/g_cambodia.html). While these things were happening, the number of Khmer Rouge’s members was rapidly increasing. Khmer Rouge’s leader, Pol Pot, was a great admirer of the Maoist communism and launched an extreme campaign of reconstructing Cambodia and eradicating the pollution that “Western Society” inflicted on them. In the Machiavellian point of view, he is a very laudable prince for he was able to gain and expand his power to hold the entire state of Cambodia in his hands. He gave us a glimpse on how to effectively activate the virtú of a leader in order to make both his subjects and soldiers obey his every command. All Pol...

Words: 1547 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Cambodian Genocide: Pol Pot And The Khmer Rouge

...“It is not power that corrupts but fear” (Aung San Suu Kyi). Pol Pot became the leader of the Khmer Rouge and shaped it due to communistic ideas. Pol Pot believed Communism could change Cambodia’s lifestyle to be more beneficial. The Khmer Rouge killed opposition and anybody who questioned their regime. Genocides are often fueled by revolution in a certain society. The Khmer Rouge was no exception, they used ideas of Communism to alter Cambodia’s economic system to try to benefit the people, but ended up creating a genocidal revolution. The Cambodian Genocide was carried out by Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge during 1975 to 1979 (Combat Genocide). About 1.6 to 2 million people were killed during the genocide (Combat Genocide). Pol Pot wanted to...

Words: 722 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Eeed

...Marxism and neglected his studies. He lost his scholarship and returned to Cambodia in 1953 and joined the underground Communist movement. The following year, Cambodia achieved full independence from France and was then ruled by a royal monarchy. Map & Photos Cambodia and surrounding area. Pol Pot addresses a closed meeting in Phnom Penh after the 1975 Khmer Rouge victory. Young Khmer Rouge soldiers in 1975. Tuol Sleng Prison, the nerve center of the Khmer Rouge secret police. Today it's the Tuol Sleng Museum of Genocide. The Killing Fields at Choeung Ek. This mass grave, discovered in 1980, was one of the first proofs to the outside world of what had occurred during Pol Pot's regime. By 1962, Pol Pot had become leader of the Cambodian Communist Party and was forced to flee into the jungle to escape the wrath of Prince Norodom Sihanouk, leader of Cambodia. In the jungle, Pol Pot formed an armed resistance movement that became known as the Khmer Rouge (Red Cambodians) and waged a guerrilla war against Sihanouk's government. In 1970, Prince Sihanouk was ousted, not by Pol Pot, but due to a U.S.-backed right-wing military coup. An embittered Sihanouk retaliated by joining with Pol Pot, his former enemy, in opposing Cambodia's new military government. That same year, the U.S. invaded Cambodia to expel the North Vietnamese from their border encampments, but instead drove them deeper into Cambodia where they allied themselves with the Khmer Rouge. From 1969 until 1973...

Words: 333 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Consider the Different Communities to Which You Belong: 1. What Is the Geopolitical Community in You Live? Why Is It Geopolitical? 2. What Is a Phenomenological Community to Which You Belong? Why Is It a

...A geopolitical community is a community that is defined by a specific boundary such as rivers, mountain or highways or jurisdictional boundaries which can be politically or geographically influenced. I live in St. Petersburg, FL and is bordered by three bodies of water, the Old Tampa Bay, Middle Tampa Bay, and Lower Tampa Bay, all of which form the Tampa Bay. Statistical and epidemiological studies are frequently based on date from specific geopolitical areas (Maurer & Smith, 2013). This is my geopolitical community because it is a geographical location. I may or may not have anything in common with my geopolitical community beside the location of home. My children do not go to the same school as the kids in the neighborhood. My husband and I work in another area. Our recreational activities usually takes place in other communities. Per Maurer & Smith (2013), the community one belongs to does not necessarily have to be the geographical location, but a community in terms of the members' feeling of belonging or sense of membership. This is a referred to as a phenomenological community. The phenomenological community does not automatically share a geographical location as does the geopolitical community. This type of community is a group of people who have shared similar values, interests, beliefs and goals. Examples of phenomenological communities include religious groups, social groups or profession. My phenomenological communities is my nursing organization, co-workers...

Words: 490 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Cambodian Genocide Research Paper

...The Cambodian Genocide was the cause of many deaths in Laos and Cambodia because of the Khmer Rouge, led by Pol Pot and the idea of the "Ideal Communist.” In the years 1975 to 1979, through execution, disease, forced labor, and starvation, Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge killed what is said to have been an estimated “two million” Cambodians. Which is almost a fourth of Cambodia’s population. This estimate does not include the maimed, the homeless, the orphaned, and the widowed, who were also suffering for all those years. The Cambodian Genocide was basically an attempt by Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge to nationalize the Cambodia farming society basically overnight, in an attempt for it to be like the “Chinese Communist agricultural model.” The population was made to work in one huge federation of many farms as labourers. Anyone who opposed, which were said to be all people in Cambodia with an education, must be terminated “together with all un-communist aspects of traditional Cambodian society.” “Christian, Buddhist and Muslim...

Words: 526 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Cambodian Genocide: The Khmer Rouge

...they have an association with all this happening. To start off, in 1953 Cambodia won it’s independence from France. Prince Norodom Sihanouk became the leader of Cambodia. Being a neutralist he wanted to please everyone by working alongside them, but that would never work because of the interests. The neutralist made it hard for himself by trying to agree with everyone instead of putting his own foot down. Interests among the U.S, China, and the Vietnamese, made it hard to prove what role he was playing with each country. Ally or enemy. Not to mention the factions from within Cambodia that split the country basically in half with their beliefs. One side being pro-Vietnamese and advocated cooperation with Sihanouk. The other side was led by Pol Pot and was anti-Vietnamese and opposed the rule of Sihanouk. The thing about this indecisive faction was that they would be the criminals taking over Cambodia’s government. Years later by 1963 the small faction overthrew the side that was pro- Vietnamese and pro-Sihanouk’s rule. Becoming the group that killed millions know as the Khmer Rouge. One of the biggest reasons for my statement that America is to blame for what happened, was the fact that Nixon ordered the bombing of Cambodia to get rid of Communism brewing in their locations. Therefore weakening the...

Words: 1175 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Demographic Transition

...Pol Pot Name: Tutor: Course: College: Date: Introduction Pol Pot was a young man who led the Khmer Rouge. Being a leader of the Khmer Rouge, Pol Pot led a rebellion alongside the regime of Cambodia. Due this, he was, therefore, elected leader of Cambodia in the year 1975. Pol Pot’s leadership was cruel, harsh and brutal. For instance, he confidently commanded civilians to move out of towns and cities into the country side. When they discarded his command, he forced them to move. This led to the creation of several camps and farms in the country side. However, the increased movement of people into the country side led to the accumulation of starvation and death of around half a million civilians (Weltig, 2009). As a leader, Pot demonstrated several character traits. His leadership was dominated by several negative traits. For instance, Pot was a harsh, cruel and brutal leader. He was interested in war and rejoiced when his country was under war. When he became the leader of Cambodia in 1975, pot established domination over the capital. He encouraged a war that occurred between his revolutionary army and Vietnamese representatives over border crisis. Compared to the traits mentioned in the text, pot portrays the characters of an infamous leader. Though he failed in his job, Pot had his own set economic goals (Haas, 1991). Pot was a self centered leader who was ignorant about his people’s rights. He was an ignorant leader who exhibited dictatorial...

Words: 655 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Cambodian Genocide Research Paper

...Warren 1 Willie Warren Ms. Dingley Period 6 April 3, 2017 Cambodian Genocide: April 17, 1975 - January 7, 1979 The cause of the Cambodian Genocide was Vietnam wanted independence which then causing the Indochina war. After the first Indochina War in the 1950's a communist movement was born in Cambodia. The communist party of Kampuchea, also known as the Khmer Rouge. The nickname was given by the fact that most of the country's ethnicity was red, the color of communism. The party was born from the country's struggle against French colonization. It was greatly influenced by the Vietnamese and wasn't an official party until 1968. During the Vietnam War the U.S. used Cambodia to their advantage by creating regrouping zones and even bombing parts...

Words: 283 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Expository Essay

...People with absolute power can either have a positive influence over society and make positive changes to the world, or the detrimental kind resulting in catastrophic loss of human life causing anarchy within societys. Some leaders with absolute power have used their power to change the world and inspire freedom and independence; other leaders have been positively evil and have used their power for influence, personal gain and notoriety. This essay will consider both points of view relating to how it affects the human lives and what effect it has on the society. Idi Amin was best known for his brutal regime and crimes against humanity while in power as President of Uganda from 1971-1979. In his time as leader he sent out killing squads to hunt down and murder those opposed to his views, which included people from every order and rank, including journalists, lawyers, homosexuals and students. He also expelled all Asians from Uganda in 1972. He then soon became known as the “Butcher of Uganda” for his brutality. It is believed that 300,000 people were killed during his presidency. He was once known to of said “You cannot run faster than a bullet” and this just is an example of his evil mind. A further example of a leader using he’s powers in a fatal grievous manner was Kim Jong-IL who was a dictator from North Korea who starved and tortured his people. 200,000 prisoners were held in labour camps, when they were too weak to work as they had been starved, he would either torture...

Words: 753 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Pol 300

...ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION This form can be filled out on your pc. CLICK THIS BOX TO CALCULATE FEES FOR THIS DOCUMENT. This box will not print. The undersigned, with the intention of creating a Maryland Limited Liability Company files the following Articles of Organization: (1) The name of the Limited Liability Company is: Global One Services, LLC . (2) The purpose for which the Limited Liability Company is filed is as follows: To secure local and Federal government, state, and private contracts. . (3) The address of the Limited Liability Company in Maryland is 2701 Moores Plains Blvd Upper Marlboro, MD 20774 . Travis Clarke and (4) The resident agent of the Limited Liability Company in Maryland is Yvonne Clarke whose address is 2701 Moores Plains Blvd Upper Marlboro MD 20774 . (5) (6) Resident Agent I hereby consent to my designation in this document. Signature(s) of Authorized Person(s) Filing party's return address: 2701 Moores Plains Blvd (7) Upper Marlboro, MD 20774 SDASDAT:Corporate CharterSDAT:Corporate Charter INSTRUCTIONS FOR DRAFTING A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY To create a Maryland Limited Liability Company (LLC) an originally executed Articles of Organization must be submitted to: Department of Assessments and Taxation 301 W. Preston Street Baltimore, MD 21201-2392 (1) Insert the name here. The name must not be misleadingly similar to that of another LLC, Corporation, Trade Name, Limited Partnership or Limited...

Words: 814 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Pol 300

...There are several concepts from the Contemporary International Problems text that we will be reviewing. We will examine several inaugural excerpts to see the correlation between the actual concept and reviewing the historical context. We will examine how all of these things affect today and have affected the U.S. in the past. Several concepts we will review are as follows: defense, deterrence, détente diplomacy, national interest and globalization. The excerpts for this study are from our current president, Barack Obama, and former presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. All three of our presidents addressed defense and deterrence; however we shall only focus on two. “Defense is blocking an enemy’s attack” (Roskin & Berry, 2008, p. 200). “Deterrence is dissuading attack by showing its high cost” (Roskin & Berry, 2008, p. 200). In 2001 former President George W. Bush spoke about defending the U.S., and tried to deter other countries from attacking the U.S. and our allies. He stated “...we will defend ourselves and our friends by force of arms when necessary.” He later stated “My most solemn duty is to protect this nation and its people against further attacks and emerging threats.” During the time he gave this address the U.S. had been through the attacks of 9/11, Iraq was threatening allies and the U.S. with weapons of mass destruction, Bin Laden would release video or voice recordings stating how America would suffer or pay. These reasons are why we still...

Words: 968 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Pol 1025

...In any political system are structures that have different functions to ensure an effective and smooth running of things in that particular political system. This is why this essay will discuss the problems faced by opposition political parties in Zambia using the structural functionalist theory. First it will explain what structural functionalism is, then it will define structures, functions, a political party and an opposition party then before giving the conclusion it will discuss the problems faced by opposition parties in Zambia. Johari (2011) defines structural functionalism as a means of explaining what political structures perform what basic functions in a political system, it is a tool of investigation. Macions and Gerber (2010:14) states “this approach looks at society through a macro-level orientation, which is a broad focus on the social structures that shape society as a whole and by this society evolves like organisms”. According to Johari (2011:73) “functions deal with the consequences involving objectives as well as processes of the patterns of action, Structures refer to those arrangements within the system which perform the functions. For example the police are a structure within the political system that have a function of maintaining peace and order. “In the concept of functions, three basic questions are involved- what basic functions are discharged in any given system, by what instruments those functions are performed and under what conditions the performance...

Words: 1786 - Pages: 8