...To: Managing Director (MD) From: Management Accountant Subject: Investment of £840 000 in machinery. Date: 25 December 2010(NB assumed date since project starts 2011) Reference: Inv/App Introduction The purpose of this report is to assess the manner in which information is presented and investment decisions made by Greinam International (GI), consider the relevance of cost figures and other information, calculate the minimum return required and the Net Present Value (NPV) of the project and finally, recommend the course of action with respect to the investment of £840 000 in machinery. Presentation of information The manner in which information is presented can be assessed using the ACCURATE1 mnemonic. Accuracy Most cost figures do not provide an exact measure of expenditure and cash flow on the project. For example, certain costs comprise a fixed cost element, while others include past costs. Cost benefit A complete rework of investment appraisal of the project is needed to avoid the possibility that wrong investments decisions be made. This is clearly not cost-beneficial for the organisation. Completeness This is a very serious issue because, firstly not all expenditure have been considered-for example Operations Supervisor costs have been excluded. Secondly, the complete time span has not been considered. Instead, a three-year payback period has been deemed sufficient. Last, only one appraisal technique has been considered...
Words: 2475 - Pages: 10