Free Essay

Reconstruction: a Success Only After the Fact

In:

Submitted By reesegil68
Words 1493
Pages 6
Reconstruction: A Success Only After the Fact
Teresa Gil

Reconstruction, the act of putting the country back together after the divisive and bloody Civil War, is the era from the end of the Civil War until 1877. Because so much was at stake and there were so many variations about how Reconstruction should be accomplished, this was a period of enormous conflict. In the South, the primary battle was between the Planters who dominated the South economically, politically, and socially, and former slaves, who wanted legal and political equality and the ability to own land. In the federal government, the Republican Party was dominant, and the most outspoken group within the Republican Party was known as the Radical Republicans. They were the northerners who were most bitter toward the planters and the most dedicated to winning equality for former slaves. In 1865, the Radicals nevertheless came to dominate Congress with their calls for significant political and legal change in the South.
One of the central conflicts within the government concerned President Johnson’s unwavering conviction that his methods were the only methods and his refusal to change any of his laws. He tried to take charge of Reconstruction, offering a plan by which the southern states would write new constitutions and re-enter the Union without having to allow political rights to the freedmen. When Johnson’s plan was put into effect, many northerners were disgusted by the results. Former Confederate leaders were elected to high positions, and Black Codes were drawn up by the new states that severely restricted the freedom of the former slaves and seemed, in some ways, to continue slavery. Congress refused to accept the new governments, and after the refusal of Johnson to modify his “state governments”, Republicans refused to seat those elected under Johnson’s plan. Johnson’s refusal effectively united all Republicans.
When it convened in 1867, Congress was determined to create a new Reconstruction Act. Their act centered on the fact that lawful governments did not exist in the south and that they should govern the area until acceptable replacements were chosen. This act divided the south into five districts and outlined how new governments would, based on suffrage, be established. This new Reconstruction Act, over President Johnson’s veto, was passed into law. Once a state’s constitution was accepted by the state’s voters and by Congress, and once the state ratified the 14th Amendment, which stated that anyone born in the U.S. was a citizen of the United States, and that all citizens were entitled to equal protection of the laws, then that state could become a functioning part of the Union. By June of 1868, all but three states had completed this process. The 14th Amendment was ratified in July.
Vehemently opposed to the Reconstruction Acts and to Congress calling the shots on Reconstruction, President Johnson attempted to thwart the plan in any way he could. As a result, he was impeached by the House of Representatives in the spring of 1868, and tried before the Senate. He avoided conviction and removal from office, by one vote, but he more or less promised to sit out the rest of his term. In November 1868 Ulysses S. Grant, a Republican and the great northern hero of the Civil War, was elected president. But the election was closer than expected, and Grant would not have won without the votes of former slaves. To protect these votes in the future, Congress approved the 15th Amendment, which was ratified by the states and became part of the Constitution in 1870. Under the terms of this amendment, no one could be denied the right to vote because of race.
The Plan of Reconstruction created by Congress dramatically changed politics in the South. More than 700,000 black voters were enfranchised, and about 15% of white voters were disqualified. As a result, Republican governments came to power in each southern state. The new state constitutions brought revolutionary change to the South. They were established on the principle that all men are created equal, and for the first time blacks were to be treated as equals before the law. The constitutions also provided social services, hospitals and orphanages, and put money into railroad expansion. Most importantly, for the first time in the South, these constitutions established free statewide public school systems, open to blacks as well as whites.
Excruciatingly hard for the former slaves to swallow was the fact that there was no redistribution of land. That continued to remain overwhelmingly in white hands. Some Radicals had favored dividing up planters’ land to give to the freedmen, but the government was not willing to go this far, fearing that such action would distance northern and southern property owners, and undermine the drive for equal rights. As a result, former slaves who didn’t own land had to work for those who did.
Planters despised the new constitutions and governments created under the congressional plan. They resented having to pay the high taxes that the new schools, social services, and railroad-building programs required. They were also appalled by the idea of educating African Americans. Above all, planters were horrified by the prospect of black political participation. They saw the former slaves as ignorant, incapable, and inferior, and could not conceive of them voting responsibly, much less holding office.
Outraged by such developments, the planters launched a counterattack against Reconstruction. In part, this attack was verbal, carried out in speeches and newspapers. Planters made two main charges against Reconstruction. First, they claimed that Reconstruction had brought black control to the South, that whites had been forced under the control of uneducated, irresponsible people. Second, they claimed that Reconstruction governments were corrupt, that Republicans sought office solely to enrich themselves at taxpayer expense.
It is true that there was some corruption during Reconstruction, but this was a very corrupt period in history. Corruption was not confined to Republican governments in the South, nor did it end with Reconstruction. Like the charge of black domination, this was an exaggeration, designed to convince supporters of Reconstruction to abandon it and allow the planters to reassume power.
Willing to go beyond verbal welfare, they employed violence as well. Almost from the beginning of its existence, the Ku Klux Klan, founded 1866, was a terrorist organization, willing to go to any length to prevent Republicans from voting and to put conservative Democrats back in control. The activities of the Klan, as well as others, grew so bold by 1870 that the federal government passed a series of Enforcement Acts which outlawed Klan activities and gave the president power to declare martial law in portions of the South where local authorities couldn’t or wouldn’t control the Klan. This government intervention worked and the Klan was temporarily crippled, showing that the government could protect Reconstruction in the South if it was willing to use force. Trouble was, the government became less willing to use such force as time went on.
At the same time that political conflict raged in the South, economic conflict between the planters and former slaves simmered as well. The planters owned land but needed labor, and the former slaves possessed the ability to labor but needed land. A compromise evolved, sharecropping, in which former slaves worked sections of a planter’s land, and paid planters a share of the crop at the end of the year. This arrangement was not so bad at first, but ultimately, it turned into an economic nightmare for the South. It also helped preserve the economic and political power of the landowning elite.
As other problems, westward expansion, Indian wars, economic change, and a major depression which began in 1873, beset the nation, most Americans were beginning to tire of Reconstruction. Many northern whites felt that the nation had done enough for the former slaves, that they should now be able to fend for themselves. After another wave of anti-black terrorism swept the South in 1875 and 1876, President Grant did not feel that it was politically possible for the federal government to intervene. One by one, Republican governments in the South fell to Democrats, calling themselves Redeemers, who were willing to use fraud and violence to seize power.
By the fall of 1876, only three Southern states maintained Republican governments. As a result of the disputed Presidential election of that year, President Hayes pulled federal troops from these states and allowed the Redeemers to take control. The entire South was now under the sway of conservative, white-supremacist Democrats, and Reconstruction was ended. The real losers in the collapse of Reconstruction were the freedmen.
Therefore, although three very important pieces of legislation were born in Reconstruction, the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the constitution, giving former slaves rights they had never known, most of what was accomplished was then stripped away for a long time to come.

References
Foner, E. Forever Free: The Story of Emancipation and Reconstruction (2006), Random House
Publishing

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

His 125 Week 1 Paper

...Reconstruction And The New South Sandra Michelli HIS 125 June 23, 2013 Paul Sunderman Reconstruction and The New South 1. Columbian historian Eric Foner (1983) quotes W. E. B. DuBois in calling Reconstruction a “splendid failure (p. 16).” After studying the events of the late 19th century, defend whether or not you agree with his position. What are the long-term implication? “A Splendid Failure”, a statement made by the African American Historian. W.E.B. Du Bois has been used to describe what some see as the best way to describe the results of the Reconstruction Era. So the question one has to ask is if this remark is actually true. Was Reconstruction a 100% failure or where there some success that came out of this time period in American History? I would say that it was neither, that in fact there were some success and there were some failures. The best way to describe my point is to use what the Military calls and After Action Report and see what these success and failures were. In looking at success of the Radical Reconstruction period the first one that stands out is in fact some say the reason the United States split and ended up in the bloody Civil War. That being the fact that Slavery was abolished. It was now once and for all illegal for a person to own another person as property. Schools for blacks were being created that had not existed before. Schools such as Salem University which was founded in Mississippi in 1872 would not have existed had access...

Words: 1019 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

How Promising Was the Period of Reconstruction to African Americans

...promising was the period of reconstruction for African Americans? (50 marks) After the end of the civil war in 1865 and the abolition of slavery, a period of reconstruction followed where by the government hoped to seize control of the south and rebuild America. Some historians argue this was a promising period for the newly freed slaves where as others would argue it was a crisis and thus a negative period for the African Americans. When looking at reconstruction one must consider the economic, legal, social and political impacts it had on the African Americans. One argument that suggests that reconstruction was promising for the African Americans was the passing of the 14th amendment. This stated that all persons born or naturalized in America were citizens. Not only did this overturn the black codes but also meant that states could not limit the right of citizenship for African Americans, resulting in them having the full protection of the law. Moreover the passing of this law secured the rights for black children (from two freed slaves) as well as securing the rights for black Americans in the future. Therefore providing strong evidence to why reconstruction was promising for AA’s. Furthermore, the 15th amendment was also passed during the period of reconstructions which intended to secure the voting rights for AA’s. As a result of this 700,000 AA’s registered to vote, not only was this a success for AA’s, some historians argue that it was also a big success for the republican...

Words: 878 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Compare And Contrast The Successes And Successes Of Reconstruction

...On April 9, 1865, the Civil War officially ended with both the North and South in debt, and with most of the South in ruins. The condition of the South was in a poorer condition than the North, attributable to the fact that the South was agrarian-base, most battles took place on their soil, and the North used total war in order to completely destroy the South. As a result of the post-Civil War condition of the United States, the Reconstruction became necessary to patch the country up and reunite the nation as one again. However, because of the death of Abraham Lincoln, the Reconstruction had only few successes with considerable failures. In the Reconstruction, there were only a few parts and aspects that were successful. For one, the Reconstruction...

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Reconstruction

...The essay below was a very strong essay answering the question about Reconstruction. It was an actual essay (word for word) written by one of the students in class. It received 28.5 points out of 30. This was a great essay; about the only comment I would write was that the thesis in the introduction could have been a little more direct: As a country, America has gone though many political changes throughout her lifetime. Leaders have come and gone, all of them having different objectives and plans for the future. As history takes its course, though, most all of these “revolutionary movements” come to an end. One such movement was Reconstruction. Reconstruction was a time period in America consisting of many leaders, goals and accomplishments. Though, like all things in life, it did come to an end, the resulting outcome has been labeled both a success and a failure. When Reconstruction began in 1865, a broken America had just finished fighting the Civil War. In all respects, Reconstruction was mainly just that. It was a time period of “putting back the pieces”, as people say. It was the point where America attempted to become a full running country once more. This, though, was not an easy task. The memory of massive death was still in the front of everyone’s mind, hardening into resentment and sometimes even hatred. The south was virtually non-existent politically or economically, and searching desperately for a way back in. Along with these things, now living...

Words: 1268 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Apush Reconstruction

...movement was Reconstruction. Reconstruction was a time period in America consisting of many leaders, goals and accomplishments. Though, like all things in life, it did come to an end, the resulting outcome has been labeled both a success and a failure. When Reconstruction began in 1865, a broken America had just finished fighting the Civil War. In all respects, Reconstruction was mainly just that. It was a time period of “putting back the pieces”, as people say. It was the point where America attempted to become a full running country once more. This, though, was not an easy task. The memory of massive death was still in the front of everyone’s mind, hardening into resentment and sometimes even hatred. The south was virtually non-existent politically or economically, and searching desperately for a way back in. Along with these things, now living amongst the population were almost four million former slaves, who had no idea how to make a living on their own. They had been freed by the 13th amendment in 1865, and in the future became a great concern to many political leaders. Still, it was no secret that something had to be done. So, as usually happens, political leaders appeared on the stage, each holding their own plan of Reconstruction, each certain their ideas were the correct ones. One of the first people who came up with a blueprint for Reconstruction was the president at the time, Abraham Lincoln. The “Lincoln Plan” was a very open one, stating that after certain criteria...

Words: 1198 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Was Reconstruction A Success Or Failure

...Civil War was a very tragic time and event in the United States history. It caused extreme amounts of damage in the South. Leaving cities in ruins, and families without homes or the ability to support one another, or even themselves for that fact. People had no food, no clothes, and no shelter. Something had to be done to rebuild this disaster, but with every plan always comes a failure at some point. That is what I am going to be discussing with you today. The failures and successes of the Reconstruction. Failures come with everything in life, especially the reconstruction! When the congress gave President Andrew Johnson two bills to sign he vetoed not one, but both of them. The first one regarding the extension of the...

Words: 615 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Reconstruction Failure

...After the Civil War ended in 1865, a series of “repair” started. Reconstruction, happened between 1865 to 1877. It attempted to rebuild the broken nation politically, economically, and socially. Also, it was meant to rejoin the South and the North together. The Union congress felt the south should be punished before they rejoin the nation and have all their rights reinstated. However, it had made some success during the Civil War, but there were more failures at some degrees brought by the South. The Confederacy attempted to appease many of the conditions to become states again; they still didn’t want to give the former slaves actual rights. In many ways the Reconstruction era can be considered both a failure and a success. But it ended the...

Words: 1208 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

African American Equality

...“freedom” the end of the war brought upon the people, inequality of race was still present in the American government, history, states, and streets. After the war ended and the 13th amendment was passed by congress, the fight for african american civil rights in the U.S. seemed to have taken one step forward. African americans were looking forward to their new lives and opportunities as “free men” but the reality was that old fashioned thinking and racist ideology still governed in the nation. The government seemed to make advances in favor for african americans even as...

Words: 899 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

President Andrew Johnson

...Lincoln chose Johnson as his running mate under the National Union Party banner. When Lincoln died April 15, 1865, Johnson became president. He did not have a Vice President. Johnson now had the job of trying to heal the country after the Civil War left the country in ruins. President Andrew Johnson lifted himself out of extreme poverty to become President of the United States. He was a man with little education who climbed the political ladder and held many different high offices. As a strict constitutionalist, Johnson believed in limiting the powers of the federal government. President Johnson was one of the most bellicose Presidents who “fought” Congress, critics, and many others. President Andrew Johnson faced numerous problems post-Civil War Era including reconstructing the Southern states to combine peacefully with the Union, his battles with Congress, and his career ending impeachment. Following Lincoln’s tragic assassination, President Andrew Johnson took on the accountability of making Reconstruction a reality. Andrew Johnson wanted to use Lincoln’s ideas of reconstruction but in a modified form. Since Congress would be in recess for eight more months Johnson decided to go ahead with his plan. Johnson was initially left to devise a Reconstruction policy without legislative intervention, as Congress was not due to meet again until December 1865. Radical Republicans told the President that the Southern states were economically in a state of chaos and urged him to use his...

Words: 1650 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Vgfd

...Civil War Essay Prompts Reconstruction Historian Synopses: • Dunning School (Traditional): Dunning and Moore. It is a Tragic Era. The Southerners were tortured. The two underlying foundations: (1) the South should have been readmitted quickly after its defeat (2) there should have been no discussion of racial equality for the freedmen. He is accused of being racist and pro-southern. The Republicans were divided between leniency (conservatives) and punishment (scalawags and carpetbaggers – radicals). The freedmen are not to be blamed because they were pawns and were used by the Republicans. Once a freedman voted for a Republican, he was not paid back for his loyalty. Corrupt and incompetent Reconstruction governments that were eventually overthrown when Democrats regained control and the Tragic Era could come to an end. Bitterness and hatred between the races resulted. South was converted into a colonial appendage. What the Radicals were trying to do was dominate the South as though it were a colony. Moore emphasizes the punishment of North on South. This is the very negative Traditional school • Revisionist School: Simpkins & Woody. In spite of the Traditional charges of incompetence, the Reconstruction governments achieved a lot. Most wrote new constitutions that introduced long-needed laws about school, administration, civil and judicial rights, etc. They were successful. The Reconstruction governments were not controlled by blacks. In no Southern...

Words: 1232 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Reconstruction

...Tatyana Dotson Part II: Report on the Condition of the South (1865) 5. According to Schurz, the overall goal of Reconstruction is to reconstruct southern society and bring it back into American Society as a whole. He also mentions that it is also about the relationship between the constitution and the general public. 6. Schurz says the transition between the freedman and the south is so difficult to achieve because the south feels that the Union was so harsh and vengeful to them, and now they are changing their way of life so drastically. He touches on this by saying “in the midst of this critical period of transition, the power which originated the revolution is expected to turn over its whole future development to another power which from the beginning was hostile to it and has never yet entered into its spirit”. This just shows how it was already problematic. Added to this, the now freedman have to fend and protect themselves in an already angry and racist environment. Schurz explains this by saying “…leaving the class in whose favor it was made completely without power to protect itself and to take an influential part in that development.” 7. Southern soldiers also faced many problems when they came back home. Schurz states that “They found, many of them, their homesteads destroyed, their farms devastated, their families in distress”. The soldiers came back to an entire new world that was unfamiliar and stressful, which cause the embarrassment....

Words: 1210 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

American Life During and Post-Civil War

...American politics were sectionally divided between the Northern Republicans and the Southern Democrats. The political culture was almost saturated as both sections had realized that the numerous compromises would only provoke questions and dissimilarities between them, with the largely interfered question of slavery and suffrage. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 had been implemented as a nationwide direction towards admitting states with reference the 36° 30´ latitude line, either as a free-state (above line) or as a slave state (below the line). Despite of the temporary success of the compromise of 1820, it was repealed by the Stephen A. Douglas in 1854 in his Kansas-Nebraska Act. Likewise, the Compromise of 1850, created by the Great Compromiser, Henry Clay, was an effort to preserve the Union by settling the issue of slavery in the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War. Although it assured a temporary peaceful settlement between the sections, it failed to give birth to the Civil war and the rise in sectionalism. Although all these compromises had served their desired intents, politically as well as socially, in turn, they only played a catalyst role in increasing the tensions between the Northerners and Southerners. Thereafter, the period of Reconstruction was booming, as the Republicans were given a tough job of readmitting the forfeited South. The Republicans in the Congress were determined to grant civil liberties to the blacks, and were least interested in...

Words: 2988 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

1900-1910 Argumentative Analysis

...were many factors why we the people of time magazine chose 1900- 1910 as decade of the year for 2015.This decade brought us many achievements but it was also due to the fact it was at the height and middle of the progressive era. During these years america was transitioning between many great changes. Now let's take a little step further back in american history to reconstruction. As the civil war came to a close new ambitions for the future of the nation were targeted either socially, economically, and politically wise. America was being reformed after both its physical and ‘mental’ damage. It is known this whole reconstruction plan did not succeed in some notable areas but economically it prospered, leading to a new main...

Words: 728 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Southern Horrors Essay

...every possible obstacle in her way she found a way to work through them and accomplish extraordinary achievements. As an African American equal rights activist in 1892, she spoke through her pen to send a strong message of egalitarianism to the world. During the post reconstructions era racial tensions reached their peak as lynching became more prominent. Lynching is a form of brutal capital punishment, usually as result of mob violence without the benefit of due process resulting in a hanging. Ida was a monumentally dominant figure in the anti-lynching campaign, as well as committees for anti-lynching that were formed to raise awareness of lynching not only as a problem in the United States but as a national issue. After the emancipation of the slaves, the whites felt as if they lost control over what was theirs and as a result used extreme force to express their dissatisfaction. In turn, the African Americans’ situation did not improve after the emancipation due to the fact that the whites no longer had a stake in their survival and still had a fierce hatred towards their race. Massive amounts of African Americans were lynched for little to no reason at all. Ida made a valiant effort to better the world through facts, reason, and logic; the power of one unlikely person was able to act as the voice of reason in a nation that was under the influence of racial injustice. In the South, it was unheard of for an African American woman to speak out against racial injustices. Ida was...

Words: 1725 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Up from Slavery

...marketable skills and work to pull themselves, as a race, up by the bootstraps. He reflects on the generosity of both teachers and philanthropists who helped in educating blacks and native Americans. He describes his efforts to instill manners, breeding, health and a feeling of dignity to students. His educational philosophy stresses combining academic subjects with learning a trade (something which is reminiscent of the educational theories of John Ruskin). Washington explained that the integration of practical subjects is partly designed to reassure the white community as to the usefulness of educating black people. This text, while certainly a biography of his life, is in fact an illustration of the problem facing African Americans by detailing the problems of one. By showing how he has risen from servitude to success, he demonstrates how others of his race can do the same, as well as how sympathizers can aid in the process.[1] This book was first released as a serialized work in 1900 through The Outlook, a Christian newspaper of New York. It is important to mention that this work was serialized because this meant that during the writing process, Washington was able to hear critiques and requests from his audience and could more easily adapt his paper to his diverse audience.[2] First Cover of The Outlook, Newspaper...

Words: 2267 - Pages: 10