Premium Essay

Prehistoric Medc

In:

Submitted By Venotex
Words 276
Pages 2
Prehistoric Medicine
How healthy were people?
Prehistoric people were relatively healthy as they have built a system of skills and behaviours that kept them healthy in the environment through many processes of trial and error. Prehistoric people were known as nomadics who travelled to different areas and had no time to settle and build hospitals nor the time to observe how their body operated.

What Caused Sickness?
Sicknesses and diseases were more common during the Prehistoric ages. Many people would go hunting bears and deer for skin and meat and may have wounded themselves in the process. Due to the limited knowledge of germs in that time, the wound would become very serious when if infected. Another reason may be due to malnutrition since men as hunters may have received better food than the women who would consequently be less resistant to sickness.

How did they treat illness and injury?
Patients would go to the medicine man who was a half priest and half doctor. He would use herbal remedies, chant spells and prayers to force the evil spirits to leave he body. If a person was critically ill and have evil spirits inside their head causing the sickness, the medicine man would perform trepanning. This is where they would drill a hole in the patient’s head to release the spirit inside.

Who treated the sick?
Patients would go see and medicine man or shaman who was a half priest, half doctor figure.

What did they think caused illness?
Prehistoric people largely explained sicknesses and diseases through evil spirits they believed in. They believed that evil spirits could enter their bodies and cause the illnesses.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Art History

...Art History 1 June 3, 2013 Art and the Consciousness of Early Man The paintings carried out on rock surfaces, which constitute parietal art, caused the curiosity of lots of scientists. These paintings are present in many places of the world; the oldest can have more than 40,000 years. The dating of the prehistoric traces was difficult, as well the interpretation and reasons of the paintings, from anthropomorphic figures to abstract forms of signs. These paintings on the caves represent a universal artistic expression because it was found at various periods on our five continents. They used many techniques to express art, but one of them was painting with the brush. The brush could be manufactured with the hair of animals and even of vegetable materials. Paintings were monochromatic or polychromatic (Cave of Lascaux). Another technique was painting with the finger, which were made with the finger coated painting (Cave of Covalanas). At that time, when the first arts were created, they already made use of some technique to trace contours (punctuated horses of the Cave of Pech Merle), to fill a surface (Cave of Lascaux), or to make prints of negative hands (Caves of Gargas) by puffing up on paintings. Beyond the techniques of analysis and study, parietal art poses to the researcher the insoluble enigma of understanding. Prints of hands with mutilated fingers (or deformed by the disease?) found in” Cueva de Las Manos” in Argentina, is an example of problematic interpretation...

Words: 368 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Cultural Exploration

...Define “prehistory” in one sentence. Prehistory is a time before we wrote things down and kept records; a time when we were unable to relate things to the past, because there was no evidence of what had happened. To what degree do you think “French” prehistoric events and national identity are related? In other words, do you believe prehistory truly influences national character or is it used to forge national myths? Give at least one example. France and the world around them have built France’s identity on symbols that were before the times of written history. One of the prehistoric events that have influenced their identity was the Lascaux caves. These caves give insight into the past and the way of life during that time; however, this has been shut down as access to the caves has since been barred (Ott 39). The lack of prehistoric artifacts in the French capital has shown us that maybe prehistory is “too elusive to serve nationalistic purposes” (Ott 39). Really, these caves represent how the population has evolved, but maybe not so much their identity. However, things like the Gallic myths have brought the Gallic Cockerel to represent many things in the national identity. These Gallic myths have changed over time to have a different meaning depending on the Era; representing things like mythological origin, biblical derivation or an autochthonous foundation (Ott 39). These Gallic myths were the starting point, and they have evolved through time to represent what...

Words: 326 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Lascaux Cave Research Paper

...Through all of the modern advancements and inventions created through history, art is notably the most important and impactful discovery known to man. From simple but intricate cave paintings to massive stones, prehistoric art is something that should always be remembered. Caves were a great way to protect artifacts from ancient civilizations. Protecting artifacts from erosion, corrosion, and decay until two boys and a dog happen to stumble upon a society hidden away for thousands of years. The Lascaux Cave paintings were an enlightening discovery giving us a broader view of ancient life. The caves are about one hundred meters long and are filled with paintings of bison, stag, ox, and many other animals. Artists used charcoal to make the outlines for their paintings. To color them in they used chunks of red and yellow ocher ground into powder and applied using animal hair made into paint brushes or blown onto the cave wall using hollowed out bones. Researchers may suspect why the cave paintings are in...

Words: 451 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Hist

...------------------------------------------------- Prehistory From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For a timeline of events in the early history of the universe and prehistoric Earth, see Timeline of prehistory. Göbekli Tepe, in southeast Turkey, erected by early Neolithic people 11,000 years ago. Human history and prehistory | ↑ before Homo  (Pliocene epoch) | Prehistory (three-age system) | Stone AgeLower Paleolithic   * Homo * Homo erectusMiddle Paleolithic Early Homo sapiensUpper Paleolithic  Behavioral modernityNeolithic Cradle of civilizationBronze Age * China * Europe * India * Near EastIron AgeBronze Age collapse * China * Europe * India * Japan * Korea * Near East * Nigeria | Recorded history | Ancient historyEarliest recordsPostclassical eraModern history * Early * Later * Contemporary | ↓ Future | * v * t * e | Prehistory means literally "before history", from the Latin word for "before," præ, and historia. Human prehistory is the span of time since behaviorally and anatomically modern humans first appear, and until the appearance of recorded history following the invention of writing systems. Since both the time of settlement of modern humans, and the evolution of human civilisations, differ from region to region, prehistory starts and ends at different moments in time, depending on the region concerned. Sumeria in Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt were the first civilisations to develop their own scripts...

Words: 980 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Development of Metallurgy in the Southern Levant in the Light of New Dates of Slag Deposits

...UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Peer Reviewed Title: Technology and society : some insights on the development of metallurgy in the Southern Levant in the light of new dates of slag deposits Author: Ben-Yosef, Erez Acceptance Date: 01-01-2008 Series: UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Degree: M.A., UC San Diego Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/03f2f3vx Local Identifier: b6636008 Abstract: An ongoing project for reconstructing the behavior of the geomagnetic field intensity during the last seven millennia has yielded several new dates for archaeometallurgical sites in the Southern Levant. These dates shed new light on the dawn of metallurgy in the region as well as on the quality of technological development and its relation to social and political structures. This paper introduces the methodology and concepts behind the archaeomagnetic project as well as the principles of the applied dating technique. In addition, the paper presents the archaeomagnetic results, discusses the alternative dating of several archaeometallurgical sites and explores the implication of these results on our understanding of the interaction between technology and society in the past. For the latter, the results particularly challenge the "Standard View of Technology" (Pfaffenberger, 1992), and suggest a complex, nonlinear evolution of copper industry in the Southern Levant eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of...

Words: 16249 - Pages: 65

Free Essay

Discovery of Metals

...The discovery of metals People probably discovered how to extract metals from their ores by accident when rocks containing metal were heated with charcoal in fireplaces. A chemical reaction called reduction would have taken place which freed the metal from its ore. The same reaction is still used in blast furnaces to extract iron. The first metals The first metals worked by people were copper, gold and silver, probably because these are found as pure metals. In about 3500 BC, the Sumerians learned how to make bronze by combining copper and tin. Bronze is stronger than the pure metals. Iron was not used until around 1350 BC, probably because it needs much higher temperatures to separate it from its compounds. New metals Up until 1735 AD, the only known metals were copper, silver, gold, iron, mercury, tin, zinc, bismuth, antimony and lead. Aluminium was discovered in 1825. Now scientists can create new metal elements, such as mendelevium, by bombarding atoms with electrons in a particle accelerator, which is a type of nuclear reactor. The atoms break apart under the bombardment, enabling scientists to get a glimpse of their structure. Period | Approximate time (Middle East) | Neolithic Period (Late Stone Age)       | 8000 - 4000 BCE       |   | Chalcolithic Period (Copper Age) | 4000 - 3150 BCE | Egypt: Beads from meteoric iron | Early Bronze Age | 3150 - 2300 BCE | Egypt: Oldest bronze (Old Kingdom, from 2700 onwards) | Middle Bronze Age | 2200 - 1550...

Words: 276 - Pages: 2