Premium Essay

Protect the American Constitution

In:

Submitted By jjwelch1
Words 999
Pages 4
Protection of the American Constitution

In the summer of 2009, Al Rozzi during a protest of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, burned a flag among a group of protesters. Rozzi was arrested for desecrating the American flag. Flag desecration is the act of intentionally destroying, damaging, or mutilating a flag. It’s usually done in the public and usually the destruction is caused to a national flag. Rozzi’s flag destruction is a form of protest which is considered a right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment of the American Constitution.
The controversy of flag desecration started with the case, United States Supreme Court in Texas v. Gregory Lee Johnson in 1989, when Johnson drenched an American flag in kerosene and burned it in front of the convention building while protesting the polices of Ronald Reagan. Other protesters followed Johnson with chanting “America; red, white and blue; we spit on you.” Johnson was arrested and convicted under a Texas law for intentionally desecrating a state or national flag. He was fined $2,000 and sentenced to one year in jail. He appealed the Supreme Court decision and Texas argued that they had a right to protect the flag as a symbol of national unity. Johnson argued that his freedom to express himself protected his actions. Luckily, the Court sided with Johnson’s argument for expressing freedom of speech.
The United States Supreme Court in Texas v. Johnson case generated years of debate over the meaning of the flag, including efforts to amend the Constitution to allow for a prohibition of the “physical desecration” of the flag. Because of this controversial case, Congress rushed to create the Flag Protection Act of 1990, which enforced a federal ban on flag desecration. This act was later struck down in the United States v. Eichman case. Congress has made four attempts since 1995 to pass a Constitutional

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Changing Our Constitution to Protect the American Flag

...137 December 3, 2014 Changing Our Constitution to Protect the America Flag America is known for being the land of the free and the home of the brave. Numerous of Americans have lost their lives trying to keep our rights the same for years to come. It is my belief that the flag should not be protected under a constitutional amendment as it could take away your freedom of speech, as the flag is only a symbolic representation of America and making a big change in the constitutional amendments may not be accepted by many Americans. We are protected by constitution, and the First Amendment States “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances”(The Bill of Rights, the U.S. Constitution). To me that states that as long as you express your feelings toward the flag or any other symbolic protest is done in a peaceful manner, under the constitution you have the right to do so. As we are currently seeing right now around the county with the multiple protest that our nation are demonstrating daily against the decision of the Ferguson police officer, many have been peaceful and in order, on the other hand many have been completely out of line and for that arrest have been made for breaking the law of the constitution . If the constitution is change to take away the right...

Words: 933 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Essay On The Declaration Of Independence

...The Constitution of the United States upholds the ideals of the American Revolution. The Constitution secures the rights of men, prevents a monarchy, and gives the people the right to modify or eliminate government and establish a new government. The American Revolution was about removing Great Britain’s control of the colonies. The Declaration of Independence is the result of the America Revolution and the purpose was to establish that the American colonies were no longer under the control of Great Britain and instruct on how to form a government. The Constitution was the laws in which the United States of America would function as a nation and how to form their government. The Declaration of Independence is a passionate document that details the rights of men and how Great Britain had violated those rights. Hancock...

Words: 940 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Anti-Federalists Against The Constitution

...years of the United States, one may analyze why Anti-Federalists were against the Constitution because the Constitution is the most important document of the United States. It was quite simple; there wasn’t a bill of rights drafted in the original copy. Without a bill of rights, the people would never be aware of their unalienable rights and the power and roles of their government. Patrick Henry said, “The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them,” at the Convention of Virginia in June 1788. He was trying to convey a message that showed the importance of citizens having their rights listed, so the government would never be able...

Words: 1709 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Articles Of Confederation Strengths And Weaknesses

...Article of Confederation The Articles of Confederation was known for the first written constitution of the United States. The plan of government created by the Articles of Confederation had strengths and weaknesses. It shows to have more weaknesses than strength. The weaknesses of the Article of Confederation included the fact that every state was in a position to follow any laws that were desired. The Articles of Confederation did little to promote colonial unity; therefore, it shows to have some weakness, strength and also the support of the anti-federalists and federalist debate. The Articles of Confederation shows to have more weakness than strength. The most common weakness in the Article of Confederation was the lack of power that was given to the Continental Congress strangled the federal government. The Articles of Confederation gave Congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. If the state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it. The Article of Confederation had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade....

Words: 680 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Bill of Rights and Amendments

...September 17th, 1789 The United States Constitution was ratified and made law. The founders of United States Constitution had the foresight to give the constitution a way to grow and adapt with America’s needs, by including an amendment process to change or add to the rights of Americans. The amendment process has allowed America to continue growth and prosperity throughout the years and become one of the most powerful nations in the world. The amendment process will be covered in this paper along with the. The author of this paper will also look at later amendments to the constitution with an emphasis on amendments 13, 14 and 15 and the effects they had on America culture and society. The Purpose of Amendments The constitution was created with an amendment process in Article V to allow the document to adapt to changes in American society. According to article V of the Constitution an amendment can be passed by either a two-thirds vote in the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a convention where two-thirds of the legislatures meet over an amendment. After the Amendment is approved in the convention process it must then be ratified by 75% of the state legislatures (UMKC School of Law, 2013). Without the Amendment process the United States would have been bound by the same rules that applied back in the late 1700’s. The Amendment process has made it possible for the Constitution to change rather than being overhauled the Constitution can be tuned to adhere to current times...

Words: 1356 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Habeas Corpus and Civil Liberties

...liberties that Americans have always enjoyed. There are people all over the world that do not enjoy those rights that were cherished by the Framers of the United States Constitution. Some even say there are people under the jurisdiction of the United States that do not enjoy those rights. The War on Terror has brought a new debate to the forefront of American public discussion; what do we do with detained terrorists? Can the United States prove that they are terrorists? Are detainees afforded the same rights as American citizens and what role does the writ of habeas corpus play? The Supreme Court has decided on a few cases and has answered a few questions, but the debate still rages. Under the precedent set by Ex Parte Quirin and the Military Commissions Act of 2006, combatants captured in the War on Terror are unlawful combatants against the United States and therefore do not have the right of habeas corpus. To begin the argument on how habeas corpus and civil liberties relates to the War on Terror, we must first look at the history and the meaning of habeas corpus. Very simply defined, many people view the writ of habeas corpus, “as the ‘writ of liberty’ which ensured that no person could be detained in prison without being put to trial by a jury of his peers,” (Lobban & Paul, 2010, p.257). This simply means that a person had the right to defend their personal liberty by appearing in front of a judge to make sure that they were not being held unjustly. This protects people...

Words: 3003 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights

...The Constitution and the Bill of Rights The freedom documents from early America were the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The U.S. Constitution was documented and presented in 1787 and finally ratified by all states, except Rhode Island, and put into effect as a suitable replacement of the Articles of Confederation in the year 1788. Since then, it has played a significant role in ensuring the security and integrity of the United States of America. It has been accepted as the highest law of the land that determines the enforcement of all other laws by the federal government. The constitution is important for a great number of reasons. Primarily because it was the document that founded our government, and it was the basis of what would form the United States. The constitution is important because it outlines all of our rights as citizens. It gives a complete list of all the things that we can do, and the rights that we have. The constitution, and its amendments protects us, protects us from each other, protects us from our own government, protects us from wrongful prosecution, incriminating ourselves, our right to speech, our right to bear arms, and our right to freedom of religion. The constitution isn't just important; I believe it is the most important document ever crafted in American History, and the one document that affects every single citizen within the United States every single day. It is the foundation of our country. It provides a single legal basis for all...

Words: 918 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

...contradictory terrain throughout American history—and nowhere is the contestation more prevalent than in the formation of the Constitution in the late 18th century. During the Revolutionary period, both common and elite Americans alike sought to define the ideals of liberty that would be incorporated into the new nation. But the realization of these ideals of equality in politics and universal rights necessitated the formation of a centralized Republican government in order to become a practical reality, thereby ensuring the success of the nation by implementing basis of lasting, effective systems of maintaining political order. In doing so, the constitution realizes revolutionary aspirations for independent government that guarantees the rights and common good of its citizens. The ratification of the US Constitution and Bill of Rights ensured that the ideals of independence, accurate representation in politics via a republican system, and the protection of natural liberties birthed during the Revolution could survive practically within the new nation. The ratification of the Constitution was critical for the success of the nation, thus realizing the revolutionary dream of...

Words: 1352 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Constitutional Democracy Essay

...individual? Amendment 1 “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The Bill of Rights states the most fundamental rights of a citizen in the United States. The First Amendment, however, is the most basic, so simple and obvious, it’s a wonder it has to be stated in the first place. It’s essentially granting freedom of speech (excluding slander and libel), press, religion, assembly, and petition. I think that the Constitution, more specifically the Bill of Rights, more than adequately protects individuals’ rights. Even if they hadn’t stated all human rights, they put in place the Tenth Amendment, whose duty was to protect freedoms that were not listed specifically in the Bills of Rights, and it is a mistake to believe that the size or extent of government has anything to do with how harsh it is. The size and extent of government activity, by itself, tells us nothing about how free or dismal a society is. The necessary trade-off between government size and citizen’s freedom doesn’t matter, and the reason is because many of the most common activities of the modern government are not naturally forceful or brutal at all, so it is simply mistaken to automatically associate more government with less...

Words: 1453 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

...Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror POL 201: American National Government April 17, 2013 Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda. Habeas Corpus in Latin, means, “You have the body.” According to our text habeas corpus means, “a demand by a court to a jailer to produce the prisoner and announce the charges” (Waldman-Levin, 2012, 5.7). In my opinion for most Americans, habeas corpus protects a prisoner and it also allows a prisoner to indicate that his/her constitution guarantees rights to a fair trial. “From a political point of view, the great value of habeas corpus is that it protects citizens from a dangerous tendency which is generally found...

Words: 1443 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Second Amendment Pros And Cons

...The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution or as most people call it the Second Amendment, has been a point of dispute throughout the American history. Despite all the controversy, the Second Amendment is still defended by a lot of American citizens and politicians. We, as European citizens, ask ourselves why. Therefore it’s time to really get to know the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. When the Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, federalists claimed the new government would only have limited powers. For the critics of the new government, known as the anti-federalists, this wasn’t enough. What they addressed was the fact that the original constitution lacked something to protect the liberties of each individual. One of the things they pleaded for was the right to keep and bear arms....

Words: 1069 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Patriot Act

... Following the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the President and Congress saw fit to protect the United States by passing a bill called the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act significantly expanded the powers of law enforcement by allowing law enforcement and intelligence agencies to use types of electronic surveillance that were previously only allowed with legal warrants (Ibid, 2001). Additionally, the Patriot Act allows government agencies to detain suspected terrorists for unspecified lengths of time in order to investigate their activities (Ibid, 2001). The detainment of terrorist suspects does not allow these individuals access to an attorney, a trial, or any other guarantee promised in the Constitution. The United States legal and judicial systems utilize a network of checks and balances to ensure that the rights of citizens, as enumerated by the United States Constitution, are not violated. These systems call for crime investigation to require a warrant issued by the judicial branch in order to execute any search or seizure of personal property, as declared by the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution (Madison, 1789). The framers of the United States started the Constitution with a Bill of Rights that set our inalienable rights. These rights are not allowed to be violated and the legal system is designed to protect these rights, even if suspected of a crime. If the police want to investigate, interrogate, or search for evidence of...

Words: 2363 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Framing of the Constitution of the Untited States

...How the Framing of the Constitution Shaped Work in America The Constitution of the United States of America is the overall supreme law for the US Government. The constitution was adopted on September 17th, 1787 by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia Pennsylvania and is considered the framework for our government and its relationship between the states and its people (Wikipedia). The Constitution is called the “Sheet Anchor” or “Lighthouse” and ensures Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness and also serves to protect property rights as well (Beard C. A., The Living Constitution, 1936). With that being said, how did the framing of this document shape the working life in America? Working life in America was shaped by the framing of this document by shifting how work is defined in the colonies based upon need the need for workers to establish more rights and further independence. Since the Constitution was framed and certain amendments were added there have been many disagreements to the actual meaning of the document. There was a widespread perception in the 20th century that the Constitution was framed to represent American Society. That our Founding Fathers acted out of idealism and the laws were established with the best interest of the colonies in mind. It wasn’t until 1913 when Economist, Charles Beard proposed a different scenario. Beard suggested that the Constitution was and economic document that was established for the reorganization of the claim of...

Words: 929 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Civil Rights or National Security

...between civil rights and national security? On October 26, 2001, President George W. Bush signed into law the Patriot Act with an overwhelming majority from Congress. The law was intended, in Bush’s words, to “enhance the penalties that will fall on terrorists or anyone who helps them.”  ("George W. Bush Signs The Patriot Act", n.d. http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/george-w-bush-signs-the-patriot-act). The bill broadly expanded law enforcements ability to investigate and perform surveillance and altered more than 15 different statues that had been in place since the early 1970’s. This law was enacted in great haste and does not provide a check and balances approach to safeguard the American citizens’ civil liberties. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects the right of the people to be secure in their own persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizure. This includes law enforcement...

Words: 1375 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Implications of Legalizing the Illegal

...Colorado and Washington passed a law that would legalize marijuana in their respected states. Though they are the first to completely legalize the substance, other states, like California, have passed similar laws allowing for medicinal use. Despite the fact that these laws were passed by the voters of Colorado and Washington, the use, possession and distribution of marijuana is punishable by federal law. By allowing the law to go into affect, both states have changed the course of political and popular culture and violated principle concepts of the constitution and federalism. The legalization of Marijuana has also brought forth tensions that question American politics, the constitution and federalism. American political and popular culture has been defined by major events and influences in American history dating back to the 16th century. The influences of the Puritans, Thomas Pain, and John Locke are all deeply rooted within American politics. As a consequence of these impacts, tensions rose within political culture. The Puritans greatly believed in a sense of community, and therefore created a local self-government. However, both Locke and Paine viewed natural and individual rights were sacred, and not the community. In fact, Paine believed that the national government should be limited from individuality, and should solely represent popular opinion. These two opposite beliefs created a strain that not only influenced political culture, but the founding of the Unites States...

Words: 783 - Pages: 4