...Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson HRM 517 – Managing Human Resource projects Strayer University June 21, 2013 What was the Prioritization Issue at D.D. Williamson? In the case study of D.D. Williamson, it appeared the organization was successful in many ventures, but lacked the ability to manage certain projects. In fact, critical projects that required attention were left to the waste side, and as a result lead to missed opportunities, or resulted in going over the allocated budget. Within the organization of D.D. Williamson, there appeared to have been a breakdown in communication, which blinded the organization in determining projects that needed the most attention. Through the process of the organization’s investigation, which took approximately three years, leaders realized the they had no accurate system in place for marking the level of importance in each of their projects. In researching the writings of Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, and McAffee (2012), D.D. Williamson would have benefited from utilizing a project management team, whom would have identified the scope of the project, cost, and taken ownership of the schedule from start to finish. D.D. Williamson would have benefited from having developed a well-rounded project team, or several teams could have managed each project independently. Furthermore, each team could have managed the project based on the urgency of each project, the cost, and the practical details concerning...
Words: 1197 - Pages: 5
...Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson 2014 October 20 HRM 517/ Professor Stephen Castellese Prioritizing Projects 1 Introduction Keeping any organization above water takes a few key components. These components are not limited to strategic planning, goals, budgeting, qualifications, leadership and loyalty. These components will make for a successful organization as long as they remember to prioritize. A case study has been conducted on the business of D.D. Williamson. The D.D. Williamson Company has not been one to lack success, but has lacked the ability to manage projects. Because of its lacking ability to manage projects they have missed out on opportunities and have exceeded budgets. After reading the case study we see that there has also been a clear breakdown in the communication when dealing with projects assignments. It took nearly three years before investigating and upper level management to figure out that there were no precise systems put into place for marking projects level of importance. Prioritizing is necessary and crucial to an organization for growth, planning, and success. According to Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, and McAffee (2012), D.D. Williamson would have benefited from utilizing a project management team, whom would have identified the scope of the project, cost, and taken ownership of the schedule from start to finish. Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. This company would have benefited more...
Words: 1041 - Pages: 5
...Critique the prioritizing process at D.D. Williamson D.D. Williamson was founded in 1865 and has grown into a multi-billion dollar global organization. It has nine natural coloring operations in five continents. With that being said this means that nothing but quality and execution is expected out of D.D. Williamson. According to Case Study 2 “Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson”, D.D. Williamson uses Outlook to database to keep track of much of its project and daily work. Outlook is a great tool depending on the nature of the project because it enables D.D Williamson when using the tools in Outlook to break their many complex projects into manageable sub-projects, assign roles and responsibilities as well as break down the structure of the project. Using Outlook for their projects also can help them focus on highest-priority items and ensure that all of their resources are used to its fullest as well as help them develop and complete the project plan. This is only half the battle is using Outlook. Suggest at least one (1) recommendation to improve the prioritizing process. Successfully prioritizing the project required D.D. Williamson to have a method in which they would decide how many projects will be assigned and in which order of importance. According to D.D Williamson they had a hefty 78 projects. So far I would say that D.D. Williamson understands that prioritizing is key and they already knew the value in establishing criteria for prioritizing the project on the first...
Words: 748 - Pages: 3
...Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson Jessie Bruswick July 18, 2014 Introduction What are the key components that keep a business or company afloat? Most business owners and CEOs would suggest a business plan, budget, qualified and experienced workers, goals for the business, great leadership, and maybe even trial and error. All of these suggestions are sure contributions to the success of any business, but we must not forget prioritizing. This case study will help us to see and understand that D. D. Williamson Company made prioritizing very crucial and necessary in the building, growth, and success of the company. Many companies have all the previously mentioned attributes, but without having a since of priority, the company will soon fail. After realizing some failed projects, D.D. Williamson began taking a closer look at what was really important. Prioritizing allows companies like D.D. Williamson, the opportunity to step back and see what’s important, very important, and least important. With that knowledge, the company can take its best managers or leaders and put them on projects that require more attention, skill, and knowledge, while other sub-projects can be seen after by others with not as much experience. Literature Review Critique the prioritizing process The process previously used by D. D. Williamson Company in 2004, caused a weakness that was two-fold. The company had too many projects that were considered as high importance and the projects...
Words: 1007 - Pages: 5
...Assignment One: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson Angel Harris Dr. Jean Gordon Human Resource Project Management April 18, 2012 Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. The prioritizing process at D.D. Williams is not that effective. One of the reasons why is that they have too many projects that requires a lot of immediate attention. How could this company complete projects on time when they have too many that are top priority? Upper management may want to consider hiring more employees so that they are not over their budget or not being able to complete the projects in a timely manner. It would be wise for them to minimize the work load or they are going to create angry employees and consumers. Also, it appears that the company is lacking in the area of been more organized. A learner should agree that being well organized is one of the best strategies to reduce stress and allows the project to run a little more smoothly. However, it appears that the company needs to spend a little more time preparing their project charter because sometimes when it is not very detailed, that could lead to important things being overlooked which may cause the company chaos in the future. Most importantly D.D. Williamson may need to focus a lot on effective leadership. A reader should agree that it takes leaders that have the capability to lead a team so that they can help the company meet and exceed their short-term and long-term...
Words: 844 - Pages: 4
...1. Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. D.D. Williamson (Williamson) is the world leader in caramel coloring and natural coloring for foods and beverages with global operations on five continents since founded in 1865. Over the years, the company has managed to be successful in many business endeavors, as well as withstanding the test of time by being in existence almost 150 years (DDW, 2013). In this time, Williamson has experienced many difficulties but yet has managed to overcome them all and their problem with prioritizing was no different. In this case study, Williamson had trouble managing projects that were successful, so they took a step back and pinpointed the cause of this issue. They found the cause to be the lack of project prioritization. There were projects of great importance being pushed to the side while meaningless project were being started. As a result of this, projects were gone over budget and there were probability many missed opportunities due to their disorganization. So they took time to devise a plan that would help them better select the projects that were more useful to the organization. The process took about three years to settle on a strategy that would bring success to their critical projects. With management being one of the essential tools needed for project management, Williamson’s first approach was where senior management worked together to select a maximum of two projects per senior sponsor by a set of criteria and resource...
Words: 1013 - Pages: 5
...Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson A company that was founded in 1865, Douw Ditmars Williamson (D. D. Williamson) has grown from a small local company owned by a Dutch immigrant to one of the world’s leading providers of caramel and natural colorings for food and beverage products. Today, they have nine natural coloring operations on five continents (DDW, 2013). The emphasis of this case study is to review the process in which the company D.D. Williamson created in order to better prioritize their projects so that all projects could be more efficiently managed. D. D. Williamson created a list of 78 projects which needed to be prioritized, organized, and selected. The company used a four step method to rate each project: 1) Establish criteria for prioritizing projects. 2) Weigh each criterion. 3) Refine the list of projects. 4) Rate each project on each criterion and total ratings. To give team members control over ranking of the projects, each member was asked to write three different criteria on three Post-it Notes. These Post-it Notes were separated into similar item groups and each group was given a name. This technique established the important criteria for selection. The criteria chosen were used to determine how well each project would fit into the strategy of the company (Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 2012, p. 48). To give team members control over ranking of the projects, each member was asked to write three different criteria on three Post-it...
Words: 1078 - Pages: 5
