Premium Essay

Principles of Morals

In:

Submitted By stolarskim1
Words 1816
Pages 8
Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals
Section I
Of the General Principles of Morals

Overview:

In this section Hume focuses on the contributions that moral sense and reason make in moral judgments that we make every day. He argues that moral sense is the tool that enables us to make the distinction between vice and virtue but both moral sense and reason contribute to the formation of our moral judgments. Reason becomes very useful when a judgment needs to be made weather something is useful or not. Basically reason enables us to determine how and why something is useful to us or others.
Further in the section Hume talks about what moral judges tend to include in their lists of virtues, what is left out and how those lists are being created. Towards the end of the section he goes back to the classification of virtues he proposed in the Treatise of Human Nature.

p. 169, 133 – All humans are obviously very different and same concept applies to our morality. Hume explains it by the example of a stubborn person who likes to argue just to “show off”. He concludes that the only way for such person to realize that he/she is an antagonist of the group is by leaving him/her alone. Through observation or experience the given individual will realize that in general more people are on the common sense and reason side.

p. 170, 134 – Here Hume starts to discuss the “foundation of morals”. He refers to ancient philosophers and points out that their belief in virtue being a conformity to reason creates a confusion because in general they believed that morals had their origins in taste and sentiment. Two kind of contradict each other.

p. 171, 135 – The most important thing that Hume does here is making it clear that “truth is disputable and taste isn’t”, “what exists in the nature of things is the standard of our judgment,

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Four Ethical Principles, Utilitarian, Individual, Moral, And

...are nearly permanent and deeply held underlying beliefs and attitudes tht help determine a person's behavior. There are four ethical principles, Utilitarian, Individual, Moral, and Justice. Utilitarian ethical behavior is guided by what will result in the greater good for the greatest number of people. Individual ethical behavior is guided by what will result in the individual's best long term interest. This is usually in everyone's best interest. Moral rights ethical behavior is guided by respect for fundamental rights of human beings and Justice ethical behavior is guided by respect for the impartial standards of fairness and equity (Kinicki & Williams, 2012). My primary ethical principle in terms of advancing up the...

Words: 1000 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Moral Principles and Acceptable Use of Private Information

...© Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC Fundamentals of Information Systems SecurityNOTManualSALE OR DISTRIBUTION Lab FOR v2.0 NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Placeholder for inside cover and copyright page © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LL NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUT © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LL NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUT © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LL NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUT © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC Copyright © 2014 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved. OR DISTRIBUTION NOT...

Words: 95466 - Pages: 382

Premium Essay

Teaching Fundamental Moral Principles to Students at Different Age Groups

...TEACHING FUNDAMENTAL MORAL PRINCIPLES TO Page 2 STUDENTS AT DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS Introduction Educational psychology is a branch of psychology concerned with developing effective educational techniques and dealing with psychological problems in schools. It’s a study of methods of training, teaching and their effectiveness. Also, the problems experienced in learning formal material; in particular, the study of how to help people, especial school children, with their learning problems to overcome their difficulties. (Definition) Fundamental moral principles are the principles of right and wrong that are accepted by an individual or a social group. (Definition) Moral education is an increasingly popular topic in the fields of psychology and education. It’s been constantly debated in our daily lives. For instance, increased suicide cases, juvenile crimes such as: drug abuse, gang fights, theft and also teen pregnancy and inclining abortion rates have caused many to question the morals of the upcoming generation. This is not only faced in Singapore, but many other nations are also facing serious moral issues with the children these days. Therefore, for today’s programme, I will be focusing on different age groups; children between the age 3 and 5, Primary 5 students (10-11 years old) and High School Seniors/Junior College students (16-17 years old), and teach these students about right or wrong of fundamental moral principles. To learn about cognitive...

Words: 2327 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Treating People Equally Is Not the Most Important Moral Principle for Resolving Issues of Poverty

...In reality, treating people equally is not the most important moral principle for resolving issues of poverty, sexism and disabilities, notwithstanding the fact that the counter proposition is often propounded. Many people hold the view that we are responsible for looking after the world’s population by treating everyone the same and by providing equal treatment to everyone, regardless of the fact that individual situations may not allow for such actions. Unfortunately although this viewpoint is seen to hold ethical significance, it is simply not a reality that translates to a possibility. This paper argues in support of the ethical viewpoint, that treating people equally is not the most important moral principle in resolving issues of poverty, by employing fundamental arguments and supporting frameworks to contribute to this conclusion. Ethical grounds for my arguments shall be explored, such as theories propounded by Aristotle, Bentham, Stuart Mill and Kant, in order to support the framework and provide supporting claims. Education and the opportunities that learning environments provide, are fundamental to the measurable successes and accomplishments within our modern day society. However, the great disparity in education standards across the globe are grounds to base an argument on the fact that subsequently treating people equally regardless of access or the ability to achieve certain levels of education, is not equitable and reasonable. Unfortunately it has been estimated...

Words: 1915 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Of the Three Moral Principles ( Autonomy, Beneficence and Justice) Which Seems to You to Be the Most Important.

...All four principles of Ethics are of significant importance and neither of the can be simply ignored. I personally feel that autonomy is the most important. This is so, because Autonomy speaks for equal rights and respect for all individuals. In a medical context, autonomy provides the right to individuals to freely determine their own choices and decisions. The best part about Autonomy in medical ethics is the fact that, it provides protection to those individuals or groups, that are not deemed capable of making their own decisions. An example of this would be a person who is deemed mentally unfit and suffers from seizures. In this situation, the patient would be handled in a manner where the best available option of treatment is given to him, despite of what he might say. A person's life and the way he chooses to live it, should be a matter of his choice and should be free of interference of others unless he is clearly detrimental to others. Now, one must consider that autonomy may not always be right and may also clash with the doctor’s duty of beneficence. For example, a person whose religion forbids him from accepting a blood transfusion may require one in the situation of an accident. In a situation as such, the patient must be duly informed. The doctor has a duty to strongly advise the patient the risk of not accepting the transfusion but once the risks have been relayed to the patient, his decision must be respected as a final one...

Words: 315 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Morality and the Law, the Validity Question

... -Definition of Morality and the law -Principles of Morality -The validity question Body -principles of Morality in details -The principle of Truth -The principle of Courage -The principle of Compassion -The principle of Love - The principle of Forgiveness - A general overview of other principles of morality II Reasons for and against the law taking validity from Morality. -Reasons why the law most take its validity from Morality -Reasons against the Law taking validity from Morality. -conclusion with a personal view Morality and the law; the validity question The notions of Morality and the Law are as old as the biblical story of creation, where God created man and gave him rights, duties and laws to follow (Genesis 1). According to the oxford dictionary, morals is ‘concerned with or derived from a code of behavior that is considered right or acceptable in a particular society. (Www.Oxforddictionaries.com). morality is the degree to which something is right and good. The moral goodness and badness of something. (Meriam-webster.com) some principles of morality include honesty, love, courage, heroism, loyalty, respect, self discipline, compassion, and forgiveness. Most moral principles today owe their origin to religion. Former American president...

Words: 2663 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

The Morality of Commercial Life

...Paper lecture 1: Lindblom: What is this market system? A market system exists only when markets proliferate and link with each other in a particular way. A market system is a system of society-wide coordination of human activities not by central command but by mutual interactions in the form of transactions. Three kinds of markets are the most familiar: The labor markets, the agricultural markets, and markets for services and goods that industry provides to customers. Two less obvious kinds of markets are no less necessary for a market system. One is markets for intermediate services and goods produced for other producers. The other is market for capital. In market systems people do not go their own way; they are tied together and turned this way or that through market interactions. In our time it is a governed market system, heavily burdened or ornamented with what old-fashioned free marketers decry as ‘interferences’. Although buying and selling may be natural to human-kind, market systems are not. The market system that lies closest to our span of attention is the capitalist market system. In ostensibly democratic societies, market skeptics sometimes fear that the market system may bring an end to democracy. One of their fears is that big corporations already exercise powers inconsistent with democracy; and that multinational corporations overwhelm small nation-states. Despite the growing consensus in favor of the market system, it is of course possible...

Words: 5820 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Social Issues

...Essays on Kant’s Moral Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000). The Final Form of Kant’s Practical Philosophy Allen Wood Yale University By the year 1768, Kant claimed to be at work on a system of ethics, under the title “metaphysics of morals” (Ak 10:74).[1] During the so-called ‘silent decade’ of the 1770s, when Kant was working on the Critique of Pure Reason, he promised repeatedly not only that he would soon finish that work but also that he would soon publish a “metaphysics of morals” (Ak 10:97, 132, 144).[2] Yet it was not until four years after the first Critique that Kant finally wrote a work on ethics, and even then he merely laid the ground for a metaphysics of morals by identifying and establishing the supreme principle on which a system of duties would be based (G 4:392). Three years later, in the Critique of Practical Reason Kant once again dealt entirely with foundational questions in moral philosophy. Kantian ethics is primarily known, especially among English-speaking philosophers, through these two ethical works of the 1780s, neither of which contains anything like a ‘metaphysics of morals’. Many of Kant’s chief works in the early 1790s are devoted to practical philosophy. The Critique of Judgment’s treatment of taste and teleology is concerned both with moral psychology and with the view of the world which a morally disposed person should take. Other works even deal with the application of Kantian principles to political and...

Words: 10308 - Pages: 42

Premium Essay

Ethics

...their practicing license cancelled. Many a times, these codes might be unwritten assuming that they would be too obvious to be written as a part of the code of ethics for that profession. For instance, to check the expiry date of the medicine before administrating it to the ailing patient would be so obvious that not all medical bodies would mention it. But it is the duty of the doctor or nurse to do so. Not all the times can one expect to get every single and minute detail to be written and be a part of the professional ethics. Many a times, it becomes too natural to be followed. Thus not following such duties and later on blaming the code of ethics would be lame and inexcusable. It often happens that not all the code of ethics appear moral. We might even face conflicts in certain cases and find it difficult to practice our profession remaining within the boundary of ethical codes. In such cases, it is always permissible to assess the situation and try to work out in a way that would give an outcome which would be in favor of all the parties involved. Code of ethics are not always complete and may have some instances missed out, but they provide a guideline as mentioned earlier. They teach us to maintain as much professionalism and ethics as possible. I chose this article because I’m a working student. I know what professional code of ethics are and many a times I have faced situations or seen my other colleagues face...

Words: 2466 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Applied Ethics Argument Paper

...of the rode or go left and kill one worker. That is when applied ethics comes in, and one looks at their moral principles that they have set for themselves to make their decision. Will re-visit the question at the end of the section once we have gain a better understanding of applied ethics. For the purpose of this paper and to better...

Words: 745 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Is Morality Objective or Subjective

...“Is morality relative or are there objective moral truths?” Is Morality Subjective or Objective? Every day, we make decisions that affect our lives and others. Sometimes, those decisions are bigger than other times. Those decisions are sometimes made because the choice is to do something right or wrong. We say that a moral person will make the right decision and the immoral person will make the wrong decision. An example of this is that if I was raised in a culture that says killing is wrong. I am a Naga from Northeast India. Just over 100 years ago, we Nagas were headhunters. Killing was more than tolerated – it was expected. Men would raid other villages nearby and kill other men, bringing back heads. Even children’s heads were special trophies. This sounds very bad, even to me, but if I was born over 100 years ago, I would be okay with it. So is killing others right or wrong? Even in enlightened cultures, wars happen and people kill each other. These questions always come up when people talk about morality. In any debate, the arguments tend to take two extreme sides, which means there is not much middle ground left for the discussions. The slippery slope fallacy is often used to talk about morality. According to Richard Nordquist at about.com, the slippery slope fallacy is “A fallacy in which a course of action is objected to on the grounds that once taken it will lead to additional actions until some undesirable consequence results” (para. 1). In other words, we say something...

Words: 2323 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Business Ethics

...people’s rights to freedom and well-being. Aristotelian virtue ethic evaluates the moral character of persons or groups. As articulated by Mill and Bentham, utilitarianism aims not for the pleasure of the individual but the “greatest good for the greatest number” of people. Refined by its later interprets, utilitarianism also rejects a simplistic belief in pursuing the most pleasure possible in favour of the view that incorporates qualitative standards and elevates pleasures of the mind over pleasures of the body. The term “happiness” seems to capture this broadened sense best, and Utilitarian philosophers sometimes call their principle the “greatest happiness principle.” To apply correctly the utilitarian approach, one should avoid several possible misunderstandings of the utilitarian principle. First, the principle does not refer to that action which produces the most utility for the person performing that action; rather, an action is right if it produces the most utility for all persons affected by the action (including the person performing the action). Nor does the utilitarian principle say that an action is right so long as its benefits outweigh its costs. Rather, utilitarianism holds that, in the final analysis, only one action is right: that one action whose net benefits are greatest by comparison to the net benefits of all other possible alternatives. Finally, the utilitarian principle does not require us to consider only the direct and immediate consequences of our...

Words: 2796 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Chapter 1 Notes

...unrestrained exercise of power; despotic abuse of authority. Absolutism – political system: a political system in which the power of a ruler is unchecked and absolute theory of objective values: a philosophical theory in which values such as truth or morality are absolute and not conditional upon human perception something absolute: a standard, principle, or theory that is absolute Utilitarianism: ethical doctrine of greatest good: the ethical doctrine that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be the criterion of the virtue of action doctrine based on value of usefulness: the doctrine that the value of an action or an object lies in usefulness utilitarian quality: the quality of being designed primarily for practical use rather than beauty Libertarianism: advocate of individual responsibility: somebody who believes in the doctrine of free will advocate of individual freedom: somebody who believes in the principle that people should have complete freedom of thought and action Categorical Imperative: Kantian moral law: according to the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant, an unconditional moral law applying to all rational beings and independent of all personal desires and motives Communism: Class less political system: the political theory or system in which all property and wealth is owned in a classless society by all the members of that society Socialism: political system of communal ownership:...

Words: 2706 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Phi 208

...Singer starts his argument by imposing the reader to accept the moral premises which are "that suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad," and "that if it is in our power to prevent it from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it" (Singer, Famine pg.599). Singer then goes on to exploit a broad-based approach to his assertion in that "we cannot discriminate against someone merely because he is far away from us" (Singer Famine pg600). Singer emphasizes on the fact that distance is not a reason to fail in doing what is morally right to do. The distance between you and the person in need is not a moral justification to discard their need. Singer also emphasizes on an interesting point in his assertion which implies that two wrongs do not make a right. Singer states, "one feels less guilty about doing nothing if one can point to others, similarly placed, who have also done nothing" (Singer Famine pg600)Singer supports this claim by providing an example of a scenario in which a person witnesses a child drowning. Most people would agree that that person has a duty to save the drowning child. Singer claims that this duty exists because we believe that the drowning of a child is a bad thing. If a person has a duty to save the child because a drowning child is a very bad thing, it is reasonable to assume then, that moral duty extends to preventing any significantly bad thing from...

Words: 1511 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Difference Between Ethics, Morals and Values

...The Difference between ethics, morals and values Dictionary Meaning (Ethics) 1. a. A set of principles of right conduct. b. A theory or a system of moral values noun. the study of standards of conduct and moral judgment; moral philosophy; a treatise on this study; the system or code of morals of a particular person, religion, group, profession Dictionary Meaning (Morals) 1. involving right and wrong: relating to issues of right and wrong and to how individual people should behave 2. derived from personal conscience: based on what somebody's conscience suggests is right or wrong, rather than on what rules or the law says should be done 3. according to common standard of justice: regarded in terms of what is known to be right or just, as opposed to what is officially or outwardly declared to be right or just Dictionary Meaning (Values) In general, important and enduring beliefs or ideals shared by the members of a culture about what is good or desirable and what is not. Values exert major influence on the behavior of an individual and serve as broad guidelines in all situations. When one look at the dictionary meanings of each of the words, you can derive that each words has some similarity rather that difference. These three words go hand in hand in determining how an individual should conduct himself or herself in a modern society. Definitions by an independent group Ethics: [pic]Define moral rights and wrongs. [pic]Transcend culture, ethnicity...

Words: 1698 - Pages: 7