The writer believes the life of a child should not be terminated solely based on a mother experiencing an unwanted pregnancy. The second pro-choice argument is the idea that personhood is different from human life. Many pro-choice advocates distinguish between human life and personhood, and they believe that this distinction is important in the context of reproductive rights. Pro-choice advocates agree that a fetus is biologically human, as it has human DNA and is the offspring of a human parent. However, many pro-choice advocates argue that being biologically human is not the same as being a person, according to Planned Parenthood.org. I believe that since a fetus possesses human DNA, it should be classified as a human being. As we recognize individuals outside the room of human beings based on their DNA, we should give the same recognition to a fetus inside the womb. The third pro-choice …show more content…
As a good mother, there is an inherent instinct to nurture and protect life. Abortion, in essence, contradicts what many women naturally yearn for. Because of these ongoing debates, the argument was taken to court in December 1971.The Roe V. Wade case was brought to Texas, a state where abortion was banned and deemed constitutional. It revolved around a woman named Jane Roe who filed a lawsuit against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas, TX. Roe challenged Texas law that made abortion illegal except when a Dr deemed it necessary to save a woman's life.The court ruled in favor of Roe stating that the law was unconstitutional but because of disagreements they re argued in October 1972. They again couldn't come to an agreement, so they appealed and were led to the Supreme Court. I believe that topics of abortion should be debated as it can lead to a more balanced perspective on the topic.Is it essential for these matters to be taken to court when the life of a child is in