Premium Essay

Printware Products Inc.

In:

Submitted By cma4
Words 404
Pages 2
Printware Products Inc. produces printers for wholesale distributors. It has just completed packaging an order from Hawes Company for 450 printers. Before the order is shipped, the controller wants to compare the unit costs computed under the company’s new activity-based costing system with the unit costs computed under its traditional costing system. Printware’s traditional costing system assigned overhead costs at a rate of
240 percent of direct labor cost.
Data for the Hawes order are as follows: direct materials, $17,552; purchased parts, $14,856; direct labor hours, 140; and average direct labor pay rate per hour, $17. Data for activity-based costing related to processing direct materials and purchased parts for the Hawes order follow.
[pic]
.:.
Required
1. Use the traditional costing approach to compute the total cost and the product unit cost of the Hawes order.
2. Using the cost hierarchy, identify each activity as unit level, batch level, product level, or facility level.
3. Prepare a bill of activities for the activity costs.
4. Use ABC to compute the total cost and product unit cost of the Hawes order. (Round your answer to the nearest cent.)
5. What is the difference between the product unit cost you computed using the traditional approach and the one you computed using ABC? Does the use of ABC guarantee cost reduction for every order?

SOLUTION:

| |1. |Hawes Order: | | | | | |
| | | |Direct materials | | |$17,552 | | |
| | | |Purchased parts | |14,856 | | |
| | | |Direct labor (140 hrs. × $17/hr.)

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Downstream Competition Between an Upstream Supplier and an Independent Downstream Firm

...Abstract: I consider an upstream supplier that supplies an input to an independent downstream firm and in addition sells the final product to consumers. I find that the upstream supplier cannot implement the monopoly outcome without imposing maximum resale price maintenance (RPM). RPM increases social welfare if consumers’ valuation for the final product of the downstream firm is high, and decreases social welfare otherwise. When the downstream firm is privately informed about the demand it faces, entry into the downstream market serves as a countervailing incentive that allows the upstream supplier to reduce the information rents. Consequently, asymmetric information induces the upstream supplier to enter the downstream market even if entry is not profitable under full information. Keywords: dual distribution, two-part tariff, resale price maintenance, information rents, countervailing incentive JEL Classification Numbers: L41, L42, D82 * I thank Koresh Galil, Asaf Ravkai, Yossi Spiegel, Manuel Trajtenberg, Marisa Trajterman and seminar percipients at Tel Aviv University for helpful comments. * Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel. Email: . 2 1. Introduction Upstream suppliers often adopt a dual distribution system whereby they not only sell their products to retailers but also enter the downstream market and sell their products directly to final consumers. This situation is common in the U.S. automobile industry (Banks, 1993), franchising (Brickley...

Words: 11783 - Pages: 48