Premium Essay

Relationship Between Law And Morality

Submitted By
Words 996
Pages 4
Law and moral standards are intimately related as both regulate the conduct of the individual in a society. The laws that are generated are usually based on moral principles of the society which may be derived from their cultural beliefs, their religions and customs. Moral standards are the code of conduct of individual on what they considered of ethical things to do and whatnot, usually it is influence by their religions and their own customs belief. Phil Harris defined moral standards as a set of beliefs, values, principles and standards of behavior. They are not necessarily enforced by the state, but rather through the influence of other people, religious organizations and conscience. An example of a moral might be the concept that it is …show more content…
Although the Law and morality are not complete reflections of one another, the law often has a moral grounding, which shows that a relationship is present. The same often happens in reverse, with Law influencing morality. Both seek to impose standards and involve a duty to follow rules. One need only look at the moral code of the Ten Commandments, and our current Law on Murder and Theft, to understand that there is coincidence between the two. The two do overlap, and often complement one another. They are both responsible for inspiring certain standards of conduct, without which, society would break down. It is important to note, however, that the correlation between the Law and Morality is not always set in stone. For example some Laws appear to have no moral connection, but are rather more regulatory in function, such as certain traffic offences, and the prohibition of certain drugs, although some may argue that public health is a moral issue with which the Law is to concern itself. Similarly, some moral issues have little to no legal backing. The moral concept that one should look after one’s neighbour is largely neglected within our Law – there is no obligation to help someone unless one has a duty to act, as in the case of Gibbons and Proctor, where the father of a child was convicted for not feeding the child, which was an omission, not an …show more content…
For example, The Wolfendon Report recommended legalising private homosexuality, as despite the moral viewpoint of many, making it criminal would be difficult to enforce. Shifts in morality may be reflected by judicial change. For example, changes on views on marital rape caused the House of Lords to reverse a decision that when someone gets married, they consent to sex, in the case of R v R. The Divorce Reform Act 1969 was the first time spouses could separate on the grounds of “irretrievable breakdown”, which reflects our more liberal society. A similar example would be the Abortion Act 1967, and even the Law on homosexuality has evolved with morality since the Sexual Offences Act 1967, to the current Marriage Act 2013, which allows homosexuals to get married. Morality may also be influenced by our Law, and many argue that this was the case since the Equalities Act 2010, which aimed to bring about more equal opportunities for those with often disadvantaged characteristics such as differing gender. Many argue that we see more acceptance of these characteristics now, since it’s

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Law and Morality

...Explain the role of morality in the law of England and Wales. Law is a set of rules and boundaries that I set as a guiding conduct that determines the way in which we behave, it was established by authorities which if disobeyed can lead to a sanction. Sir John Salmon said: 'the body of principles recognised and applied by the state in the administration of justice' Whereas morals are set of beliefs,  values and principles shared by society or a part of society to determine what is right from wrong, that doesn't need to be obeyed as it is a voluntary. As society becomes more diverse the need for a distinct set of rules emerges. Legal codes emerge from moral codes but there are differences between the two, such as: Law can be made instantly an alternate deliberately by legalisation. A law either exists or doesn't. Morality cannot be deliberately changed and develops over a long period of time, according to the attitudes of society. Morals will consistently change over time, to reflect a change in attitudes, and the law must attempt to keep up in these situations. An example of this can be seen in the case of Gillick( Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA (1989)), where Mrs Gillick a roman catholic mother of five, sought a declaration that what she saw as an immoral activity of giving contraceptive advice and treatment to girls under the age of consent was illegal regarding its immorality. There was a conflict, as some saw this as immoral as it would encourage underage sex...

Words: 1391 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Effect of Fdi in the Insurance Sector in India

...SCHOOL OF LAW A Project Submitted On Law And Morality And Its Interrelations To Be Submitted To- Ms. Nanda Pardhey Submitted by – Kunal Paleja B.B.A L.L.B(Hons) Roll No- A044   ACKNOWLEDGEMENT “Man cannot find a new ocean unless he has courage to lose sight of the shore”- Andre Gilde I take this opportunity to extend my sincere thanks to NMIMS School of Law offering a unique platform to garner knowledge in the subject of Jurisprudence. I wish to extend my sincere and heartfelt gratitude to my subject guide Professor Nanda Pardhey who guided, supported and encouraged me during the entire tenure of the project. I would also like to offer my thanks for her valuable advices throughout the course of my project. Also I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the faculty members present in the library. I am glad that I can say it with conviction that I have immensely benefited from the allotment of this topic. Contents S. No. Topic Page 1. Abbreviations 2. Table of Cases 3. Table of Statutes 4. Research Methodology 5. Introduction 6. Jurisprudential Study 7. Analysis on Indian Legal Provisions 8. Comparative Study 9. Conclusion 10. Suggestions 11. Bibliography Table of Abbreviations Sr.No Keyword Meaning 1 SC Supreme Court 2 HC High Court 3 IPC Indian Penal Code 4 Sec Section 5 v versus 6 www World wide web 7 i.e That is 8 etc Etcetera   Table of Cases and Statutes Case Laws 1)...

Words: 5875 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Law and Morality

...Law and Morality It is possible that law and morality in many ways are interrelated. Law is essentially a set of rules provided by the government to mediate our behaviour and to ensure our society lives harmoniously. These rules must be complied with, as failure to do so will result in penalties or sentences against the deviants. These laws can be implemented immediately through statute and can provide guidelines for future cases. In contrast with law, morality is less of a collective sentiment and rather more an individual set of values and beliefs. These can vary from person to person and as opposed to laws that are enforceable immediately, morals take many years or even decades to adapt and become something that various groups may follow as a whole. Morals are not in themselves law and while they may hold social stigma in the perspective of other social groups, it is up to the individual to follow them. Law and morality have a variety of differences that make it slightly harder to establish a clear relationship between the two. As stated earlier, law is largely created externally and is a way of regulating human action/behaviour. Morality is concerned with the motives of an individual and can be unique to each member of society, meaning they will behave in a different way compared to another person who holds different morals. In this sense, morality promotes individuality as opposed to law that is enforced on the entire population alike. Disputes that may arise over legal...

Words: 890 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Hart's Principles Of Legality

...only difference between Nazi law and, say, English Law is that the Nazis used their laws to achieve ends that are odious to an Englishman.” Though Hart and Fuller completely agreed about the odiousness of the ends that the Nazis pursued and the disgusting means through which they pursued them: racial discrimination, war crimes, genocide and torture. However, Fuller thought that there were important aspects of misrule by the Nazis that needed special attention by jurists and legal philosophers. He said that continuous violations of principles of legality...

Words: 2253 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Principles of Morals

...Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals Section I Of the General Principles of Morals Overview: In this section Hume focuses on the contributions that moral sense and reason make in moral judgments that we make every day. He argues that moral sense is the tool that enables us to make the distinction between vice and virtue but both moral sense and reason contribute to the formation of our moral judgments. Reason becomes very useful when a judgment needs to be made weather something is useful or not. Basically reason enables us to determine how and why something is useful to us or others. Further in the section Hume talks about what moral judges tend to include in their lists of virtues, what is left out and how those lists are being created. Towards the end of the section he goes back to the classification of virtues he proposed in the Treatise of Human Nature. p. 169, 133 – All humans are obviously very different and same concept applies to our morality. Hume explains it by the example of a stubborn person who likes to argue just to “show off”. He concludes that the only way for such person to realize that he/she is an antagonist of the group is by leaving him/her alone. Through observation or experience the given individual will realize that in general more people are on the common sense and reason side. p. 170, 134 – Here Hume starts to discuss the “foundation of morals”. He refers to ancient philosophers and points...

Words: 1816 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Introduction to Law

...MIDLANDS STATE UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF LAW NAME : IVY TATENDA GUMBO MODULE: INTRODUCTION TO LAW REG NUMBER: R125548P LECTURER: MS CHAKAUYA TUTORIAL QUESTIONS DUE DATE: 8 APRIL 2013 QUESTION 1:Highlight the functions of law in society.Your answer must take into consideration the theories of law and its individual relationship Law can be defined as a set of rules and regulations which govern societal relationships and is enforced by the state through institutions such as the police,courts ,prisons etc.However many schools of thoughts have tried to define law since the term law means different things to different people.According to the Natural theory law should take into account of morals in a community.A Positivist theory says that law is law regardless of the moral content.This suggestion advances the idea that law remains law whether or not it is just or unjust,fair or unfair.The Marxist theory defines law as an instrument of class oppression that is the rich oppressing the poor.On the other hand some critic scholars like Hlalo and Kahn defined law as rules governing human conduct that is recognized as binding by the state and if necessary enforced. The purpose of law is to enforce morality inorder to prevent harm to others.According to Lord Delvin,a society has a right to punish any kind of act that is immoral.Most legal rules are derived from morality.Morals can be defined as standard...

Words: 2497 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Assignment 2: Incorporating Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development Into the Justice System

...Criminal Justice CRJ 220 Professor Judy Tompkins August 16, 2015 Abstract The perception of justice is an affiliation that exists between the citizens and the state. Justice means that the state treats every person equally and seeks to find resolution in disputes. This resolution is found on the basis of the detailed facts and is compared to intent criteria, rather than a biased determination. It is based upon the civil rights and duty of individual persons, particularly law enforcement officers. Law enforcement officers employ the concept of justice occasionally, but they are not constantly fair. Law enforcement officers make mistakes just like any other human being. Justice in law enforcement includes an extensive array of recruits and agencies. This includes victim services, the police, department of corrections, crime prevention, the probation and parole departments, and the court system. In order for law enforcement to uphold a general clarity of justice, officers are obliged to have power over the moral capability to legally enforce laws, as well as to continue with admiration that is articulated by the department and its operation. Also, justice includes officers that respect and uphold the rights of citizens. A potion they shall accept on and off the job. Additionally, officers must arrest suspects contained by the rules of the law. The goal is to uphold and serve, protecting the community and the citizens within it. Assignment 2: Incorporating Kohlberg’s Stages...

Words: 1336 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Difference Between Law and Morality

...Assignment: Difference between Law and Morality Instructor: Mr.Garmon Student: Mr. Rupert L.Griffith 03/31/15 The Debate between Law and Morality: Laws are absolute rules prescribed by government representatives, while morality has to do with personal views on what is right or wrong. A major difference between these two concepts is that a law is formal public policy that has consequences for those who violate it. Someone who murders or steals, for instance, goes to jail if found guilty in court. In contrast, someone who violates what others view as a moral standard may have no tangible consequence other than damaged relationships. Laws are sometimes viewed as legislation on moral issues. Many people lean on religious beliefs to frame their moral viewpoints. Politicians and some citizens also point to faith-based principles in suggesting that laws should follow what God commands. Others believe that laws should protect individual rights and freedoms but should not extend to topics viewed as ethical gray areas. In some cases, laws and morals evolve over time based on changing societal views. The Civil Rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s developed as Americans became more supportive of an end to segregation. Sometimes, though, principle-based politicians and leaders look to enact laws based on personal convictions, even though they may contradict the popular opinion of the time. My Position on this View: This would lend itself to the current “Religious freedom Law” recently passed...

Words: 584 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Morality and the Law, the Validity Question

...MORALITY AND THE LAW; The Validity Question By Nfon Mark PLAN Introduction -A general overview of Morality and the Law -Definition of Morality and the law -Principles of Morality -The validity question Body -principles of Morality in details -The principle of Truth -The principle of Courage -The principle of Compassion -The principle of Love - The principle of Forgiveness - A general overview of other principles of morality II Reasons for and against the law taking validity from Morality. -Reasons why the law most take its validity from Morality -Reasons against the Law taking validity from Morality. -conclusion with a personal view Morality and the law; the validity question The notions of Morality and the Law are as old as the biblical story of creation, where God created man and gave him rights, duties and laws to follow (Genesis 1). According to the oxford dictionary, morals is ‘concerned with or derived from a code of behavior that is considered right or acceptable in a particular society. (Www.Oxforddictionaries.com). morality is the degree to which something is right and good. The moral goodness and badness...

Words: 2663 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Philo

...Moral Issues in Business Chapter Two Normative Theories of Ethics Consequentialist Theories • Egoism - Adam Smith • Egoism is a consequentialist theory. What matters for egoists is the consequences of their actions for themselves. • • Utilitarianism - Bentham and Mill o Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory. Right and wrong depends on the consequences of one’s actions for everyone who might be affected by them. Jeremy Bentham • Bentham was a hedonist. He believed that happiness was a matter of more pleasure and less pain. • Bentham thought you could assign pleasure points to an action according to the following categories: o Intensity: How intense is the pleasure? o Duration: How long will it last? o Certainty: How sure are you that the pleasure will occur? o Proximity: How soon will the happiness occur? o Fecundity: How much more pleasure will this lead to? o Purity: How much pain will be mixed with this pleasure? o Extent: How many people will experience the pleasure? Quality vs. Quantity o Bentham: Pushpin is as good as poetry. o Mill: It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied. o Bentham believed that all pleasures should count equally, but Mill believed that humanity would be better off if the intellectual, moral and aesthetic pleasures were more valued. Principle of Utility o The right action is the one that produces the greatest balance of pleasure over pain, or happiness over unhappiness, for everyone affected by that action. o Animals...

Words: 2579 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Ethical Essay

...Ethical Essay Mark Best ETH/316 University of Pheonix Ethics is a division of philosphy that deals with human behaviors. There are many different theories that have existed throughout history. An ethical theory must consider and take into account what makes the “right” dicisions different from the “wrong” decision. Ethical behavior has been defined by a lot of different people and organization of the history of the world, but still some actions are argued as to whether or not they are ethical or even moral. Plato’s view of ethics was that it had to do with the arrangement of the human soul. He believe that every human sould consisted of three parts, the rational, spiritual, and passionate. For a person to commit ethical behavior Plato believed that the soul must be properly organized. This meant that the reason must command, organized, and focus the other two parts of the soul. If this was done, then one sought general good and not flights of fancy. Religions such as Christianity have come up with theories about ethics as well. Christians have theorized that “human souls desire the good, found only in God.” This good is supposed to be “unchanging, perminant, and always satisfying. The goods of this world, such as food, drink or wealth, are only partially satisfying, since these are always changing and human physiology always demands them. God, however, as the final end of all things, is the end of human souls as well. The soul that "rests" in God is the...

Words: 1245 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Nature of Law

...| What is the Nature of Law | Ian ToughS211177 | | | | | WHAT IS THE NATURE OF LAW 1 What is the nature of Law? What is the Law? Does humanity have any regard for laws?Do all societies have the same laws? The answer to these questions, are thought to have two competing answers.  The classical answer is provided by natural law theory, which is frequently characterized as asserting that there is an essential relationship between law and morality or justice.  The modern answer is provided by legal positivism, which, as developed by John Austin, asserted that law is the command of the sovereign backed by the threat of punishment. Arguments over the nature of law focus on a revised set of positions.  Legal positivism is represented by analytic legal positivists, like H.L.A. Hart, Joseph Raz, and Jules Coleman.  The natural law tradition is defended by John Finnis.  And a new positition,interpretivism is represented by Ronald Dworkin. The "What is law?" question has been approached by contemporary legal philosophers who have over many decades attempted to define the term. For example, the sociological tradition includes important work on the nature of law by Max Weber and Niklas Luhmann. . Natural law theory is strongly associated with classical and medieval thought, especially Aristotle, Roman jurisprudence, and St. Thomas Aquinas.  There are several challenges associated...

Words: 1608 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Ted Bundy Theory

...Moral Evolution The original theorist of morality, Greek philosopher Aristotle, postulated that the attainment of life’s ultimate happiness was contingent upon the implementation of virtuous deeds (Boss, 2017). To elucidate further, the concept of virtue embodies an ethical theory which inserts value upon one’s character, rather than their adherence to societal rules (Parry, 2014). To this effect, Aristotle promoted the idea that focusing on being a good person would eventually reap good deeds in turn (Parry, 2014). Nevertheless, when analyzing the morality (or lack thereof) of deplorable serial killers such as Ted Bundy, many questions concerning the relationship between their moral development and the inception of their calcified...

Words: 1563 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Gsgsdg

...CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study “The widespread assumption that ethical behavior takes the fun out of life is false. In actuality, living ethically ensures that relationships in our lives, including encounters with strangers, nurture our spiritual growth.” - Bell Hooks The moral aspects of day-to-day living are directly engaging, persistant, and urgent. Each day, fundamental moral considerations affect our lives in common place ways. We laughed at a joke expressing sexual act. We may have failed to respond to an act of kindness with the gratitude dictated by common decency. Perhaps we abused alcohol, drugs, or food with a compulsiveness that made us wonder whether we respected ourselves anymore. These everyday aspects of our lives provide an immediate stimulus for thinking about morality. Moral responsibility is an ongoing process of development skills: identifying moral problems and reasons; sensitivity to alternative perspectives; creative vision in discerning solutions; weighing conflicting moral reasons; adeptness in clarifying concepts that otherwise might be vague or ambiguous. It also requires moral concern and responsibles commitment All these capacities nature through studies in the liberal arts, among which ethics is central, that aim at liberating us from parochial prejudices while deeeping our understanding of our own moral traditions and those of others. It should not be forgotten that one challenge some moral beliefs without...

Words: 892 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Fuller Morality of Law - Jurisprudence

...century’s jurisprudence field was ruled by the positivist school of thought - unseating the natural law theories of the time, with its clear separation of law and morality coupled with empirical methods. The 20th century however, saw a huge of interest again in the natural law theory. American legal philosopher, Lon Fuller who was “an outsider within the intellectual climate of mid-twentieth century legal philosophy” today, stands as “the leading natural lawyer” at the forefront of it. However, despite seeming to conform to natural law thinkers, Nicholson claims that Fuller’s “natural law terminology should not be allowed to obscure his originality”. He eschews the Christian doctrines normally present in natural law, and instead presents a more procedural approach to marry the ideas of morality and law. This essay will explore his claims - namely the “internal morality of law”, its moral authority and also further the argument that posits the inherent intertwine of law and morality is correct and necessary as the first line of defence against evil regimes and as a check and balance to ensure government accountability. Fuller’s Internal Morality of Law For context, it’s worth noting what Fuller believes as the purpose of law - that it is a purposive “enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules”. Fuller begins by introducing two types of moralities - the morality of duty and aspiration. He describes the two using “an imaginary scale” that “starts at the bottom...

Words: 3199 - Pages: 13