...Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson Critique the prioritizing process D. D. Williamson. D. D. Williamson is a small privately held company. Founded in 1865 in Louisville, Kentucky, D. D. Williamson has become a global leader in non-artificial colors (Kloppenberg & Nkomo, 2012). The company has grown to nine operating facilities in six countries and supplying many food and beverage companies around the world. D. D. Williamson had too many projects that were all deemed important. Even though the project was ongoing, some projects were late, over budget, and not achieving the predicted results (Kloppenberg & Nkomo, 2012). With so many active and important projects, the company decided to implement a prioritization matrix. The prioritization matrix was an excellent way to prioritize the company’s projects and improve the budget and on-time rates. As of 2009, the company made more changes to their prioritization process. They decided to choose no more than five “Vision Impact Projects” that would get high-level focus and attention (Kloppenberg & Nkomo, 2012). Projects are now receiving more in depth attention. Suggest at least one recommendation to improve the prioritizing process. Although D. D. Williamson has an effective prioritizing process, any method can be improved. The first thing D. D. Williams can do to improve the prioritizing process. Knowing that whatever process that is done the greatest impact will be on the stakeholder (“Prioritizing...
Words: 771 - Pages: 4
...Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson HRM 517 October 23, 2011 Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson This paper will critique the prioritizing process at D.D. Williamson; suggest one recommendation to improve the prioritizing process, a scenario to discuss where the implemented process at D.D. Williamson would not work, and a long term goal of five years from now speculating whether or not D.D. Williamson will be using the same process. D.D. Williamson has nine natural coloring operations on five continents since founded in 1865. With that said, it took D.D. Williamson three years; two iteration to reconcile on an approach that significantly increased the company success rate with critical projects they now call VIP (Vision Impact Projects) (.Kloppenborg, 2012 p 48) D.D. Williamson began its first approach to prioritize the company senior management team, being that it is the company major management support system. With this, the senior management teams would have a limit of two projects per senior management totaling 16 projects. According to D.D. Williamson, the company thought it was a great move ahead because the year before, the senior management teams had been challenge to monitor over 60 improvement projects (Kloppenborg, 2012, p 48). Although the company improved to well over 60 percent, there were still some problems. Some projects were not moving forward as planned and came to be a critical investment for D.D. Williamson. The company realized...
Words: 1008 - Pages: 5
...Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson A company that was founded in 1865, Douw Ditmars Williamson (D. D. Williamson) has grown from a small local company owned by a Dutch immigrant to one of the world’s leading providers of caramel and natural colorings for food and beverage products. Today, they have nine natural coloring operations on five continents (DDW, 2013). The emphasis of this case study is to review the process in which the company D.D. Williamson created in order to better prioritize their projects so that all projects could be more efficiently managed. D. D. Williamson created a list of 78 projects which needed to be prioritized, organized, and selected. The company used a four step method to rate each project: 1) Establish criteria for prioritizing projects. 2) Weigh each criterion. 3) Refine the list of projects. 4) Rate each project on each criterion and total ratings. To give team members control over ranking of the projects, each member was asked to write three different criteria on three Post-it Notes. These Post-it Notes were separated into similar item groups and each group was given a name. This technique established the important criteria for selection. The criteria chosen were used to determine how well each project would fit into the strategy of the company (Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 2012, p. 48). To give team members control over ranking of the projects, each member was asked to write three different criteria on three Post-it...
Words: 1078 - Pages: 5
...1. Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. D.D. Williamson (Williamson) is the world leader in caramel coloring and natural coloring for foods and beverages with global operations on five continents since founded in 1865. Over the years, the company has managed to be successful in many business endeavors, as well as withstanding the test of time by being in existence almost 150 years (DDW, 2013). In this time, Williamson has experienced many difficulties but yet has managed to overcome them all and their problem with prioritizing was no different. In this case study, Williamson had trouble managing projects that were successful, so they took a step back and pinpointed the cause of this issue. They found the cause to be the lack of project prioritization. There were projects of great importance being pushed to the side while meaningless project were being started. As a result of this, projects were gone over budget and there were probability many missed opportunities due to their disorganization. So they took time to devise a plan that would help them better select the projects that were more useful to the organization. The process took about three years to settle on a strategy that would bring success to their critical projects. With management being one of the essential tools needed for project management, Williamson’s first approach was where senior management worked together to select a maximum of two projects per senior sponsor by a set of criteria and resource...
Words: 1013 - Pages: 5
...Critique the prioritizing process at D.D. Williamson D.D. Williamson was founded in 1865 and has grown into a multi-billion dollar global organization. It has nine natural coloring operations in five continents. With that being said this means that nothing but quality and execution is expected out of D.D. Williamson. According to Case Study 2 “Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson”, D.D. Williamson uses Outlook to database to keep track of much of its project and daily work. Outlook is a great tool depending on the nature of the project because it enables D.D Williamson when using the tools in Outlook to break their many complex projects into manageable sub-projects, assign roles and responsibilities as well as break down the structure of the project. Using Outlook for their projects also can help them focus on highest-priority items and ensure that all of their resources are used to its fullest as well as help them develop and complete the project plan. This is only half the battle is using Outlook. Suggest at least one (1) recommendation to improve the prioritizing process. Successfully prioritizing the project required D.D. Williamson to have a method in which they would decide how many projects will be assigned and in which order of importance. According to D.D Williamson they had a hefty 78 projects. So far I would say that D.D. Williamson understands that prioritizing is key and they already knew the value in establishing criteria for prioritizing the project on the first...
Words: 748 - Pages: 3
...Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson 2014 October 20 HRM 517/ Professor Stephen Castellese Prioritizing Projects 1 Introduction Keeping any organization above water takes a few key components. These components are not limited to strategic planning, goals, budgeting, qualifications, leadership and loyalty. These components will make for a successful organization as long as they remember to prioritize. A case study has been conducted on the business of D.D. Williamson. The D.D. Williamson Company has not been one to lack success, but has lacked the ability to manage projects. Because of its lacking ability to manage projects they have missed out on opportunities and have exceeded budgets. After reading the case study we see that there has also been a clear breakdown in the communication when dealing with projects assignments. It took nearly three years before investigating and upper level management to figure out that there were no precise systems put into place for marking projects level of importance. Prioritizing is necessary and crucial to an organization for growth, planning, and success. According to Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, and McAffee (2012), D.D. Williamson would have benefited from utilizing a project management team, whom would have identified the scope of the project, cost, and taken ownership of the schedule from start to finish. Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. This company would have benefited more...
Words: 1041 - Pages: 5
...Prioritizing Process at D. D. Williamson Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the prioritizing process that D.D. Williamson created in order to better manage their projects and prevent financial loss. D.D. Williamson decided to create this process after they realized that some “critical” projects were not being completed in a timely fashion. In this paper you will also see different sceneries that D.D. Williamson’s new process may not work as well as some additional suggestions to improve their current process. Prioritizing Process of D.D. Williamson The main point of this case study was to review the process that D.D. Williamson created in order to better prioritize their projects so that all projects could be more manageable. According to our text (Kloppenborg, T., Nkomo, S. (2012). Human resource project management. (2nded.) Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning (pg 48) that the reason the first trial of the project didn’t work was because they still had to many projects and “critical” projects were not being completed and were over budget. This caused them to have to re-evaluate the current process and create yet another process. One of the ways that I would have critiqued this project would have been suggesting that everyone review a few different charter templates. They could have used one from a website like Projectmanager.com or they could have used a software like Swiftlight. I think had they used...
Words: 780 - Pages: 4
...Assignment One: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson Angel Harris Dr. Jean Gordon Human Resource Project Management April 18, 2012 Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. The prioritizing process at D.D. Williams is not that effective. One of the reasons why is that they have too many projects that requires a lot of immediate attention. How could this company complete projects on time when they have too many that are top priority? Upper management may want to consider hiring more employees so that they are not over their budget or not being able to complete the projects in a timely manner. It would be wise for them to minimize the work load or they are going to create angry employees and consumers. Also, it appears that the company is lacking in the area of been more organized. A learner should agree that being well organized is one of the best strategies to reduce stress and allows the project to run a little more smoothly. However, it appears that the company needs to spend a little more time preparing their project charter because sometimes when it is not very detailed, that could lead to important things being overlooked which may cause the company chaos in the future. Most importantly D.D. Williamson may need to focus a lot on effective leadership. A reader should agree that it takes leaders that have the capability to lead a team so that they can help the company meet and exceed their short-term and long-term...
Words: 844 - Pages: 4
...Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson Jessie Bruswick July 18, 2014 Introduction What are the key components that keep a business or company afloat? Most business owners and CEOs would suggest a business plan, budget, qualified and experienced workers, goals for the business, great leadership, and maybe even trial and error. All of these suggestions are sure contributions to the success of any business, but we must not forget prioritizing. This case study will help us to see and understand that D. D. Williamson Company made prioritizing very crucial and necessary in the building, growth, and success of the company. Many companies have all the previously mentioned attributes, but without having a since of priority, the company will soon fail. After realizing some failed projects, D.D. Williamson began taking a closer look at what was really important. Prioritizing allows companies like D.D. Williamson, the opportunity to step back and see what’s important, very important, and least important. With that knowledge, the company can take its best managers or leaders and put them on projects that require more attention, skill, and knowledge, while other sub-projects can be seen after by others with not as much experience. Literature Review Critique the prioritizing process The process previously used by D. D. Williamson Company in 2004, caused a weakness that was two-fold. The company had too many projects that were considered as high importance and the projects...
Words: 1007 - Pages: 5
...qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer...
Words: 984 - Pages: 4
...Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson HRM 517 – Managing Human Resource projects Strayer University June 21, 2013 What was the Prioritization Issue at D.D. Williamson? In the case study of D.D. Williamson, it appeared the organization was successful in many ventures, but lacked the ability to manage certain projects. In fact, critical projects that required attention were left to the waste side, and as a result lead to missed opportunities, or resulted in going over the allocated budget. Within the organization of D.D. Williamson, there appeared to have been a breakdown in communication, which blinded the organization in determining projects that needed the most attention. Through the process of the organization’s investigation, which took approximately three years, leaders realized the they had no accurate system in place for marking the level of importance in each of their projects. In researching the writings of Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, and McAffee (2012), D.D. Williamson would have benefited from utilizing a project management team, whom would have identified the scope of the project, cost, and taken ownership of the schedule from start to finish. D.D. Williamson would have benefited from having developed a well-rounded project team, or several teams could have managed each project independently. Furthermore, each team could have managed the project based on the urgency of each project, the cost, and the practical details concerning...
Words: 1197 - Pages: 5
...Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson Crystal D. Dr. Donny Bagwell Managing Human Resources Projects: HRM 517 October 27, 2013 Introduction D.D. Williamson implemented a new process for project prioritization that included focusing on the vision and impact of projects and narrowing down projects by selecting the ones of high importance and assigning them to senior management teams. I will attempt to critique that process, recommend an improvement for the process, provide a scenario of why the process could possibly not be successful, and project if the process will still be successful in five years. Critiquing D.D. Williamson Project Prioritization The prioritization process at D. D. Williamson is a great improvement opposed to the previous prioritization process that was implemented. I believe that D.D. Williamson was able to finally overcome challenges after years of not having a successful process in place. Cutting down the amount of projects from 60 to 16 was a smart plan that in return helped D.D. Williamson not to go over budget, increase the success rate to over 60 percent of projects finishing close to the expected completion date, and earn better results. This process also helped to move forward the most critical projects of high importance. Simplifying the criteria ratings also helped to narrow down projects and prioritize them. By selecting a new criteria rating and focusing on the Vision Impact Projects (VIPs), it made...
Words: 809 - Pages: 4
...Working papers are distributed in draft form for purposes of comment and discussion. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holders. Copies are available from the authors. Innovation through Global Collaboration: A New Source of Competitive Advantage Date: August 14th 2007 Alan MacCormack* Harvard Business School, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163 Theodore Forbath, Peter Brooks, Patrick Kalaher Wipro Technologies 75 Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110 * Corresponding Author Abstract Many recent studies highlight the need to rethink the way we manage innovation. Traditional approaches, based on the assumption that the creation and pursuit of new ideas is best accomplished by a centralized and collocated R&D team, are rapidly becoming outdated. Instead, innovations are increasingly brought to the market by networks of firms, selected for their unique capabilities, and operating in a coordinated manner. This new model demands that firms develop different skills, in particular, the ability to collaborate with partners to achieve superior innovation performance. Yet despite this need, there is little guidance on how to develop or deploy this ability. This article describes the results of a study to understand the strategies and practices used by firms that achieve greater success in...
Words: 6275 - Pages: 26
...2005/ED/EFA/MRT/PI/9 Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2005 The Quality Imperative The importance of mother tongue-based schooling for educational quality Carole Benson 2004 This paper was commissioned by the Education for All Global Monitoring Report as background information to assist in drafting the 2005 report. It has not been edited by the team. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and should not be attributed to the EFA Global Monitoring Report or to UNESCO. The papers can be cited with the following reference: “Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005, The Quality Imperative”. For further information, please contact efareport@unesco.org The importance of mother tongue-based schooling for educational quality Commissioned study for EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005 Carol Benson, Ph.D. Centre for Research on Bilingualism Stockholm University 14 April 2004 Part A: Overview While there are many factors involved in delivering quality basic education, language is clearly the key to communication and understanding in the classroom. Many developing countries are characterized by individual as well as societal multilingualism, yet continue to allow a single foreign language to dominate the education sector. Instruction through a language that learners do not speak has been called “submersion” (Skutnabb-Kangas 2000) because it is analogous to...
Words: 10095 - Pages: 41
...revised form 19 March 2009 Accepted 25 March 2009 Keywords: Supplier involvement New product development Supplier relationships abstract This paper provides a comprehensive and critical review and synthesis of the current state of empirical research into supplier involvement in new product development (NPD). The paper begins by defining supplier involvement in NPD and evaluating the rationale for supplier involvement in NPD. This suggests that early and extensive supplier involvement in NPD projects has the potential to improve NPD effectiveness and efficiency, however, existing research remains fragmented and empirical findings to date show conflicting results. The paper takes stock of the research on supplier involvement in NPD, tracing the origins of the literature to the late 1980s, and evaluating the development of the field up to the present day. From this broad base of empirical research the analysis identifies a set of factors affecting the success of supplier involvement projects. The paper concludes with a discussion of two emerging themes: (1) supplier relationship development and adaptation; (2) supply network involvement in product innovation. & 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction As more and more companies are outsourcing parts of their new product development (NPD) activities to...
Words: 8850 - Pages: 36
